Abstract
Recently, policymakers have been developing some policies to improve environmental quality. Environmental taxes are the most important of these policies. This study examines the effects of transport taxes, economic growth, and fossil fuel energy consumption on air pollution within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis framework. The study used data from 1994 to 2019 for the ten countries with the highest transport tax revenues. According to the results, while the EKC hypothesis is valid for Portugal and Switzerland, it is not valid for all other countries. Moreover, fossil fuel energy consumption seems to increase air pollution in all countries except the Netherlands and Switzerland. However, transport taxes increase air pollution in Brazil. Therefore, transport taxes are not effective in reducing air pollution. In this context, it was concluded that the structure of transport taxes should be improved or reformed. In addition, it has been underlined that those national decisions alone will not be sufficient to improve transport taxes or environmental taxes. Therefore, regulations to be made with international coordination will be more successful in combating environmental problems by preventing tax competition and increasing tax harmonization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data is accessible from the corresponding author upon request.
Notes
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, Turkey, and Brazil.
Based on Model 1, the formula used to calculate the threshold value is as follows: \({Y}^{*}={e}^{-\frac{{\beta }_{1}}{2{\beta }_{2}}}\).
References
Akca H (2021) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Turkey: evidence from augmented ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-11https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15417-w
Akkaya Ş, Hepsag A (2021) Does fuel tax decrease carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey? Evidence from an asymmetric nonlinear cointegration test and error correction model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-8https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12907-9
Amin A, Altinoz B, Dogan E (2020) Analyzing the determinants of carbon emissions from transportation in European countries: the role of renewable energy and urbanization. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(8):1725–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01910-2
Aydin C, Esen Ö (2018) Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: do environmental taxes work? J Environ Planning Manage 61(13):2396–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395731
Aydin M (2020) Impacts of environmental taxes on environmental pollution in selected OECD countries: evidence from causality test with structural breaks. Int J Econo Administrative Stud (28), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.704936
Bashir MF, Ma B, Shahbaz M, Jiao Z (2020) The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions with the roles of environmental technology and financial development. PLoS ONE 15(11):e0242412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242412
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econometrics 188(2):393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Ciaschini M, Pretaroli R, Severini F, Socci C (2012) Regional double dividend from environmental tax reform: an application for the Italian economy. Res Econ 66(3):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2012.04.002
Degirmenci T, Aydin M (2021) The effects of environmental taxes on environmental pollution and unemployment: a panel co-integration analysis on the validity of double dividend hypothesis for selected African countries. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2505
Ekins P, Potter S (2010) Reducing carbon emissions through transport taxation. GFC Briefing Paper 6. Green Fiscal Commission, London, UK. http://www.greenfiscalcommission.org.uk/images/uploads/gfcBriefing6_PDF_ISBN_v7.pdf
Freire-González J (2018) Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: a critical review. J Policy Modeling 40(1):194–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.11.002
Gemechu ED, Butnar I, Llop M, Castells F (2014) Economic and environmental effects of CO2 taxation: an input-output analysis for Spain. J Environ Planning Manage 57(5):751–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.767782
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser No 3914:1–57. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2021) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
He P, Ya Q, Chengfeng L, Yuan Y, Xiao C (2021) Nexus between environmental tax, economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from China, Finland, and Malaysia based on a panel-ARDL approach. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 57(3):698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1658068
King M, Tarbush B, Teytelboym A (2019) Targeted carbon tax reforms. Eur Econ Rev 119:526–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.08.001
Lin B, Jia Z (2018) The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: a CGE based study in China. Energy 159:558–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.167
Lin B, Li X (2011) The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 39(9):5137–5146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.050
Mardones C, Baeza N (2018) Economic and environmental effects of a CO2 tax in Latin American countries. Energy Policy 114:262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.001
Meade JE (1952) External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Econ J 62(245):54–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2227173
Meireles M, Robaina M, Magueta D (2021) The effectiveness of environmental taxes in reducing CO2 emissions in passenger vehicles: the case of Mediterranean countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(10):5442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105442
Morley B (2012) Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Appl Econ Lett 19(18):1817–1820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.650324
OECD (2017). Environmental fiscal reform – progress, prospects and pitfalls., Report for the Italian Presidency of the G7, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/environmental-fiscal-reform-G7-environment-ministerial-meeting-june-2017.pdf
OECD (2021). “Environmental tax” (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/5a287eac-en (Accessed on 05 October 2021)
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econometrics 142(1):50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London
Potter S, Parkhurst G (2005) Transport policy and transport tax reform. Public Money and Management 25(3):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00470.x
Potter S, Parkhurst G, Lane B (2005) European perspectives on a new fiscal framework for transport. In Methods and Models in Transport and Telecommunications (pp. 319–333). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28550-4_16
Ritchie H, Roser M (2020) “Energy”. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/energy (Accessed on 20 October 2021)
Rodríguez M, Robaina M, Teotónio C (2019) Sectoral effects of a green tax reform in Portugal. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 104:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.016
Safi A, Chen Y, Wahab S, Zheng L, Rjoub H (2021) Does environmental taxes achieve the carbon neutrality target of G7 economies? Evaluating the importance of environmental R&D. J Environ Manage 293:112908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112908
Scrimgeour F, Oxley L, Fatai K (2005) Reducing carbon emissions? The relative effectiveness of different types of environmental tax: the case of New Zealand. Environ Model Softw 20(11):1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.024
Shahzad U (2020) Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: theoretical survey with policy implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(20):24848–24862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4
Shi Q, Ren H, Cai W, Gao J (2019) How to set the proper level of carbon tax in the context of Chinese construction sector? A CGE analysis. J Clean Prod 240:117955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117955
Silajdzic S, Mehić E (2018) Do environmental taxes pay off? The impact of energy and transport taxes on CO2 emissions in transition economies. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business 13(2):126–143. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2018-0016
Swamy PA (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 311–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
Vallés-Giménez J, Zárate-Marco A (2020) A dynamic spatial panel of subnational GHG emissions: environmental effectiveness of emissions taxes in Spanish regions. Sustainability 12(7):2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072872
Van Dender K (2019) Taxing vehicles, fuels, and road use: opportunities for improving transport tax practice, OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 44, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/bb60cc01-en
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Economet 23(2):193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
Wolde-Rufael Y, Mulat-Weldemeskel E (2021) Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from 7 emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(18):22392–22408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8
Zaghdoudi T, Maktouf S (2017) Threshold effect in the relationship between environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: a PSTR specification. Economics Bulletin 37(3):2086–2094
Zhao Y, Liang C, Zhang X (2021) Positive or negative externalities? Exploring the spatial spillover and industrial agglomeration threshold effects of environmental regulation on haze pollution in China. Environ Dev Sustain 23(8):11335–11356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01114-0
Zhou S, Shi M, Li N, Yuan Y (2011) Impacts of carbon tax policy on CO2 mitigation and economic growth in China. Adv Clim Chang Res 2(3):124–133. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2011.00124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mucahit Aydin: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, formal analysis, software, supervision, writing – review and editing. Oguzhan Bozatli: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aydin, M., Bozatli, O. Do transport taxes reduce air pollution in the top 10 countries with the highest transport tax revenues? A country-specific panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 54181–54192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19651-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19651-8