Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does haze pollution aggravate urban–rural income gap? Evidence from 283 prefecture-level cities in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban–rural income gap and haze pollution concerns are remained at top priority to achieve sustainable development objectives in China. Based on the panel data of 283 cities in China from 2008 to 2018, the quantile regression model is used to study the impact of haze pollution on the urban–rural income gap. In addition, we adopt ventilation coefficients as the instrumental variable of haze pollution to control for potential endogeneity. Findings obtained from the quantile regression estimator suggest that haze pollution can significantly increase the urban–rural income gap. The effect of haze pollution on urban–rural income gap is more significant in the low quantile than the high quantile state. After alleviating endogenous bias through instrumental variables, the promotion effect is more obvious. Furthermore, haze pollution affects the urban–rural income gap through healthy human capital. Our results shed new light on the relationship between haze pollution and urban–rural income gap and provide support for policymakers in tackling the dual tasks of urban–rural income gap and haze pollution. A less haze pollution, our findings suggest, may exert positive effects in relation to the mitigation of urban–rural income gap in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Baek J, Gweisah G (2013) Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy 62:1434–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Feng C, Yan H et al (2020) Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions? J Environ Manag 264:110482

  • Baloch MA, Danish Khan UD et al (2020) Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 740:13986

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Social Psychol 51(6):1173–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner RJ, Rauter R (2017) Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. J Clean Prod 150:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1995) Estimating the asymptotic covariance matrix for quantile regression models a Monte Carlo study. J Econom 2:303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai ZY, Liu ZX, Zuo SM et al (2019) Finding a peaceful road to urbanization in China. Land Use Policy 83:560–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao HP, Xi JM, Chen YZ (2020) Urban residents’ marginal willingness to pay for environmental pollution control. Resource Sci 5:801–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao XJ, Shen KR (2014) Urban-rural income disparity, labor quality and economic growth in China. J Econo Research 6:30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Cheng S, Song M (2017) Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption. Energy Policy 107:698–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Xian Q, Zhou J et al (2020) Impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in G20 countries. J. Environ. Manag. 271:110987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY, Chen DK (2018) Air pollution, government regulations and high-quality economic development. Econ Res 2:20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant K (2019) Environmental policy and human capital inequality: a matter of life and death. J Environ Econ Manage 97:134–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant K, Davin M (2021) Pollution, children’s health and the evolution of human capital inequality. Math Social Sci 112:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65(2):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir C, Cergibozan R, Gök A (2019) Income inequality and CO2 emissions: A empirical evidence from Turkey. Energy Environ 30:444–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng JQ, He AP (2017) Government dominance, local government competition and urban-rural income gap: empirical evidence based on panel quantile model. Chin J Popul Sci 6:54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng QZ, Shi J, Yu DK (2020) Social capital structure and urban-rural income gap under the background of household registration system. Manag Review 8:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Docquier F, Iftikhar Z (2019) Brain drain, informality and inequality: a search-and-matching model for sub-Saharan Africa. J Int Econ 120:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein A, Fan M, Greenstone M et al (2015) Growth, pollution, and life expectancy (Online Appendix). Am Econ Rev 105:226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Cheng J, Shen J et al (2019) Spatial effects of air pollution on public health in China. Environ Resour Econ 73:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvao AF (2011) Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects. J Econom 1:142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald N, Klasen S, Martínez ZI et al (2017) The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecol Econ 142:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L (2014) CO2 Emissions and regional income disparity: evidence from China. Singapore Econ Rev 59:145000

  • Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hering L, Poncet S (2014) Environmental policy and exports: evidence from Chinese cities. J Environ Econ Manage 2:296–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Duan H (2020) Estimating the threshold interactions between income inequality and carbon emissions. J Environ Manag 263:110393

  • Hulber K, Moser D, Sauberer N et al (2017) Plant species richness decreased in semi-natural grasslands in the Biosphere Reserve Wienerwald, Austria, over the past two decades, despite agri-environmental measures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 243:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing SW, Chen HL (2017) FDI and industry structure influence on residents’ income gap in urban and rural areas in China: based on provincial panel data analysis. World Economy Stud. 10:55–64, 122, 136

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson A, Schor J, Huang X (2017) Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: A state-level analysis, 1997–2012. Ecol Econ 134:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashwan P (2017) Inequality, Democracy, and the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis. Ecol Econ 131:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasuga H, Takaya M (2017) Does inequality affect environmental quality?—Evidence from major Japanese cities. J Clean Prod 142:3689–3701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li BX, Cheng SX, Xiao D (2020) The impacts of environmental pollution and brain drain on income inequality. China Econ Rev 62:101481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Sicular T, Tarp F (2020) Income inequality in China: development, transformation and policy. J Beijing Technol Bus University (Soc Sci). 4:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhu MB (2018) Changes of residents’ income gap in 40 years of China’s economic transformation. Manag World 12:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Li WB (2019) The impact of air pollution on enterprise productivity: evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Manag World 10:95–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zheng MN, Wang MC (2020) Does air pollution aggravate income inequality in China? An empirical analysis based on the view of health. J. Clean. Prod. 20:122469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GC, Hou SJ (2017) The effects of structure on urban-rural income gap viewed through economic growth and urbanization. Finance & Trade Econ 38(6):98–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W et al (2019) Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives. Appl Energy 236:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wang C, Zhao XJ et al (2018) The income distribution gap in China: the current situation, reasons and countermeasures. J Renmin University of China 5:25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XX, Dong XY, Li S et al (2021) Air pollution and high human capital population migration: an empirical study based on 35 major cities in China. Sustain Prod Consump 10:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Lu Y (2015) The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: a model-based scenario analysis. Appl Energy 141:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo CL, Li S, Yue XM (2021) An analysis of changes in the extent of income disparity in China (2013–2018). Soc. Sci. in China. 1:33-54+204-205

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader S (2018) The nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions revisited: challenging its empirical validity. Environ Sci Pol 89:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masud MM, Kari FB, Banna H et al (2018) Does income inequality affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from the ASEAN-5. J Asia Pacific Econ 23:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pun VC, Manjourides J, Su H (2017) Association of ambient air pollution with depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults: results from the NSHAP study. Environ Health Perspect 125:342–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Lu HY (2015) Pollution, health and inequality-beyond the “environmental health poverty” trap. Manag World 9:32–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Lv HY (2015) ‘Environmental Poverty Trap’ mechanism and China environmental knee. China Popul Resour Environ 25(10):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin M, Fan LF, Li J et al (2021) The income distribution effects of environmental regulation in China: The case of binding SO2 reduction targets. J Asian Econ 73:101272

  • Schoolman ED, Ma C (2012) Migration class and environmental inequality: exposure to pollution in China’s Jiangsu province. Ecol Econ 75:140–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng PF (2017) Environmental pollution and the income gap between urban and rural residents: impacting mechanism and evidence from China’s economic facts. China Popul Resour Environ 10:56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Li ZR, Yang TT, Xia Q (2020) Does the expansion of the joint prevention and control area improve the air quality?—Evidence from China’s Jing-Jin-Ji region and surrounding areas. Science of the Total Environment 706:136034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs LA (1998) Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecolo Econ 26:259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? Int Econ Rev 1:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Kahn ME, Zheng SQ (2017) Self-protection investment exacerbates air pollution exposure inequality in urban China. Ecol Econ 6:468–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu ZG, Zhang MY, Xu ZJ et al (2018) Income growth, air pollution and public health. China Popul Resour Environ 6:130–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Vona F, Patriarca F (2011) Income inequality and the development of environmental technologies. Ecol Econ 70(11):2201–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu TV, Shi Z, Cheng J et al (2019) Assessing the impact of clean air action plan on air quality trends in Beijing using a machine learning technique. Atmos Chem Phys 19:11303–11314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DH (2012) Health human capital, economic growth and poverty trap. Econ Res 6:143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SX, Benjamin FY (2019) Labor mobility barriers and rural-urban migration in transitional China. China Econ Rev 53:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YZ, Luo NS (2020) Air pollution, health depreciation and medical costs: research based on the three perspectives of physical health, mental health and social adaptability. Econ Res 12:80–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P (2017) Coupling research on urbanization, industrial structure and urban-rural income gap. Statist & Decis 5:109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu SM, Zhong MC (2018) Environmental policy and economic performance: a perspective of the health effects of pollution. China Popul Resour Environ 11:130–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ML (2020) Does income inequality affect environmental quality? China Popul. Resour Environ 4:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang TR, Liu W (2018) Does air pollution affect public health and health inequality? Empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 203:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin XB, Wang Q (2020) The study on financial development, urbanization and urban & rural residents’ income gap in China. Econ Geogr 3:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Wang MS, Zhu Y et al (2020) Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: a meta-regression analysis. Land Use Policy. 99:104995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhao W (2014) Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China. Appl Energy 136:382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JJ, Mu Q (2018) Air pollution and defensive expenditures: evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks. J Environ Econ Manag 92:517–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang QY, Zhang M (2021) Environmental regulation and CO2 emissions: based on strategic interaction of environmental governance. Ecol. Complex. 45:100893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Ren R, Zhang Q et al (2020) Air pollution and tourism development: an interplay. Ann. Tour. Res. 85:101272

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wan GH, Zhang JJ et al (2019) Digital economy, financial inclusion, and inclusive growth. Econ Res 8:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan H (2016) Is Pollution Aggravated by Income Inequality? Evidence from China′s CO2 Emission, Nankai. Econ Stud 6:126–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XY, Li N, Gong F (2021) New urbanization, equalization of public services and urban-rural income Gap. Econ Rev 2:61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivin JG, Neidell M (2012) The impact of pollution on worker productivity. Am Econ Rev 7:3652–3673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu BZ, Jiang MX, Zhang SF et al (2020) Resource and environment economic complex system: models and applications. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu BZ, Ye SX, Wang P, Chevallier JL, Wei YM (2021) Forecasting carbon price using a multi-objective least squares support vector machine with mixture kernels. J Forecast. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper, upon which we have improved the content.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72174195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ming Zhang: methodology.

Lujing Wang: writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 Summary of selected previous studies on the relationship between income inequality and environmental degradation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Wang, L. Does haze pollution aggravate urban–rural income gap? Evidence from 283 prefecture-level cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 55902–55915 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19555-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19555-7

Keywords

Navigation