Abstract
Typical non-parametric frontier analysis based on material balance principle (MBP) is superior for measuring agricultural economic-environmental trade-offs when considering the flow of materials, but fails to incorporate the serious health effects caused by excessive use of pesticides. Here, using MBP-based data envelopment analysis, we measure the economic-environmental-health performances and trade-offs of agricultural production in China during 2006–2016. Evaluation results indicate that (i) the average agricultural sector would be able to produce current output with 16.3% fewer inputs; (ii) 17 million tons CO2 reduction potentials (9.6% of total emissions in 2016) could be realized through technical efficiency promotion without damaging environmental, health, and economic performances; (iii) synergistic effects on agricultural performance promotion exist in 12 regions indicating that the improvement of technical efficiency and the adjustment of input mix would simultaneously lead to 0.2–74.3% reductions on costs and pollutions; and (iv) improving cost efficiency in 18 regions and improving pollution efficiency in another 11 regions would be the most beneficial strategies for their agricultural sectors which would lead to additional reductions on total (economic, environmental, and health) costs by 10.3–22.5%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Data will be made available on request.
References
Aldanondo-Ochoa AM, Casasnovas-Oliva VL, Almansa-Sáez MC (2017) Cross-constrained measuring the cost-environment efficiency in material balance based frontier models. Ecol Econ 142:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.006
Ayres RU (1995) Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios. Environ Resource Econ 63:207–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705980
Ball, E. Lovell, C. A. K. Nehring, R. F. Somwaru, A. (1994). Incorporating undesirable outputs into models of production: an application to United States agriculture. Cahiers d’Economie et Sociologie Rurales France. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284023856_Incorporating_undesirable_outputs_into_models_of_production_An_application_to_US_agriculture
Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1975) The theory of environmental policy: externalities, public outlays, and the quality of life, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173513
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 26:429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-22177890138-8
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manage 51(3):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
Coelli T, Lauwers LV, Huylenbroeck G (2007) Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. J Prod Anal 281:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0052-8
De Koeijer TJ, Wossink GAA, Struik PC, Renkema JA (2002) Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency: the case of Dutch sugar beet growers. J Environ Manage 661:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0578
De Koeijer TJ, Van Wossink GAA, Ittersum MK, Struik PC, Renkema JA (1999) A conceptual model for analysing input–output coefficients in arable farming systems: from diagnosis towards design. Agric Syst 611:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X9900030-X
Dung NH, Dung TTT (1999) Economic and health consequences of pesticide use in paddy production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. EEPSEA research report series/IDRC. Regional Office for Southeast and East Asia, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia. https://ideas.repec.org/p/eep/report/rr1999021.html
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The review of economics and statistics, 90–98. https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v71y1989i1p90-98.html
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh DW, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics 1262:469–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.010
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A General 1203:253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Gong B (2018) Agricultural reforms and production in China: changes in provincial production function and productivity in 1978–2015. J Dev Econ 132:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.12.005
Hai ATN, Speelman S (2020) Economic-environmental trade-offs in marine aquaculture: the case of lobster farming in Vietnam. Aquaculture 516:734593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734593
Han H, Cai S (2011) Study on the health costs of pesticide application and its determining factors: an empirical study based on a field survey of rice households in Anhui Province. Journal of China Agricultural University 165:163–170
Hoang VN, Alauddin M (2012) Input-orientated data envelopment analysis framework for measuring and decomposing economic, environmental and ecological efficiency: an application to OECD agriculture. Environmental and Resource Economics, 513, 431–452. https://doi.org/10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2011.05.028
Hoang VN, Coelli T (2011) Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: a nutrients balance approach. J Environ Econ Manag 623:462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.05.009
Huyen VN, Van Song N, Thuy NT, Hoan LK (2020) Effects of pesticides on farmers’ health in Tu Ky district, Hai Duong province. Vietnam Sustainable Futures 2:100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100026
Kanter DR, Musumba M, Wood SL, Palm C, Antle J, Balvanera P, … & Andelman S (2018) Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, 163, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.010
Komarek AM, Rahman NA, Bandyopadhyay A, Kizito F, Koo J, Addah W (2021) Trade-offs and synergies associated with maize leaf stripping within crop-livestock systems in northern Ghana. Agric Syst 193:103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103206
Lauwers L (2009) Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models. Ecol Econ 686:1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.022
Li N, Jiang Y, Mu H, Yu Z (2018) Efficiency evaluation and improvement potential for the Chinese agricultural sector at the provincial level based on data envelopment analysis DEA. Energy 164:1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.022
Macharia I (2015) Pesticides and health in vegetable production in Kenya. BioMed Research International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/241516
Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, Nelson J … D’amore M (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience, 4210, 750-760. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311994
Pimentel, D. Burgess, M. (2014). Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. In Integrated pest management pp. 47–71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7796-5_2
Pittman, R. W. (1981). Issue in pollution control: Interplant cost differences and economies of scale. Land economics, 571, 1–17. https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v57y1981i1p1-17.html
Reinhard S, Lovell CK, Thijssen GJ (2000) Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. Eur J Oper Res 1212:287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-22179900218-0
Rehman A, Ma H, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2020) Does carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and GHG emissions influence the agriculture? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(23):28768–28779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08912-z
Scheel H (2001) Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. Eur J Oper Res 1322:400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-22170000160-0
Shaik, S. Helmers, G. A. Langemeier, M. R. (2002). Direct and indirect shadow price and cost estimates of nitrogen pollution abatement. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.31121
Sheng Y, Tian X, Qiao W, Peng C (2020) Measuring agricultural total factor productivity in China: pattern and drivers over the period of 1978–2016. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 641:82–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12327
de Soares WL, Souza Porto MF (2009) Estimating the social cost of pesticide use: an assessment from acute poisoning in Brazil. Ecol Econ 6810:2721–2728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.008
Thanh Nguyen T, Hoang VN, Seo B (2012) Cost and environmental efficiency of rice farms in South Korea. Agric Econ 434:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00589.x
Van Meensel J, Lauwers LV, Huylenbroeck G (2010) Communicative diagnosis of cost-saving options for reducing nitrogen emission from pig finishing. J Environ Manage 9111:2370–2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.026
Wang K (2018) System comprehensive evaluation and data envelopment analysis method: modeling and application. Science Press, Beijing
Wang K, Mi Z, Wei YM (2019a) Will pollution taxes improve joint ecological and economic efficiency of thermal power industry in China?: a DEA-based materials balance approach. J Ind Ecol 232:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12740
Wang K, Xian Y, Lee CY, Wei YM, Huang Z (2019b) On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: a review. Ann Oper Res 2781:43–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2423-5
Xian Y, Yang K, Wang K, Wei YM, Huang Z (2019) Cost-environment efficiency analysis of construction industry in China: a materials balance approach. J Clean Prod 221:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.266
Xinhua. (2020). Xi stresses agriculture, rural areas, farmers as top priority for CPC. http://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/202012/30/content_WS5febb519c6d0f72576942aa7.html
Yli-Viikari A, Hietala-Koivu R, Huusela-Veistola E, Hyvönen T, Perälä P, Turtola E (2007) Evaluating agri-environmental indicators AEIs—use and limitations of international indicators at national level. Ecol Ind 71:150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.11.005
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the reviewers and editor for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71871022 and 71521002), the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (grant number 161076), the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, and the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
QW conducted the investigation, visualization, developed the suitable methodology, and was involved with the writing (original draft) of the manuscript. KW guided with the conceptualization of the work, provided supervision in the presented work, and helped in writing (review and editing). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Wang, K. The synergistic and trade-off effects of economic-environmental-health improvement in agriculture sector: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 52590–52604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19533-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19533-z