Abstract
Financial inclusion means that individuals and businesses can easily avail financial goods and services at an affordable cost. It is widely recognized that financial inclusion can help preserve the environment by increasing the consumption of renewable energy sources. Hence, our basic aim is to investigate whether financial inclusion has any effect on renewable energy consumption and environmental quality in China. To get the estimates of the variables, we have preferred the ARDL model. The estimates of the model confirm that a rise in the number of ATMs and total insurance has a positive impact on renewable energy consumption in China in the long run. Conversely, an increase in the number of ATMs and total insurance negatively affects CO2 emissions in China. In general, we can say that financial inclusion increases renewable energy consumption and reduces CO2 emissions in China. Therefore, by using financial inclusion, policymakers should try to divert the resources towards environmentally friendly consumption and production activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Economics 83:156–179
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Usman A, Ullah S (2020) Asymmetric J-curve in the commodity trade between Pakistan and United States: evidence from 41 industries. Eurasian Econ Rev 10(2):163–188
Baloch MA, Ozturk I, Bekun FV, Khan D (2021) Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? Bus Strateg Environ 30(1):176–184
Chibba M (2009) Financial inclusion, poverty reduction and the millennium development goals. Eur J Dev Res 21(2):213–230
Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276
Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO 2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676
Filos E (2010) ICT for sustainable manufacturing: a European perspective. In: International Conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 28–35
Frankel JA, Romer DH (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89(3):379–399
IEA S (2017) International Energy Agency, 2016. Key World Energy Statistics, ed.
IPA (2017) Climate change and financial inclusion. Retrieved on November 26, 2019. Available at:https://www.povertyaction.org/sites/default/files/publications/Climate-Change-Financial-Inclusion_Final.pdf
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with appucations to the demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210
Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecol Econ 176:106760
Le TH, Le HC, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2020) Does financial inclusion impact CO2 emissions? Evidence from Asia. Finance Res Lett 34:101451
Lei W, Ozturk I, Muhammad H, Ullah S (2021) On the asymmetric effects of financial deepening on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: insights from China. Econ Res-Ekon Istraž pp. 1–18
Lesani SB, Mashhadi A, Habibnejad SA, Habibi Mojandeh M (2020) The mechanisms of protection of environment at economic activities in Iran. Public Law StudiesQuarterly 50(3):899–920
Li X, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Hafeez M, Ullah S (2022) Considering the asymmetric effect of financial deepening on environmental quality in BRICS economies: Policy options for the green economy. J Clean Prod 331:129909
Li N, Pei X, Huang Y, Qiao J, Zhang Y, Jamali RH (2021) Impact of financial inclusion and green bond financing for renewable energy mix: implications for financial development in OECD economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res: 1–12
Liu N, Hong C, Sohail MT (2021) Does financial inclusion and education limit CO2 emissions in China? A new perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res: 1–8
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Economet 16(3):289–326
Qin Z, Ozturk I (2021) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in BRICS: assessing the dynamic linkage between foreign capital inflows and energy consumption. Energies 14(10):2974
Sadorsky P (2012) Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 48:130–136
Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telematics Inform 32(4):862–878
Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253
Usman A, Ozturk I, Hassan A, Zafar SM, Ullah S (2021b) The effect of ICT on energy consumption and economic growth in South Asian economies: an empirical analysis. Telematics Inform 58:101537
Usman A, Ozturk I, Ullah S, Hassan A (2021c) Does ICT have symmetric or asymmetric effects on CO2 emissions? Evidence from selected Asian economies. Technol Soc 67:101692
Usman A, Bahmani-Oskoee M, Anwar S, Ullah S (2021a). Is there J-curve effect in the trade between Pakistan and United Kingdom? Asymmetric evidence from industry level data. Singap Econ Rev: 1–21
World Bank (2018) World development indicators 2018. World Bank Publications
Wang L, Wang Y, Sun Y, Han K, Chen Y (2022) Financial inclusion and green economic efficiency: evidence from China. J Environ Planning Manage 65(2):240–271
Wang L, Wang Y, Sun Y, Han K, Chen Y (2021) Financial inclusion and green economic efficiency: evidence from China. J Environ Plan Manag: 1–32
Zadek S, Forstater M, Yu K, Kornik J (2010) The ICT contribution to low carbon development in China. Prepared for the digital energy solutions campaign (DESC) China. Discussion Paper.
Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44:12–19
Zhang D, Ozturk I, Ullah S (2022) Institutional factors-environmental quality nexus in BRICS: a strategic pillar of governmental performance. Econ Res-Ekon Istraž 1–13
Zhao W, Hafeez M, Maqbool A, Ullah S, Sohail S (2021) Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res: 1–11
Zhu X, Xia M, Chiang HD (2018) Coordinated sectional droop charging control for EV aggregator enhancing frequency stability of microgrid with high penetration of renewable energy sources. Appl Energy 210:936–943
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This idea was given by Jingchao Feng. Jingchao Feng and Qing Sun analyzed the data and wrote the complete paper, while Jingchao Feng and Sidra Sohail read and approved the final version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, J., Sun, Q. & Sohail, S. Financial inclusion and its influence on renewable energy consumption-environmental performance: the role of ICTs in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 52724–52731 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19480-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19480-9