Abstract
Seawater desalination is one of the most popular options to alleviate the water crisis worldwide. Effective management of a seawater desalination system is thus critical. In this study, a fuzzy robust optimization programming model, named FROP, has been proposed to provide robust decision support for seawater desalination management under consideration of environmental pollution control and uncertainty. The major contributions of the proposed FROP model include the following: (1) it is designed for effectively addressing the interactions among seawater desalination development, desalted water distribution, water requirement, and control of environmental pollutant emission within an integrated seawater desalination system; (2) it is an effective decision support tool for decision-makers to provide robust planning strategies through simultaneously considering the optimality robustness and feasibility robustness; (3) it can quantify imprecise and vague uncertainties related to the various aspects of the integrated seawater desalination system expressed as fuzzy parameters; and (4) it can address the tradeoffs among meeting the economic objective and environmental protection requirements and guaranteeing the stability of the system (i.e., risk of violating system constraints) under uncertainty. In order to demonstrate its applicability, the FROP model is applied in a hypothetical seawater desalination management system which is consistent with management schemes in practices. The results indicate that despite a higher total system cost, the management objective and environmental requirements are met, whereas a lower total system cost results in a higher risk of violating the constraints and the possibility of destabilizing the system. The FROP model is helpful for decision-makers to develop robust and cost-effective management schemes for seawater desalination systems under different economic and environmental constraints and complex uncertain conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Adida E, Perakis G (2005) A robust optimization approach to dynamic pricing and inventory control with no backorders. Math Program 107:97–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-005-0681-5
Abduljawad M, Ezzeghni U (2010) Optimization of Tajoura MSF desalination plant. Desalination 254:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.12.019
Asiedu-Boateng P, Akaho EHK, Nyarko BJB, Yamoah S (2012) Modeling and simulation of cogeneration nuclear power plant for seawater desalination. Nucl Eng Des 242:143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.09.037
Ali MB, Kairouani L (2016) Multi-objective optimization of operating parameters of a MSF-BR desalination plant using solver optimization tool of Matlab software. Desalination 381:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.030
Abujazar MSS, Fatihah S, Rakmi AR (2016) Shahrom MZ. The effects of design parameters on productivity performance of a solar still for seawater desalination: a review. Desalination 385:178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.025
Alkaisi A, Mossad R (2017) Sharifian-Barforoush A. A Review of the water desalination systems integrated with renewable energy. Energy Procedia 110:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.138
Abdulrahim AH, Chung JN (2019) Comparative thermodynamic performance study for the design of power and desalting cogeneration technologies in Kuwait. Energy Convers Manage 185:654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.027
Ben Ali I, Turki M, Belhadj J, Roboam X (2018) Optimized fuzzy rule-based energy management for a battery-less PV/wind-BWRO desalination system. Energy 159:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.110
Chen M, Mei Y, Yu Y, Zeng RJ, Zhang F, Zhou S et al (2019) An internal-integrated RED/ED system for energy-saving seawater desalination: a model study. Energy 170:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.111
Dubois D, Prade H (1987) The mean value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24:279–300
El Azhar F, Tahaikt M, Zouhri N, Zdeg A, Hafsi M, Tahri K et al (2012) Remineralization of reverse osmosis (RO)-desalted water for a Moroccan desalination plant: optimization and cost evaluation of the lime saturator post. Desalination 300:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.003
Frioui S, Oumeddour R (2008) Investment and production costs of desalination plants by semi-empirical method. Desalination 223:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.180
Ghabayen S, Mckee M, Kemblowski M (2004) Characterization of uncertainties in the operation and economics of the proposed seawater desalination plant in the Gaza Strip. Desalination 161:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90054-9
Gao Z, Lin Z, Wang D, Gao C (2008) Seawater utilization and impact on environment in China. Mar Environ Sci 027:671–676
Gao, B., Guo, J., Meng, Q., 2012. Analysis and empirical study on external cost economy of seawater desalination industry. J Ocean Univ China (Soc Sci). 39–43.
González-Bravo R, Nápoles-Rivera F, Ponce-Ortega JM, El-Halwagi MM (2015) Involving integrated seawater desalination-power plants in the optimal design of water distribution networks. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.010
Ghahremani-Nahr J, Kian R, Sabet E (2019) A robust fuzzy mathematical programming model for the closed-loop supply chain network design and a whale optimization solution algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 116:454–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.027
Heilpern S (1992) The expected value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 47:81–86
Heck N, Paytan A, Potts DC, Haddad B, Petersen KL (2017) Management priorities for seawater desalination plants in a marine protected area: a multi-criteria analysis. Mar Policy 86:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.012
Huang X, Luo X, Yang Z, Chen J, Wang C, Chen Y (2017) Modelling and optimization of a utility system considering different water desalination technologies. Energy Procedia 142:1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.522
M Inuiguchi 2000 Possibilistic Linear Programming: a Brief Review of Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and a Comparison with Stochastic Programming in Portfolio Selection Problem 111 1 3 28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00449-7
Jamaly S, Darwish NN, Ahmed I, Hasan SW (2014) A short review on reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies. Desalination 354:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.017
Jabari F, Mohammadi-ivatloo B, Mohammadpourfard M (2019) Robust optimal self-scheduling of potable water and power producers under uncertain electricity prices. Appl Therm Eng 162:114258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114258
Jin L, Fu H, Kim Y, Wang L, Li Y, Huang G (2019) A robust inexact trapezoidal T2 fuzzy approach coupling possibility degrees for solid waste disposal allocation with integrated optimal greenhouse gas control under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 221:753–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.252
Ji L, Huang GH, Niu DX, Cai YP, Yin JG (2020) A stochastic optimization model for carbon-emission reduction investment and sustainable energy planning under cost-risk control. J Environ Inf 36(2):107–118. https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.202000428
Khawaji AD, Kutubkhanah IK, Wie JM (2008) Advances in seawater desalination technologies. Desalination 221:47–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.067
Kavvadias C, Khamis I (2014) Sensitivity analysis and probabilistic assessment of seawater desalination costs fueled by nuclear and fossil fuel. Energy Policy 74:S24–S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.033
Khanmohammadi S, Atashkari K (2018) Modeling and multi-objective optimization of a novel biomass feed polygeneration system integrated with multi effect desalination unit. Thermal Sci Eng Prog 8:269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.08.003
Klaimi R, Alnouri SY, Al-Hindi M, Azizi F (2019) Optimization techniques for coupling renewable/hybrid energy options with desalination systems for carbon footprint reduction. Chem Eng Res Des 151:270–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.09.010
Kotb KM, Elkadeem MR, Khalil A, Imam SM, Hamada MA, Sharshir SW, Dan A (2021) A fuzzy decision-making model for optimal design of solar, wind, diesel-based RO desalination integrating flow-battery and pumped-hydro storage: case study in Baltim. Egypt Energy Conver Manage 235:113–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.04-18
Karambasti BM, Ghodrat M, Ghorbani G, Lalbakhsh A, Behnia M (2022) Design methodology and multi-objective optimization of small-scale power-water production based on integration of Stirling engine and muti-effect evaporation desalination system. Desalination 526:115–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115542
Liu B, Iwamura K (1998) Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94:227–237
Li YP, Huang GH, Nie XH, Nie SL (2008) A two-stage fuzzy robust integer programming approach for capacity planning of environmental management systems. Eur J Oper Res 189:399–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.014
Liu TK, Sheu HY, Tseng CN (2013) Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management. Desalination 326:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.07.003
Luo X, Zhu Y, Liu J, Liu Y (2018) Design and analysis of a combined desalination and standalone CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) system integrating solar energy based on a bi-level optimization model. Sustain Cities Soc 43:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.023
Luo B, Huang GH, Chen JP, Zhang XY, Zhao K (2021) A chance-constrained small modular reactor siting model–a case study for the Province of Saskatchewan. Canada 148:111–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111320
Malek A, Hawlader MNA, Ho JC (1996) Design and economics of RO seawater desalination. Desalination 105:245–261
Mussati SF, Aguirre PA, Scenna NJ (2004) A rigorous, mixed-integer, nonlineal programming model (MINLP) for synthesis and optimal operation of cogeneration seawater desalination plants. Desalination 166:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.088
Mezher T, Fath H, Abbas Z, Khaled A (2011) Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies. Desalination 266:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.035
Maalouf S, Rosso D, Yeh WWG (2014) Optimal planning and design of seawater RO brine outfalls under environmental uncertainty. Desalination 333:134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.015
Mojtaba F, Adel A, Gholamreza J, Ehsan A (2018) A novel robust fuzzy stochastic programming for closed loop supply chain network design under hybrid uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst 341:69–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2017.03.019
M. Abdelshafy, A., Hamdy, H., Jakub, J., 2018. Optimal design of a grid-connected desalination plant powered by renewable energy resources using a hybrid PSO–GWO approach. Energy Convers Manage 173(OCT.), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.083
Nie XH, Huang GH, Li YP, Liu L (2007) IFRP: a hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty. J Environ Manage 84:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.006
Nisan S, Benzarti N (2008) A comprehensive economic evaluation of integrated desalination systems using fossil fuelled and nuclear energies and including their environmental costs. Desalination 229:125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.07.031
Organization of Qingdao Development and Reform OQDR, 2005. Qingdao seawater desalination industry development plan, http:// www.qingdao.gov.cn / n172 / n25685095 / n25685320/n25685925/n25687747/100020080604775532.html.
Park C, Park PK, Mane PP, Hyung H, Gandhi V, Kim SH et al (2010) Stochastic cost estimation approach for full-scale reverse osmosis desalination plants. J Membr Sci 364:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.055
Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M, Torabi SA (2011) A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 35:637–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.013
Pishvaee MS, Razmi J, Torabi SA (2012) Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: a new approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010
Qiblawey HM, Banat F (2008) Solar thermal desalination technologies. Desalination 220:633–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.059
Qasim M, Darwish NA, Sarp S, Hilal N (2015) Water desalination by forward (direct) osmosis phenomenon: a comprehensive review. Desalination 374:47–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.07.016
Reza Balali M, Keulartz J, Korthals M (2009) Reflexive water management in arid regions: the case of Iran. Environ Values 18:91–112. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109x404807
Soliman, M., 1981. A mathematical model for multi-stage flash desalination plants. J Eng Sci 7, 143–150.
Seo J, Kim YM, Chae SH, Lim SJ, Park H, Kim JH (2019) An optimization strategy for a forward osmosis-reverse osmosis hybrid process for wastewater reuse and seawater desalination: a modeling study. Desalination 463:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.012
Tsiakis P, Papageorgiou LG (2005) Optimal design of an electrodialysis brackish water desalination plant. Desalination 173:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.08.031
Tokui Y, Moriguchi H, Nishi Y (2014) Comprehensive environmental assessment of seawater desalination plants: multistage flash distillation and reverse osmosis membrane types in Saudi Arabia. Desalination 351:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.07.034
Talaei M, Farhang Moghaddam B, Mir SP, Ali BA, Sepideh G (2016) A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry. J Clean Prod 113:662–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.074
The State Council, 2016. The 13th five-year plan for ecological and environmental protection, http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-12/05/content_5143290.htm.
Udono K, Sitte R (2008) Modeling seawater desalination powered by waste incineration using a dynamic systems approach. Desalination 229:302–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.017
Voros NG, Maroulis ZB, Marinoskouris D (1997) Short-cut structural design of reverse osmosis desalination plants. J Membr Sci 127:47–68
Wu L, Hu Y, Gao C (2013) Optimum design of cogeneration for power and desalination to satisfy the demand of water and power. Desalination 324:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.006
Xu R, Tian Y (2004) Environmental cost analysis of power plants. Environ Prot 24:27
Yu RX, Wang Y, Wang SC (2005) A review on brine disposal from desalination plants. Technol Water Treat 31:1–51. https://doi.org/10.1360/gs050302
Zhang X, Huang GH, Nie X (2009) Robust stochastic fuzzy possibilistic programming for environmental decision making under uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 408:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.050
Zheng X, Chen D, Wang Q, Zhang Z (2014) Seawater desalination in China: retrospect and prospect. Chem Eng J 242:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.104
Zhang Y, Wang R, Huang P, Wang X, Wang S (2020) Risk evaluation of large-scale seawater desalination projects based on an integrated fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and analytic hierarchy process method. Desalination 478:114–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114286
Zhou B, Liu BY, Yang DS, Cao J, Littler T (2020) Multi-objective optimal operation of coastal hydro-electrical energy system with seawater reverse osmosis desalination based on constrained NSGA-III. Energy Convers Manage 207:112–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112533
Acknowledgements
We would like to appreciate the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51779132).
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 51779132).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yaqi Cao: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, visualization, and writing—review and editing.
Xiaodong Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
Shuguang Wang: supervision and investigation.
Hua Zhang: investigation and writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, S. et al. Robust decision support for seawater desalination system management under consideration of environmental pollution control. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 50096–50116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19390-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19390-w