Abstract
Over the past few years, a growing number of scholars have explored environmental deterioration and its connection to various indicators acting as proxies for growth and globalisation. Taking this into view, the current study examines the globalisation-environment nexus, using 66 major countries and administrative regions of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as case studies for 2000–2015. For this analysis, six biophysical resource usages were used within the safe operating space of the planetary boundary concept as proxies for the environmental state, along with the four main and five sub-indices of the Konjunkturforschungsstelle (KOF) globalisation index. Pearson’s correlation, hierarchical clustering, redundancy analysis, linear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) forecasting, etc. were used to infer existing trends, the interactions between the environment and globalisation, a projected future, and coupling with safe operating space aspects. The findings reveal the long-run asymmetric relationship of variables. Surpassing safe operating limits to achieve globalisation is the most prominent outcome. Economic, trade, and financial globalisation are more crucially related to biophysical resource usage. Nitrogen use and material footprint act as strong drivers for various indices of globalisation. At least 40% of countries are above the global average resource usage and 50% have crossed all of the safe operating limits. At the present rate, nearly 51% of countries might cross all their safe operating spaces in 2030. In a race to achieve more globalisation (0.95), more than 30% of countries might cross 5 of the 6 planetary boundaries. Land system change, the biogeochemical cycle, and climate change are impending as the most important domains to be focused on regarding globalisation. Based on the findings, it can be recommended that governments and policymakers devote more attention to reframing and redesigning globalisation to be more environment friendly to achieve long-term sustainable development goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data, used in this study, is available in public databases.
References
Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic 121:107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Akadiri SS, Alola AA, Bekun FV, Etokakpan MU (2020) Does electricity consumption and globalization increase pollutant emissions? Implications for environmental sustainability target for China Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:25450–25460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08784-3
Alam S (2010) Globalization, poverty and environmental degradation: sustainable development in Pakistan. J Sustain Dev 3:103–114. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/6502
Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan NA (2020) Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: an analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecol Indic 115:106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416
Ascensão F, Fahrig L, Clevenger AP et al (2018) Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nat Sustain 1:206–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3
Berlie JA (2020) China’s globalization and the belt and road initiative. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940179
ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and canodraw for windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca NY, USA (www.canoco.com)
Bringezu S (2015) Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources. Resources 4:25–54. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4010025
Bu M, Lin CT, Zhang B (2016) Globalization and climate change: new empirical panel data evidence. J Econ Surv 30:577–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12162
CAIT. Climate analysis indicators tool - climate data explorer. Available from https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
Carpenter SR, Bennett EM (2011) Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus. Environ Res Lett 6:014009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014009
Clark WC (2000) Governance in a globalizing world, Environ glob, p. 86 108. Brookings Institution Press
de Vries W, Kros J, Kroeze C, Seitzinger SP (2013) Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability 5:392–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.004
Dittrich M, Giljum S, Lutter S, Polzin C (2012) Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment. Sustain Europe Res Ins (SERI). (Available from https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/research/green-economies-around-world-implications-resource-use-development-and-environment)
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring globalisation - gauging its consequences. Springer, New York
Ediger VS, Akar S (2007) ARIMA forecasting of primary energy demand by fuel in Turkey. Energy Policy 35(3):1701–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.009
Ehrenstein M, Calvo-Serrano R, Galan-Martín A, Pozo C, Zurano-Cervello P, Guillen-Gosalbez G (2020) Operating within planetary boundaries without compromising well-being? A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. J Clean Prod 270:121833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121833
Fang K, Heijungs R, Duan Z, de Snoo GR (2015) The environmental sustainability of nations: benchmarking the carbon, water and land footprints against allocated planetary boundaries. Sustainability 7:11285–11305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70811285
Fang K, Wang S, He J, Song J, Fang C, Jia X (2021) Mapping the environmental footprints of nations partnering the Belt and Road Initiative. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105068
FAOSTAT. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. Available from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
Figge L, Martens P (2014) Globalisation continues: the Maastricht globalisation index revisited and updated. Globalizations 7731:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.887389
Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:863–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8
Ghemawat P, Altman SA (2016) DHL global connectedness index 2016 - the state of globalization in an age of ambiguity
Global footprint network, Glossary. Available from https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/glossary/. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
KOF Globalization Index. Available from https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF globalisation index – revisited. Rev Int Organ 14(3):543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Ahmad A, Khurshid H (2019) Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:8594–8608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x
Henry RC, Engstrom K, Olin S, Alexander P, Arneth A, Rounsevell MDA (2018) Food supply and bioenergy production within the global cropland planetary boundary. PLoS ONE 13:e0194695
Hughes AC (2019) Understanding and minimizing environmental impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Conserv Biol 33(4):883–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13317
Hughes AC et al (2020) Horizon Scan of the Belt and Road Initiative. Trends Ecol Evol 35(7):583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.02.005
Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Khan D, Ullah A (2019) Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:15194–15208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04913-9
Kluver R, Fu W (2004) The cultural globalization index. Foreign Policy. Available from https://foreignpolicy.com/2004/02/10/the-cultural-globalization-index/
Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22680–22697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
Lettenmeier M, Liedtke C, Rohn H (2014) Eight Tons of Material Footprint - Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland. Resources 3(3):488–515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488
Liu W (2019) The Belt and Road Initiative - a pathway towards inclusive globalization. First Edition, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429447228
Liu W, Dunford M (2016) Inclusive globalization: unpacking China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Area Dev Policy 1(3):323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2016.1232598
Liu W, Dunford M, Gao B (2018) A discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neo-liberal to inclusive globalization. J Geogr Sci 28:1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1520-y
Lockwood B, Redoano M (2005) The CSGR globalisation index: an introductory guide. Technical report 155 (04), CSGR working paper
Lucas PL, Wilting WC, Hof AF, van Vuuren DP (2020) Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness. Glob Environ Change 60:102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017
Luukkanen J, Vehmas J, Kaivo-oja J (2021) Quantification of Doughnut Economy with the Sustainability Window Method: Analysis of Development in Thailand. Sustainability 13:847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020847
Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Change 137:340–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004
Mehmood U (2021) Globalization-driven CO2 emissions in Singapore: an application of ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11317–11322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11368-w
Nathaniel SP (2021a) Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: evidence from ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:64871–64881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15360-w
Nathaniel SP (2021b) Environmental degradation in ASEAN: assessing the criticality of natural resources abundance, economic growth and human capital. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21766–21778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12034-x
Nathaniel SP, Barua S, Ahmed Z (2021) What drives ecological footprint in top ten tourist destinations? Evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:38322–38331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13389-5
Global Footprint Network. Ecological footprint of consumption dataset. Available from https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
Norris P (2000) Governance in a globalizing world, global governance and cosmopolitan citizens. Brookings Institution Press, p 155–177
Nye JS, Keohane RO (2000) Governance in a globalizing world, Introduction. Brookings Institution Press, p 144
Nykvist B, Persson A, Moberg F, Persson L, Cornell S, Rockström J (2013) National environmental performance on planetary boundaries. A study for the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Stockholm. Available from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Om-Naturvardsverket/Publikationer/ISBN/6500/978-91-620-6576-8/)
O’Neill DW, Fanning AL, Lamb WF, Steinberger JK (2018) A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat Sustain 1:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
Phong LH (2019) Globalization, financial development, and environmental degradation in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. Int J Energy Econ Pol 9:40–50. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7290
Potrafke N (2015) The evidence on globalisation. World Econ 38(3):509–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12174
Raab M, Ruland M, Schonberger B, Blossfeld HP, Hofacker D, Buchholz S, Schmelzer P (2008) GlobalIndex: a sociological approach to globalization measurement. Int Sociol 23:596–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580908090729
Rafindadi AA, Usman O (2019) Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test. J Environ Manage 244:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.048
Rahman S, Chen S, Saud S, Bano S, Haseeb A (2019) The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:24733–24747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05714-w
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Roy A, Pramanick K (2019) Analysing progress of sustainable development goal 6 in India: past, present, and future. J Env Manage 232:1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.060
Roy A, Basu A, Dong X (2021) Achieving Socioeconomic Development Fuelled by Globalization: An Analysis of 146 Countries. Sustainability 13:4913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094913
Roy A, Pramanick K (2020) Safe and just operating space for India. In Hussain CM (ed) Handbook of modern environmental materials management. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_210-1
Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:33387–33398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shahzadi A, Yaseen MR, Anwar S (2019) Relationship between globalization and environmental degradation in low income countries: an application of Kuznet Curve. Indian J Sci Technol 12:19. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i19/143994
Sharif A, Godil DI, Xu B, Sinha A, Khan SAR, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) Revisiting the role of tourism and globalization in environmental degradation in China: fresh insights from the quantile ARDL approach. J Clean Prod 272:122906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122906
Shuen ng L. et al (2020) The scale of biodiversity impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia. Biol Conserv 248:108691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108691
Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D et al (2018) Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Suki NM, Sharif A, Afshan S, Suki NM (2020) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia: the role of globalization in sustainable environment. J Clean Prod 264:121669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121669
Teo HC, Lechner AM, Walton GW, Chan FKS, Cheshmehzangi A, Tan-Mullins M, Chan HK, Sternberg T, Campos-Arceiz A (2019) Environmental impacts of infrastructure development under the Belt and Road Initiative. Environments 6(6):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6060072
Ulucak ZS, ˙Ilkay SÇ, ¨Ozcan B, Gedikli A (2020) Financial globalization and environmental degradation nexus: evidence from emerging economies. Resour Pol 67:101698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101698
UNCCD (2017) The global land outlook, first edition. Bonn, Germany. Available from https://knowledge.unccd.int/glo/GLO_first_edition
UNDESA (2019) 2019 Revision of world population prospects. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/
UNEP (2014a) UNEP 2014 Annual Report. United Nations. Available from https://www.unep.org/resources/annual-report/unep-2014-annual-report
UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, a report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel. Available from https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/9816
UNEP (2014b) Managing and conserving the natural resource base for sustained economic and social development (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi). Available from https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/managing-and-conserving-natural-resource-base-sustained-economic-and-social-development
UNEP (2020) Emissions Gap Report 2020. Nairobi. Available from https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020
UNEP. Material footprint (total) per capita data. Environment Live/Global Material Flows Database. Available from https://wesr.unep.org/indicator/index/12_2_1. Accessed 22 Oct 2021
Usman O, Olanipekun IO, Iorember PT, Abu-Goodman M (2020) Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8334–8349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6
Vujakovic P (2010) How to measure globalisation? A new globalisation index (NGI). Atl Econ J 38(2):237–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-010-9217-3
Waskom ML (2021) seaborn: statistical data visualization. J Open Source Softw 6(60):3021. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393:447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210
Zhang Q, Wiedmann T, Fang K, Song J, He J, Chen X (2022) Bridging planetary boundaries and spatial heterogeneity in a hybrid approach: a focus on Chinese provinces and industries. Sci Tot Environ 804:150179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150179
Funding
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42171149 and 41901222).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation—Ajishnu Roy, Xuhui Dong.
Data Curation—Ajishnu Roy.
Methodology—Ajishnu Roy, Aman Basu.
Investigation—Ajishnu Roy.
Formal Analysis—Ajishnu Roy, Tusheema Dutta, Aman Basu.
Software—Ajishnu Roy, Tusheema Dutta, Aman Basu, Xuhui Dong.
Interpretation—Ajishnu Roy, Xuhui Dong.
Resources—Ajishnu Roy.
Project administration—Yan Li, Xuhui Dong.
Writing (original draft preparation)—Ajishnu Roy.
Writing (review and editing)—Ajishnu Roy, Tusheema Dutta, Aman Basu, Xuhui Dong.
Visualisation—Ajishnu Roy, Tusheema Dutta, Aman Basu, Xuhui Dong.
Supervision—Xuhui Dong.
Funding Acquisition—Yan Li, Xuhui Dong.
The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable. Based on the dataset from international databases.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Philippe Garrigues.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, A., Li, Y., Dutta, T. et al. Understanding the relationship between globalization and biophysical resource consumption within safe operating limits for major Belt and Road Initiative countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 40654–40673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18683-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18683-4