Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Review on fabrication methodologies and its impacts on performance of dye-sensitized solar cells

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review highlights and summarizes the impact of different fabrication processes on the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Energy conversion efficiency of cell depends upon semiconductor, sensitizer, electrolyte, and counter electrode. Efficiency of DSSCs can be enhanced by properly selecting the optimum significance of various parameters of fabrications process. Major challenges of these solar cells are non-vegetal, noxious, extreme sensitizers. Application of natural dyes in this field plays a significant role. An optimized CdSe-TiO2 photoanode showed a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.29% and short circuit current density of 15.30 mA cm−2 for the DSSC. Power conversion efficiency of 3.26% was achieved by using TTO electrode for DSSC device that is ascribed to the improved electrical and optical properties due to doping with Ta element. Absorbance of betalain was shown in the visible range of 530–535 nm for betanin while 450–559 nm for anthocyanin pigment. The natural dyes are economical, readily available, and environmentally friendly. This compilation would be beneficial for researchers working on dye solar cell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Here, critical analysis has been done with reference to earlier research work. This is a kind of comprehensive review. Hence, there is no data used.

Abbreviations

DSSC :

dye-sensitized solar cell

FF :

fill factor

FSP :

flame spray pyrolysis

I sc :

short circuit photocurrent (mA)

P max :

maximum value power (mW)

J sc :

photocurrent current density (mA/cm2)

PCE :

power conversion efficiency (%)

PVP :

polyvinylpyrrolidone

V oc :

open-circuit voltage of DSSC (V)

V m :

maximum value of voltage corresponds to maximum power (mV or V)

η :

efficiency (%)

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to the Centre for Energy and Environment, Delhi Technological University, and Energy Centre, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, for providing the basic facility for this review compiling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Geetam Richhariya: methodology, writing (original draft), and investigation. Bhim Charan Meikap: conceptualization and supervision. Anil Kumar: conceptualization, writing (review and editing), visualization, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

•Different fabrication methodologies of dye-sensitized solar cells are described.

• Ideal features of fabrication parameters of DSSCs are explained.

• Various natural sensitizers for a healthy environment are discussed.

• Performance evaluation between natural and synthetic dye is described.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richhariya, G., Meikap, B.C. & Kumar, A. Review on fabrication methodologies and its impacts on performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 15233–15251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18049-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18049-2

Keywords

Navigation