Skip to main content
Log in

Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan’s cultural ecosystem services

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services are the non-material benefits that people obtain from ecosystems and these services are subject to tremendous anthropogenic and climatic pressures. This study evaluates the spatiotemporal economic valuation of selected cultural and natural landscapes in Pakistan using net present value method. The results indicate that both cultural landscapes and mountain ecosystems are the most significant contributors to Pakistan’s cultural ecosystem services. The net present value of our study area was USD 96/ha, while this value is ranged from USD 0.000242/ha to USD 138,997/ha in the 42 previous studies selected for comparison. Service flow, population, and visitor numbers were the most significant indicators of cultural ecosystem services. The promotion of cultural ecosystem services as an inclusive service and the application of discounted rates are identified as key approaches for ensuring sustainable resource use and enhanced intergenerational benefits by incorporating cultural ecosystem services into the national policy framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

References

  • Abigail A, Atwood J, August PV, Byron C, Cobb S, Cheryl Foster CF, Gold A, Hagos K, Leanna H, Kellogg DQ, Lellis-Dibble K, Opaluch JJ, Oviatt CA, Pfeiffer-Herbert A, Rohr N, Smith L, Smythe T, Swift J, Vinhateiro N (2009) Coastal Lagoons and Climate Change: Ecological and Social Ramifications in U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coast Ecosystems. Ecol Soc 14:2947–2948. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[2947:ETACHH]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baig SP, Rizvi AR, Pangilinan MJ (2016) Cost and Benefits of Ecosystem Based Adaptation Global Ecosystems Management Programme

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P et al (2002) Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild. Nature 297:950–954

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bann C, Basak E (2013) Economic Analysis of Fethiye-Göcek Special Environmental Protection Area: Strengthening the System of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas of Turkey Project, 1-44

  • Banzhaf HS, Burtraw D, Chung S, et al (2016) Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Resour Futur RFF DP 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03829

  • Barrena J, Nahuelhual L, Báez A et al (2014) Valuing cultural ecosystem services : Agricultural heritage in Chiloé island, southern Chile. Ecosyst Serv 7:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernue A, Rodrı T (2014) Socio-Cultural and Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Mediterranean Mountain Agroecosystems. PLoS One 9:e102479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernués A, Rodríguez-Ortega T, Alfnes F et al (2015) Quantifying the multifunctionality of fjord and mountain agriculture by means of sociocultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 48:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blythe J, Armitage D, Alonso G, Campbell D, Esteves Dias AC, Epstein G, Marschke, M, Nayak P (2020) Frontiers in coastal well-being and ecosystem services research: a systematic review. Ocean Coast Manag 185:105028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105028

  • Boerema A, Schoelynck J, Bal K et al (2014) Economic valuation of ecosystem services, a case study for aquatic vegetation removal in the Nete catchment (Belgium). Ecosyst Serv 7:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner J, Jimenez J, Sarda R, Garola A (2010) Ocean & Coastal Management An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean Coast Manag 53:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R, Brander L, Kuik O, et al (2013) A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB. TEEB Follow Stud Eur 144

  • Brown G, Hausner VH (2017) An empirical analysis of cultural ecosystem values in coastal landscapes. Ocean Coast Manag 142:49–60

  • Brown G, Raymond C (2007) The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Appl Geogr 27:89–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canedoli C, Bullock C, Collier MJ et al (2017) Public Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services : Citizen Perception and Park Management in the Parco Nord of Milan (Italy). Sustainability 9:1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro A, Vaughn C, García-Llorente, M; Julian J, Atkinson C (2016) Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services among Stakeholder Groups in a South-Central U.S. Watershed with Regional Conflict. J Water Resour Plan Manag 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000671.

  • Chiabai A, Travisi CM, Ding H et al (2009) Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Serices: Methodology and Monetary Estimates. Nota di Lav 12:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiabai A, Travisi C, Markandya A (2011) Economic assessment of forest ecosystem services losses: cost of policy inaction

  • Cropper ML, Freeman MC, Groom B, Pizer WA (2015) Declining discount rates. LSE Res Online 104:538–543. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato D, Rekola M, Li N, Toppinen A (2016) Monetary valuation of forest ecosystem services in China: A literature review and identification of future research needs. Ecol Econ 121:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A et al (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8812–8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M et al (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359: 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826

  • Groot R de, Ramakrishnan PS, Berg A van de, et al (2005) Chapter 17, Cultural and Amenity Services. Ecosyst Hum well-being Curr State Trends 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.016

  • de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L et al (2010a) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot R; Fisher Brendan; Christie Mike (2010b) Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. Econ Ecosyst Biodivers Ecol Econ Found 1–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x11000088

  • de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S et al (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dendoncker N, Keune H, Jacobs S, Gómez-Baggethun E (2013) Inclusive Ecosystem Services Valuation. In: Ecosystem Services: Global Issues, Local Practices. pp 3–12

  • Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke CR (2014) Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol Indic 43:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton LR, Rister ME, Lacewell RD, Sturdivant AW (2015) A Review of Discounting Natural Resources: Technical Report. Texas Water Resources Instit 1-25

  • ECONorthwest (2016) Quiet Recreation on Blm-Managed Lands: Economic Contribution 2014. Final Repoert for The Pew Charitable Trusts, 1-23

  • Egoh BN, Africa S, Drakou E (2012) Indicators for mapping ecosystem services : A Review. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Europeon Commission, 1-144

  • Eregae EJ, Njogu P, Karanja R, Gichua M (2021) Economic valuation for cultural and passive ecosystem services using a stated preference (Contingent Valuation Method  (CVM)) case of the elgeyo watershed ecosystem, Kenya. International Journal of Forestry Research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5867745

  • FIA (2015) Foreign visitors to Pakistan. 1974

  • Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R et al (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4:1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Fu T, Liu J et al (2018) Ecosystem Services Management Based on Differentiation and Regionalization along Vertical Gradient in Taihang Mountain, China. Sustainability 10:986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould RK, Ardoin NM, Woodside U, et al (2014) The forest has a story: Cultural ecosystem services in Kona, Hawaii. Ecol Soc 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06893-190355

  • Gowdy J, Howarth RB, Tisdell C, et al (2010) Discounting, ethics, and options for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem integrity. Econ Ecosyst Biodivers Ecol Econ Found 257–283. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775489

  • Grêt-Regamey A, Bishop ID, Bebi P (2007) Predicting the scenic beauty value of mapped landscape changes in a mountainous region through the use of GIS. Environ Plan B Plan Des 34:50–67. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin RC (2006) Water Resource Economics. The Analysis of Scarcity, Policies, and Projects, XV edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom BEN, Hepburn C, Koundouri P, Pearce D (2005) Declining Discount Rates : The Long and the Short of it. Environ Resour Econ 32:445–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4681-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J et al (2015) Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7348–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ha PDT (2011) The use of time declining discount rates in climate change projects: Thesis submitted to the Environmental Economics and Natural resources. Wageningen University, Wageningen, pp 1–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Dunford R, Savin C et al (2014) Cross-sectoral impacts of climate change and socio-economic change for multiple, European land- and water-based sectors. Clim Chang 128:279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1239-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyhä T, Paolo P, Paletto A, Fath BD (2015) Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosyst Serv 14:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes T, Service F, Alger K, Zinkhan C (1998) The Effect of Response Time on Conjoint Analysis Estimates of Rainforest Protection. J For Econ 4:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN-UNDP-UNEP (2011) Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Mountain Ecosystems : Challenges and Opportunities in Nepal. A joint paper of IUCN, UNDP and UNEP, Peru and Uganda

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H (2014) Ecosystem Rervices: Global Issues. Local Pactices, San Diego and Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H (2018) Ecosystem services: Global issues, local practices. Elsevier,  San Diego, CA, Waltham, MA

  • Kenter JO, Hyde T, Christie M, Fazey I (2011) The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries-Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob Environ Chang 21:505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobryn HT, Brown G, Munro J, Moore SA (2018) Cultural ecosystem values of the Kimberley coastline: an empirical analysis with implications for coastal and marine policy. Ocean Coast Manag 162: 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.002

  • Körner C, Ohsawa M, Spehn E, et al (2005) Mountain systems. Ecosyst Hum well-being Curr State 683–716

  • Laband DN (2013) The neglected stepchildren of forest-based ecosystem services: Cultural, spiritual, and aesthetic values. For Policy Econ 35:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam VWY, Cheung WWL, Reygondeau G, Rashid Sumaila U (2016) Projected change in global fisheries revenues under climate change. Sci Rep 6:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Layke C (2009) Measuring Nature ’ s Benefits : A Preliminary Roadmap for Improving Ecosystem Service Indicators. Anal World Reso 1–36

  • Lu Y, Wang J, Wei L, Mo J (2006) Land Use Change and its Impact on Values of Ecosystem Services in the West of Jilin. Wuhan Univ J Ntural Sci 1202:1028–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Burkhard B, Geneletti D (2018) Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature ’ s contributions to people. One Ecosyst 3:e24720. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makers IP (2011) THE ECONOMICS OF ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY TEEB for National and International Policy Makers. Energy

  • Maynard S, James D, Davidson A (2015) Determining the value of multiple ecosystem services in terms of community wellbeing: Who should be the valuing agent? Ecol Econ 115:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. ISLAND PRESS, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J (2013) Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344

  • Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A (2013) Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps. Ecosystems 16:894–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A et al (2009) Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective. Qxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Lozada P et al (2013) Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile. Appl Geogr 40:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R et al (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:9495–9500. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707823105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National F, National F, National F, et al (2008) Visitors at Archaeological Museums in Pakistan During January-December, 2008 Contd .. Visitors at Archaeological Museums in Pakistan During January-December, 2008

  • Ndebele TOM (2009) Economic Non-Market Valuation Techniques: theory and Application to Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services. Massey University, Palmerston North

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning W, Rawat GS, Joshi S et al (2013) High-Altitude Rangelands and their Interfaces in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. Mt Res Dev 34:189

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleson KLL, Barnes-Mauthe M, Brander LM et al (2015) Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Environ Econ 114:104–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby AA, Bhagwat SA (2010) Sacred forests of India: A strong tradition of community-based natural resource management. Environ Conserv 37:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAF (2015) Winter Ski Sport Naltar. Official record data of the Naltar Ski Sports. Base camp of the Pakistan Air Force Naltar, Gilgit

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Muradian R, Brander L, et al (2010) The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and economic foundations. pp 183–255

  • Paul A, Martin F (2017) Mountain Ecosystem Services and Climate Change: A Global Overview of Potential Threats and Strategies for Adaptation. Prepared for the UNESCO Programme Climate Change Impacts in Major Mountainous Regions of the World: Multidisciplinary Network for Adaptat. UNESCO

  • Pinkston B (2015) Identifying and Evaluating Revenue Strategies for Parks and Recreation Departments across the Western United States. San Jose State University, San Jose

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • PMD (2012) Climate of pakistan. Islamabad

  • Polizzi C, Simonetto M, Barausse A, et al (2015) Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort ? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.001

  • Rasul G (2011) The Role of the Himalayan Mountain Systems in Food Security and Agricultural Sustainability in South Asia. Int J Rural Manag 6:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/097300521100600105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5242–5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Bidoglio G, Dhar U, et al (2010) Measuring biophysical quantities and the use of indicators. Econ Ecosyst Biodivers Ecol Econ Found 47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775489

  • Rodríguez-Labajos B, Martínez-Alier J (2013) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Recent instances for debate. Conserv Soc 11:326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander HA, Haight RG (2012) Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. J Environ Manag 113:194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaraz S, Hasan Arsalan M, Fatima H (2014) Regionalizing the Climate of Pakistan Using Köppen Classification System. Pak Geogr Rev 69:111–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2013) Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landsc Urban Plan 111:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen H, Aziz S, Ejaz Ul Islam Dar M (2017) Ecosystem services and structure of western himalayan temperate forests stands in Neelum valley, Pakistan. Pak J Bot 49:707–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedayi AA, Xu M, Gonalez-Redin J, Hagist SCN, Aslam S, Khan N (2019) Spatiotemporal assessment and valuation of provisioning ecosystem services of Pakistan. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(3):6735–6759. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_67356759

  • Sheikh K, Ahmad T, Khan MA (2002) Use, exploitation and prospects for conservation: People and plant biodiversity of Naltar Valley, northwestern Karakorums, Pakistan. Biodivers Conserv 11:715–742. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015584202121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sher H, Aldosari A, Bussmann RW (2015) Morels of Palas Valley, Pakistan: A Potential Source for Generating Income and Improving Livelihoods of Mountain Communities. Econ Bot 69:345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9326-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreeraman BA and Ananthakrishnan R (2009) Valuing Wetland Attributes Using Discrete Choice Experiments: A Developing Country Experiment. In: 17th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. Amsterdam

  • Stern N (2007) STERN REVIEW: The Economics of Climate Change. A Book commissioned by the Government of the United Kingdom; 1-662

  • Sterner T, Kyriakopoulou E (2012) The Economics of Discounting: Unbalanced Growth, Uncertainty , and Spatial Considerations. Ann Rev Resour Econ 4:285–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Z, Yan H, Zhan J (2012) Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Heshui Watershed using Contingent Valuation Method. Proc Environ Sci 13:2445–2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tengberg A, Fredholm S, Eliasson I et al (2012) Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosyst Serv 2:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TYSCGB (2015) Data of tourist flow to Gilgit-Baltistan. Official record data Department of Tourism Youth Affairs Sports & Culture Department Gilgit Baltistan. 25

  • UK-NEA (2010) Economic Values from Ecosystems. In: A technical Report of the United Kingdom-National Ecosystem Assessment. pp 1067–1152

  • Unesco (2004) UNESCO world heritage. Espac. Tour. Loisirs 21–43

  • Watson RT, Zakri AH (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well Being. WHO 1–64

  • Welton KA (2009) World Heritage Sites: A Complete Guide to 868 UNESCO World Heritage Sites

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the respective organizations for providing the data. This study was supported by the ‘GEF, Biodiversity Conservation Project Qinghai’, project number ‘Y55M1200AL’.

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AAS and MX conceived and designed the study; AAS collected data, analysed, and wrote the manuscript. JGR, AA, LS, and SR reviewed, edited, and offered feedback. MX approved for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 123 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shedayi, A.A., Xu, M., Gonalez-Redin, J. et al. Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan’s cultural ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 41834–41848 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17611-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17611-2

Keywords

Navigation