Abstract
The biomasses like post-harvest agricultural residues are usually disposed of as landfills and used as cattle fodder and manure. Large quantities of such wastes are often set to open firing. The open firing of such waste biomasses leads to particulate matter emission and air pollution. Kerala, the second-largest producer of coffee in India, produces around 65,925 metric tonnes of coffee. Almost 30–50% of waste is produced during coffee processing, out of which coffee husk has a significant contribution. The thermochemical process like gasification helps in bio-energy extraction and proper disposal of coffee husk. In the present study, the physico-chemical characteristics of coffee husk are studied in detail to investigate its feasibility as a biomass feedstock for thermochemical applications. The thermal degradation of coffee husk at higher temperatures (up to 1000 °C) is investigated using thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. The higher heating value is determined using a bomb calorimeter and is found to be 19.67 MJ/kg. The selected sample has a volatile matter content of 66.85% and fixed carbon content of 14%. The elemental composition is also determined to identify the presence of inorganic elements in the sample. The presence of inorganic elements like potassium and sodium in the feedstock often leads to defluidization when used in fluidized bed gasifiers. The physical and chemical properties analysed would enable in apt handling and treating coffee husk prior to thermochemical processing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Agu CE, Tokheim LA, Pfeifer C, Moldestad BME (2019) Behaviour of biomass particles in a bubbling fluidized bed: A comparison between wood pellets and wood chips. Chem Eng J 363:84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.120
Ahmed A, Hidayat S, Abu Bakar MS et al (2021) Thermochemical characterisation of Acacia auriculiformis tree parts via proximate, ultimate, TGA, DTG, calorific value and FTIR spectroscopy analyses to evaluate their potential as a biofuel resource. Biofuels 12:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1442663
Ali L, Baloch KA, Palamanit A et al (2021) Physicochemical characterisation and the prospects of biofuel production from rubberwood sawdust and sewage sludge. Sustain 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115942
AlNouss A, McKay G, Al-Ansari T (2020a) Production of syngas via gasification using optimum blends of biomass. J Clean Prod 242:118499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118499
AlNouss A, Parthasarathy P, Shahbaz M et al (2020b) Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS. Appl Energy 261:114350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114350
Basu P (2013) Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory
Bekalo SA, Reinhardt HW (2010) Fibers of coffee husk and hulls for the production of particleboard. Mater Struct Constr 43:1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9565-0
Belgiorno V, De Feo G, Della Rocca C, Napoli RMA (2003) Energy from gasification of solid wastes. Waste Manag 23:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00149-6
Bhatt BP, Todaria NP (1992) Firewood characteristics of some mountain trees and shrubs. Commonw for Rev 71:183–185
Billen P, Creemers B, Costa J et al (2014) Coating and melt induced agglomeration in a poultry litter fired fluidized bed combustor. Biomass Bioenerg 69:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.013
Braga RM, Melo DMA, Aquino FM et al (2014) Characterization and comparative study of pyrolysis kinetics of the rice husk and the elephant grass. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:1915–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3503-7
Brand D, Pandey A, Roussos S, Soccol CR (2000) Biological detoxification of coffee husk by filamentous fungi using a solid state fermentation system. Enzyme Microb Technol 27:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00186-1
Brus E, Öhman M, Nordin A (2005) Mechanisms of bed agglomeration during fluidized-bed combustion of biomass fuels. Energy Fuels 19:825–832. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0400868
Burhenne L, Messmer J, Aicher T, Laborie MP (2013) The effect of the biomass components lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose on TGA and fixed bed pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 101:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.012
Chang D, Song Y (2010) Estimates of biomass burning emissions in tropical Asia based on satellite-derived data. Atmos Chem Phys 10:2335–2351. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2335-2010
Coffee Board of India (2021) Database on coffee
Deka D, Saikia P, Konwer D (2007) Ranking of fuelwood species by fuel value index. Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 29:1499–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030600820476
Dhanavath KN, Shah K, Bhargava SK et al (2018) Oxygen-steam gasification of karanja press seed cake: fixed bed experiments, ASPEN Plus process model development and benchmarking with saw dust, rice husk and sunflower husk. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3061–3069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.046
El-Sayed S (2019) Thermal decomposition, kinetics and combustion parameters determination for two different sizes of rice husk using TGA. Eng Agric Environ Food 12:460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2019.08.002
Elías LG (1979) Chemical composition of coffee-berry by-products. Coffee Pulp Compos Technol Util 11–16
Evaristo RBW, Viana NA, Guimarães MG et al (2020) Evaluation of waste biomass gasification for local community development in central region of Brazil. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00821-y
Ferro L, Gojkovic Z, Funk C (2019) Statistical methods for rapid quantification of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates in nordic microalgal species using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Molecules 2(18):3237. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183237
George J, Arun P, Muraleedharan C (2017) Experimental investigations on air gasification of coffee husk. In: Proceedings of the 24th National and 2nd International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (IHMTC-2017). pp 1433–1437
George J, Arun P, Muraleedharan C (2020) Region-specific biomass feedstock selection for gasification using multi-attribute decision-making techniques. Int J Sustain Eng 14(5):1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1790058
Girotto F, Pivato A, Cossu R et al (2018) The broad spectrum of possibilities for spent coffee grounds valorisation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0621-5
Khalil RA, Mészáros E, Grønli MG et al (2008) Thermal analysis of energy crops. Part I: The applicability of a macro-thermobalance for biomass studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 81:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2007.08.004
Kittivech T, Fukuda S (2020) Investigating agglomeration tendency of co-gasification between high alkali biomass and woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed system. Energies 13(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010056
Larsson A, Kuba M, Berdugo Vilches T et al (2021) Steam gasification of biomass—typical gas quality and operational strategies derived from industrial-scale plants. Fuel Process Technol 212:106609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106609
Liu J, Li R, Guo M et al (2017) Study of the thermal degradation of benzene-containing glycerol carbonate derivatives by a combined TG–FTIR and theoretical calculation. Thermochim Acta 654:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.05.021
Lynch D, Henihan AM, Kwapinski W et al (2013) Ash agglomeration and deposition during combustion of poultry litter in a bubbling fluidized-bed combustor. Energy Fuels 27:4684–4694. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400744u
Malika A, Jacques N, Jaafar EF et al (2016) Pyrolysis investigation of food wastes by TG-MS-DSC technique. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 6:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0171-9
Motta IL, Miranda NT, Maciel Filho R, Wolf Maciel MR (2018) Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: a review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:998–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.042
Müsellim E, Tahir MH, Ahmad MS, Ceylan S (2018) Thermokinetic and TG/DSC-FTIR study of pea waste biomass pyrolysis. Appl Therm Eng 137:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.050
Nascimento FRM, González AM, Silva Lora EE et al (2021) Bench-scale bubbling fluidized bed systems around the world—bed agglomeration and collapse: a comprehensive review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:18740–18766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.036
Natarajan E, Öhman M, Gabra M et al (1998) Experimental determination of bed agglomeration tendencies of some common agricultural residues in fluidized bed combustion and gasification. Biomass Bioenerg 15:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00015-4
Nisamaneenate J, Atong D, Seemen A, Sricharoenchaikul V (2020) Mitigating bed agglomeration in a fluidized bed gasifier operating on rice straw. Energy Rep 6:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.050
Oliveira TJP, Cardoso CR, Ataíde CH (2013) Bubbling fluidization of biomass and sand binary mixtures: minimum fluidization velocity and particle segregation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 72:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2013.06.010
Omosun AO, Bauen A, Brandon NP et al (2004) Modelling system efficiencies and costs of two biomass-fuelled SOFC systems. J Power Sources 131:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.004
Park S, Kim SJ, Oh KC et al (2020) Characteristic analysis of torrefied pellets: determining optimal torrefaction conditions for agri-byproduct. Energies 13(2):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020423
Park SJ, Son SH, Kook JW et al (2021) Gasification operational characteristics of 20-tons-per-day rice husk fluidized-bed reactor. Renew Energy 169:788–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.045
Prakash P, Sheeba KN (2016) Prediction of pyrolysis and gasification characteristics of different biomass from their physico-chemical properties. Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 38:1530–1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2014.953713
Promdee K, Chanvidhwatanakit J, Satitkune S et al (2017) Characterization of carbon materials and differences from activated carbon particle (ACP) and coal briquettes product (CBP) derived from coconut shell via rotary kiln. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1175–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.099
Puig-Gamero M, Pio DT, Tarelho LAC et al (2021) Simulation of biomass gasification in bubbling fluidized bed reactor using aspen plus®. Energy Convers Manag 235:113981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113981
Qian K, Kumar A, Patil K et al (2013) Effects of biomass feedstocks and gasification conditions on the physiochemical properties of char. Energies 6:3972–3986. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6083972
Raheem A, Zhao M, Dastyar W et al (2019) Parametric gasification process of sugarcane bagasse for syngas production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:16234–16247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.127
Rajus S, Bhagavan SG, Kharva H et al (2021) Behavioral ecology of the coffee white stem borer: toward ecology-based pest management of India’s coffee plantations. Front Ecol Evol 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.607555
Ram NK, Singh NR, Raman P et al (2020) Experimental study on performance analysis of an internal combustion engine operated on hydrogen-enriched producer gas from the air–steam gasification. Energy 205:118029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118029
Raveendravarrier B, Palatel A, Chandrasekharan M (2020) Physico-chemical characterization of sewage sludge for thermochemical conversion processes. Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 00:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1841858
Singh J (2018) Paddy and wheat stubble blazing in Haryana and Punjab states of India: a menace for environmental health. Environ Qual Manag 28:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21598
Situmorang YA, Zhao Z, Yoshida A et al (2020) Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (<200 kW class): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 117:109486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109486
Sohni S, Norulaini NAN, Hashim R et al (2018) Physicochemical characterization of Malaysian crop and agro-industrial biomass residues as renewable energy resources. Ind Crops Prod 111:642–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.031
Suraj P, Arun P Muraleedharan C (2020b) Development of a systematic design procedure for circulating fluidized bed gasifier. In: Springer transactions in civil and environmental engineering. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020, pp 71–84
Suraj P, George J, Arun P, Muraleedharan C (2020a) Theoretical and experimental feasibility study of groundnut shell gasification in a fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 10:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00577-0
Tsujiyama SI, Miyamori A (2000) Assignment of DSC thermograms of wood and its components. Thermochim Acta 351:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(00)00429-9
Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG (2010) An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel 89:913–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022
Veiga TRLA, Lima JT, de Dessimoni AL, A, et al (2017) Different plant biomass characterizations for biochar production. Cerne 23:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723042373
Yao X, Hu Y, Ge J, et al (2020a) A comprehensive study on influence of operating parameters on agglomeration of ashes during biomass gasification in a laboratory-scale gasification system. Fuel 276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118083
Yao X, Zhao Z, Li J et al (2020b) Experimental investigation of physicochemical and slagging characteristics of inorganic constituents in ash residues from gasification of different herbaceous biomass. Energy 198:117367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117367
Yin C-Y (2011) Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel 90:1128–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SP has contributed to the main conceptual idea, investigation and full article writing. AP and MC have guided the study and modified the write-up.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Philippe Garrigues.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poyilil, S., Palatel, A. & Chandrasekharan, M. Physico-chemical characterization study of coffee husk for feasibility assessment in fluidized bed gasification process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 51041–51053 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17048-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17048-7