Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spillover effect of greenhouse gas emissions across five major continents

Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are some studies that either examine the convergence or spillover effect of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) at the country or multiple country level but research on the spillover effect of GHGEs is very limited particularly for the agriculture sector across the major continents. Therefore, this study examined the connectedness across the five major continents namely Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania and Americas for the period 1961–2018. To achieve the objective, this study applies a very recent time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) model. The results obtained from TVP-VAR model indicate that all the five continents are highly interconnected in GHGEs. In particular, the findings show that Asia, Africa and Americas are the main transmitters and Europe and Oceania are the main receivers of GHGEs. The findings suggest that Asia, Africa and Americas should use the economic profits received from the economic integration for the environmental protection policies with more attention. This might help for high economic growth and development with a clean environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data and materials availability

Available upon request.

Notes

  1. Detaile rational is provided in the first contribution.

  2. The details of the Kalman filter can be found from the original paper.

  3. The details of limit as k tends to infinity can be found in original paper (Antonakakis et al. 2020).

References

  • Acar S, Lindmark M (2016) Periods of converging carbon dioxide emissions from oil combustion in a Pre-Kyoto context. Environ Dev 19:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram V, Ali J (2021) Global disparities of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture sector: panel club convergence analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14786-6

  • Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Gabauer D (2020) Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time-varying parameter vector autoregressions. J Risk Financ Manag 13(4):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13040084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe FJ, Glynn WJ (1983) Distribution of the Kurtosis statistic B2 for normal samples. Biometrika 70:227–34

  • Antweiler W, Copeland B, Taylor S (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic. Review 91(4):877–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Garzón AJ (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions convergence in Spain: evidence from the club clustering approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:38602–38606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2017) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across US states by sector and fossil fuel source: evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Econ 63(2):365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barassi MR, Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2011) The stochastic convergence of CO2 emissions: a long memory approach. Environ Resour Econ 49(3):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, Davis DL, Cifuentes LA, Krupnick AJ, Morgenstern RD, and Thurston GD. 2008. “Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation” Environ Health 7(41). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-41.

  • Bhattacharya M, Inekwe JN, Sadorsky P (2020) Consumption-based and territory based carbon emissions intensity: determinants and forecasting using club convergence across countries. Energy Econ 86:104632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R (2018) Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:35404–35419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E (2019) Implications of environmental convergence: Continental evidence based on ecological footprint. In: In Energy and environmental strategies in the era of globalization. Springer, Cham, pp 133–165 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA,  Taylor MS (2003) The kindergarten rule of sustainable growth. Working Paper 9597. NBER. Massachusetts

  • Brock WA, Taylor MS (2010) The green Solow model. J Econ Growth 15:127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-010-9051-0

  • Christmann P, Taylor G (2001) Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. J Int Bus Stud 32(3):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill A, Inekwe S, Ivanovski JK (2018) Conditional convergence in per capita carbon emissions since 1900. Appl Energy 228:916–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill AS, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K (2020) Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: evidence from emerging economies, 1921–2014. Energy Econ 86:104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes L, Borja-Aburto VH, Gouveia N, Thurston G, Davis DL (2001) Assessing the health benefits of urban air pollution reductions associated with climate change mitigation (2000-2020): Santiago, So Paulo, Mexico City, and New York City. Environ Health Perspect 109(Supplement 3):419–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L-B, Fan Y, Zhu L, Bi Q-H (2014) How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? Appl Energy 136:1043–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2012) Better to give than to receive: predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2014) On the network topology of variance decompositions: measuring the connectedness of financial firms. J Econ 182:1119–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring globalization – gauging its consequences. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner DW (2000) Bottom feeders. For Policy 122(1):64–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze L, McCarl BA (2004) Should we consider the co-benefits of Agricultural GHG Offsets? Choices Fall:25–26

  • Friedlingstein, P., Andrew, R.M., Rogelj, J., Peters, G., Canadell, J.G., Knutti, R., ... van Vuuren, D.P., 2014. Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Nat Geosci 7 (10), 709–715.

  • Haider S, Akram V (2019a) Club convergence analysis of ecological and carbon footprint: evidence from a cross-country analysis. Carbon Manag 10(5):451–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haider S, Akram V (2019b) Club convergence of per capita carbon emissions: global insight from disaggregated level data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11074–11086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haider S, Akram V, Ali J (2021) Does biomass material footprint converge? Evidence from club convergence analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:27362–27375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12464-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovski K, Churchill SA (2019) Convergence and determinants of greenhouse gas emissions in Australia: a regional analysis. Energy Econ 92:104971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovski K, Awaworyi Churchill S (2020) Convergence and determinants of greenhouse gas emissions in Australia: A regional analysis. Energy Economics 92:104971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104971

  • Ji S, Zhang W, Xu Y, Wang Y, Lv W, Ahmad B, Wang S (2021) Analysis of the spillover effect between CO2 and other pollutants in China. Ecol Indic 129:107988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney J (2010) Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2793–2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberg DK (2009) An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. J Int Econ 78(2):242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khezri M, Karimi MS, Khan YA, Abbas SZ (2021) The spillover of financial development on CO2 emission: a spatial econometric analysis of Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 145:111110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koop G, Pesaran MH, Simon MP (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. J Econ 74:119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le TH, Chang Y, Park D (2016) Trade openness and environmental quality: international evidence. Energy Policy 92:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2008) New evidence on the convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions from panel seemingly unrelated regressions Augmented Dickey Fuller tests. Energy 33(9):1468–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S, Menaldo V, Prakash A (2015) Foreign aid, economic globalization, and pollution. Policy Sci 48(2):181–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Managi S, Kumar S (2009) Trade-induced technological change: analyzing economic and environmental outcomes. Econ Model 26(3):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier JGJ, Peters JAHW (2020) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, 2020, PBL publication number: 4331. https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2020-trends-in-global-co2-and_total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2020-report_4331.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2021

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Econ Lett 58:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios V, Gianmoena L (2018) Convergence in CO2 emissions: a spatial economic analysis with cross-country interactions. Energy Econ 75:222–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie H, Roser M (2019) CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strazicich MC, List JA (2003) Are CO2 emissions levels converging among industrial countries? Environ Resour Econ 24(3) Kluwer Academic Publishers:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022910701857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN (2019) Greenhouse gas emissions due to agriculture. Ref Module Food Sci Encycl Food Secur Sustain 1:196–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Apergis N (2018) Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environ Sci Pol 80:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Kassouri Y, İlkay SÇ, Altıntaş H, Garang APM (2020) Does convergence contribute to reshaping sustainable development policies? Insights from Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecol Indic 112:106140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106140

  • Westerlund J, Basher SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environ Resour Econ 40(1):109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9143-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73(2018):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng C, Stringer LC, Lv T (2021) The spatial spillover effect of fossil fuel energy trade on CO2 emissions. Energy 223:120038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Yang J, Sun Z, Wu F (2017a) Analyzing the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: what can spatial panel regressions tell us? J Clean Prod 161(10):1085–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017b) Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:17616–17625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the valuable suggestions received from the Editor Prof. Ilhan Ozturk and anonymous referees on the earlier draft of this paper which substantially improved the paper. All errors are my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Vaseem Akram has alone written this paper from idea design to finalization of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaseem Akram.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The author declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, V. Spillover effect of greenhouse gas emissions across five major continents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 11634–11643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16535-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16535-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation