Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of government size and digitization in the process of environmental quality is a matter of considerable debate in the field of environmental economics. BRICS economies have suffered from environmental pollution. This paper scrutinizes that how CO2 emissions respond to government size and digitization in BRICS economies. Empirical estimates of the ARDL approach show that government size has a positive impact on CO2 in Brazil, India, and China, while negative impact on CO2 in Russia in the long run. The long-run estimates reveal a negative and significant effect of digitization on CO2 in Brazil, India, and China. Education and e-learning activities have a favorable and crucial role played in environmental quality in Brazil, India, and China. Based on these findings, BRICS authorities should improve the efficiency of government expenditures and invest more in digitization to improve the quality of the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35(12):5412–5420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adewuyi AO (2016) Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:489–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1142–1153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam B, Hu J, Hafeez M, Ma D, AlGarni TS, Saeed M, Abdullah MA, Hussain S (2021) Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO2 emission. Environ Technol Innov 21:101377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Wang B (2019) Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: The BRICS experience. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 51:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106(2):407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck S, Mahony M (2018) The IPCC and the new map of science and politics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 9(6):e547

  • Bernauer T, & Koubi V (2006). States as providers of public goods: how does government size affect environmental quality?. Available at SSRN 900487.

  • Carlsson F, & Lundström S (2001). Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Department of Economics, Goteborg University, Goteborg.

  • Cheikh NB, Zaied YB, Chevallier J (2021) On the nonlinear relationship between energy use and CO2 emissions within an EKC framework: Evidence from panel smooth transition regression in the MENA region. Res Int Bus Financ 55:101331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Ozcan B, Ulucak R (2021) An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses. Nucl Eng Technol 53(6):2056–2065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan MR, Markwardt G (2018) Development and pollution in the Middle East and North Africa: democracy matters. J Policy Model 40(2):350–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fölster S, Henrekson M (2001) Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. Eur Econ Rev 45(8):1501–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederik C, & Lundström S (2001). Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Department of Economics, Göteborg University.

  • Galinato GI, Islam A (2017) The challenge of addressing consumption pollutants with fiscal policy. Environ Dev Econ 22(5):624–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godil DI, Sharif A, Ali MI, Ozturk I, Usman R (2021) The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. J Environ Manag 285:112208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi F, Zabardast MA (2020) Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technol Soc 63:101370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M, Yuan C, Khelfaoui I, Sultan Musaad OA, Waqas Akbar M, Jie L (2019) Evaluating the energy consumption inequalities in the one belt and one road region: implications for the environment. Energies 12(7):1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M, Yuan C, Shah WUH, Mahmood MT, Li X, Iqbal K (2020) Evaluating the relationship among agriculture, energy demand, finance and environmental degradation in one belt and one road economies. Carbon Manag 11(2):139–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkio CS, Rush M (1991) Cointegration: how short is the long run? J Int Money Financ 10(4):571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2016) The effects of fiscal policy on CO2 emissions: evidence from the USA. Energy Policy 88:317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han C, Zhang B, Chen H, Wei Z, Liu Y (2019) Spatially distributed crop model based on remote sensing. Agric Water Manag 218:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Wei Z, Zhang B, Li Y, Du T et al (2021) Crop evapotranspiration prediction by considering dynamic change of crop coefficient and the precipitation effect in back-propagation neural network model. J Hydrol (Amsterdam) 596:126104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhou Y, Wang H, Bolan NS, Jiang R, Tsang DCW (2021) Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution by polyethyleneimine modified straw hydrochar. Sci Total Environ 778:146116–146116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JW (2015) ICT, The Environment, and Climate Change. Int Encycl Digital Commun Soc 76:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam AM, & López RE (2013). Government spending and air pollution in the US (No. 1667-2016-136314).

  • Khan M, Ozturk I (2021) Examining the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO2 emissions for 88 developing countries. J Environ Manag 293:112812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotera G, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation. Econ Model 29(6):2340–2348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecol Econ 176:106760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashkarizadeh M, Salatin P (2012) The Effects of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) on Air Pollution. Elixir Pollut 46:8058–8064

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang F, He Y (2020) Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Battery Swapping Considering Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland) 12(24):10537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez RE, & Palacios A (2010). Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? (No. 1667-2016-136345).

  • López R, Galinato GI, Islam A (2011) Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2):180–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. C. (2018). The Impacts of Information and Communication Technology, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, and Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in 12 Asian Countries. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 1-15.

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

  • Martynenko TS, Vershinina IA (2018) Digital economy: The possibility of sustainable development and overcoming social and environmental inequality in Russia. Revista Espacios 39(44)

  • Murshed M, Nurmakhanova M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R (2020) Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on CO 2 emissions: revisiting the EKC hypothesis for the OPEC using panel spatial estimation techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):38951–38973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murshed M, Alam R, Ansarin A (2021) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Bangladesh: the importance of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and hydropower consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):17208–17227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990

  • OECD (2010). Greener and Smarter: ICTs, The Environment and Climate Change. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at www.oecd.org/ site/stitff/45983022.

  • Olaoye OO, Eluwole OO, Ayesha A, Afolabi OO (2020) Government spending and economic growth in ECOWAS: An asymmetric analysis. J Econ Asymmetries 22:e00180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The Impact of Internet Use on Air Pollution: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(9):3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Salah Uddin G (2012) Causality among carbon emissions, energy consumption and growth in India. Econ Res-Ekonomska istraživanja 25(3):752–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plepys A (2002) The Grey Side of ICT. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22(5):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Liu J, Cheng Z, & Forrest JYL (2021). Does the smart city policy promote the green growth of the urban economy? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-15.

  • Qin L, Raheem S, Murshed M, Miao X, Khan Z, & Kirikkaleli D (2021). Does financial inclusion limit carbon dioxide emissions? Analyzing the role of globalization and renewable electricity output. Sustain Dev.

  • Quan Q, Gao S, Shang Y, Wang B (2021) Assessment of the sustainability of Gymnocypris eckloni habitat under river damming in the source region of the Yellow River. Sci Total Environ 778:146312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PK (2010) The architecture of green economic policies. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

  • Rehman A, Ma H, Ahmad M, Ozturk I, & Işık C (2021a). Estimating the connection of information technology, foreign direct investment, trade, renewable energy and economic progress in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach and cointegrating regression analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-13.

  • Rehman, A., Ma, H., Ozturk, I., Murshed, M., & Dagar, V. (2021b). The dynamic impacts of CO2 emissions from different sources on Pakistan’s economic progress: a roadmap to sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 1-24.

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The Effects of Internet Usage and Economic Growth on CO2 Emissions in OECD Countries: A Panel Investigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1226–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen A, Sheng J, Arshad S, Salam S, Hafeez M (2020a) The Dynamic Linkage between Income, Energy Consumption, Urbanization and Carbon Emissions in Pakistan. Pol J Environ Stud 29(1):267–276. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/95033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen A, Sheng J, Arshad S, Muhammad H, Salam S (2020b) Forecasting the determinants of environmental degradation: a gray modeling approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects:1–21

  • Shvakov EE, Petrova EA (2019) Newest trends and future scenarios for a sustainable digital economy development. In: In Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. Springer, Cham, pp 1378–1385

  • Solow RM (1994) Perspectives on growth theory. J Econ Perspect 8(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su CW, Xie Y, Shahab S, Faisal C, Nadeem M, Hafeez M, Qamri GM (2021) Towards achieving sustainable development: Role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO2 emission for BRICS. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(1):277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sui DZ, Rejeski DW (2002) Environmental impacts of the emerging digital economy: the e-for-environment e-commerce? Environ Manag 29(2):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Raza S, Jie L, Liu X (2020) Does regional energy consumption disparities assist to control environmental degradation in OBOR: an entropy approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7105–7119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Apergis N, Usman A, Chishti MZ (2020a) Asymmetric effects of inflation instability and GDP growth volatility on environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Ullah S, Ozturk I, Sohail S (2020b) The asymmetric effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on Pakistan’s environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12

  • Usman A, Ozturk I, Hassan A, Zafar SM, Ullah S (2021) The effect of ICT on energy consumption and economic growth in South Asian economies: an empirical analysis. Telematics Inform 58:101537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, J., & Jordan, A. (2003). Governance and the environment. Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 137-58.

  • Wu Y, Luo C, Luo L (2021) The impact of the development of the digital economy on Sulfur Dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence based on provincial panel data. J Wuhan Polytech 20:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuelan P, Akbar MW, Hafeez M, Ahmad M, Zia Z, Ullah S (2019) The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(28):28919–28932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The Impact of ICT Industry on CO2 Emissions: A Regional Analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Xu D, Liu Y, Li F, Cai J et al (2016) Multi-scale evapotranspiration of summer maize and the controlling meteorological factors in north China. Agric For Meteorol 216:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wang M, Tang Y, Ding Q, Wanga C, Huang X,... Yan F (2021). Angular Velocity Measurement with Improved Scale Factor Based on a Wideband-tunable Optoelectronic Oscillator. IEEE Trans Instrum Measur 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3067183

  • Zimmerman R (2005) Mass transit infrastructure and urban health. J Urban Health 82(1):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    Lijuan Chen

Authors
  1. Lijuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This idea was given by Lijuan Chen. Lijuan Chen has conducted data analysis, and written the complete paper and read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijuan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L. How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 457–467 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation