Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The non-linear influence of trade, foreign direct investment, financial development, energy supply and human capital on carbon emissions in the BRICS

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigates the relationship between foreign direct investment, domestic credit to the private sector, energy supply and human capital on carbon emissions subject to the level of trade. In the interest of capturing this non-linear association, this paper utilises the fixed effect panel threshold model. Thus, deploying a panel dataset of BRICS economies from 2000 to 2018, the study produces important findings that trade exerts a considerable non-linear influence on environmental quality. In this context, the paper determines specific threshold levels upon which environmental quality either increase or decrease for the BRICS economies when either energy supply (1.5962, approximately $US 4.934 million), domestic credit to the private sector (1.6375, about $US 5.142 million), foreign direct investment (1.6375, about $US5.142 million) or human capital (1.6375, about $US5.142 million) increases. To ascertain the causation of included parameters, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality test results are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Econ 83:156–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad A, Zhao Y, Shahbaz M, Bano S, Zhang Z, Wang S, Liu Y (2016) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy. Energy Policy 96:131–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U, Sab CNBC (2012) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic and financial development in 19 selected countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(7):4365–4369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin L (2016) Intra-BRICS trade opening and its implications for carbon emissions: a general equilibrium approach. J Econ Dev Stud 4(2):207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin C, Esen Ö (2018) Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: do environmental taxes work? J Environ Plg Manage 61(13):2396–2420

    Google Scholar 

  • Aye GC, Edoja PE (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ Financ 5(1):1379239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bano S, Zhao Y, Ahmad A, Wang S, Liu Y (2018) Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 183:1082–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baz K, Xu D, Ali H, Ali I, Khan I, Khan MM, Cheng J (2020) Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Sci Total Environ 718:137364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belucio M, Lopes C, Fuinhas JA, Marques AC (2019) Energy–growth nexus, domestic credit, and environmental sustainability: a panel causality analysis. In: The Extended Energy-Growth Nexus. Academic Press 173-197

  • Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAIT (2017) CAIT climate data explorer. Washington DC: World Resources Institute

  • Cheikh NB, Zaied YB, Chevallier J (2021) On the nonlinear relationship between energy use and CO2 emissions within an EKC framework: evidence from panel smooth transition regression in the MENA region. Res Int Bus Financ 55:101331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z, Yan C (2019) Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission-evidence from the BRIICS. Sci Total Environ 668:1328–1338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Yang J, Guo H, Sun H (2021) Tracing CO2 emissions in China-US trade: a global value chain perspective. Sci Total Environ 775:145701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du WC, Xia XH (2018) How does urbanization affect GHG emissions? A cross-country panel threshold data analysis. Appl Energy 229:872–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du K, Yu Y, Li J (2020) Does international trade promote CO2 emission performance? An empirical analysis based on a partially linear functional-coefficient panel data model. Energy Econ 92:104983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganda F (2018) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Zimbabwe: investigating the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve within a developing economy context. Int J Sustain Econ 10(3):226–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganda F (2019) The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(7):6758–6772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganda F (2021) The influence of growth determinants on environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa states. Environ Dev Sustain 23(5):7117–7139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom 37:424–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliru AM, Loganathan N, Hassan AAG, Mardani A, Kamyab H (2020) Re-examining the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the Economic Community of West African States: a panel quantile regression approach. J Clean Prod 276:124247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanif I, Raza SMF, Gago-de-Santos P, Abbas Q (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (2017) Regression kink with an unknown threshold. J Bus Econ Stat 35(2):228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2021) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan ST, Baloch MA, Tarar ZH (2020) Is nuclear energy a better alternative for mitigating CO2 emissions in BRICS countries? An empirical analysis. Nucl Eng Technol 52(12):2969–2974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (1996) IPCC Second Assessment on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Centre (2017) BRICS countries: emerging players in global services trade, ITC, Geneva

  • Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty-eight countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton J (2020) BRICS Climate Governance in 2020. http://wwwbricsutorontoca/biblio/Kirton_BRICS_Climate_Governance_2020html Accessed 12 May 2021

  • Kozul-Wright R, Fortunato P (2012) International trade and carbon emissions. Eur J Dev Res 24(4):509–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Wei W (2021) Financial development, openness, innovation, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Energy Econ 97:105194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Li Z (2020) Is more use of electricity leading to less carbon emission growth? An analysis with a panel threshold model. Energy Policy 137:111121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Butkus M (2019) Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions. Renew Energy 132:1310–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez L, Weber S (2017) Testing for Granger causality in panel data. Stata J 17(4):972–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q, Fang K, Heijungs R, Feng K, Li J, Wen Q, Li Y, Huang X (2020) Imbalance and drivers of carbon emissions embodied in trade along the Belt and Road Initiative. Appl Energy 280:115934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik MK, Villanthenkodath MA, Mallick H, Gupta M (2021) Assessing the effectiveness of total foreign aid and foreign energy aid inflows on environmental quality in India. Energy Policy 149:112015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Financial development and ecological footprint: a global panel data analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(2):487–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryam J, Mittal A, Sharma V (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRICS: an empirical analysis. J Human Soc Sci 22(2):53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1233–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosikari TJ, Eita JH (2020) CO2 emissions, urban population, energy consumption and economic growth in selected African countries: a panel smooth transition regression (PSTR). OPEC Energy Rev 44(3):319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhlis M (2020) The causality between human capital, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Indonesia. Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia (June 13, 2020)

  • Munksgaard J, Pade LL, Minx J, Lenzen M (2005) Influence of trade on national CO2 emissions. Int J Glob Energy Issues 23(4):24–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Shao Q, Zhu X, He Q, Xiang C, Wei G (2019) Environmental regulation, economic growth and air pollution: panel threshold analysis for OECD countries. Sci Total Environ 657:234–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman ZU, Ahmad M (2019) Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO2 (a) symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: an empirical analysis through NARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(8):8111–8124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Kashem MA (2017) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL co-integration and Granger causality analysis. Energy Policy 110:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Nepal R, Alam K (2021) Impacts of human capital, exports, economic growth and energy consumption on CO2 emissions of a cross-sectionally dependent panel: Evidence from the newly industrialized countries (NICs). Environ Sci Pol 121:24–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A (2019) Foreign direct Investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod 217:603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheraz M, Deyi X, Ahmed J, Ullah S, Ullah A (2021) Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–19

  • Sirag A, Matemilola BT, Law SH, Bany-Ariffin AN (2018) Does environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? Evidence from dynamic panel threshold. J Environ Econ Policy 7(2):145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu E, Altinoz B, Aslan A (2020) Global evidence from the link between economic growth, natural resources, energy consumption, and gross capital formation. Res Policy 66:101622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah I, Rehman A, Khan FU, Shah MH, Khan F (2020) Nexus between trade, CO2 emissions, renewable energy, and health expenditure in Pakistan. Int J Health Plann Manag 35(4):818–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo DH, Nguyen NT, Vo AT, Ho CM, Nguyen TC (2021) Does the Kuznets curve apply for financial development and environmental degradation in the Asia-Pacific region? Heliyon 7(4):e06708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q (2015) Fixed-effect panel threshold model using Stata. Stata J 15(1):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Shao Q (2019) Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: evidence from panel threshold regression. Sci Total Environ 660:1346–1354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Van Fan Y, Jiang P, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ (2021) Virtual water and CO2 emission footprints embodied in power trade: EU-27. Energy Policy 155:112348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2021) GNI per capita, Atlas Method https://dataworldbankorg/indicator/NYGNPPCAPCD Accessed 01 March 2021

  • Wu H, Xu L, Ren S, Hao Y, Yan G (2020a) How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model. Res Policy 67:101678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Ren S, Yan G, Hao Y (2020b) Does China’s outward direct investment improve green total factor productivity in the “Belt and Road” countries? Evidence from dynamic threshold panel model analysis. J Environ Manag 275:111295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Q, Wang X, Cong X (2020) How does foreign direct investment affect CO2 emissions in emerging countries? New findings from a nonlinear panel analysis. J Clean Prod 249:119422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Zhao G, Xie R, Zhu K (2020) A trade-related CO2 emissions and its composition: Evidence from China. J Environ Manag 270:110893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakarya GY, Mostefa BE, Abbes SM, Seghir GM (2015) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries: a panel data analysis. Procedia Econ Finance 26:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou A, Li J (2020) The nonlinear impact of industrial restructuring on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: a panel threshold regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–16

  • Zubair AO, Samad ARA, Dankumo AM (2020) Does gross domestic income, trade integration, FDI inflows, GDP, and capital reduces CO2 emissions? An empirical evidence from Nigeria. Curr Res Environ Sustain 2:100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ganda Fortune conceptualised the paper, investigated and provided all resources, performed the research methodology, implemented formal data analysis, wrote the full paper, and reviewed and undertook editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fortune Ganda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
figure 1

Likelihood ratio function graph for regression 7.1

Fig. 2
figure 2

Likelihood ratio function graph for regression 7.2

Fig. 3
figure 3

Likelihood ratio function graph for regression 7.3

Fig. 4
figure 4

Likelihood ratio function graph for regression 7.4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganda, F. The non-linear influence of trade, foreign direct investment, financial development, energy supply and human capital on carbon emissions in the BRICS. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 57825–57841 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14704-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14704-w

Keywords

Navigation