Abstract
Petroleum sludge is produced during oilfield development and production and can negatively impact the production area and surrounding environment. With increasing attention to the environmental protection of oilfields, finding an energy-efficient, environmentally sound, cost-effective and socially acceptable sludge treatment method is crucial to the sustainable development of oil companies. However, there are several problems in the selection process: ① there is no effective index system for the evaluation of treatment technologies; ② there is data uncertainty and loss of information; ③ experts in the field often make one-sided decisions; and ④ the common decision models fail to balance the general effect and local dominance of a treatment technology. This study is innovative in the following aspects: ① a decision index system of petroleum sludge treatment technology is established; ② the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set effectively managed data uncertainty and loss of information; ③ the redundancy-based expert weighting method is used to avoid one-sided decisions; and ④ using the basic ideas of the VIKOR model to balance the general effect and local dominance of a technology. Example verification proved the effectiveness of this method and a sensitivity analysis showed the results were reliable. Finally, this study compared the results obtained by three other similar methods, and comparative analysis demonstrated that this approach effectively evaluated and selected petroleum sludge treatment technologies. This study improves the rationality of petroleum sludge treatment technology selection and provides a necessary reference for the selection of treatment technology for other petroleum pollutants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data are available from the Internet, as well as interviews with experts.
References
Abdulredha MM, Aslina HS, Luqman CA (2020) Overview on petroleum emulsions, formation, influence and demulsification treatment techniques. Arab J Chem 13:3403–3428
Achillas C, Vlachokostas C, Moussiopoulos N, Banias G, Kafetzopoulos G, Karagiannidis A (2011) Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:857–863
Antonopoulos I-S, Perkoulidis G, Logothetis D, Karkanias C (2014) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:149–159
Arıkan E, Şimşit-Kalender ZT, Vayvay Ö (2017) Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey. J Clean Prod 142:403–412
Biswas A, Sarkar B (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision-making with unknown weight information through entropy measure. Int J Intell Syst 34:1108–1128
Büyüközkan G, Güleryüz S (2016) An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. Int J Prod Econ 182:435–448
Chang J-P, Chen Z-S, Xiong S-H, Zhang J, Chin K-S (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making: a consolidated model with application to emergency plan selection. IEEE Access 7:41958–41980
Chen T-Y (2018) Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Information Fusion 41:129–150
Chen X, Lin J, Li X, Ma Z (2020) A novel framework for selecting sustainable healthcare waste treatment technologies under Z-number environment. J Oper Res Soc:1–14
Chu Z, Fan X, Wang W, Huang W-c (2019) Quantitative evaluation of heavy metals' pollution hazards and estimation of heavy metals' environmental costs in leachate during food waste composting. Waste Manag 84:119–128
Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167
Durdevic D, Trstenjak M, Hulenic I, (2020). Sewage sludge thermal treatment technology selection by utilizing the analytical hierarchy process. Water 12.
Estay-Ossandon C, Mena-Nieto A, Harsch N (2018) Using a fuzzy TOPSIS-based scenario analysis to improve municipal solid waste planning and forecasting: a case study of Canary archipelago (1999–2030). J Clean Prod 176:1198–1212
Feyzi S, Khanmohammadi M, Abedinzadeh N, Aalipour M (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis FANP based on GIS for siting municipal solid waste incineration power plant in the north of Iran. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101513
Garg H (2016) A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31:529–540
Geetha S, Narayanamoorthy S, Kang D, Kureethara JV (2019) A novel assessment of healthcare waste disposal methods: intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy MULTIMOORA decision making approach. IEEE Access 7:130283–130299
Hinduja A, Pandey M (2018) Assessment of healthcare waste treatment alternatives using an integrated decision support framework. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 12:318–333
Hu G, Li J, Zhang X, Li Y (2017) Investigation of waste biomass co-pyrolysis with petroleum sludge using a response surface methodology. J Environ Manag 192:234–242
Ilangkumaran M, Sasirekha V, Anojkumar L, Sakthivel G, Raja MB, Raj TRS, Siddhartha CNS, Nizamuddin P, Kumar SP (2013) Optimization of wastewater treatment technology selection using hybrid MCDM. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 24:619–641
Jean DS, Lee DJ (1999) Expression deliquoring of oily sludge from a petroleum refinery plant. Waste Manag 19:349–354
Jeddi MK, Laitinen O, Liimatainen H, (2019). Magnetic superabsorbents based on nanocellulose aerobeads for selective removal of oils and organic solvents. Materials & Design 183.
Ju Y, Liang Y, Luis M, Santibanez Gonzalez EDR, Giannakis M, Dong P, Wang A (2020) A new framework for health-care waste disposal alternative selection under multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment environment. Comput Ind Eng 145:106489
Kahraman C, Öztayşi B, Sarı İU, Turanoğlu E (2014) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl-Based Syst 59:48–57
Khan MSA, Abdullah S (2018) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy GRA method for multiple-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Int J Intell Syst 33:1689–1716
Kharat MG, Murthy S, Kamble SJ, Raut RD, Kamble SS, Kharat MG (2019) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Technol Soc 57:20–29
Koksalmis E, Kabak Ö (2019) Deriving decision makers’ weights in group decision making: an overview of objective methods. Information Fusion 49:146–160
Liu H-C, You J-X, Lu C, Shan M-M (2014) Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection. Waste Manag 34:2355–2364
Liu H-C, You J-X, Lu C, Chen Y-Z (2015) Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:932–942
Lu C, You J-X, Liu H-C, Li P (2016) Health-care waste treatment technology selection using the interval 2-tuple induced TOPSIS method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:562
Lu J-W, Xie Y, Xu B, Huang Y, Hai J, Zhang J (2019) From NIMBY to BIMBY: an evaluation of aesthetic appearance and social sustainability of MSW incineration plants in China. Waste Manag 95:325–333
Mao F, Han X, Huang Q, Yan J, Chi Y (2016) Effect of frequency on ultrasound-assisted centrifugal dewatering of petroleum sludge. Dry Technol 34:1948–1956
Meng F, Chen X (2015) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making based on cross entropy and 2-additive measures. Soft Comput 19:2071–2082
Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, pp 302
Oyoo R, Leemans R, Mol AP (2013) The determination of an optimal waste management scenario for Kampala, Uganda. Waste Manag Res 31:1203–1216
Özdemir A, Özkan A, Günkaya Z, Banar M (2020) Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12
Peng Y-b (2017) Environmentally friendly treatment of hardly soluble cyanides discharged from electroplating. Electroplating & Finishing 36:260–264
Peng X, Li W (2019) Algorithms for interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. Ieee Access 7:7419–7441
Peng X, Yang Y (2016) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31:444–487
Ramirez D, Collins CD (2018) Maximisation of oil recovery from an oil-water separator sludge: influence of type, concentration, and application ratio of surfactants. Waste Manag 82:100–110
Shannon CE (2001) A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5:3–55
Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh MJ (2011) A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl 38:12160–12167
Shi H, Liu H-C, Li P, Xu X-G (2017) An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder. Waste Manag 59:508–517
Song F, Lv D, Que J, Liu Z, Zhao S, Wang S, Liu Y, Liu X, Wu H, Duan H (2015) Analysis on the main safety problems of treatment systems of high level liquid wastes and organic solvent wastes in nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. Nucl Sci Eng 35:320–327
Wu Y, Qin L, Xu C, Ji S, (2018). Site selection of Waste-to-Energy (WtE) plant considering public satisfaction by an extended VIKOR method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018.
Xiao F (2018) A novel multi-criteria decision making method for assessing health-care waste treatment technologies based on D numbers. Eng Appl Artif Intell 71:216–225
Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:958–965
Yap H, Nixon J (2015) A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK. Waste Manag 46:265–277
Yu C, Shao Y, Wang K, Zhang L (2019) A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 121:1–17
Zhang W, Zhi H, Sun H (2020) Effects of heavy metal pollution on fitness and swimming performance of Bufo raddei Tadpole. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 105:387–392
Zolfaghari R, Fakhru’l-Razi A, Abdullah LC, Elnashaie SS, Pendashteh A (2016) Demulsification techniques of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry. Sep Purif Technol 170:377–407
Funding
This study was funded by doctoral foundation of Shandong Jianzhu University (X19003S).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Geng Shuai contributed to the conception of the study;Huang Peng contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation;Wu Weidong performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval will be sought through the Research Ethics Boards of Shandong Jianzhu University and Southwest Petroleum University. All stakeholders will be consulted for consent to participate and publish.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data and thus no consent for publication is required.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, W., Huang, P. & Geng, S. Application of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approach for petroleum sludge treatment technology evaluation and selection. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 50890–50907 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14225-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14225-6