Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With rapid economic growth, BRICS is facing enormous burdens of carbon emission and severe issues of income inequality. However, behind this economic success, the BRICS economies also face few thoughtful challenges to improve environmental quality by catching up the sustainable development goals. Consequently, the existing empirical research is concerned with the dynamic links between income inequality and CO2 emissions by using the novel nonlinear ARDL approach, but small attention has been paid to the BRICS in literature. Therefore, we observed that a negative and positive change in income inequality has positive effect on CO2 emissions in Russia and South Africa in the long run, although a positive change in income inequality has positive effects on CO2 emissions in Brazil, Russia, and China, while a negative change in income inequality has negative effect on CO2 emissions in India, Brazil, and Russia in the short run. Hence, the findings value specific attention from policymakers in BRICS economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aslam B, Hu J, Majeed MT, Andlib Z, Ullah S (2021) Asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of CO 2 emission in China and policy approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Baek J, Gweisah G (2013) Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy 62:1434–1437

  • Baloch MA, Khan SUD, Ulucak ZŞ, Ahmad A (2020) Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 740:139867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berthe A, Elie L (2015) Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecol Econ 116:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Park Y (2005) Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? Econ J 115(507):F397–F412

  • Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11(3):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JK (2003) Inequality and environmental protection, Working Paper No. 52. Political Economy Research Institute. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

  • Cantore N, Padilla E (2010) Equality and CO2 emissions distribution in climate change integrated assessment modelling. Energy 5(1):298–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Zhang W, Liu S, Huang B, Huang W (2019). Pareto law-based regional inequality analysis of PM2. 5 air pollution and economic development in China. J Environ Manage 252:109635

  • Chao A, Schor JB (1998) Empirical tests of status consumption: evidence from women's cosmetics. J Econ Psychol 19(1):107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Xu X (2020) Effect evaluation of the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system on the health care of the elderly: a review. J Multidiscip Healthc 13:863–875. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S270454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Zhang X, Xu X (2020) Health insurance and long-term care services for the disabled elderly in China: based on CHARLS Data. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 13:155–162. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S233949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65(2):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir C, Cergibozan R, Gök A (2019) Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Energy & Environment 30(3):444–461

  • Dhrifi A, Jaziri R, Alnahdi S (2020) Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 52:13–21

  • Doğan N, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Does gender equality in education matter for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Drabo A (2011) Impact of income inequality on health: does environment quality matter? Environ Plan A 43(1):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeocha DO (2021) Urbanization, inequality, economic development and ecological footprint: Searching for turning points and regional homogeneity in Africa. J Clean Prod 291:125244

  • Feng W, Lu H, Yao T, Yu Q (2020) Drought characteristics and its elevation dependence in the Qinghai–Tibet plateau during the last half-century. Sci Rep 10(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71295-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald JB, Jorgenson AK, Clark B (2015) Energy consumption and working hours: a longitudinal study of developed and developing nations, 1990–2008. Environ Sociol 1(3):213–223

  • Galor O, Moav O, Vollrath D (2004) Land inequality and the origin of divergence and overtaking in the growth process: theory and evidence. Economics Working Paper No. 2003-04, Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.378161

  • Gassebner M, Gaston N, Lamla MJ (2008) Relief for the environment? The importance of an increasingly unimportant industrial sector. Econ Inq 46(2):160–178

  • Golley J, Meng X (2012) Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Chinese urban households. Energy Econ 34(6):1864–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerink N, Mulatu A, Bulte E (2001) Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 38(3):359–367

  • Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(10):9579–9592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M, Yuan C, Yuan Q, Zhuo Z, Stromaier D (2019) A global prospective of environmental degradations: economy and finance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(25):25898–25915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China's provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Shen J, Zhang Y (2018) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. J Environ Manag 206:1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran M, Khan KB, Zaman K, Musah MB, Sudiapermana E, Aziz ARA et al (2021) Achieving pro-poor growth and environmental sustainability agenda through information technologies: as right as rain. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–16

  • Ivins C (2013) Inequality matters: BRICS inequalities fact sheet. BRICS Policy Center, Rio de Janeiro

  • Jin G, Fu R, Li Z, Wu F, Zhang F (2018) CO2 emissions and poverty alleviation in China: an empirical study based on municipal panel data. J Clean Prod 202:883–891

  • Jorgenson A, Schor J, Huang X (2017) Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997–2012. Ecol Econ 134:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasuga H, Takaya M (2017) Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. J Clean Prod 142:3689–3701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M (2019) Does macroeconomic instability cause environmental pollution? The case of Pakistan economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14649–14659

  • Li Y, Peng H, Hafeez M, Ahmad H (2020) Assessment of energy disparity and financial development nexus in environmental Kuznets curve framework. In: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Springer, Cham, pp 613–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yu Z, Salman A, Ali Q, Hafeez M, Aslam MS (2021a) The role of financial development indicators in sustainable development-environmental degradation nexus. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12

  • Li Y, Wang S, Xu T, Li J, Zhang Y, Xu T, Yang J (2021b) Novel designs for the reliability and safety of supercritical water oxidation process for sludge treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot 149:385–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu Y, Wang X (2019) An environmental assessment model of construction and demolition waste based on system dynamics: a case study in Guangzhou. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:37237–37259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07107-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper SA, Hillemeier M, Ross N, Kaplan GA, Wolfson M (2004) Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. Milbank Q 82(1):5–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani E (2000) The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecol Econ 32(3):431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik MK, Mallick H, Padhan H, Sahoo B (2018) Is skewed income distribution good for environmental quality? A comparative analysis among selected BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):23170–23194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick H, Padhan H, Mahalik MK (2019) Does skewed pattern of income distribution matter for the environmental quality? Evidence from selected BRICS economies with an application of Quantile-on-Quantile regression (QQR) approach. Energy Policy 129:120–131

  • Nicole W (2014) Cooking up indoor air pollution: Emissions from natural gas stoves. Environ Health Perspec 122(1):A27

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326

  • Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequalityOxf. Econ Pap 52(4):651–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Vallejos J, Lastuka A (2020) The income inequality and carbon emissions trade-off revisited. Energy Policy 139:111302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehrawat M (2020) Modelling the nexus between human capital, income inequality, and energy demand in India: new evidences from asymmetric and non-linear analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(3):3632–3643

  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314

  • Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin MM, Mishra V, Smyth R (2020) Income inequality and CO2 emissions in the G7, 1870–2014: Evidence from non-parametric modelling. Energy Econ 88:104780

  • Ullah S, Ozturk I, Sohail S (2021) The asymmetric effects of fiscal and monetary policy instruments on Pakistan’s environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):7450–7461

  • Usman A, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Chishti MZ, Zafar SM (2020) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):20736–20747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Xie Z (2020) Identifying the impacts of income inequality on CO2 emissions: empirical evidences from OECD countries and non-OECD countries. J Clean Prod 277:123858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Chen L (2019) Projection of long-term care costs in China, 2020–2050, based on the Bayesian quantile regression method. Sustainability 11(13):3530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Li Z, Yan K, Zhang X, Xu Z, Liu W, Liu Z, Liu H (2021) Removing and recycling mercury from scrubbing solution produced in wet nonferrous metal smelting flue gas purification process. J Environ Sci (China) 103:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Wang Z, Shi Y, Hao J (2021) A dissipative structure theory-based investigation of a construction and demolition waste minimization system in China. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1889484

  • Zhang J, Zhang Y (2021) The relationship between China’s income inequality and transport infrastructure, economic growth, and carbon emissions. Growth Chang 52(1):243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhao W (2014) Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Appl Energy 136:382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Xia H, Guo Y, Peng C (2018) The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO 2 emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(17):17176–17193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020) World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington DC

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This idea was given by Weijun Zhao. Muhammad Hafeez, Sana Ullah, and Adnan Maqbool analyzed the data and wrote the complete paper. Sidra Sohail read and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weijun Zhao or Sidra Sohail.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, W., Hafeez, M., Maqbool, A. et al. Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 51199–51209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6

Keywords

Navigation