Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study of the allocation of energy consumption permits among the regions of China based on clustering analysis and cuckoo search

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy sources are power force of society and economy to develop. In recent years, extensive energy consumption patterns have threatened China’s economic development step by step and made China’s economic growth encounter unprecedented “bottlenecks.” Therefore, this paper introduce a novel energy allocation scheme including cluster analysis and weighted voting allocation model to limit energy consumption in each region of China. The entire quota allocation process is divided into two parts by the proposed allocation scheme. In the first part, 30 regions in China are grouped into four classes through energy conservation pressure, capacity, responsibility, potential, and effectiveness. And, the total energy consumption is quoted to various classes. In the second part, the total energy consumption of each class is allocated to the corresponding regions. The weighted voting model runs through two-tier allocation schemes, and the allocation schemes based on historical energy consumption, GDP, and population are selected by each class and each region based on the voting rights. The voting rights are quantified by multi-index comprehensive evaluation model, which adopts entropy weight method in the first part owing to inexperience and cuckoo search algorithm (CS) in the second part to choose better weights. The combination of entropy weight method and CS can increase the flexibility of reducing energy consumption policy while maintaining impartiality in decision process. According to the proposed allocation scheme, case study of the allocation for energy consumption in China by 2020 is performed. The allocation results indicate that the proposed allocation scheme improves the fairness and effectiveness to a certain extent, which is superior to the allocation scheme based on historical energy consumption, GDP, and population. We also compare with the state-of-the-art algorithm and prove that our algorithm is more fair and effective. In addition, the proposed distribution scheme can stimulate all regions to cut down energy intensity in the case of meeting the energy consumption needs of each region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

China Statistical Yearbook.

References

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2016). China energy statistical yearbook 2006-2016. China Statistical Press.

  • Bai H, Zhang Y, Wang H, Huang Y, Xu H (2014) A hybrid method for provincial scale energy-related carbon emission allocation in China. Environ Sci Technol 48(5):2541–2550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Wu Z, & He J. (2005). Two-convergece approach for future global carbon permit allocation. J Tsinghua Univ (Science and Technology), 6.

  • Clarke-Sather A, Qu J, Wang Q, Zeng J, Li Y (2011) Carbon inequality at the sub-national scale: a case study of provincial-level inequality in CO2 emissions in China 1997–2007. Energy Policy 39(9):5420–5428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S (2009) Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy 37(11):4208–4219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M and Gambardella LM. 1996. “A study of some properties of Ant-Q.” In: Proc of the 44th Int'l Conf on Parallet Problem Solving from Nature. pp. 656-665.

  • Elsevier Science B (1999) Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom. Energy Econ 23(4):371–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Z, Tang W, Niu Z, Wu Q (2018) Bi-level allocation of carbon emission permits based on clustering analysis and weighted voting: a case study in China. Appl Energy 228:1122–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzén LG, Lindberg F, Viklander V, Walther A (2012) The potential peatland extent and carbon sink in Sweden, as related to the peatland/ice age hypothesis. Mires Peat 10(08)

  • Guerrero M, Castillo O, and García Valdez M. (2015). “Cuckoo search via Lévy flights and a comparison with genetic algorithms.” Fuzzy logic augmentation of nature-inspired optimization metaheuristics, vol. 574, pp. 91-103.

  • Guo R, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Li F, Hu J, Yang H (2017) Low carbon development and local sustainability from a carbon balance perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. J R Stat Soc 28(1):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Xue F, Song X (2013) Simulation analysis on policy interaction effects between emission trading and renewable energy subsidy. J Modern Power Syst Clean Energy 1(2):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Cao X, Li T (2012) The spatio-temporal variations of urban private car ownership in China and their influencing factors. Acta Geograph Sin 67:745–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney J and Eberhart R. (1995). “Particle swarm optimization.” In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Neural Networks.

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnand KN and Ghose D. 2005. “Detection of multiple source location using a glowworm metaphor with applications to collective robotics.” In: Proc of IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. pp. 84-91.

  • Li M-J, Song C-X, Tao W-Q (2016) A hybrid model for explaining the short-term dynamics of energy effectiveness of China’s thermal power plants. Appl Energy 169:738–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz B (2000) International equity in climate change policy. Integr Assess 1(2):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min Y, An Q, Tao D, Yin P, Liang L (2017) Carbon emission allocation in China based on gradually effectiveness improvement and emission reduction planning principle. Ann Oper Res 278:123–139 (1): 1-17

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). (2017). 13th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development. Available online: http://huanbao.bjx.com.cn/news/20170117/804064-3.shtml.

  • Pan X, Teng F, Wang G (2014b) A comparison of carbon allocation schemes: On the equity-effectiveness tradeoff. Energy 74:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Teng F, Wang G (2014c) Sharing emission space at an equitable basis: allocation scheme based on the equal cumulative emission per capita principle. Appl Energy 113:1810–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Teng F, Ha Y, Wang G (2014a) Equitable access to sustainable development: based on the comparative study of carbon emission rights allocation schemes. Appl Energy 130:632–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang R-Z, Deng Z-Q, Chiu Y-H (2015) Pareto improvement through a reallocation of carbon emission quotas. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:419–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park J-W, Kim CU, Isard W (2012) Permit allocation in emissions trading using the Boltzmann distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391(20):4883–4890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlyukevich I (2007a) Cooling down Lévy flights. J Phys A Math Theor 40:12299–12313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlyukevich I (2007b) Lévy flights, non-local search and simulated annealing. Computational Physics 226:1830–1844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Q, Liu Y, Li X, Li H (2017) A multi-criteria decision analysis model for carbon emission quota allocation in China’s east coastal areas: effectiveness and equity. J Clean Prod 168:410–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Zhang ZX (2004) Interregional burden-sharing of greenhouse gas mitigation in the United States. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 9(4):477–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Z, Tong Q, Yu S, Wang Y, Chai Q, Zhang X (2012) Role of non-fossil energy in meeting China’s energy and climate target for 2020. Energy Policy 51(C):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuai C, Shen L, Jiao L, Wu Y, Tan Y (2017) Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011. Appl Energy 187:310–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Plattner GK, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1704–1709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan W, Xu W, Yu G, Jiang C, Xiong F, Lei LI, Yan Z (2017) Initial allocation of carbon emission permits in power systems. J Modern Power Syst Clean Energy 5(2):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RS (2005) The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33(16):2064–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Dai H-C, Ren S-Y, Zhao D-Q, Masui T (2015a) Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China. Energy 79(79):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang AD, Tan W, France N (2015b) The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises. Energy Policy 86(1):176–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell E, Price L, Martin N, Hendriks C, Meida LO (2001) Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annu Rev Energy Environ 26(1):303–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Zhang H (2019) Research on optimization allocation scheme of initial carbon emission quota from the perspective of welfare effect. Energies 12(11):2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia XH, Huang GT, Chen GQ, Zhang B, Chen ZM, Yang Q (2011) Energy security, effectiveness and carbon emission of Chinese industry. Energy Policy 39(6):3520–3528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xian Y, Wang K, Wei Y-M, Huang Z (2019) Would China’s power industry benefit from nationwide carbon emission permit trading? An optimization model-based ex post analysis on abatement cost savings. Appl Energy 235:978–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS and Deb S. 2009. “Cuckoo search via Lévy flights.” In: World congress on Nature & biologically inspired computing. pp. 210–214.

  • Yi WJ, Zou L-L, Guo J, Wang K, Wei Y-M (2011) How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development. Energy Policy 39(5):2407–2415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ying K, Dong-Shan (2016) A carbon-intensity based carbon allowance allocation scheme among enterprises in Shenzhen. Ecol Econ 1:2–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Wei Y-M, Wang K (2014) Provincial allocation of carbon emission reduction targets in China: an approach based on improved fuzzy cluster and Shapley value decomposition. Energy Policy 66(7):630–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J, Hao J-F (2017) Carbon emission quota allocation among China’s industrial sectors based on the equity and effectiveness principles. Ann Oper Res 255(1-2):117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J, Wang A-D, Da Y-B (2014) Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: evidence from the Shapley value method. Energy Policy 74(C):454–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Wang M (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: a review. Ecol Econ 125:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Guan X, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Zhou M (2017) Allocation and simulation study of carbon emission quotas among China’s provinces in 2020. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(8):7088–7113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, James G, Liebman A, Dong ZY, Ziser C (2009) Partial carbon permits allocation of potential emission trading scheme in Australian electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(1):543–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zicheng Zhang provided the research ideas of this paper. Xiaolei Xu wrote the entire manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolei Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

On behalf of, and having obtained permission from all the authors, I declare that: the material has not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; the paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere; all authors have been personally and actively involved in substantive work leading to the report, and will hold themselves jointly and individually responsible for its content. All relevant ethical safeguards have been met concerning patient or subject protection or animal experimentation. I testify to the accuracy of the above on behalf of all the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

This article utilizes public datasets.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Xu, X. A study of the allocation of energy consumption permits among the regions of China based on clustering analysis and cuckoo search. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 37244–37261 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12905-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12905-x

Keywords

Navigation