Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intellectual capital, financial resources, and green supply chain management as predictors of financial and environmental performance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the influence of intellectual capital on financial and environmental performance with a mediating role of green supply chain management and a moderating role of financial resources. Structural model estimation was conducted on the data set of 324 Pakistani manufacturing SMEs and showed that intellectual capital significantly encourages green supply chain management as well as significantly contributes to financial and environmental performance. Green supply chain management partially mediates the relationship between intellectual capital and performance both the financial and environmental. Financial resources significantly strengthen the relationship between intellectual capital and green supply chain management. In light of the results, we suggest that firms should encourage intellectuality among their managers and employees to adopt green practices that can improve their financial and environmental performance. In addition, it is also suggested for managers and CEOs to effectively manage financial resources that are necessary for green practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some restrictions are applied to the data used in the results (tables and figures). Hence, it can be gained by sending a request to the email address: anwar.msfin@iiu.edu.pk.

References

  • Abbas J, Sağsan M (2019) Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis. J Clean Prod 229:611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbas J, Mahmood S, Ali H, Ali Raza M, Ali G, Aman J et al (2019) The effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors through a moderating role of social media marketing on sustainable performance of business firms. Sustainability 11(12):3434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal A, Giraud-Carrier FC, Li Y (2018) A mediation model of green supply chain management adoption: the role of internal impetus. Int J Prod Econ 205:342–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed W, Najmi A (2018) Developing and analyzing framework for understanding the effects of GSCM on green and economic performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

  • Aigbedo H (2019) Assessment of the effect of location and financial variables on environmental management performance for industrial goods supply chains. J Environ Manag 236:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar CS, Ismail K, Ndaliman M, Hussain J, Haider M (2015) Can intellectual capital of SMEs help in their sustainability efforts. J Manag Res 7(2):82

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar M (2018) Business model innovation and SMEs performance—does competitive advantage mediate? Int J Innov Manag 22(07):1850057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiach T, Lee D, Nelson D, Walker J (2010) The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance 50(1):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):794–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Special theory forum the resource-based model of the firm: origins, implications, and prospects. J Manag 17(1):97–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktaroglu AE, Calisir F, Baskak M (2019) Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. J Intellect Cap 20:406–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts TK, Super JF, North J (2018) Exploring the influence of institutional pressures and production capability on the environmental practices-environmental performance relationship in advanced and developing economies. J Clean Prod 187:1082–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis N, Bart C, Tovstiga G, Tulugurova E (2009) Intellectual capital practices: a four-region comparative study. J Intellect Cap

  • Chang CH, Chen YS (2012) The determinants of green intellectual capital. Management decision

  • Chege SM, Wang D (2020) The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya. Technol Soc 60:101210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu SH, Yang H, Lee M, Park S (2017) The impact of institutional pressures on green supply chain management and firm performance: top management roles and social capital. Sustainability 9(5):764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, Seng D, Whiting RH (2011) Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. J Intellect Cap 12:505–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2011) Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J Account Public Policy 30(2):122–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero MD, Molina-Azorín JF, Zaragoza-Sáez PDC (2007) Intellectual and environmental capital. J Intellect Cap 8:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier D, Magnan M (1999) Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 14(4):429–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucciella F, Koh L, Shi VG, Koh SL, Baldwin J, Cucchiella F (2012) Natural resource based green supply chain management. An International Journal, Supply Chain Management

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers C, Sharma U (2017a) A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Crit Perspect Account

  • De Villiers C, Sharma U (2017b) A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting:101999

  • Dias A, Rodrigues LL, Craig R, Neves ME (2019) Corporate social responsibility disclosure in small and medium-sized entities and large companies. Social Responsibility Journal

  • Farhadi M, Tovstiga G, Vollmer J (2009) Intellectual property management in M&A–Transaktionen. M&A Review 2:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, M., Melis, M., & Vagnoni, E. (2009). Recent developments in social and environmental reporting among Italian universities: a critical evaluation of leading edge practices

    Google Scholar 

  • George D (2011) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e: Pearson education India

  • Golicic SL, Smith CD (2013) A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. J Supply Chain Manag 49(2):78–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Rodríguez MR, Díaz-Fernández MC, Simonetti B (2015) The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: the role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs. Int Bus Rev 24(5):836–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green KW, Zelbst PJ, Meacham J, Bhadauria VS (2012) Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. An International Journal, Supply Chain Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF (2010) Black, Wc, Babin, Bj, & Anderson, Re (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7

  • Hansmann K, Claudia K (2001) Environmental management policies. Green manufacturing and operations: From design to delivery and back:192–204

  • Hasan MM, Habib A (2017) Corporate life cycle, organizational financial resources and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 13(1):20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L t, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Hsieh J, He W (2014) Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: the contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. J Appl Psychol 99(5):816–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyas S, Hu Z, Wiwattanakornwong K (2020) Unleashing the role of top management and government support in green supply chain management and sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(8):8210–8223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan A, Marimuthu M, Bin Mohd MP, Isa M (2019) The nexus of sustainability practices and financial performance: from the perspective of Islamic banking. J Clean Prod 228:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardon CM, Dasilva A (2017) Intellectual capital and environmental concern in subsistence small businesses. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

  • Jawaad M, Zafar S (2020) Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustain Dev 28(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Jian C, Yu Z, Golpîra H, Kumar A (2019a) Impact of green practices on Pakistani manufacturing firm performance: a path analysis using structural equation modeling. In: Computational intelligence and sustainable systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SZ, Yang Q, Waheed A (2019b) Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(2):285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak MS (2020) Does access to domestic finance and international finance contribute to sustainable development goals? Implications for policymakers. J Public Aff 20(2):e2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight H, Megicks P, Agarwal S, Leenders M (2019) Firm resources and the development of environmental sustainability among small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from the Australian wine industry. Bus Strateg Environ 28(1):25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonmee K, Singhapakdi A, Virakul B, Lee D-J (2010) Ethics institutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: a survey of human resource managers in Thailand. J Bus Res 63(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Song Y, Wang J, Li C (2019) Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation performance: evidence from the Chinese construction industry. Sustainability 11(9):2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Luo Z, Anwar M, Lu Y, Wang X, Liu X (2020) Intellectual capital and the efficiency of SMEs in the transition economy China; do financial resources strengthen the routes? PLoS One 15(7):e0235462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C-H (2017) Creating competitive advantage: linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital. Int J Hosp Manag 66:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longoni A, Cagliano R (2018) Inclusive environmental disclosure practices and firm performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38:1815–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Gamero MD, Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortes E (2011) The relationship between managers' environmental perceptions, environmental management and firm performance in Spanish hotels: a whole framework. Int J Tour Res 13(2):141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas MT, Noordewier TG (2016) Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: the moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. Int J Prod Econ 175:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Vinuesa LM, Scarpellini S, Portillo-Tarragona P, Moneva JM (2020) The impact of eco-innovation on performance through the measurement of financial resources and green patents. Organ Environ 33(2):285–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro M, Dumay J, Garlatti A, Dal Mas F (2018) Practitioners’ views on intellectual capital and sustainability. J Intellect Cap 19:367–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud MA, Fayad R, El-Fadel M, Kamleh R (2010) Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: a case of Lebanon. J Clean Prod 18(3):200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon A, Yong An Z, Memon MQ (2020) Does financial availability sustain financial, innovative, and environmental performance? Relation via opportunity recognition. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(2):562–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli GJ, Cagno E, Mustillo G, Trianni A (2020) Green supply chain management drivers, practices and performance: a comprehensive study on the moderators. J Clean Prod 121024

  • Milgrom P (2002) e J. ROBERTS (1992), Economics, organization and management. Home Wood: Prentice-Hall International Editions

  • Musibah AS, Alfattani WSBWY (2014) The mediating effect of financial performance on the relationship between Shariah supervisory board effectiveness, intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility, of Islamic banks in gulf cooperation council countries. Asian Soc Sci 10(17):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namagembe S, Ryan S, Sridharan R (2019) Green supply chain practice adoption and firm performance: manufacturing SMEs in Uganda. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychological theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrini M (2007) Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports. J Intellect Cap 8:346–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Q, Wang C, Xu L (2020) Emission abatement and procurement strategies in a low-carbon supply chain with option contracts under stochastic demand. Comput Ind Eng 106502

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Ahearne M (1997) Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. J Appl Psychol 82(6):974–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:898–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrambinina D, Kariodimedjo D (2011) Is company intellectual capital linked to corporate social responsibility disclosure? Findings from Indonesia. Communications of the IBIMA

  • Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88(2):351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero P, Cupertino S (2018) CSR strategic approach, financial resources and corporate social performance: the mediating effect of innovation. Sustainability 10(10):3611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saade R, Thoumy M, Sakr O (2019) Green supply chain management adoption in Lebanese manufacturing industries: an exploratory study. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 32(3–4):520–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro G, Ferraris A, Giacosa E, Giovando G (2018) How SMEs engage in open innovation: a survey. J Knowl Econ 9(2):561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellitto MA, Hermann FF (2019) Influence of green practices on organizational competitiveness: a study of the electrical and electronics industry. Eng Manag J 31(2):98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seok H, Nof SY, Filip FG (2012) Sustainability decision support system based on collaborative control theory. Annu Rev Control 36(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seow C, Hillary R, Jamali D (2006) Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal

  • Sharabati A-AA, Naji Jawad S, Bontis N (2010a) Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan. Manag Decis 48(1):105–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharabati AAA, Jawad SN, Bontis N (2010b) Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan. Management decision

  • Stewart TA (2010) Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organization: currency

  • Teixeira AA, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Latan H, De Oliveira JHC (2016) Green training and green supply chain management: evidence from Brazilian firms. J Clean Prod 116:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Z., Hsertawbu, N. M. P., & Hirani, P. (2020). Why not now?: reasons for small firm unable to adopt and transform through green supply chain management

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonial G, Cassol A, Selig PM, Giugliani E (2019) Intellectual capital management and sustainability activities in Brazilian organizations: a case study. In: Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torugsa NA, O’Donohue W, Hecker R (2012) Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. J Bus Ethics 109(4):483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah I, Hameed RM, Kayani NZ (2017) Development of CSR through ethical leadership: constructive role of ethical culture and intellectual capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 11(3):977–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Venieris G, Naoum VC, Vlismas O (2015) Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses. Manag Account Res 26:54–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CY, Wong CW, Boon-itt S (2020) Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Research:1–21

  • Xu L, Wang C, Zhao J (2018) Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation. J Clean Prod 197:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Shi J, Chen J (2020) Pricing and collection rate for remanufacturing industry considering capacity constraint in recycling channels. Complexity 2020

  • Yang C-S, Lu C-S, Haider JJ, Marlow PB (2013) The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 55:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong JY, Yusliza M, Ramayah T, Fawehinmi O (2019) Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management. J Clean Prod 215:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusliza M, Yong JY, Tanveer MI, Ramayah T, Faezah JN, Muhammad Z (2020) A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. J Clean Prod 249:119334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff YM, Nejati M, Kee DMH, Amran A (2018) Linking green human resource management practices to environmental performance in hotel industry. Glob Bus Rev 0972150918779294

  • Yusoff YM, Omar MK, Zaman MDK, Samad S (2019) Do all elements of green intellectual capital contribute toward business sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian context using the partial least squares method. J Clean Prod 234:626–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaid AA, Jaaron AA, Bon AT (2018) The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: an empirical study. J Clean Prod 204:965–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zailani S, Jeyaraman K, Vengadasan G, Premkumar R (2012) Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Wang Z (2014) Inter-firm collaborations on carbon emission reduction within industrial chains in China: practices, drivers and effects on firms' performances. Energy Econ 42:115–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K-H (2013) Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. J Purch Supply Manag 19(2):106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank SMEDA, Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and Pakistani SMEs who helped us in completing this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Najib Ullah Khan worked on the model and literature. Muhammad Anwar has written a theoretical framework and methodology and analyzed the data. Li Shuangjie revised the draft. Muhammad Sualeh Khattak has done the data collection and data entry.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Najib Ullah Khan or Shuangjie Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical committee of the Hamdard Institute of Management approved the questionnaire for data collection. It was mentioned in the survey for the respondents that the survey is volunteers, rather than obligatory.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, N.U., Anwar, M., Li, S. et al. Intellectual capital, financial resources, and green supply chain management as predictors of financial and environmental performance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 19755–19767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12243-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12243-4

Keywords

Navigation