Skip to main content

The non-negligibility of greenhouse gas emission from a combined pre-composting and vermicomposting system with maize stover and cow dung

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 28, pages 19412–19423 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

The acceptance of combined pre-composting and vermicomposting systems is increasing because of the advantage in rapidly stabilizing organic wastes and reducing emission of greenhouse gasses (GHG). However, GHG emission during the pre-composting phase is often neglected when evaluating the system. This study aimed to quantify GHG emission from a combined pre-composting and vermicomposting system and to investigate the effects of earthworms on GHG emission. A combined system using Eisenia fetida was employed to stabilize maize stover and cow dung (mixing ratio 60:40). The inoculating densities were 60 (T1), 120 (T2), and 180 (T3) earthworms per kilogram of substrate. A traditional composting system without earthworms was set as a control (T0). The results indicated that earthworms increased CO2 while decreased CH4 and N2O emissions compared to the control. Higher emission of CO2 suggested that the earthworms promoted the degradation of the substrates. Lower emission of CH4 and N2O showed the advantage of the combined system because CH4 and N2O possess extremely higher global warming potential than that of CO2. T2 is recommended for stabilizing maize stover and cow dung when making a tradeoff between stabilization rate and reduction of GHG. The percentages of GHG emission during pre-composting relative to total GHG emission in T1, T2, and T3 were 34%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. GHG emission is non-negligible when using a combined system, especially the emission of GHG during the pre-composting phase cannot be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Andersen JK, Boldrin A, Samuelsson J, Christensen TH, Scheutz C (2010) Quantification of greenhouse gas emission from windrow composting of garden waste. J Environ Qual 39:713–724

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ba SD, Qu QB, Zhang KQ, Groot JCJ (2020) Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from dairy manure composting. Biosyst Eng 193:126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo JM, Romero E, Nogales R (2013) Dynamics of microbial communities related to biochemical parameters during vermicomposting and maturation of agroindustrial lignocellulose wastes. Bioresour Technol 146:345–354

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan YC, Sinha RK, Wang W (2011) Emission of greenhouse gases from home aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting of household wastes in Brisbane, Australia. Waste Manag Res 29:540–548

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis-Lardy L, Brauman A, Bernard L, Pablo AL, Toucet J, Mano M, Weber L, Brunet D, Razafimbelo T, Chotte JL (2010) Effect of the endogeic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on the microbial structure and activity related to CO2 and N2O fluxes from a tropical soil (Madagascar). Appl Soil Ecol 45:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay GN (2012) Use of vermicomposting biotechnology for recycling organic wastes in agriculture. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 1:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Whalen JK, Guo XB (2014) Earthworms reduce soil nitrous oxide emission during drying and rewetting cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 68:117–124

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen TH, Gentil E, Boldrin A, Larsen A, Weidema B, Hauschild M (2009) C banlance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Manag Res 27(8):707–715

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel P, Douglas E, Harriss R, Crill P (1996) Measurement of N2O from composted organic wastes. Environ Sci Technol 30:2519–2525

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depkat-Jakob PS, Brown GG, Tsai SM, Horn MA, Drake HL (2013) Emission of nitrous oxide and dinitrogen by diverse earthworm families from Brazil and resolution of associated denitrifying and nitrate-dissimilating taxa. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83:375–391

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklind Y, Kirchmann H (2000) Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II: nitrogen turnover and losses. Bioresour Technol 74:125–133

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Gómez MJ, Nogales R, Insam H, Romero E, Goberna M (2010) Continuous-feeding vermicomposting as a recycling management method to revalue tomato-fruit wastes from greenhouse crops. Waste Manag 30:2461–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotto F, Cossu R (2019) Role of animals in waste management with a focus on invertebrates’ biorefinery: an overview. Environ Dev 32:100454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson AM, Frederickson J, Dise NB (2005) CH4 and N2O from mechanically turned windrow and vermicomposting systems following in-vessel pre-treatment. Waste Manag 25:345–352

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Zhang J, Li S, Xie H (2013) Impact of carbon source on nitrous oxide emission from anoxic/oxic biological nitrogen removal process and identification of its emission sources. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1059–1069

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi 1973:7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee LH, Wu TY, Shak KPY, Lim SL, Ng KY, Nguyen MN, Teoh WH (2018) Sustainable approach to biotransform industrial sludge into organic fertilizer via vermicomposting: a mini-review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93(4):925–935

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY (2016) Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 111:262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers IM, van Groenigen KJ, Fonte SJ, Six J, Brussaard L, van Groenigen JW (2013) Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms. Nat Clim Chang 3:187–194

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luth RP, Germain P, Lecomte M, Landrain B, Li Y, Cluzeau D (2011) Earthworm effects on gaseous emissions during vermifiltration of pig fresh slurry. Bioresour Technol 102:3679–3686

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv BY, Zhang D, ChenQ CYX (2019) Effects of earthworms on nitrogen transformation and the correspond genes (amoA and nirS) in vermicomposting of sewage sludge and rice straw. Bioresour Technol 287:121428

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marhan S, Langel R, Kandeler E, Scheu S (2007) Use of stable isotopes (13C) for studying the mobilisation of old soil organic carbon by endogeic earthworms (Lumbricidae). Eur J Soil Biol 43:S201–S208

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mupambwa HA, Mnkeni PNS (2018) Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(11):10577–10595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon and organic carbon and organic matter, in: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds.), Method of Soil Analysis. ASA and SSSA, Madison 1996; pp. 539-579.

  • Nigussie A, Bruun S, de Neergaard A, Kuyper TW (2017) Earthworms change the quantity and composition of dissolved organic carbon and reduce greenhouse gas emissions during composting. Waste Manag 62:43–51

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie A, Kuyper TW, Bruun S, Ade N (2016) Vermicomposting as a technology for reducing nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions from small-scale composting. J Clean Prod 139:429–439

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagans E, Barrena R, Font X, Sánchez A (2006) Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes, dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere 62:1534–1542

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah GM, Oenema O, Lantinga EA (2012) Covered storage reduces losses and improves crop utilization of nitrogen from solid cattle manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94(2-3):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Garg VK (2019) Recycling of lignocellulosic waste as vermicompost using earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14024–14035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2007; pp. 33

  • Suthar S, Pandey B, Gusain R, Gaur RZ, Kumar K (2017) Nutrient changes and biodynamics of Eisenia fetida during vermicomposting of water lettuce (Pistia sp.) biomass: a noxious weed of aquatic system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:199–207

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui H, Fujiwara T, Matsukawa K, Funamizu N (2013) Nitrous oxide emission mechanisms during intermittently aerated composting of cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 141:205–211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JZ, Hu ZY, Xu XK, Jiang X, Zheng BH, Liu XN, Pan XB (2014) Emission of ammonia and greenhouse gases during combined pre-composting and vermicomposting of duck manure. Waste Manag 34:1546–1552

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welte C, Deppenmeier U (2014) Bioenergetics and anaerobic respiratory chains of aceticlastic methanogens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:1130–1147

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YP, Shaaban M, Zhao JS, Hao R, Hu RG (2015) Effect of the earthworm gut-stimulated denitrifiers on soil nitrous oxide emissions. Eur J Soil Biol 70:104–110

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Liu EK, Zhu XM, Wang HY, Liu HB, Liu X, Dong WY (2019) Impact of composting methods on nitrogen retention and losses during dairy manure composting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3324

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu-Barker X, Bailey SK, Paw KT, Burger M, Horwath WR (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions from green waste composting window. Waste Manag 59:70–79

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872178).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, China

    Lei Zhang, Tingting Zhao, Enhui Shi & Yuxiang Chen

  2. The Electron Microscopy Center, Jilin University, Changchun, 130000, China

    Zunhao Zhang

  3. Costal Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, 39567, USA

    Yan Zhang

Authors
  1. Lei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tingting Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enhui Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zunhao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuxiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LZ, methodology, investigation, interpretation, writing—original draft. TZ, data collection. ES, data collection. ZZ, data analysis. YZ, data analysis, writing—editing. YC, conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuxiang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The present study was carried out at the College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, China. The experimental protocol used in the study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Consent to participate

All authors agree to participate in this study.

Consent to publish

All authors allow the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Zhao, T., Shi, E. et al. The non-negligibility of greenhouse gas emission from a combined pre-composting and vermicomposting system with maize stover and cow dung. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 19412–19423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12172-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12172-2

Keywords

  • Greenhouse gasses
  • Eisenia fetida
  • Biodegradable wastes
  • Carbon
  • Nitrogen
  • Vermicomposting