Abstract
The study tries to discover the impact of financial and social indicators’ growth towards environmental considerations to understand the drivers of economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions change in G7 countries. The DEA-like composite index has been used to examine the tradeoff between financial and social indicator matters in environmental consideration by using a multi-objective goal programming approach. The data from 2008 to 2018 is collected from G-7 countries. The results from the DEA-like composite index reveals that there is a mixed condition of environmental sustainability in G-7 countries where the USA is performing better and Japan is performing worse among the set of other countries. The further result shows that the energy and fiscal indicators help to decrease the dangerous gas emissions. Divergent to that, the human and financial index positively contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Fostering sustainable development is essential to successfully reduce emissions, meet established objectives, and ensure steady development. The study provides valuable information for policymakers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on request.
References
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish (2020) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Al-Salem SM, Antelava A, Constantinou A et al (2017) A review on thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic solid waste (PSW). J Environ Manag 197:177–198
Alemzero DA, Iqbal N, Iqbal S, Mohsin M, Chukwuma NJ, Shah BA (2020a) Assessing the perceived impact of exploration and production of hydrocarbons on households perspective of environmental regulation in Ghana. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10880-3
Alemzero DA, Sun H, Mohsin M, Iqbal N, Nadeem M, Vo XV (2020b) Assessing energy security in Africa based on multi-dimensional approach of principal composite analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10554-0
Anser MK, Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Chaudhry IS (2020) Assessing the integration of solar power projects: SWOT-based AHP–F-TOPSIS case study of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:31737–31749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09092-6
Baloch ZA, Tan Q, Iqbal N, Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Iqbal W, Chaudhry IS (2020) Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:34337–34347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09578-3
Bampatsou C, Halkos G (2019) Economic growth, efficiency and environmental elasticity for the G7 countries. Energy Policy 130:355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.017
Beccue PC, Huntington HG, Leiby PN, Vincent KR (2018) An updated assessment of oil market disruption risks. Energy Policy 115:456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.013
Bhattacharyya PS (2018) Sustainability of coal as a source of energy in India. In: Green Energy and Technology, pp 255–264
Cao S, Alanne K (2018) The techno-economic analysis of a hybrid zero-emission building system integrated with a commercial-scale zero-emission hydrogen vehicle. Appl Energy 211:639–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.079
Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Rehman A, Twumasi MA, Pathan AG, Mohsin M (2020) Determinants of demand for credit by smallholder farmers’: a farm level analysis based on survey in Sindh, Pakistan. J Asian Bus Econ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabes-01-2020-0004
Chen YE, Fu Q, Zhao X, Yuan X, Chang CP (2019) International sanctions’ impact on energy efficiency in target states. Econ Model 82:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.07.022
Ebiringa TO, Anyaogu NB (2014) Exchange rate, inflation and interest rates relationships: an autoregressive distributed lag analysis. J Econ Dev Stud 2:263–279
Ervural BC, Zaim S, Delen D (2018) A two-stage analytical approach to assess sustainable energy efficiency. Energy 164:822–836
Gathala MK, Laing AM, Tiwari TP, Timsina J, Islam S, Bhattacharya PM, Dhar T, Ghosh A, Sinha AK, Chowdhury AK, Hossain S, Hossain I, Molla S, Rashid M, Kumar S, Kumar R, Dutta SK, Srivastwa PK, Chaudhary B, Jha SK, Ghimire P, Bastola B, Chaubey RK, Kumar U, Gérard B (2020) Energy-efficient, sustainable crop production practices benefit smallholder farmers and the environment across three countries in the eastern Gangetic Plains. South Asia J Clean Prod 246:118982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118982
Geddes A, Schmidt TS, Steffen B (2018) The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: an analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy Policy 115:158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.009
Green F, Stern N (2017) China’s changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Clim Pol 17(4):423–442
Hall S, Roelich KE, Davis ME, Holstenkamp L (2018) Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions. Appl Energy 222:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.007
Hanif I, Raza SMF, Gago-de-Santos P, Abbas Q (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501
Hussain J, Mahmood S, Scott J (2019) Gender, Microcredit and Poverty Alleviation in a Developing Country: The Case of Women Entrepreneurs in Pakistan. J Int Dev 31:247–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3403
Iram R, Zhang J, Erdogan S, Abbas Q, Mohsin M (2019) Economics of energy and environmental efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:3858–3870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07020-x
Khalid SA, Salman V (2020) Welfare impact of electricity subsidy reforms in Pakistan: a micro model study. Energy Policy 137:111097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111097
LaBelle MC (2017) In pursuit of energy justice. Energy Policy 107:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.054
Lin B, Xu M (2018) Regional differences on CO2 emission efficiency in metallurgical industry of China. Energy Policy 120:302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.050
Millard R, Withey P, Lantz V, Ochuodho TO (2017) The general equilibrium costs and impacts of oil price shocks in Newfoundland and Labrador. Energy Econ 68:192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.003
Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Zhang J, Ikram M, Iqbal N (2019a) Integrated effect of energy consumption, economic development, and population growth on CO2 based environmental degradation: a case of transport sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32824–32835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06372-8
Mohsin M, Nurunnabi M, Zhang J, Sun H, Iqbal N, Iram R, Abbas Q (2020) The evaluation of efficiency and value addition of IFRS endorsement towards earnings timeliness disclosure. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1878
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Saidur R (2018) Economic viability and production capacity of wind generated renewable hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:2621–2630
Mohsin M, Zhang J, Saidur R, Sun H, Sait SM (2019b) Economic assessment and ranking of wind power potential using fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:22494–22511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05564-6
Mudakkar SR, Zaman K, Khan MM, Ahmad M (2013) Energy for economic growth, industrialization, environment and natural resources: Living with just enough. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:580–595
Ouedraogo NS (2017) Africa energy future: alternative scenarios and their implications for sustainable development strategies. Energy Policy 106:457–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.021
Pashaei Kamali F, Meuwissen MPM, de Boer IJM, van Middelaar CE, Moreira A, Oude Lansink AGJM (2017) Evaluation of the environmental, economic, and social performance of soybean farming systems in southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 142:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.135
Piñeiro-Chousa J, López-Cabarcos MÁ, Caby J, Šević A (2021) The influence of investor sentiment on the green bond market. Technol Forecast Soc Change 162:120351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120351
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood S, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Yan, Jinsong Xu (2019) Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 8(2):34
Ríos JR, Olaya Y (2018) A dynamic analysis of strategies for increasing energy efficiency of refrigerators in Colombia. Energy Effic 11:733–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9601-9
Romero JC, Linares P, López X (2018) The policy implications of energy poverty indicators. Energy Policy 115:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.054
Samaras C, Nuttall WJ, Bazilian M (2019) Energy and the military: convergence of security, economic, and environmental decision-making. Energy Strateg Rev 26:100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100409
Shah SAA, Zhou P, Walasai GD, Mohsin M (2019) Energy security and environmental sustainability index of south Asian countries: a composite index approach. Ecol Indic 106:105507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105507
Shahbaz M, Van Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.023
Song CQ, Chang CP, Gong Q (2020) Economic growth, corruption, and financial development: global evidence. Econ Model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.022
Srivastava G, Kathuria V (2020) Impact of corporate governance norms on the performance of Indian utilities. Energy Policy 140:111414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111414
State of Electricity Access Report (SEAR) (2017) World Bank, SEAR 2017
Steffen B (2018) The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects. Energy Econ 69:280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006
Sudmant AH, Gouldson A, Colenbrander S, Sullivan R, McAnulla F, Kerr N (2017) Understanding the case for low-carbon investment through bottom-up assessments of city-scale opportunities. Clim Pol 17:299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1104498
Sueyoshi T, Yuan Y, Goto M (2017) A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment. Energy Econ 62:104–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.006
Sun H, Ikram M, Mohsin M, Abbas Q (2019a) Energy security and environmental efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Singap Econ Rev:1943003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590819430033
Sun H, Mohsin M, Alharthi M, Abbas Q (2020a) Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia. J Clean Prod 251:119519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
Sun HP, Tariq G, Haris M, Mohsin M (2019b) Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: evidence from SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:24542–24551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05750-6
Sun L, Cao X, Alharthi M, Zhang J, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Mohsin M (2020b) Carbon emission transfer strategies in supply chain with lag time of emission reduction technologies and low-carbon preference of consumers. J Clean Prod 264:121664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121664
Sun L, Qin L, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Zhang J, Mohsin M, Chaudhry IS (2020c) Analyzing carbon emission transfer network structure among provinces in China: new evidence from social network analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23281–23300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08911-0
United Nations (2013) World economic and social survey 2013
van Moerkerk M, Crijns-Graus W (2016) A comparison of oil supply risks in EU, US, Japan, China and India under different climate scenarios. Energy Policy 88:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.015
Wu W, Qi Z, Zhou L (2020) Environmentally responsible closed-loop supply chain models for joint environmental responsibility investment, recycling and pricing decisions. J Clean Prod 259:120776
Zhan C, de Jong M (2018) Financing eco cities and low carbon cities: the case of Shenzhen International Low Carbon City. J Clean Prod 180:116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.097
Zheng J, Mi Z, Coffman DM et al (2019) Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Econ 81:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003
Zhou K, Li Y (2019) Carbon finance and carbon market in China: progress and challenges. J Clean Prod
Zweifel P, Praktiknjo A, Erdmann G (2017) Energy economics: theory and applications
Funding
This research did not receive any specific funding from public, commercial, or non-profit sector funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Nguyen Van Song: Conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing—original draft
Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong: Data curation, visualization
Thai Thi Kim Oanh: Visualization, supervision, editing
Do Huy Chien: Review and editing
Vu Quang Phuc: Writing—review and editing and software
Muhammad Mohsin: Editing, reviewing
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
We declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that seem to affect the work reported in this article. We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human tissues.
Consent for publication
We do not have any individual person’s data in any form.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Song, N., Phuong, N.T.M., Oanh, T.T.K. et al. Does tradeoff between financial and social indicators matters in environmental consideration: evidence from G7 region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 19911–19925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12041-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12041-y