Skip to main content

Whether foreign direct investment can promote high-quality economic development under environmental regulation: evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Abstract

Based on the development concepts of “innovation, coordination, green, opening and sharing,” a high-quality economic evaluation index system is constructed using city-level data in Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), China. Further, the spatial lag model is used to empirically study the effects of environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and its interaction term on the high-quality economic development. The results show that environmental regulation is conducive to promoting high-quality economic development, which provides a certain empirical basis for the Porter Hypothesis. In addition, foreign direct investment also plays a significant positive role. Specifically, environmental regulation has positive impacts on the relationship between foreign direct investment and the high-quality economic development. Finally, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions, such as improving environmental regulation policy and actively introducing high-quality foreign direct investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmed EM (2012) Are the FDI inflow spillover effects on Malaysia’s economic growth input driven? Econ Model 29(4):1498–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broner, F., Bustos, P., Carvalho, V. M. 2012. Sources of comparative advantage in polluting industries. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Wan N, Zhang H, Zhang X, Zhou Q (2020) Linking environmental regulation and economic growth through technological innovation and resource consumption: analysis of spatial interaction patterns of urban agglomerations. Ecol Indic 112:106062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao X, Ren B (2012) The fluctuation and regional difference of quality of economic growth in China. Econ Res J 4:26–40 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY, Chen DK, Air Pollution (2018) Government regulations and high-quality economic development. Econ Res J 53(2):20–34 (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Kahn ME, Liu Y, Wang Z (2018) The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. J Environ Econ Manag 88:468–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintrakarn P (2008) Environmental regulation and US states’ technical inefficiency. Econ Lett 100(3):363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong Z, Qin C, Ye X (2016) Environmental regulation, economic network and sustainable growth of urban agglomerations in China. Sustainability 8(5):467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow GC, Li KW (2002) China’s economic growth: 1952–2010. Econ Dev Cult Chang 51(1):247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RJ, Zhou Y (2013) Environmental regulation induced foreign direct investment. Environ Resour Econ 55(1):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Wang X, Du W, Wu H, Wang J (2019) Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 235:210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Millimet DL (2002) Is there a ‘California effect’in US environmental policy making? Reg Sci Urban Econ 32(6):737–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma S, Gong Y, Görg H (2009) What determines innovation activity in Chinese state-owned enterprises? The role of foreign direct investment. World Dev 37(4):866–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney TM, Li Y, Tu D (2017) Pollution control and foreign firms’ exit behavior in China. J Asian Econ 48:148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto M (2006) Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 28(4):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Wang Z, Huang Q, Zhang X (2019) Environmental regulation intensity, foreign direct investment, and green technology spillover—an empirical study. Sustainability 11(10):2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1990) Environmental regulation and US economic growth. RAND J Econ 21:314–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong Q, Peng D, Ni Y, Jiang X, Wang Z (2020) Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: empirical analysis using Ardl model. Financ Res Lett:101488

  • Lin Y, Huang R, Yao X (2020) Air pollution and environmental information disclosure: an empirical study based on heavy polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production:124313

  • Liu Y, Zhu J, Li EY, Meng Z, Song Y (2020) Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:119993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q, Zhou J, Li Z, Yu B (2020) Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: a comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt. Sci Total Environ 138452

  • Macdougall GDA (1960) The benefits and costs of private investment from abroad: a theoretical approach. Econ Rec 36(73):13–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi ZF, Zeng G, Xin XR, Shang YM, Hai JJ (2018) The extension of the Porter hypothesis: can the role of environmental regulation on economic development be affected by other dimensional regulations? J Clean Prod 203:933–942

  • Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139:111310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1996) America’s green strategy. Business and the environment: a reader 33

  • Slaughter M J. 2002. Does inward foreign direct investment contribute to skill upgrading in developing countries? Center for Economic Analysis Working Paper.

  • Song D. Y., Yang Q. Y., 2019. Does environmental regulation break the resource curse: an empirical analysis based on transnational panel data. China population, resources and environment, (10), 9. (In Chinese)

  • Song M, Zhu S, Wang J, Wang S (2019) China’s natural resources balance sheet from the perspective of government oversight: Based on the analysis of governance and accounting attributes. J Environ Manag 248:109232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yang T, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhang M (2020) Research on the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on environmental pollution: Empirical evidence from 253 prefecture-level cities in China. J Clean Prod 122425

  • Wei M, Li SH (2018) Construction and measurement of China’s economic growth quality evaluation system under the new normal. Economist 04:19–26 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CH, Tseng YH, Chen CP (2012) Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34(4):514–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan XY, Cui PP (2016) Estimation and evaluation of China’s provincial quality of economic growth-empirical analysis based on “Five Development Concepts”. Public Finance Research, 08:40-53+39. (In Chinese)

  • Zhang W, Li G, Uddin MK, Guo S (2020) Environmental regulation, foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China. J Clean Prod 248:119208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Zeng X, Jiang L, Xue B (2020) High-quality Economic growth under the influence of technological innovation preference in China: a numerical simulation from the government financial perspective. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 54:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71874149, 71934001, 71873001, and 71904162) and National Social Science Fund of China (grant number 20ZDA084).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, supervision, and writing were performed by Xiaosheng Li. Data curation and methodology were conducted by Yuling Lu. Ruting Huang was actively involved in the study design and revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruting Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Lu, Y. & Huang, R. Whether foreign direct investment can promote high-quality economic development under environmental regulation: evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21674–21683 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12032-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12032-z

Keywords

  • Environmental regulation
  • Foreign direct investment
  • High-quality economic development
  • Yangtze River Economic Belt