Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With growing concerns about climate change, global warming and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, environmental taxes, renewable energy consumption, and environmental technologies have caught attention from researchers, policymakers, and concerned organizations in developed and developing world. The environmental-related taxes and carbon and energy taxes are considered as effective tool and highly recommended by economists and environmental scientists in developed nations (e.g., European economies). To this end, the current study examines the role of environmental policies and regulations and cleaner energy consumption for GHG emissions across leading emitter countries in Europe. The study used annual data of variables from 1994 to 2018 for nine leading European economies. The empirical estimates of quantile regression, FMOLS, and DOLS revealed that environmental taxes and promotion of cleaner energy sources can be effective to reduce overall pollution efflux. The study reports new implications regarding sustainable development goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding or first author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alvarez-Herranz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni V (2019) Environmental taxes: drivers behind the revenue collected. J Clean Prod 221:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S (2000) A future for carbon taxes. Ecol Econom 32(3):395–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00122-6

  • Bruvoll A, Larsen BM (2004) Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? Energy Policy 32(4):493–505

  • Bashir MA, Sheng B, Doğan B, Sarwar S, Shahzad U (2020) Export product diversification and energy efficiency : empirical evidence from OECD countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 55:232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco MI, Rodrigues G (2009) Direct employment in the wind energy sector: an EU study. Energy Policy 37(8):2847–2857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borozan D (2019) Unveiling the heterogeneous effect of energy taxes and income on residential energy consumption. Energy Policy 129:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannlund R, Persson L (2012) To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes. Clim Pol 12(6):704–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.675732

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldés N, Varela M, Santamaría M, Sáez R (2009) Economic impact of solar thermal electricity deployment in Spain. Energy Policy 37(5):1628–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler DL (2018) Carbon taxes could make significant dent in climate change, study finds, Massachusetts Institute of Technology News. Available at: https://news.mit.edu/2018/carbon-taxes-could-make-significant-dent-climate-change-0406 Accessed 10 July 2020

  • Dogan B et al (2020) The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustain Dev (August):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2125

  • Energy Information Administration (2020) Energy Data, US Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/opendata/. Accessed 25 July 2020

  • Fatima T, Shahzad U, Cui L (2020) Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade and CO2 emissions in high emitter countries: does the income level matter? J Environ Plan Manag:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1816532

  • Frondel M, Ritter N, Schmidt CM, Vance C (2010) Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: the German experience. Energy Policy 38(8):4048–4056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazouani A, Xia W, Ben Jebli M, Shahzad U (2020) Exploring the role of carbon taxation policies on CO2 emissions: contextual evidence from tax implementation and non-implementation European Countries. Sustainability 12(8680):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He P, Ning J, Yu Z, Xiong H, Shen H, Jin H (2019a) Can environmental tax policy really help to reduce pollutant emissions? An empirical study of a panel ARDL model based on OECD countries and China. Sustainability 11(16):4384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He P, Chen L, Zou X, Li S, Shen H, Jian J (2019b) Energy taxes, carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic consequences: a comparative study of nordic and G7 countries. Sustainability 11(21):6100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Mitigation of climate change summary for policymakers, J Teach Educ. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717302400108

  • Lin B, Li X (2011) The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 39(9):5137–5146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lluís Carrion-i-Silvestre J, Del Barrio-Castro T, López-Bazo E (2005) Breaking the panels: an application to the GDP per capita. Econ J 8(2):159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Menéndez AJ, Pérez R, Moreno B (2014) Environmental costs and renewable energy: re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. J Environ Manag 145:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardones C, Cabello M (2019) Effectiveness of local air pollution and GHG taxes: the case of Chilean industrial sources. Energy Econ 83:491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller S, Vela M (2013) Are environmentally related taxes effective?

  • Mohtasham J (2015) renewable energies. Energy Procedia 74:1289–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon HR, Perron B (2004) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. J Econ 122(1):81–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno B, Lopez AJ (2008) The effect of renewable energy on employment. The case of Asturias (Spain). Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(3):732–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley B (2012) Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Appl Econ Lett 19(18):1817–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) Effective carbon rates: pricing CO2 through taxes and emissions trading systems. Éditions OECD, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264260115-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2020) OECD database. Available at: https://data.oecd.org/. Accessed date: 25 september 2020

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 597-625

  • Peng JT, Wang Y, Zhang X, He Y, Taketani M, Shi R, Zhu XD (2019) Economic and welfare influences of an energy excise tax in Jiangsu province of China: a computable general equilibrium approach. J Clean Prod 211:1403–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran HM (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265e312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollin R, Heintz J, Garrett-Peltier H (2009) The economic benefits of investing in clean energy: how the economic stimulus program and new legislation can boost US economic growth and employment (No. economic_benefits). Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

  • Sarwar S, Shahzad U, Chang D, Tang B (2019) Economic and non-economic sector reforms in carbon mitigation: empirical evidence from Chinese provinces, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. North-Holland 49:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STRUECO.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastresa EL, Usón AA, Bribián IZ, Scarpellini S (2010) Local impact of renewables on employment: assessment methodology and case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(2):679–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Vollebergh H (2018) The effectiveness of taxing the carbon content of energy consumption. J Environ Econ Manag 92:74–99.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.017

  • Shahzad U (2020) Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: theoretical survey with policy implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24848–24862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad U et al (2020) Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of export product diversification on renewable energy consumption: new evidence from G-7 and E-7 countries, Renewable Energy. Elsevier Ltd, p 105730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.143

  • Shahzad U, Doğan B, Sinha A, Fareed Z (2021) Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: exploring the contextual evidences from the newly industrialized countries. Energy 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118881

  • Smith LV, Leybourne S, Kim TH, Newbold P (2004) More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. J Appl Econ 19(2):147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012) Sustainable Urban Energy Is the Future. Retrieved from United Nations Sustainable development: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/sustainable-urban-energy-future

  • Westerlund J (2006) Testing for panel cointegration with multiple structural breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 68(1):101–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020) World Development Indicators, World Development Bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators#. Accessed 25 July 2020

  • Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F, Sinha A (2019) From nonrenewable to renewable energy and its impact on economic growth: the role of research & development expenditures in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 212:1166–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Jendouba, FSJEG de Jendouba, Jendouba, Tunisia

    Assaad Ghazouani & Mehdi Ben Jebli

  2. QUARG UR17ES26, ESCT, Campus University of Manouba, 2010, Manouba, Tunisia

    Mehdi Ben Jebli

  3. Faculty of Legal, Economic and Social Sciences, University of Manouba, Manouba, 2010, Tunisia

    Mehdi Ben Jebli

  4. School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, 233030, People’s Republic of China

    Umer Shahzad

Authors
  1. Assaad Ghazouani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehdi Ben Jebli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Umer Shahzad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Umer Shahzad: introduction, revision, concept building, data. Mehdi Ben Jebli: literature review, methods, analysis, supervision. Assaad Ghazouani: literature review, editing, discussion, conclusion, and implications.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umer Shahzad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Panel data of European countries is analyzed over 1994–2018.

• Environmental-related taxes induce to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

• Cleaner and greener technologies should be encouraged to reduce emissions.

• Urban population and income enhance climate change issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghazouani, A., Jebli, M.B. & Shahzad, U. Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 22758–22767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation