Skip to main content
Log in

NO2 catalytic formation, consumption, and efflux in various types of diesel particulate filter

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high NO2/NOX ratio in the after-treatment system is beneficial to its performance and achieved by NO catalytic conversion in diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) located upstream (CRDPF), catalytic DPF (CDPF), or a combination of both (CCDPF). In order to effectively control the emission of particulates and nitrogen oxides, various types of diesel particulate filter models are established to compare NO2 catalytic formation, consumption, and efflux. The results show that the catalytic performance of NO conversion is limited by mass transfer in DOC catalytic coating, while it is almost non-existent in CDPF. At low temperature, the passive regeneration of CDPF is slower than that of CRDPF, but as the temperature increases, the passive regeneration speed of CDPF will exceed that of CRDPF. CCDPF is the most effective for the NO2 catalytic formation, consumption, and efflux in the hot-start and high-speed cycle and thereby is conducive to improve the performance of the diesel particulate filter and downstream selective catalytic reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

a c :

geometric surface area [m2·m−3]

c p :

specific heat capacity [J·(kg·K) −1]

d :

channel diameter [m]

Dw:

effective diffusion coefficient [m2·s−1]

E :

activation energy [J·mol−1]

K :

number of components

k :

reaction rate constant [s−1]

km:

mass transfer coefficient [m·s−1]

h :

heat transfer coefficient [W·m−2·K−1]

L :

channel length [m]

MC :

molar mass of carbon [kg·mol−1]

MNO2 :

molar mass of species NO2 [kg·mol−1]

P :

pressure [Pa]

r :

reaction rate [mol·s−1m−3]

S c :

specific surface of the particulate [m2·m−3]

t :

time[s]

T :

temperature [K]

v :

gas velocity[m·s−1]

v W :

wall velocity [m·s−1]

V :

volume [m3]

y :

mass fraction

λ :

thermal conductivity [W·m−1·K−1]

ρ :

density [kg·m−3]

ζ :

sum

γ :

stoichiometric coefficient

ε S :

porosity

0:

channel entrance

1:

inlet channel

2:

outlet channel

i:

species index

j:

reaction index

g:

gas

W:

Washcoat

S:

solid

CDPF:

catalytic diesel particulate filter

CCDPF:

catalytic diesel particulate filter with diesel oxidation catalyst located upstream

CRDPF:

continuous regenerative diesel particulate filter

DOC:

diesel oxidation catalyst

DPF:

diesel particulate filter

PM:

particulate matter

SCR:

selective catalytic reduction

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GJ developed the idea for the study; JG designed the experiment; CZ, SW, JT, JL, and YZ did the analyses; and CZ was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guohai Jia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, C., Gong, J., Wang, S. et al. NO2 catalytic formation, consumption, and efflux in various types of diesel particulate filter. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 20034–20044 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11870-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11870-1

Keywords

Navigation