Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effect of solution chemistry on aqueous As(III) removal by titanium salts coagulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solution chemistry is of great importance to the removal of arsenic by coagulation through influencing the speciation of arsenic, the in situ precipitation of metal salts coupled with the adsorption and coprecipitation behavior of arsenic during coagulation. While the researches on the influence of solution chemistry in As(III) removal by titanium salts, a promising candidate for drinking water treatment was still deficient. Batch tests were performed to evaluate the removal of As(III) by titanium salts coagulation under solution chemistry influences. The results indicated that As(III) removal by Ti(SO4)2 and TiCl4 increased first and then decreased with the rising of solution pH from 4 to 10. TiCl4 preformed better in As(III) removal than Ti(SO4)2 at pH 4–8, but the opposite trends were observed at pH 9–10. XPS analysis indicated that the involvement of surface hydroxyl groups was primarily responsible for As(III) adsorption on Ti(IV) precipitates. As(III) removal was inhibited in the presence of SO42− mainly by competitive adsorption, especially at elevated SO42− concentration under acidic and alkaline conditions. F− exerted a greater suppressive effect than SO42− via indirectly hindering Ti(IV) precipitate formation, and through direct competitive adsorption with H3AsO3, the inhibitive effect increased as F− concentration increased and depended highly on solution pH. As(III) removal was promoted by co-existing Fe(II) primarily through the facilitation of Ti(IV) precipitation, especially under neutral and alkaline conditions, while it was inhibited to a different extent by the presence of high-concentration Mn(II) possibly via competitive adsorption. The presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ enhanced the removal of As(III), but the positive effect did not increase as ionic concentration elevated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

Not applicable

References

  • Abejon A, Garea A, Irabien A (2015) Arsenic removal from drinking water by reverse osmosis: minimization of costs and energy consumption. Sep Purif Technol 144:46–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alfredo KA (2012) Drinking water treatment by alum coagulation: competition among fluoride, natural organic matter, and aluminum. Ph.D. dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin

  • Awual MR, Shenashen MA, Yaita T, Shiwaku H, Jyo A (2012) Efficient arsenic(V) removal from water by ligand exchange fibrous adsorbent. Water Res 46(17):5541–5550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bora AJ, Gogoi S, Baruah G, Dutta RK (2016) Utilization of co-existing iron in arsenic removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH. J Environ Chem Eng 4(3):2683–2691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chi L, Tu P, Liu C, Lai Y, Xue J, Ru H, Lu K (2019) Chronic arsenic exposure induces oxidative stress and perturbs serum lysolipids and fecal unsaturated fatty acid metabolism. Chem Res Toxicol 32(6):1204–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciardelli M, Xu H, Sahai N (2008) Role of Fe(II), phosphate, silicate, sulfate, and carbonate in arsenic uptake by coprecipitation in synthetic and natural groundwater. Water Res 42(3):615–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder D, De Wetering TSCMV, Van Dijk T, Van Halem D (2018) Influence of HPO42−, H4SiO4, Ca2+, Mg2+ on Fe floc growth and as(III) removal in aerated, natural groundwater. J Water Process Eng 25:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Wu B, Zhang G, Zhang S (2019) Coagulation removal of fluoride by zirconium tetrachloride: performance evaluation and mechanism analysis. Chemosphere 218:860–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan X, Ma J, Dong H, Jiang L (2009) Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on as(III) removal in the KMnO4-Fe(II) process. Water Res 43(20):5119–5128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gubler R, ThomasArrigo LK (2021) Ferrous iron enhances arsenic sorption and oxidation by non-stoichiometric magnetite and maghemite. J Hazard Mater 402:123425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gude JCJ, Rietveld LC, Van Halem D (2017) As(III) oxidation by MnO2 during groundwater treatment. Water Res 111:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hesami F, Bina B, Ebrahimi A, Amin MM (2013) Arsenic removal by coagulation using ferric chloride and chitosan from water. Int J Environ Heal Eng 2(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Luo J, Song S, Li Y, Li Q (2017) The remarkable effect of the coexisting arsenite and arsenate species ratios on arsenic removal by manganese oxide. Chem Eng J 315:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain S, Van Leeuwen J, Chow CWK, Aryal R, Beecham S, Duan J, Drikas M (2014) Comparison of the coagulation performance of tetravalent titanium and zirconium salts with alum. Chem Eng J 254:635–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav SV, Bringas E, Yadav GD, Rathod VK, Ortiz I, Marathe KV (2015) Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: a review of current technologies for contaminants removal. J Environ Manag 162:306–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Loeppert RH (2000) Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J Environ Qual 29(5):1422–1430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John Y, David VE, Mmereki D (2018) A comparative study on removal of hazardous anions from water by adsorption: a review. Int J Chem Eng 2018:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Gong W, Lan H, Gao Y, Liu H, Qu J (2011) Defluoridation by freshly prepared aluminum hydroxides. Chem Eng J 175:144–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Zhu L, He Z, Lan H, Liu H, Qu J (2015) Simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride by freshly-prepared aluminum hydroxide. Colloid Surface A 466:147–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Tan W, Suib SL, Qiu G, Liu F (2020) Epitaxial growth mechanism of heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of Mn(II) on manganite under oxic conditions. Chem Geol 547:119670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Tu SX (2011) Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by two types of nano TiO2 crystals. Environ Chem Lett 9(4):465–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Kiser JR, Kwon AH, Kanel SR (2007) Spectroscopic investigation of Cr(III)- and Cr(VI)-treated nanoscale zerovalent iron. Environ Sci Technol 41(2):586–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicomel NR, Leus K, Folens K, Der Voort PV, Du Laing G (2015) Technologies for arsenic removal from water: current status and future perspectives. Int J Env Res Pub He 13(1):62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidheesh PV, Singh TSA (2017) Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation process: recent trends and removal mechanism. Chemosphere 181:418–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pallier V, Feuilladecathalifaud G, Serpaud B, Bollinger J (2010) Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 342(1):26–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao J, Jiang Z, Sun B, Sun Y, Wang Q, Guan X (2012) Arsenate and arsenite removal by FeCl3: effects of pH, as/Fe ratio, initial as concentration and co-existing solutes. Sep Purif Technol 92:106–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VK, Sohn M (2009) Aquatic arsenic: toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation. Environ Int 35(4):743–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kim IS, Cho J, Kim GJ, Kim J, Kim JH (2007) Preparation of titanium dioxide (TiO2) from sludge produced by titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) flocculation of wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 41(4):1372–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Zhou G, Xiong X, Guan X, Li L, Bao H (2013) Enhanced arsenite removal from water by Ti(SO4)2 coagulation. Water Res 47(13):4340–4348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uwamariya V, Petrusevski B, Lens PNL, Amy GL (2014) Effect of calcium on adsorptive removal of as(III) and as(V) by iron oxide-based adsorbents. Environ Technol 35(24):3153–3164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Tang H, Gregory J (2002) Relative importance of charge neutralization and precipitation on coagulation of kaolin with PACl: effect of sulfate ion. Environ Sci Technol 36(8):1815–1820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Duan J, Liu S, Li W, Van Leeuwen J, Mulcahy D (2014) Removal of as(III) and as(V) by ferric salts coagulation – implications of particle size and zeta potential of precipitates. Sep Purif Technol 135:64–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Duan J, Li W, Beecham S, Mulcahy D (2016) Aqueous arsenite removal by simultaneous ultraviolet photocatalytic oxidation-coagulation of titanium sulfate. J Hazard Mater 303:162–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Tie J, Liu Y, Zhao Y (2020) Removal of aqueous arsenite by simultaneous ultraviolet photocatalytic oxidation-coagulation of titanium salts: effect of precipitate particles size and solution chemistry. Desalin Water Treat 197:280–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Liu W, Gao N, Tao T (2011) A study of titanium sulfate flocculation for water treatment. Water Res 45(12):3704–3711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Tu H, Chan T, Jing C (2017) Mechanistic study of simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal using granular TiO2-La adsorbent. Chem Eng J 313:983–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng H, Zhai L, Qiao T, Yu Y, Zhang J, Li D (2020) Efficient removal of As(V) from aqueous media by magnetic nanoparticles prepared with Iron-containing water treatment residuals. Sci Rep 10:9335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65840-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang S, Song R, Cao T, Luo L, Chen X, Gao Y, Lu J, Li W, Huang W (2017) The most active cu facet for low-temperature water gas shift reaction. Nat Commun 8(1):488–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wu B, Pan B, Zhang S, Pignatello JJ (2020) Deep removal of arsenite from water with no need for pre-oxidation or in-line oxidation. Chem Eng J 401:126046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Jia Y, Wu X, Wang H (2009a) Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 172(2):1591–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu M, Paul KW, Kubicki JD, Sparks DL (2009b) Quantum chemical study of arsenic (III, V) adsorption on Mn-oxides: implications for arsenic(III) oxidation. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6655–6661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu KN, Qin HY, Liu BH, Li ZP (2011) Carbon nanotubes supported Fe-based compounds as the electrode catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J Power Sources 196(1):182–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions from the editor and anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This work was funded by the Scientific Research Foundation of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (No. 40506).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Yuxia Wang & Yaguang Zhao

  2. Henan Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation and Treatment, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Yuxia Wang

  3. School of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, 30 Qingquan Road, Laishan District, Yantai, 264005, China

    Yucan Liu

Authors
  1. Yuxia Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaguang Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yucan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Wang Yuxia conceived the work and conducted the experiments; Zhao Yaguang conducted XPS analysis; and Wang Yuxia wrote the manuscript with the help of Liu Yucan. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yucan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. & Liu, Y. Effect of solution chemistry on aqueous As(III) removal by titanium salts coagulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21823–21834 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11825-6

Keywords