Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic driving factors of PM2.5 emission in Jing-Jin-Ji region, China: a generalized Divisia index approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air quality in China is increasingly improving, but the situation facing the atmosphere environment is still dire. Regional atmospheric environmental problems characterized by PM2.5 pollutants are becoming increasingly prominent, especially in the Jing-Jin-Ji (3J) region. This study employs the generalized Divisia index approach to decompose the factors that influence the changes of PM2.5 emission in the 3J region. It is divided into 8 factors: scale effect of regional economy, scale effect of regional energy consumption, scale effect of investment in treatment of environment pollution (ITEP), technology effect of energy efficient utilization, technology effect of clean energy utilization technology, the intensity effect of regional green economic development, the intensity effect of investment in treatment of regional PM2.5 emission, and the intensity effect of regional environmental regulation. To identify the vital driving force of the change of PM2.5 emission, the contribution of each driving factor of PM2.5 emission variation is analyzed. The results show that the factors affecting the change of PM2.5 emission are almost the same, but the contribution of each factor is apparently different in the 3J region. The level of regional economic development and the scale of energy consumption promoted the increase of PM2.5 emission in the region. The growth of PM2.5 emission can be effectively controlled by green economic development intensity, energy clean utilization technology, environmental regulation intensity, and the intensity of investment in treatment of PM2.5 emission. Energy efficiency has a slight effect on the changes of PM2.5 emission. ITEP has a negative effect on the changes of PM2.5 emission. In the future, the 3J region needs to optimize the structure of ITEP further and implement the refinement and precision of pollution treatment. Moreover, it also needs to promote the development of energy clean and efficient use of technological innovation to drive PM2.5 emission reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32(9):1131–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (2005) The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy 33(7):867–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (2015) LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Zhang FQ (2000) A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25(12):1149–1176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai S, Wang Y, Zhao B, Wang S, Chang X, Hao J (2017) The impact of the “air pollution prevention and control action plan” on PM2.5 concentrations in Jing-Jin-Ji region during 2012–2020. Sci Total Environ 580:197–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Wang S, Zhou C, Li M (2019) Does the path of technological progress matter in mitigating China’s PM2.5 concentrations? Evidence from three urban agglomerations in China. Environ Pollut 254:113012

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li F, Zhang J, Zhou W, Wang X, Fu H (2020) Spatiotemporal mapping and multiple driving forces identifying of PM2.5 variation and its joint management strategies across China. J Clean Prod 250:119534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2020) The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China. J Environ Manag 265:110532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):121–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Zhang M, Chen S, Wang W, Nie R (2019) The environmental Kuznets curve for PM2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China: a spatial panel data approach. J Clean Prod 220:984–994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Yu B, Pan Y (2019) Examining the synergistic effect of CO2 emissions on PM2.5 emissions reduction: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 223:759–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (2019) Cleaner air for China. Nat Geosci 12(7):497–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang D, Hao P, Yu Q, Wang J (2020) The impacts of electricity consumption in China’s key economic regions. Appl Energy 267:115078

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Ning M, Lei Y, Sun Y, Liu W, Wang J (2019) Defending blue sky in China: effectiveness of the “air pollution prevention and control action plan” on air quality improvements from 2013 to 2017. J Environ Manag 252:109603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan D, Su X, Zhang Q, Peters GP, Liu Z, Lei Y, He K (2014) The socioeconomic drivers of China’s primary PM2.5emissions. Environ Res Lett 9(2):024010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra R, van den Bergh JCJM (2003) Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Econ 25(1):39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Fang C, Wang S, Sun S (2016) The effect of economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in China. Environ Sci Technol 50(21):11452–11459

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Zhang X, Shi M, Hewings GJD (2019) Does China’s air pollution abatement policy matter? An assessment of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on a multi-regional CGE model. Energy Policy 127:213–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Han S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li J, Wang Y (2020) Feasibility assessment of the carbon emissions peak in China’s construction industry: factor decomposition and peak forecast. Sci Total Environ 706:135716

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Chu Y, Hu J (2020) Clean air actions and air quality improvements — Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and surrounding areas, China, 2013−2019. China CDC Wkly 2(23):418–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu W, Li Y, Guan D, Zhao H, Zhang Q, Liu Z (2016) Driving forces of Chinese primary air pollution emissions: an index decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 133:136–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Z, Baležentis T, Shao S, Chang D (2019) Energy use, industrial soot and vehicle exhaust pollution—China’s regional air pollution recognition, performance decomposition and governance. Energy Econ 83:501–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu T, Yao X, Shao S, Li D, Wang W (2018) Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: an estimated DSGE model. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 47:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Liu J, Geng Y, Miao Z, Yang Y (2016) Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector. Appl Energy 166:220–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi K, Shen J, Wang L, Ma M, Cui Y (2020) A multiscale analysis of the effect of urban expansion on PM2.5 concentrations in China: evidence from multisource remote sensing and statistical data. Build Environ 174:106778

    Google Scholar 

  • Song X, Geng Y, Li K, Zhang X, Wu F, Pan H, Zhang Y (2020) Does environmental infrastructure investment contribute to emissions reduction? A case of China. Front Energy 14(1):57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Fang J, Sun J (2018) Health-related benefits of air quality improvement from coal control in China: evidence from the Jing-Jin-Ji region. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:416–423

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chinese Ministry of Ecology and Environment (2019) 2019-2020 comprehensive action plan for air pollution control during fall and winter in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and nearby areas. Retrieved from http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/201910/t20191016_737803.html. Access 20 May 2020

  • The State Council of China (2013) Air pollution prevention and control action plan. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm. Access 20 May 2020

  • The State Council of China (2018) Three-year action plan to win the battle for a blue sky. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm. Access 20 May 2020

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin Randall V, Brauer M, Boys Brian L (2015) Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect 123(2):135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Hsu NC, Kahn RA, Levy RC, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Winker DM (2016) Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ Sci Technol 50(7):3762–3772

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaninsky A (2014) Factorial decomposition of CO2 emissions: a generalized Divisia index approach. Energy Econ 45:389–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Lu X, Deng Y, Sun Y, Nielsen CP, Liu Y, Zhu G, Bu M, Bi J, McElroy MB (2019a) China’s CO2 peak before 2030 implied from characteristics and growth of cities. Nat Sustain 2(8):748–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Yin H, Chen Y (2019b) The effect of environmental regulation on air quality: a study of new ambient air quality standards in China. J Clean Prod 215:268–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Tan L, Guo J, Wang Y, Liu H, Zhu W (2016) A study of allocative efficiency of PM2.5 emission rights based on a zero sum gains data envelopment model. J Clean Prod 113:1024–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Zhang M, Ding Y (2020) Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2.5 concentration: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. J Environ Manag 268:110703

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Q, Sun Q (2020) Assessing the impact of FDI on PM2.5 concentrations: a nonlinear panel data analysis for emerging economies. Environ Impact Assess Rev 80:106314

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua (2019) China sets air quality target for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-10/16/c_138476499.htm

  • Xu B, Lin B (2018) What cause large regional differences in PM2.5 pollutions in China? Evidence from quantile regression model. J Clean Prod 174:447–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Ren X, Xiong K, Li L, Bi X, Wu Q (2020) Analysis of the driving factors of PM2.5 concentration in the air: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecol Indic 110:105889

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q, Yin J, Baležentis T, Makutėnienė D, Štreimikienė D (2017) Energy-related GHG emission in agriculture of the European countries: an application of the Generalized Divisia Index. J Clean Prod 164:686–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Lei Y, Shi Y, Zhu Q, Li L, Zhang Z (2018) Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China – a case study from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Atmos Environ 183:225–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q, Wang Y, Baležentis T, Streimikiene D (2019a) Analysis of China’s regional thermal electricity generation and CO2 emissions: decomposition based on the generalized Divisia index. Sci Total Environ 682:737–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q, Wang Y, Li Z, Baležentis T, Streimikiene D (2019b) Coordinated development of thermal power generation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: evidence from decomposition and scenario analysis for carbon dioxide emission. J Clean Prod 232:1402–1417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Ren X, Kong Y, Ye B, Liao Z (2020) The heterogeneous effects of socioeconomic determinants on PM2.5 concentrations using a two-step panel quantile regression. Appl Energy 272:115246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Song D, Fang D, Wu F (2019) Drivers of consumption-based PM2.5 emission of Beijing: a structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 219:734–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue H, He C, Huang Q, Yin D, Bryan BA (2020) Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China. Nat Commun 11(1):1462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zheng Y, Tong D, Shao M, Wang S, Zhang Y, Xu X, Wang J, He H, Liu W, Ding Y, Lei Y, Li J, Wang Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Cheng J, Liu Y, Shi Q, Yan L, Geng G, Hong C, Li M, Liu F, Zheng B, Cao J, Ding A, Gao J, Fu Q, Huo J, Liu B, Liu Z, Yang F, He K, Hao J (2019a) Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(49):24463–24469

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Shuai C, Bian J, Chen X, Wu Y, Shen L (2019b) Socioeconomic factors of PM2.5 concentrations in 152 Chinese cities: decomposition analysis using LMDI. J Clean Prod 218:96–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wu Y, Yu Y (2020a) Spatial decomposition analysis of water intensity in China. Socio Econ Plan Sci 69:100680

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Sun X, Wang W (2020b) Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. J Clean Prod 256:120748

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Zhao K, Yu Y (2020c) The effect of environmental regulation on air pollution, productivity, and factor structure: a quasi-natural experiment evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(16):20392–20409

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Geng Y, Shao S, Dong H, Wu R, Yao T, Song J (2020d) How to achieve China’s CO2 emission reduction targets by provincial efforts? – an analysis based on generalized Divisia index and dynamic scenario simulation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 127:109892

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Geng Y, Shao S, Song X, Fan M, Yang L, Song J (2020e) Decoupling PM2.5 emissions and economic growth in China over 1998–2016: a regional investment perspective. Sci Total Environ 714:136841

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Wang M, Zhang B (2019) The effects of urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt: new evidence from spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 239:118065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Q, Shi J (2020) The heterogeneous effect of socioeconomic driving factors on PM2.5 in China’s 30 province-level administrative regions: evidence from Bayesian hierarchical spatial quantile regression. Environ Pollut 264:114690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive suggestions and comments on an earlier version of the paper.

Funding

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71801133, 71771126, and 7177116), Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (No. 2017SJB0336, and 2020SJZDA051), and funded by Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu (17GLB013) and Government Audit Research Foundation of Nanjing Audit University (GAS171014). This research was also supported by Suzhou Key Laboratory for Big Data and Information Service (SZS201813).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yu Yu: writing - original draft, conceptualization, methodology, investigation. Xia Zhou: data curation, software, writing - review and editing. Weiwei Zhu: conceptualization, investigation. Qinfen Shi: supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weiwei Zhu or Qinfen Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 5
figure 5

Changes in relative factors of the change of PM2.5 emission in the 3J region (based on PM2.5 emission in 2000)

Table 5 Contributions of factors of the change rate of PM2.5 emission from 2003 to 2017 in Beijing
Table 6 Contributions of influencing factors of PM2.5 emission change from 2003 to 2017 in Beijing
Table 7 Contributions of influencing factors of PM2.5 emission change rate from 2003 to 2017 in Tianjin
Table 8 Contributions of influencing factors of PM2.5 emission change from 2003 to 2017 in Tianjin
Table 9 Contributions of influencing factors of PM2.5 emission change rate from 2003 to 2017 in Hebei
Table 10 Contributions of influencing factors of PM2.5 emission change from 2003 to 2017 in Hebei
Table 11 Contribution rates of various influencing factors on PM2.5 emission change in the 3J at different stages from 2003 to 2017

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Zhou, X., Zhu, W. et al. Socioeconomic driving factors of PM2.5 emission in Jing-Jin-Ji region, China: a generalized Divisia index approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 15995–16013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11698-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11698-9

Keywords

Navigation