Abstract
The aerobic granular sludge (AGS) process and microalgal-bacterial granular sludge (MBGS) process were comparably applied for municipal wastewater treatment in sequencing batch reactors with a height to diameter ratio of eight. For morphological appearances, the yellow aerobic granules were strip-shaped (4.0 mm × 0.62 mm) while the green microalgal-bacterial granules were elliptical-shaped (2.0 mm × 0.75 mm). The dominated rod-shaped bacteria (e.g., Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes) and the slender configuration might be associated with the strip shape of aerobic granules under weak acid conditions. The nutrients removal performances by MBGS process were generally slightly better than AGS process. In addition, nutrients removal mechanisms were identified to elucidate how organics, ammonia, and phosphorus were removed by AGS process and MBGS process, respectively. Mass balance calculation estimated that MBGS process appeared to achieve much less CO2 emission (5.8%) compared with AGS process (44.4%). Overall, it proved that MBGS process, with the merits of potentially low energy cost, limited CO2 emission, and excellent performance, showed more prospects in municipal wastewater treatment than AGS process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ab Halim MH, Anuar AN, Jamal NSA, Azmi SI, Ujang Z, Bob MM (2016) Influence of high temperature on the performance of aerobic granular sludge in biological treatment of wastewater. J Environ Manag 184:271–280
APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21th edn. Washington
Azam HM, Alam ST, Hasan M, Yameogo DDS, Kannan AD, Rahman A, Kwon MJ (2019) Phosphorous in the environment: characteristics with distribution and effects, removal mechanisms, treatment technologies, and factors affecting recovery as minerals in natural and engineered systems. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:20183–20207
Boelee NC, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman C, Wijffels RH (2014) Balancing the organic load and light supply in symbiotic microalgal–bacterial biofilm reactors treating synthetic municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 64:213–221
Cai J, Liu J, Pan A, Liu J, Wang Y, Liu J, Sun F, Lin H, Chen J, Su X (2020) Effective decolorization of anthraquinone dye reactive blue 19 using immobilized Bacillus sp. JF4 isolated by resuscitation-promoting factor strategy. Water Sci Technol 81:1159–1169
Daims H, Lebedeva EV, Pjevac P, Han P, Herbold C, Albertsen M, Jehmlich N, Palatinszky M, Vierheilig J, Bulaev A, Kirkegaard RH, von Bergen M, Rattei T, Bendinger B, Nielsen PH, Wagner M (2015) Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528:504–509
Du R, Cao S, Peng Y, Zhang H, Wang S (2019) Combined partial denitrification (PD)-anammox: a method for high nitrate wastewater treatment. Environ Int 126:707–716
González-Camejo J, Montero P, Aparicio S, Ruano MV, Borrás L, Seco A, Barat R (2020) Nitrite inhibition of microalgae induced by the competition between microalgae and nitrifying bacteria. Water Res 172:115499
Gu J, Yang Q, Liu Y (2018) Mainstream anammox in a novel A-2B process for energy-efficient municipal wastewater treatment with minimized sludge production. Water Res 138:1–6
He Q, Chen L, Zhang S, Chen R, Wang H, Zhang W, Song J (2018) Natural sunlight induced rapid formation of water-born algal-bacterial granules in an aerobic bacterial granular photo-sequencing batch reactor. J Hazard Mater 359:222–230
He Q, Song J, Zhang W, Gao S, Wang H, Yu J (2020) Enhanced simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal through mixed carbon source by aerobic granular sludge. J Hazard Mater 382:121043
Heylen K, Vanparys B, Wittebolle L, Verstraete W, Boon N, De Vos P (2006) Cultivation of denitrifying bacteria: optimization of isolation conditions and diversity study. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2637–2643
Ji B, Chen W, Fan J, Song H (2017) Research progress on microbes in aerobic granular sludge. Chin Sci Bull 62:2639–2648
Ji B, Zhang X, Zhang S, Song H, Kong Z (2019) Insights into the bacterial species and communities of a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic wastewater treatment plant by using third-generation sequencing. J Biosci Bioeng 128:744–750
Ji B, Zhang M, Gu J, Ma Y, Liu Y (2020a) A self-sustaining synergetic microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process towards energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res 179:115884
Ji B, Zhang M, Wang L, Wang S, Liu Y (2020b) Removal mechanisms of phosphorus in non-aerated microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process. Bioresour Technol 312:121531
Ji B, Zhu L, Wang S, Qin H, Ma Y, Liu Y (2020c) A novel micro-ferrous dosing strategy for enhancing biological phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater. Sci Total Environ 704:135453
Jiang HL, Tay JH, Liu Y, Tay S (2003) Ca2+ augmentation for enhancement of aerobically grown microbial granules in sludge blanket reactors. Biotechnol Lett 25:95–99
Jiang Y, Shang Y, Gong T, Hu Z, Yang K, Shao S (2020) High concentration of Mn2+ has multiple influences on aerobic granular sludge for aniline wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 253:126664
Kong Y, Xia Y, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2008) Structure and function of the microbial community in a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plant. Microbiology 153:4061–4073
Li C, Liu S, Ma T, Zheng M, Ni J (2019) Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) under low temperature. Chemosphere 229:132–141
Liu Y, Tay J (2004) State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22:533–563
Liu L, Fan H, Liu Y, Liu C, Huang X (2017) Development of algae-bacteria granular consortia in photo-sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 232:64–71
Liu L, Hong Y, Ye X, Wei L, Liao J, Huang X, Liu C (2018) Biodiesel production from microbial granules in sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 249:908–915
Meng S, Meng X, Fan W, Liang D, Wang L, Zhang W, Liu Y (2020) The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in membrane fouling: a critical review. Water Res 181:115930
Nguyen TKL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Nghiem LD, Liu Y, Ni B, Hai FI (2019) Insight into greenhouse gases emissions from the two popular treatment technologies in municipal wastewater treatment processes. Sci Total Environ 671:1302–1313
Pang H, Li L, He J, Yan Z, Ma Y, Nan J, Liu Y (2020) New insight into enhanced production of short-chain fatty acids from waste activated sludge by cation exchange resin-induced hydrolysis. Chem Eng J 388:124235
Qin H, Ji B, Zhang S, Kong Z (2018) Study on the bacterial and archaeal community structure and diversity of activated sludge from three wastewater treatment plants. Mar Pollut Bull 135:801–807
Quijano G, Arcila JS, Buitrón G (2017) Microalgal-bacterial aggregates: applications and perspectives for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 35:772–781
Sedlacek CJ, McGowan B, Suwa Y, Sayavedra-Soto L, Laanbroek HJ, Stein LY, Norton JM, Klotz MG, Bollmann A (2019) A physiological and genomic comparison of Nitrosomonas cluster 6a and 7 ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Microb Ecol 78:985–994
Świątczak P, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A (2018) Performance and microbial characteristics of biomass in a full-scale aerobic granular sludge wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:1655–1669
Timmermans P, Van Haute A (1983) Denitrification with methanol: fundamental study of the growth and denitrification capacity of Hyphomicrobium sp. Water Res 17:1249–1255
Yang X, Xu T, Cao P, Qiao K, Wang L, Zhao T, Zhu J (2019) The viscosity behaviors of bacterial suspensions or extracellular polymeric substances and their effects on aerobic granular sludge. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:30087–30097
Zhang B, Lens PNL, Shi W, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Guo Y, Bao X, Cui F (2018) Enhancement of aerobic granulation and nutrient removal by an algal-bacterial consortium in a lab-scale photobioreactor. Chem Eng J 334:2373–2382
Zhang M, Gu J, Liu Y (2019) Engineering feasibility, economic viability and environmental sustainability of energy recovery from nitrous oxide in biological wastewater treatment plant. Bioresour Technol 282:514–519
Zhang M, Ji B, Liu Y (2021) Microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process: a game changer of future municipal wastewater treatment? Sci Total Environ 752:141957
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments for improving the quality of this paper.
Funding
This research was financially supported by the Project of Key Laboratory of Healthy and Freshwater Aquaculture, Ministry of Agriculture (ZJK201810), the College Students’ Science and Technology Innovation Fund of WUST (18ZRA023) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808416).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DG and XZ wrote the initial paper including drawing the pictures. XZ and YS performed the research and analyzed the data. JY and JF contributed to the experiment conduction and commented on the initial version of the paper. BJ and BC revised the paper. BJ made substantial contributions to the conception of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ta Yeong Wu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, D., Zhang, X., Shi, Y. et al. Microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process outperformed aerobic granular sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment with less carbon dioxide emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 13616–13623 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11565-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11565-7