Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of natural resources, globalization, and renewable energy in testing the EKC hypothesis in MINT countries: new evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We employ the new Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach to expose the role of natural resources, renewable energy, and globalization in testing Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC) in MINT panel covering the years 1995–2018. The outcome validates the EKC curve between economic progress and carbon emissions from the third quantile to the extreme highest quantile. The result also shows that natural resources increase CO2 emissions at the lowest quantile and then turn insignificant from the middle to the highest quantiles due to the potential utilization of resources in a sustainable manner. The renewable energy mitigates CO2 emissions at the lower half quantiles. Still, for upper quantiles, the results are unexpected and imply that the countries’ total energy mix depends heavily on fossil fuels. As far as globalization is concerned, the significant results from medium to upper quantiles reveal that as globalization heightens due to foreign direct investment or trade, energy consumption also expands, leading to the worst environment quality. Thus, the present study’s consequences deliver guidelines for policymakers to utilize natural resources sustainably and opt technologies based on clean energy, which may offset environmental degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. The data used in this study can be provided upon request to the corresponding author of this paper.

References

  • Agras J, Chapman D (1999) A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 28:267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Zhao Z-Y (2018) Empirics on linkages among industrialization, urbanization, energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: a heterogeneous panel study of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30617–30632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Qasim A, Long W (2015) The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan. Ecol Indic 49:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Mahalik MK, Shahbaz M (2016) Dynamics between economic growth, labor, capital and natural resource abundance in Iran: an application of the combined cointegration approach. Resour Policy 49:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlFarra HJ, Abu-Hijleh B (2012) The potential role of nuclear energy in mitigating CO2 emissions in the United Arab Emirates. Energy Policy 42:272–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Waqas H, Ahmad N (2015) Analyzing the dynamics of energy consumption, liberalization, financial development, poverty and carbon emissions in Pakistan. J Appl Env Biol Sci 5:166–183

    Google Scholar 

  • An H, Razzaq A, Haseeb M, Mihardjo LW (2020) The role of technology innovation and people’s connectivity in testing environmental Kuznets curve and pollution heaven hypotheses across the Belt and Road host countries: new evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10775-3

  • Apergis N, Payne J, Menyah K, Yemane W-R (2010a) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69:2255–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE, Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010b) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69:2255–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Attiaoui I, Toumi H, Ammouri B, Gargouri I (2017) Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13036–13048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8850-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Audi M, Ali A (2018) Determinants of environmental degradation under the perspective of globalization: a panel analysis of selected MENA nations. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85776/

  • Aziz N, Sharif A, Raza A, Rong K (2020a) Revisiting the role of forestry, agriculture, and renewable energy in testing environment Kuznets curve in Pakistan: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:10115–10128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07798-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz N, Mihardjo LWW, Sharif A, Jermsittiparsert K (2020b) The role of tourism and renewable energy in testing the environmental Kuznets curve in the BRICS countries: fresh evidence from methods of moments quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:39427–39441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10011-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4881–4892

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M (2016) Energy consumption and trade openness in the correction of GHG levels in Spain. Bull Energy Econ 4:310–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Driha OM, Bekun FV, Osundina OA (2019a) Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:25218–25234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05737-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019b) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:23010–23026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekhet HA, Othman NS (2018) The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP toward sustainable development in Malaysia. Energy Econ 72:47–61

  • Bélaïd F, Youssef M (2017) Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: assessing the evidence from Algeria. Energy Policy 102:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder M, Coad A (2011) From average Joe’s happiness to miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution. J Econ Behav Organ 79:275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brajer V, Mead RW, Xiao F (2011) Searching for an environmental Kuznets curve in China’s air pollution. China Econ Rev 22:383–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2011.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum (2018) BP statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Canay IA (2011) A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Econom J 14:368–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavlovic TA, Baker KH, Berrens RP, Gawande K (2000) A meta-analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curve studies. Agric Resour Econ Rev 29(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):401–416

  • Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2005) Free trade and global warming: a trade theory view of the Kyoto protocol. J Environ Econ Manage 49:205–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadasov R, Hefeker C, Lorz O (2017) Natural resource extraction, corruption, and expropriation. Rev World Econ 153:809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-017-0288-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO 2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vita G, Katircioglu S, Altinay L, Fethi S, Mercan M (2015) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in a tourism development context. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16652–16663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4861-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf E, Vollebergh HRS (1998) Growth and environment—is there a Kuznets curve for carbon emissions? In: 2nd ESEE conference, University of Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30:1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19834279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Hochman G, Zhang Y, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: empirical evidence across regions. Energy Econ 75:180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu C, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • El Fadel M, Rachid G, El-Samra R, Boutros GB, Hashisho J (2013) Emissions reduction and economic implications of renewable energy market penetration of power generation for residential consumption in the MENA region. Energy Policy 52:618–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2009) Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:1082–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Genty A, Arto I, Neuwahl F (2012) Final database of environmental satellite accounts: technical report on their compilation. WIOD Deliv 4(6):1–69

  • Ghosh S (2002) Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 30:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Hinterberger F, Bruckner M, Burger E, Frühmann J, Lutter S, Pirgmaier E, Polzin C, Waxwender H, Kernegger L, Warhurst M (2009) Overconsumption? Our use of the world’s natural resources. Retrieved from https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:41132213

  • Gill AR, Viswanathan KK, Hassan S (2018) A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for carbon emission and potential of renewable energy to reduce green house gases (GHG) in Malaysia. Environ Dev Sustain 20:1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9929-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2017) Annual Report Global Footprint Network. Reterived from https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/uploads/2018/07/GFN_AR_2017_FINAL_lores.pdf

  • Global IRP (2019) Resources outlook 2019: natural resources for the future we want

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser No 3914:1–57. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh W, Levinson A, Wilson DM (2002) Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84:541–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Haseeb A, Xia E, Danish, Baloch MA, Abbas K (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31283–31296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil MT, Wodon QT (1997) Inequality in CO2 emissions between poor and rich countries. J Environ Dev 6:426–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659700600404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huaman RNE, Jun TX (2014) Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:368–385

  • Huang J-T (2018) Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China - evidence from spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 175:431–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain J, Khan A, Zhou K (2020) The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: a cross-country analysis. Energy 199:117409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IBRD (1992) World Development Report 1992. Development and the environment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2014) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-overview

  • Irandoust M (2016) The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: evidence from the Nordic countries. Ecol Indic 69:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaycı C, Hayaloğlu P (2019) The impact of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: the case of NAFTA countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9:356–360. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang M-H (2001) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited

  • Katircioǧlu ST (2014) Testing the tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Singapore. Econ Model 41:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.05.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MK, Teng JZ, Khan MI, Khan MO (2019a) Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 688:424–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MTI, Yaseen MR, Ali Q (2019b) Nexus between financial development, tourism, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: a continent-wise analysis. Energy Econ 83:293–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (2004) Quantile regression for longitudinal data. J Multivar Anal 91(1):74–89

  • Kolcava D, Nguyen Q, Bernauer T (2019) Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? Ecol Econ 163:98–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwakwa PA, Alhassan H, Adu G (2018) Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana. University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2013) Investigating the influence of tourism on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from panel analysis of the European Union. Tour Manag 38:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Oh D-W (2015) Economic growth and the environment in China: empirical evidence using prefecture level data. China Econ Rev 36:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Ren X, Cheng C, Wang Z (2020) The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Sci Total Environ 718:137379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machado J, Silva JS (2019) Quantiles via moments. J Econom 213:145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood N, Wang Z, Hassan ST (2019) Renewable energy, economic growth, human capital, and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:20619–20630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05387-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehmet M, Bölük G, Büyükyilmaz A (2015) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs and economic growth: evidence from a ridge regression of Kyoto annex countries. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilim. Fakültesi Derg 15:45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mert M, Bölük G, Çağlar AE (2019) Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO 2 emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21495–21510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mudakkar SR, Zaman K, Khan MM, Ahmad M (2013) Energy for economic growth, industrialization, environment and natural resources: living with just enough. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:580–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill J (2013) Who you calling a BRIC? Bloom. View 12:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk Z, Yildirim E (2015) Environmental kuznets curve in the mint countries: evidence of long-run panel causality test. Int J Econ Soc Res 11(1):175–183

  • Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38:7850–7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory 20:597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao H, Zheng F, Jiang H, Dong K (2019) The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: evidence from G20 countries. Sci Total Environ 671:722–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafindadi AA, Usman O (2019) Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: startling empirical evidence from the Makicointegration test. J Environ Manag 265–275:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza SA, Shah N (2017) Tourism growth and income inequality: does Kuznets Curve hypothesis exist in top tourist arrival countries. Asia Pacific J Tour Res 22:874–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Akadiri S, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2019) Examining the impact of globalization in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the case of tourist destination states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:12605–12615

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2699–2709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:21993–22022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2347-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satoglu EB (2017) Emerging through foreign investment: investment development path estimation of MINT economies. Adv Econ Bus 5:256–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbia R, Shahbaz M, Hamdi H (2014) A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness, carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE. Econ Model 36:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer L, Behrens P, de Koning A, Heijungs R, Sprecher B, Tukker A (2018) Trade-offs between social and environmental Sustainable Development Goals. Environ Sci Pol 90:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Econ 46:757–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross country evidence. Background Paper for the World Development Report 1992. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabadi A, Feyzi S (2016) The relationship between natural resources abundance, foreign direct investment and environmental performance in selected oil and developed countries during 1996–2013. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/trd/journl/v4y2016i3p101-116.html

  • Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Bhattacharya M, Ahmed K (2015a) Growth-globalisation-emissions nexus: the role of population in Australia. Monash Bus Sch Discuss Pap 23:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015b) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Dube S, Ozturk I, Jalil A (2015c) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Portugal. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(2):475–481

  • Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time-varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth nexus: statistical experience in next 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singapore Econ Rev 62:929–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Lahiani A, Abosedra S, Hammoudeh S (2018a) The role of globalization in energy consumption: a quantile cointegrating regression approach. Energy Econ 71:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Naeem M, Ahad M, Tahir I (2018b) Is natural resource abundance a stimulus for financial development in the USA? Resour Policy 55:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Kumar Mahalik M, Jawad Hussain Shahzad S, Hammoudeh S (2019) Testing the globalization-driven carbon emissions hypothesis: international evidence. Int Econ 158:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi MA (2019a) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11191–11211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019b) The dynamic relationship of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Mishra S, Sinha A, Jiao Z, Shahbaz M, Afshan S (2020) The renewable energy consumption-environmental degradation nexus in top-10 polluted countries: fresh insights from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Renew Energy 150:670–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Simas M, Wood R, Hertwich E (2015) Labor embodied in trade: The role of labor and energy productivity and implications for greenhouse gas emissions. J Ind Ecol 19(3):343–356

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern D (2017) The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. J Bioecon 19:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: a critique of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 24:1151–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman J, Azman A, Saboori B (2013) The potentialof renewable energy: using the environmental kuznets curve model. Am J Environ Sci 9:103–112. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2013.103.112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi H (2012) The environmental Kuznets curve in Asia: the case of sulphur and carbon emissions. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 19(2):77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman O, Iorember PT, Olanipekun IO (2019) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13390–13400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Ox Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

  • Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2008) A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70(5):665–704

  • World Bank (2019) World Development Report 2019 retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2019

  • Wright C (2014) After the BRICS are the MINTs, but can you make any money from them? Forbes, January 6. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswright/2014/01/06/after-the-brics-the-mints-catchy-acronym-but-can-you-make-any-money-from-it/

  • Wu R, Geng Y, Liu W (2017) Trends of natural resource footprints in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. J Clean Prod 142:775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou F (2019) The nexus of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:15162–15173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04912-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zencey E (2012) The other road to serfdom and the path to sustainable democracy. University Press of New England, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Noshaba Aziz: conceptualization, writing – original draft

Arshian Sharif: writing methodology and data analysis

Ali Raza: writing – original draft

Kittisak Jermsittiparsert: writing – review and editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kittisak Jermsittiparsert.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz, N., Sharif, A., Raza, A. et al. The role of natural resources, globalization, and renewable energy in testing the EKC hypothesis in MINT countries: new evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 13454–13468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11540-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11540-2

Keywords

Navigation