Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation and environmental total factor productivity in China: the moderating roles of economic policy uncertainty and marketization process

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s economic development practices are facing strict energy constraints and severe environmental pollution. Improvement of China’s environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) through innovation is a major scientific focus of both policy-makers and academia. However, the boundary conditions where innovation affects ETFP are yet to be clarified. On this basis, the present study starts from two dimensions—policy context and market context, introduces economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and marketization process as moderating variables, and examines the impact mechanism of innovation on ETFP. The results show the following: (1) Innovation promotes ETFP. (2) Although EPU inhibits ETFP, it positively moderates the impact of innovation on ETFP. (3) The marketization process has an insignificant inhibitory effect on ETFP. Specifically, the development of product markets, the development of market intermediary organizations, and the legal system environment have a significant inhibitory effect on ETFP. In contrast, the marketization process positively moderates the impact of innovation on ETFP. (4) The impact of innovation on ETFP exhibits obvious regional heterogeneity. In regions with low pollution intensity, innovation and EPU promotes ETFP. The marketization process inhibits ETFP and shows a positive moderating effect. In regions with high pollution intensity, both innovation and EPU inhibits ETFP. Based on these conclusions, policy-makers should guide companies to increase investment in research and development, improve innovation capabilities, and focus on strengthening energy-saving and environmental protection technologies and process innovations. When formulating and adjusting economic policies, policy-makers should aim promote enterprise innovation and reduce the negative impact of economic policy uncertainty. Policies should fully utilize the decisive role of the market in the allocation of innovative factors and rely on market mechanisms to enhance the positive effect of innovation on regional ETFP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For detailed information and related data on this index, please refer to http://policyuncertainty.com/china_monthly.html.

References

  • Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 120(2):701–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldieri L, Kotsemir M, Vinci CP (2019) Environmental innovations and productivity: empirical evidence from Russian regions. Res Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101444

  • Amable B, Ledezma I, Robin S (2016) Product market regulation, innovation, and productivity. Res Policy 45(10):2087–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov J, Julio B, Leng T (2015) The bright side of political uncertainty: the case of R&D. SSRN Electron J

  • Baker SR, Bloom N, Canes-Wrone B, Davis SJ, Rodden J (2014) Why has US policy uncertainty risen since 1960? Am Econ Rev 104(5):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Q J Econ 131(4):1593–1636

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N (2007) Uncertainty and the dynamics of R&D. Am Econ Rev 97(2):250–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaime A, Gulen H, Ion M (2018) Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions? J Financ Econ 129(3):531–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrión-Flores CE, Innes R (2010) Environmental innovation and environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manag 59:27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Li R, Tillmann P (2019) Pushing on a string: state-owned enterprises and monetary policy transmission in China. China Econ Rev 54:26–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Kettunen J (2017) Is certainty in carbon policy better than uncertainty? Eur J Oper Res 258(1):230–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Golley J (2014) ‘Green’ productivity growth in China’s industrial economy. Energy Econ 44:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lee CC (2020) Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J Clean Prod 263:121550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui H, Wei P (2017) Analysis of thermal coal pricing and the coal price distortion in China from the perspective of market forces. Energy Policy 106:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakhlaoui I, Aloui C (2016) The interactive relationship between the US economic policy uncertainty and BRIC stock markets. Int Econ 146:141–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M (2019) The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15028–15038

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Xu Y, Fan X (2020) How to achieve a win-win situation between economic growth and carbon emission reduction: empirical evidence from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading. Environ Sci Pollut Res. (In press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09883-x

  • Droste N, Hansjürgens B, Kuikman P, Otler N, Antikainen R, Leskinen P, Pitkänen K, Saikku L, Loiseau E, Thomsen M (2016) Steering innovations towards a green economy: understanding government intervention. J Clean Prod 135:426–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Chen Y, Huang Y (2018) A modified Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index: assessing environmental productivity performance in China. Eur J Oper Res 269(1):171–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan S, Yıldırım S, Yıldırım DÇ, Gedikli A (2020) The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. J Environ Manag 267:110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan G, Wang X, Zhu H (2011) The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China. The Economic Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA (2007) Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32(7):1055–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder C (2018) The effects of disruptive innovations on productivity. Technol Forecast Soc Change 126:186–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Wang M (2019) Journey for green development transformation of China’s metal industry: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 225:1105–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine I, Razafindravaosolonirina J, Didier L (2018) Chinese policy uncertainty shocks and the world macroeconomy: evidence from STVAR. China Econ Rev 51:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Mohnen P, Zanello G (2018) Innovation and productivity in formal and informal firms in Ghana. Technol Forecast Soc Change 131:315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Pozo A, Marchante-Mera AJ, Campos-Soria JA (2018) Innovation, environment, and productivity in the Spanish service sector: an implementation of a CDM structural model. J Clean Prod 171:1049–1057

  • Ghisetti C, Rennings K (2014) Environmental innovations and profitability: how does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. J Clean Prod 75:106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulen H, Ion M (2016) Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Rev Financ Stud 29(3):523–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Wu Y, Wu H, Ren S (2020) How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:7835–7850

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Chiu YH, Zhang B (2015) The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firm’s efficiency in China. North Am J Econ Finance 33:252–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu F, Tan W, Xin Q, Yang S (2013) How do market forces affect executive compensation in Chinese state-owned enterprises? China Econ Rev 25:78–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Gong D (2019) Economic policy uncertainty, prudential regulation and bank lending. Financ Res Lett 29:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, He S, Cui Y, Zhou H, Kong H (2020) Effects of the socio-economic influencing factors on SO2 pollution in Chinese cities: a spatial econometric analysis based on satellite observed data. J Environ Manag 268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110667

  • Jin P, Peng C, Song M (2019) Macroeconomic uncertainty, high-level innovation, and urban green development performance in China. China Econ Rev 55:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang W, Lee K, Ratti RA (2014) Economic policy uncertainty and firm-level investment. J Macroecon 39:42–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G (2014) The green productivity revolution of agriculture in China from 1978 to 2008. China Econ Q 13(2):537–558 (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang J, Chen R, Xi Y, Liu SQ, Wu F, Masoud M, Wu X (2019) Innovation-driven industrial green development: the moderating role of regional factors. J Clean Prod 222:344–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XM, Zhang B, Gao R (2015) Economic policy uncertainty shocks and stock–bond correlations: evidence from the US market. Econ Lett 132:91–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Zhao J, He S, Xu Q, Ma X (2019) Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emission intensity in Chinese provinces from the perspective of innovation-driven. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13878–13895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Chen Z (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Zhan J, Wang C, Li S, Zhang F (2018) Environmentally sensitive productivity growth of industrial sectors in the Pearl River Delta. Resour Conserv Recycl 139:50–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Feng C (2019) What drives the fluctuations of “green” productivity in China’s agricultural sector? A weighted Russell directional distance approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 147:201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhu J, Li EY, Meng Z, Song Y (2020) Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze river economic belt in China. Technol Forecast Soc Change 155:119993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Xin L (2019) Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?—Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energy Policy 129:360–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Long X, Chen Y, Du J, Oh K, Han I (2017) Environmental innovation and its impact on economic and environmental performance: evidence from Korean-owned firms in China. Energy Policy 107:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Long X, Luo Y, Wu C, Zhang J (2018) The influencing factors of CO2 emission intensity of Chinese agriculture from 1997 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13093–13101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markel E, Sims C, English BC (2018) Policy uncertainty and the optimal investment decisions of second-generation biofuel producers. Energy Econ 76:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Zarzoso I, Bengochea-Morancho A, Morales-Lage R (2019) Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries? Energy Policy 134:110982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao C, Fang D, Sun L, Luo Q, Yu Q (2018) Driving effect of technology innovation on energy utilization efficiency in strategic emerging industries. J Clean Prod 170:1177–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnoli A, de Vries FP (2010) Carbon trading thickness and market efficiency. Energy Econ 32(6):1331–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor L, Veronesi P (2012) Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. J Financ 67(4):1219–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel co-integration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of fooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20(3):597–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng X (2020) Strategic interaction of environmental regulation and green productivity growth in China: green innovation or pollution refuge? Sci Total Environ 732:139200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raza SA, Shah N, Shahbaz M (2018) Does economic policy uncertainty influence gold prices? Evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach. Res Policy 57:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper S, Tapinos E (2016) Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: an exploratory analysis of green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 112:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzenenti F, Basosi R (2008) The rebound effect: an evolutionary perspective. Ecol Econ 67(4):526–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Wang S, Liu W, Chu J (2019b) Does migration of pollution-intensive industries impact environmental efficiency? Evidence supporting “Pollution Haven Hypothesis”. J Environ Manag 242:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen N, Liao H, Deng R, Wang Q (2019a) Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China’s industry. J Clean Prod 211:171–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimshack JP, Ward MB (2008) Enforcement and over-compliance. J Environ Econ Manag 55(1):90–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Giudice MD, Chierici R, Graziano D (2020) Green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol Forecast Soc Change 150:119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Bello MO (2020) Energy innovations and environmental sustainability in the U.S.: the roles of immigration and economic expansion using a maximum likelihood method. Sci Total Environ 712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135594

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbano C, Crema M (2016) Linking technology innovation strategy, intellectual capital and technology innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs. Tech Anal Strat Manag 28(5):524–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Liu S (2020) Is technological innovation the effective way to achieve the “double dividend” of environmental protection and industrial upgrading? Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:18541–18556

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Pang S, Ding L, Miao Z (2020b) Combining the biennial Malmquist–Luenberger index and panel quantile regression to analyze the green total factor productivity of the industrial sector in China. Sci Total Environ 739:140280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Sun X (2017) Crude oil price: demand, supply, economic activity, economic policy uncertainty and wars – from the perspective of structural equation modelling (SEM). Energy 133:483–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Mirza N, Vasbieva DG, Abbas Q, Xiong D (2020a) The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: what should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements? J Environ Manag 271:111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Fan G, Yu J (2017) Marketization index of China’s provinces. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shen N (2016) Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: the case of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:758–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen J, Wang H, Chen F, Yu R (2018) Research on environmental efficiency and TFP of Beijing areas under the constraint of energy-saving and emission reduction. Ecol Indic 84:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng Q, Xu H (2018) A review of China’s carbon trading market. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Zou B, Du K, Li K (2020) Do renewable energy technology innovations promote China’s green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models. Energy Econ 90:104842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Wang S, Gong L (2018) The effects of factor market distortion and technical innovation on China’s electricity consumption. J Clean Prod 188:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu B (2020) Industrial structure, technological innovation, and total-factor energy efficiency in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8371–8385

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B (2019) Effectiveness-based innovation or efficiency-based innovation? Trade-off and antecedents under the goal of ecological total-factor energy efficiency in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:17333–17350

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176:895–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Lu R, Chen H, Yuan J (2018) Does financial development promote the win-win balance between environmental protection and economic growth? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Gallagher KS (2016) Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: evidence from China’s PV industry. Energy Policy 94:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Chang Y, Zhang L, Li D (2018) Do technological innovations promote urban green development?—A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China. J Clean Prod 182:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wu G, Zhang J (2004) The estimation of China's provincial capital stock: 1952–2000. Econ Res J 10:35–44 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Yu J (2014) Marketization and economic growth pattern in China: empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Nankai Econ Stud 3:3–22 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Wu L, Li A (2017) Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Zhang X, Shao Q, Wang X (2019) The non-linear effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution: empirical evidence for 277 Chinese cities during 2002–2010. J Environ Manag 248:109274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhu L (2020) Does renewable energy technological innovation control China’s air pollution? A spatial analysis. J Clean Prod 250:119515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This work was supported by the Social Science Foundation Think Tank Project of Hunan Province (19ZWB29), by the Think Tank Project of Central South University of Forestry and Technology (2019ZK003), by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2018JJ3889), by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71703171), and by the National Social Science Foundation of China (18CJL035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, People’s Republic of China

    Baolong Yuan & Xi Xiong

  2. Business School, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 514004, People’s Republic of China

    Chen Li

Authors
  1. Baolong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xi Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.Y.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, software and revising. C.L.: data collection and processing. X.X.: data collection, writing—reviewing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baolong Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

Innovation can significantly promote regional ETFP.

EPU has a significantly inhibiting impact on regional ETFP.

EPU positively moderates the effect of innovation on ETFP.

Marketization process positively moderates the effect of innovation on ETFP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, B., Li, C. & Xiong, X. Innovation and environmental total factor productivity in China: the moderating roles of economic policy uncertainty and marketization process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 9558–9581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11426-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11426-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation