Abstract
In the preceding two decades, the expansion of financial services has played a vital role in pursuing economic growth agendas in the developing Asian nations. However, its harmful effect on environmental quality cannot be denied. In this backdrop, in the present study, we investigated whether the financial sector development moderated the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint in the eight developing nations of South and Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2015. In doing so, we included the per capita income, energy solutions, and trade expansions as determinants of the ecological indicators. The results of the second-generation unit root tests and Westerlund’s cointegration test reported the long-run stability and cointegration, respectively. To navigate the possible cross-country dependency, we employed the cross-sectional augmented autoregressive distributed lag approach (CS-ARDL). The results confirmed that per capita income, energy solutions, trade expansion, and financial sector development invigorated the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint in the long run. Further, it is reported that the development in the financial sector has a significant moderating impact on the nexus between energy and environmental footprints. In other words, the financial sector development drove the association between the overall environmental quality and energy solutions in the long run. Similarly, we observed that the financial sector development worked as a significant mediator between environmental proxies and trade expansion. By including the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint as environmental proxies, the study provides the wider environmental spectrum. Based on the outcomes of the study, we proposed a novel scheme, which may help to address the harmful environmental impacts of the financial sector development in the selected developing nations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
We have prepared the data set and can be submitted as and when it is required.
References
Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed A (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323
Alola AA, Arikewuyo AO, Ozad B, Alola UV, Arikewuyo HO (2019a) A drain or drench on biocapacity? Environmental account of fertility, marriage, and ICT in the USA and Canada. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:4032–4043
Alola A, Bekun F, Sarkodie S (2019b) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709
Álvarez A, Balsalobre D, Shahbaz M, Cantos J (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397
Anderson G, Raissi M (2018) Corporate indebtedness and low productivity growth of Italian firms. IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/33, International Monetary Fund, European Department
Ang J (2008a) CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China. Ecol Econ 68(10):4772–4778
Ang J (2008b) Economic development, pollutant emission and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Policy Model 30(2):271–278
Baloch M, Danish, Meng F, Zhang J, Xu Z (2018) Financial instability and CO2 emissions: the case of Saudi Arabia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:26030–26045
Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Levine R (1999) A new database on financial development and structure. Discussion Paper No. 2, World Bank
Bekhet H, Matar A, Yasmin T (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:117–132
Bello M, Solarin S, Yen Y (2018) The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footrprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manag 219:218–230
Breusch T, Pagan A (1980) The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253
Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Raissi M (2016) Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 85–135
Destek M, Aslan A (2020) Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew Energy 151:1298–1306
Destek M, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085
Ebohon O (1996) Energy, economic growth and causality in developing countries: a case study of Tanzania and Nigeria. Energy Policy 24(5):447–453
Edoja GC (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ Financ 5(1379239):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239
Faisal F, Türsoy T, Reşatoğlu N (2016) Energy consumption, electricity, and GDP causality; the case of Russia, 1990-2011. Procedia Econ Financ 39:653–659
Fosten J, Morley B, Taylor T (2012) Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecol Econ 76:25–33
Ghita S, Saseanu A, Gogonea R-M, Huidumac-Petrescu C-E (2018) perspectives of ecological footprint in European context under the impact of information society and sustainable development. Sustainability 10(3224):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093224
Gill A, Hassan S, Haseeb M (2019) Moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets: a case study of Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:34468–34478
Herrmann I, Hauschild M (2009) Effects of globalisation on carbon footprints of products. CIRP Ann 58(1):13–16
Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D (2000) Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. J Dev Econ 62(2):445–476
Hou Y, Iqbal W, Shaikh G, Iqbal N, Solangi Y, Fatima A (2019) Measuring energy efficiency and environmental performance: a case of South Asia. Processes 7(325):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7060325
Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Castillo R, Sun L, Xue J (2017) Global carbon inequality. Energy Ecol Environ 2:361–369
IEA (2019) Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2019. Country report — October 2019, IEA, Paris. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2019. Accessed 21 Dec 2019
Ike G, Usman O, Sarkodie S (2020) Fiscal policy and CO2 emissions from heterogeneous fuel sources in Thailand: evidence from multiple structural breaks cointegration test. Sci Total Environ 702:134711
IMF (2003) Foreign direct investment in emerging market countries. Report of the Working Group of the Capital Markets Consultative Group, International Monetary Fund
IMF (2017) South Asia: continued robust growth, South Asia Regional Update. Available at: www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Countries/ResRep/IND/2017/051517-south-asia-continued-robust-growth.ashx (accessed 15 December 2019), International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ 44(27):3513–3519
Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:406–416
Jenkins H, Katircioglu S (2010) The bounds test approach for cointegration and causality between financial development, international trade and economic growth: the case of Cyprus. Appl Econ 42(13):1699–1707
Kanjilal K, Ghosh S (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56:509–515
Katircioğlu S, Taşpinar N (2017) Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:572–586
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28
Levin R, Loayza N, Beck T (2000) Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. J Monet Econ 46:31–77
Levin A, Lin C, Chu J (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24
Liu Y (2013) Energy production and regional economic growth in China: a more comprehensive analysis using a panel model. Energies 6(3):1409–1420
Llorca M, Meunié A (2009) SO2 emissions and the environmental Kuznets curve: the case of Chinese provinces. J Chin Econ Bus Stud 7(1):1–16
Mazur A, Phutkaradze Z, Phutkaradze J (2015) Economic growth and environmental quality in the European Union countries – is there evidence for the environmental Kuznets curve? Int J Manag Econ 45:108–126
Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (1972) The limits to growth; a report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books, New York
Moghadam H, Lotfalipour M (2014) Impact of financial development on the environmental quality in Iran. Chin Bus Rev 13(9):537–551
Munir A, Lean H, Smyth R (2020) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: a cross-sectional dependence approach. Energy Econ 85:104571
OECD (2018) Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: fostering growth through digitalisation. Paris, available at: http://dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2019) Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019: towards smart urban transportation. OECD iLibrary 19(1). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/economic-outlook-for-southeast-asia-china-and-india-2019_saeo-2019-en. Accessed 27 Dec 2019
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267
Pesaran M (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Rahman S, Wijayatunga P, Gunatilake H, Fernando P (2011) Energy trade in South Asia opportunities and challenges. Publication Stock No. BKK124531, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines
Riti J, Shu Y, Song D, Kamah M (2017) The contribution of energy use and financial development by source in climate change mitigation process: a global empirical perspective. J Clean Prod 148:882–894
Roy V, Singh S (2017) Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: review and research framework. J Clean Prod 150:224–236
Roy V, Schoenherr T, Charan P (2018) The thematic landscape of literature in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(4):1091–1124
Sabir S, Gorus M (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:33387–33398
Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38:2528–2535
Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: a survey of empirical literature. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168
Shahbaz M, Lean H, Shabir M (2012) Environment Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:537–544
Shahbaz M, Hye Q, Tiwari A, Leitão N (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121
Shahbaz M, Mahalik M, Loganathan N (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393
Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Kumar M, Sadorsky P (2016) The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Econ 55:52–68
Shahbaz M, Hoang TH, Mahalik MK, Roubaud D (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212
Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A (2019) Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod 217:603–614
Shahbaz M, Sharma R, Sinha A, Jiao Z (2021) Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy 148:111965
Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi M (2019a) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11191–11211
Sharif A, Raza S, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019b) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138
Sharma R, Kautish P (2020a) Examining the nonlinear impact of coal and oil based electricity production on CO2 emissions in India. Electr J 33(6):106775
Sharma R, Kautish P (2020b) Linkages between financial development and economic growth in the middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Vision 24(2):140–150
Sharma R, Kautish P, Kumar D (2019) Impact of selected macroeconomic determinants on economic growth in India: an empirical study. Vision 22(4):405–415
Sharma R, Kautish P, Uddin G (2020) Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Manag Environ Qual 31(1):89–110
Sharvini S, Noor Z, Chong C, Stringer L, Yusuf R (2018) Energy consumption trends and their linkages with renewable energy policies in East and Southeast Asian countries: challenges and opportunities. Sustain Environ Res 28:257–266
Sinha A (2017) Inequality of renewable energy generation across OECD countries: a note. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:9–14
Sinha A, Bhattacharya J (2016) Confronting environmental quality and societal aspects: an environmental Kuznets curve analysis for Indian cities. Int J Green Econ 10(1):69–88
Sinha A, Sengupta T, Kalugina O, Gulzar MA (2020a) Does distribution of energy innovation impact distribution of income: a quantile-based SDG modeling approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 160:120224
Sinha A, Sengupta T, Saha T (2020b) Technology policy and environmental quality at crossroads: sesigning SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 161:120317
Sinha A, Shah MI, Sengupta T, Jiao Z (2020c) Analyzing technology-emissions association in Top-10 polluted MENA countries: how to ascertain sustainable development by quantile modeling approach. J Environ Manage 267:110602
Sulaiman J, Azman A, Saboori B (2013) The potential of renewable energy: using the environmental Kuznets curve model. Am J Environ Sci 9(2):103–112
The Economics Times (2019) Out of top 10 most polluted cities in the world, 7 cities are from India alone. Available at: The-Economics-Times: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/out-of-top-10-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world-7-cities-are-from-india-alone/south-asias-battle/slideshow/68266564.cms. Accessed 25 May 2020
The Jakarta Post (2019) Jakarta has most polluted air in Southeast Asia: study. Available at: from The-Jakarta-Post: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/03/08/jakarta-has-most-polluted-air-in-southeast-asia-study.html. Accessed 25 May 2020
Tiwari A, Shabaz M, Adnan H (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527
Todaro M, Smith S (2017) Economic Development, 12th edn. Pearson Education, Noida
Uddin G, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic 77:166–175
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157
UNCTAD (2018) Trade policy frameworks for developing countries: a manual of best practices. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2017/5, United Nations, Geneva
Wang Z, Rasool Y, Asgar M, Wang B (2019) Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: emipirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36248–36263
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748
World Bank (2012) Global financial development report 2013: rethinking the role of the state in finance. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/financialdevelopment. Accessed 22 Jan 2020
Yeo A, Deng A (2019) The trade policy effect in international trade: case of Pakistan. J Econ Struct 8(43):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0169-8
Zhang P, London K (2011) Does globalization benefit developed or developing country? – case studies on Chinese and Australian construction industry. In: Zhou Q (ed) Advances in applied economics, business and development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Funding
We did not approach for the financial support pertaining to the submitted manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The corresponding author, i.e., Dr. Rajesh Sharma, has written the paper. The whole idea, novelty, and technical part is handled by Dr. Avik Sinha. Lastly, Dr. Pradeep Kautish provided support in terms of editing, proofreading, and drafting.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Ethical approval
While preparing the manuscript, to the best of our knowledge, we have followed required ethical procedures. We would like to declare that there is no conflict from authors and any other party directly or indirectly.
Consent to participate
We have consent of all authors and respective institutions to communicate the manuscript for consideration in the Journal.
Consent to publish
We confirm that if the paper is accepted, it could be published in this prestigious journal.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, R., Sinha, A. & Kautish, P. Does financial development reinforce environmental footprints? Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 9067–9083 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11295-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11295-w
Keywords
- Ecological footprint
- Carbon footprint
- Land footprint
- South Asian countries
- Southeast Asian countries
- Per capita income
- Energy