Skip to main content

The impact of economic and financial activities on air quality: a Chinese city perspective

Abstract

This study examines the impact of economic and financial activities on air pollution in China using prefecture-level panel data from 2004 to 2015. Recruiting the air quality index (AQI) as a measure of overall air quality in Chinese cities, we find that industrial production, financial development, and economic integration lead to higher overall air pollution. Nevertheless, efficiency in urban planning through public transportation and population density alleviates this environmental degradation. A closer look into the two main air pollutants in China, sulphur dioxide and dust, further highlights the complexity of the issue. We find that trade openness reduces both sulphur dioxide and dust emissions, whereas financial development reduces sulphur dioxide emissions but increases dust in Chinese cities. Our findings are of particular interest to policymakers when devising environmental policies in support of sustainable economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. This model is developed based on the (popular) IPAT (Influence, Population, Affluence, and Technology) model of Ehrlich and Holdren (1971)

  2. A few studies use prefecture-level data, see Lee and Oh (2015), Lin (2017), Chen et al. (2017).

  3. It is widely accepted as the main cause of global warming and climate change.

  4. It is the index of air quality (higher value means lower quality of air). That is, this value cannot be transformed to measure the air quality per capita.

  5. See Table 6, Appendix, for the list of cities.

  6. Equal to 1 if the year is in the period 2011–2015, otherwise equal to 0.

  7. In China’s 13th Five-Year Plan covering the period 2016–2020, dust emission (PM2.5), for the first time, is being added in the control list as a main pollutant.

  8. We thank our anonymous referee for this point.

References

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nguyen Phuc Canh: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, writing - original draft preparation, writing - reviewing and editing.

Wei Hao: data curation, validation, writing - original draft preparation, writing - reviewing and editing.

Udomsak Wongchoti: writing - original draft preparation, writing - reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Phuc Canh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 List of cities
Table 7 Summary of recent literature on air pollution (2011–2019)
Table 8 Summary of recent literature on the air pollution in China (2017–2019)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Canh, N.P., Hao, W. & Wongchoti, U. The impact of economic and financial activities on air quality: a Chinese city perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8662–8680 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11227-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11227-8

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • City
  • China
  • Industrial development
  • Economic integration

JEL code

  • Q53
  • Q54
  • Q56
  • F18
  • F64