Abstract
Cucumber, as a major cultivated plant in Iran, takes up more than 80% of greenhouse production. So, improving the production efficiency can save energy, reduce the environmental consequences and production costs, and also create a lot of job opportunities. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of energy flow optimization on the environmental impacts and costs in greenhouse cucumber production by data envelopment analysis (DEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods. For environmental assessment, human health damage, ecosystem damage, and resource scarcity were considered and analyzed in the form of 8, 12, and 2 impact categories, respectively, using the ReCiPe2016 (H) method on endpoint level. Required data were collected through questionnaire from 30 cucumber growers. The results of the current status of environmental impacts showed the major contribution of fuels (natural gas and diesel) in all three main impact categories. Based on DEA analysis, 19 greenhouses (63%) were identified as inefficient units with a mean efficiency score of 0.70 (TE = 0.7). The highest inefficiency was related to the manure (72%), electricity (71.7%), and fuel (59%), respectively. Electricity and manure showed the highest saving potential, while the highest contribution to total energy saving was related to fuel (87%). Environmental analysis of optimized greenhouses showed that efficient use of inputs can reduce all environmental impacts between 7 and 80%, which highlights the importance of efficient resource management in this study. Also, production costs were decreased by about 67 $ tonne−1 (196 to 129 $) after the optimization of the units.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.







Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- LCA:
-
Life cycle assessment
- DEA:
-
Data envelopment analysis
- DMU:
-
Decision-making unit
- LCI:
-
Life cycle inventory
- LCIA:
-
Life cycle impact assessment
- FU:
-
Functional unit
- DALY:
-
Disability-adjusted life years
- CCR:
-
Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes
- BCC:
-
Banker, Charnes, and Cooper
- VRS:
-
Variable returns to scale
- CRS:
-
Constant returns to scale
- TE:
-
Technical efficiency
- PTE:
-
Pure technical efficiency
References
Avkiran NK (2001) Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio Econ Plan Sci 35(1):57–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(00)00010-0
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Bolandnazar E, Rohani A, Taki M (2020) Energy consumption forecasting in agriculture by artificial intelligence and mathematical models. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 42(13):1618–1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1604872
Cecchini L, Venanzi S, Pierri A, Chiorri M (2018) Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): a SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. J Clean Prod 197:895–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.165
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444
Chauhan NS, Mohapatra PK, Pandey KP (2006) Improving energy productivity in paddy production through benchmarking—an application of data envelopment analysis. Energ Convers Manage 47:1063–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.07.004
Cichorowski G, Joa B, Hottenroth H, Schmidt M (2015) Scenario analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Darjeeling tea. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(4):426–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0840-0
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) (2004) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer, Dordrecht
Cooper JM, Butler G, Leifert C (2011) Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional food production systems, with and without bio-energy options. NJAS-Wagen J Life Sc 58(3–4):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2011.05.002
Durlinger B, Tyszler M, Scholten J, Broekema R, Blonk H, Beatrixstraat G (2014) October. Agri-footprint; a life cycle inventory database covering food and feed production and processing. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, pp 310–317
Eady S (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions from the cultivation of canola oilseed in Australia. CSIRO, Australia
Elhami B, Akram A, Khanali M (2016) Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Inform Process Agri 3(3):190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.07.002
Esfahani SMJ, Naderi Mahdei K, Saadi H, Dourandish A (2017) Efficiency and sustainability of silage corn production by data envelopment analysis and multi-functional ecological footprint: evidence from Sarayan County, Iran. J Agr Sci Tech 19(7):1453–1468 http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-23-5649-en.html
Farashah HR, Tabatabaeifar SA, Rajabipour A, Sefeedpari P (2013) Energy efficiency analysis of white button mushroom producers in Alburz Province of Iran: a data envelopment analysis approach. Open J Energy Effic 2:65–74. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojee.2013.22010
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Statist Soc: Ser A. 120(3):253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Heidari MD, Omid M, Mohammadi A (2012) Measuring productive efficiency of horticultural greenhouses in Iran: a data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.104
Huijbregts MA, Steinmann ZJ, Elshout PM, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(2):138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 408(22):5265–5272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.078
Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I, Rugani B, Benetto E (2014) On the feasibility of using emergy analysis as a source of benchmarking criteria through data envelopment analysis: a case study for wind energy. Energy. 67:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.109
ISO (2006a) Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. ISO 14040
ISO (2006b) Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044
Khanali M, Farahani SS, Shojaei H, Elhami B (2017) Life cycle environmental impacts of saffron production in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut R 24(5):4812–4821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8228-2
Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H (2013a) Applying data envelopment analysis approach to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG (greenhouse gas) emission of wheat production. Energy. 58:588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.030
Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H (2013b) Reduction of CO2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach. Energy. 55:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.021
Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H, Clark S (2014) Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Clean Prod 73:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.057
Kouchaki-Penchah H, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, O’Dwyer J, Sharifi M (2017) Environmental management of tea production using joint of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approaches. Environ Prog Sustain. 36(4):1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12550
Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2009) The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts: a joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 407(5):1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.062
Martínez-Blanco J, Muñoz P, Antón A, Rieradevall J (2011) Assessment of tomato Mediterranean production in open-field and standard multi-tunnel greenhouse, with compost or mineral fertilizers, from an agricultural and environmental standpoint. J Clean Prod 19:985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.018
Masuda K (2016) Measuring eco-efficiency of wheat production in Japan: a combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 126:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.090
Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Keyhani A, Dalgaard T, Knudsen MT, Nguyen TLT, Borek R, Hermansen JE (2015) Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of environmental impacts in rice paddy production. J Clean Prod 106:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.008
Mohseni P, Borghei AM, Khanali M (2018) Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. J Clean Prod 197:937–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.243
Mostashari-Rad F, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Soheilifard F, Hosseini-Fashami F, Chau K (2019) Energy optimization and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation for agricultural and horticultural systems in Northern Iran. Energy 186:115845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.175
Mostashari-Rad G-MH, Taki M, Ghahdarijani M, Kaab A, Chau KW, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A (2021) Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. J Clean Prod 278:123788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123788
Mousavi-Avval SH, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Mohammadi A (2011) Optimization of energy consumption for soybean production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Appl Energ 88(11):3765–3772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.021
Mousavi-Avval SH, Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Tabatabaeefar A (2012) Assessing the technical efficiency of energy use in different barberry production systems. J Clean Prod 27:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.014
Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Abdi R, Rafiee S, Mobtaker HG (2014) Optimization of energy required and greenhouse gas emissions analysis for orange producers using data envelopment analysis approach. J Clean Prod 65:311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.019
Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Chau KW (2017) Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. J Clean Prod 162:571–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.071
Naderi SA, Lotfalian Dehkordi A, Taki M (2019) Energy and environmental evaluation of greenhouse bell pepper production with life cycle assessment approach. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 3-4:100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100011
Naderi S, Ghasemi Nejad Raini M, Taki M (2020) Measuring the energy and environmental indices for apple (production and storage) by life cycle assessment (case study: Semirom county, Isfahan, Iran). Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 6:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100034
Nassiri SM, Singh S (2009) Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique. Appl Energ 86:1320–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.10.007
Nikkhah A, Emadi B, Firouzi S (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions footprint of agricultural production in Guilan province of Iran. Sustain Energ Technol Assess 12:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.08.002
Omid M, Ghojabeige F, Delshad M, Ahmadi H (2011) Energy use pattern and benchmarking of selected greenhouses in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energ. Convers. Manage. 52(1):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.054
Paramesh V, Arunachalam V, Nikkhah A, Das B, Ghnimi S (2018) Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of arecanut production through coupled data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 203:674–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.263
PRé Consultants BV (2008) SimaPro 7 user’s manual. PRe Consultants BV, the Netherlands
Russo G, Scarascia Mugnozza G, De Lucia Zeller B (2007) Environmental improvements of greenhouse flower cultivation by means of LCA methodology. In International Symposium on High Technology for Greenhouse System Management. Acta Hortic 801:301–308. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.801.30
Schröder JJ, Aarts HFM, Ten Berge HFM, Van Keulen H, Neeteson JJ (2003) An evaluation of whole-farm nitrogen balances and related indices for efficient nitrogen use. Eur J Agron 20:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00070-4
Soheili-Fard F, Kouchaki-Penchah H, Raini MGN, Chen G (2018) Cradle to grave environmental-economic analysis of tea life cycle in Iran. J Clean Prod 196:953–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.083
Taki M, Yildizhan H (2018) Evaluation the sustainable energy applications for fruit and vegetable productions processes; case study: greenhouse cucumber production. J Clean Prod 199:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.136
Taki M, Soheili-Fard F, Rohani A, Chen G, Yildizhan H (2018) Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems. J Clean Prod 197:195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.173
Ullah A, Perret SR, Gheewala SH, Soni P (2016) Eco-efficiency of cotton-cropping systems in Pakistan: an integrated approach of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 134:623–632 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.112
Vázquez-Rowe I, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):272–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0154-9
Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). J Clean Prod 27:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.039
Wang F, Liu Y, Ouyang X, Hao J, Yang X (2018) Comparative environmental impact assessments of green food certified cucumber and conventional cucumber cultivation in China. Renew Agr Food Syst 33(5):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000229
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Yildizhan H, Taki M (2019) Sustainable management and conservation of resources for different wheat production processes; cumulative exergy consumption approach. Int J Exergy 28(4):404–422
Zarei MJ, Kazemi N, Marzban A (2019) Life cycle environmental impacts of cucumber and tomato production in open-field and greenhouse. Journal Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18(3):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.07.001
Zhang Y, Liang K, Li J, Zhao C, Qu D (2016) LCA as a decision support tool for evaluating cleaner production schemes in iron making industry. Environ Prog Sustain 35(1):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12208
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran. The authors are grateful for the support provided by this University.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Farshad Soheilifard: conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, writing - original draft; Morteza Taki: conceptualization, resources, data curation, writing - review and editing, visualization; Rosalie van Zelm: methodology, software, resources, review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable in this section.
Consent for publication
Not applicable in this section.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Loubet
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soheilifard, F., Taki, M. & van Zelm, R. Impact of energy flow optimization on the mitigation of environmental consequences and costs in greenhouse cucumber production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8421–8433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11219-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11219-8