Abstract
In order to effectively promoting green consumption, this paper constructs a theoretical model from the perspective of double-entry mental accounting to study the impact of perceived value and consumption sensitivity on green consumption intention. Conducting a large-scale empirical study, we analyzed the influence of perceived value on green consumption intention, tested the mediating effect of double-entry mental accounting, and explored the moderating effect of consumption sensitivity on perceived value and green consumption intention. The results indicate that perceived benefits are significantly positively correlated with green consumption intention, and perceived sacrifices are significantly negatively correlated with green consumption intention. In addition, perceived benefits have a greater impact on green consumption intention than perceived sacrifices. Double-entry mental accounting plays a significant mediating role on the path from perceived value to green consumption intention. Compared with the mediating effect of the coefficient of pleasure attenuation and the coefficient of pain buffering, the mediating effect of coefficient of pleasure attenuation is stronger and the mediating path is more important. This study concludes that individuals with lower consumption sensitivity are more willing to buy green products. When consumption sensitivity is lower, the negative correlation between perceived sacrifices and green consumption intention is stronger. Finally, corresponding policies are proposed based on the results of this study.




Data availability
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Al-Sabbahy H, Ekinci Y, Riley M (2004) An investigation of perceived value dimensions: implications for hospitality research. J Travel Res 42:226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258841
Bi W, Liu M (2014) Product demand forecasting and dynamic pricing considering consumers’ mental accounting and peak-end reference effects. J Appl Math 2014:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/139030
Bi W, Tian L, Liu H, Chen X (2014) A stochastic dynamic programming approach based on bounded rationality and application to dynamic portfolio choice. Discret Dyn Nat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/840725
Biswas A (2017) A consumption value-gap analysis for sustainable consumption. Environ Sci Pollut R 24(8):7714–7725
Carroll CD, Overland J, Weil DN (2000) Saving and growth with habit formation. Amer Econ Rev 90(3):341–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.3.341
Cheng A, Cryder C (2018) Double mental discounting: when a single price promotion feels twice as nice. J Marketing Res 55(2):226–238. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0559
Chitturi R, Raghunathan R, Mahajan V (2008) Delight by design: the role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. J Mark 72(3):48–63. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.72.3.048
Cole JC, Mcdonald JB, Wen X, Kramer RA (2018) Marketing energy efficiency: perceived benefits and barriers to home energy efficiency. Energy Effic 11(7):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9614-z
Cowe R, Williams S (2000) Who are the ethical consumers? Cooperative Bank, Manchester
De Medeiros JF, Ribeiro JLD, Cortimiglia MN (2016) Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil. J Clean Prod 110:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.100
Gallarza MG, Gil-Saura I, Holbrook MB (2011) The value of value: further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. J Consum Behav 10:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.328
Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Cherry M, Watkins M (2017) Moral, wasteful, frugal, or thrifty? Identifying consumer identities to understand and manage pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 51(1):24–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517733782
Guariglia A, Rossi M (2002) Consumption, habit formation, and precautionary saving: evidence from the British household panel survey. Oxford Econ Pap 54(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/54.1.1
Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2008) Virtual nature experiences as emotional benefits in green product consumption: the moderating role of environmental attitudes. Environ Behav 40(6):818–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507309870
He CC, Yu SW, Han Q, de Vries B (2019) How to attract customers to buy green housing? Their heterogeneous willingness to pay for different attributes. J Clean Prod 230:709–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.160
Hossain MT (2018) How cognitive style influences the mental accounting system: role of analytic versus holistic thinking. J Consum Res 45(3):615–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy020
Huang J, Leng M, Parlar M (2013) Demand functions in decision modeling: a comprehensive survey and research directions. Decision Sci 44(3):557–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12021
Hur WO, Yoo JJ, Chung TL (2012) The consumption values and consumer innovativeness on convergence products. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(5):688–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211232271
Hur WM, Kim Y, Park K (2013) Assessing the effects of perceived value and satisfaction on customer loyalty: a ‘green’ perspective. Corp Soc Resp Environ Mana 20(3):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1280
Inman JJ, Winer RS, Ferraro R (2009) The interplay among category characteristics, customer characteristics, and customer activities on in-store decision making. J Marketing 73:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.19
Iwata K, Katayama H, Arimura TH (2015) Do households misperceive the benefits of energy-saving actions? Evidence from a Japanese household survey. Energy for Sustainable Development 25:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.12.005
Jing S (2004) An analysis about green marketing and its impact on consumer psychology and behavior. Mana World (5):145–146. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2004.05.023 (In Chinese)
Kaenzig J, Wüstenhagen R (2008) Understanding the green energy consumer. Mark Rev St Gallen 25(4):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11621-008-0057-3
Kamleitner B, Hölzl E (2009) Cost-benefit associations and financial behavior. Appl Psychol 58(3):435–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00400.x
Kim HW, Chan HC, Gupta S (2007) Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decis Support Syst 43(1):111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
Kivetz R (1999) Advances in research on mental accounting and reason-based choice. Mark Lett 10(3):249–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008066718905
Knutson B, Rick S, Wirnmer GE, Prelec D, Loewenstein G (2007) Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron 53:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010
Leppäniemi M, Karjaluoto H, Saarijärvi H (2016) Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of willingness to share information. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 27(2):164–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2016.1251482
Li QW, Long RY, Chen H, Chen FY, Cheng X (2018) Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housing based on double-entry mental accounting theory. Nat Hazards 95(1–2):129–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3435-4
Liaw SY, Le TM (2017) Under interruptive effects of rarity and mental accounting, whether the online purchase intention can still be enhanced even with higher search costs and perceived risk. Int J Bus Manage 12(8):160. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n8p160
Liu LC, Wu G, Zhang YJ (2015) Investigating the residential energy consumption behaviors in Beijing: a survey study. Nat Hazards 75(1):243–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1317-y
Lu HP, Hsiao KL (2010) The influence of extro/introversion on the intention to pay for social networking sites. Inform Manage 47(3):150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.01.003
Ma XW, Ye Y, Shi XQ, Zou LL (2016) Decoupling economic growth from CO2 emissions: a decomposition analysis of China’s household energy consumption. Adv Clim Chang Res 7:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2016.09.004
Marshall A (1961) Principles of economics: an introductory volume. Macmillan, London
Miao K, Yang Q, Wei X, Du X, Zhang J (2017) How perceived factors of review contents influence consumers’ purchase decision. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), 1:483-486. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.91
Mu J, Peng G, MacLachlan DL (2009) Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation 29:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.006
Nguyen HV, Nguyen CH, Hoang TTB (2018) Green consumption: closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustain Dev 27(1):118–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875
Ohtomo S, Hirose Y (2007) The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior. J Environ Psychol 27(2):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.005
Pickett-Baker J, Ozaki R (2008) Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J Consum Mark 25(5):281–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760810890516
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instru Comput 36(4):717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1998) The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Mark Sci 17(1):4–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.4
Rick SI, Cryder CE, Loewenstein G (2008) Tightwads and spendthrifts. J Consum Res 34(6):767–782. https://doi.org/10.1086/523285
Sangroya D, Nayak JK (2017) Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. J Clean Prod 151:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.010
Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991) Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22(2):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
Sweeney JC, Soutar GN (2001) Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J Retailing 77(2):203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Thaler RH (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1(1):39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 4(3):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Making 12(3):183–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::aid-bdm318>3.0.co;2-f
Tian L, Wan Y, Dong L (2016) Research on the dimensions of consumers’ mental activities under purchasing decision-making—based on mental accounting theory. Chin J Mana Sci 24:199–205 (In Chinese)
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Sci 211(4481):453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Wang Y, Hazen BT, Mollenkopf DA (2018a) Consumer value considerations and adoption of remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains. Ind Manage Data Syst 118(2):480–498. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2016-0437
Wang Y, Huscroft JR, Hazen BT, Zhang M (2018b) Green information, green certification and consumer perceptions of remanufactured automobile parts. Resour Conserv Recy 128:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.015
Woodruff RB (1997) Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350
Yamamoto Y, Suzuki A, Fuwa Y, Sato T (2008) Decision-making in electrical appliance use in the home. Energy Policy 36:1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.022
Yang XY, Zhou YJ (2006) Green value: a new dimension of customer perceived values. Chin Ind Econ (7):110–116. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2006.07.015 (In Chinese)
Yeung KL (2014) Exploring the origin of pain of payment in cash and its relevance to computer payment interface. Iowa State University: Doctoral dissertations
Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Zhai TC, Hu BC (2017) Review of habit formation theory in consumption. Econo Rev (02):140–151. https://doi.org/10.19361/j.er.2017.02.11 (In Chinese)
Zhang QY, Sun XX (2018) The research on effect of consumer confusion on green brand purchase intention—the mediating role of ambivalent attitude. Consum Econ 34(03):80–88 (In Chinese)
Zhang YJ, Bian XJ, Tan W (2018) The linkages of sectoral carbon dioxide emission caused by household consumption in China: evidence from the hypothetical extraction method. Empir Econ 54(4):1743–1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1272-z
Zhang Y, Xiao C, Zhou G (2020) Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. J Clean Prod 242:118555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118555
Zhou D, Yu Y, Wang Q, Zha D (2019) Effects of a generalized dual-credit system on green technology investments and pricing decisions in a supply chain. J Environ Mana 247:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.058
Funding
This work was financially supported by the project of National Natural Science Fund of China (grant numbers 72074211, 71603257, 71874188, 71904187, and 71603255), the Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (grant number 19ZDA107), the Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (grant number 2018SJZDA008), the Think Tank of Energy Mining Economy 2018 Project for Cultural Evolution and Creation of CUMT (grant number 2018WHCC01), the project of General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number 2016M601920), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 2015QNA17), and the Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 18AZD014 and 16ZDA056).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Guiding in the experiment and revising the manuscript: Ting Yue
Conducting the experiment and writing the original draft: Junli Liu
Project administration: Ruyin Long
Supervision: Hong Chen
Assisting in the experiment: Qianwen Li
Data collection: Haiwen Liu
Review and editing the manuscript: Yu Gu
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yue, T., Liu, J., Long, R. et al. Effects of perceived value on green consumption intention based on double-entry mental accounting: taking energy-efficient appliance purchase as an example. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 7236–7248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11027-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11027-0