Ethical issues of treating a patient during or post pandemic mostly depend on the concerned country or state authority regulations. Most of the dental bodies recommend emergency and urgent dental care (Mallineni et al. 2020). Social distancing may not be possible during emergency care. It may carry the risk of being infected to the entire dental team, which may, in turn, be a source of infection to the community. The moral decision to treat a patient under a dental emergency is in line with esteemed professionalism and professional assurance (Mallineni et al. 2020). Conscious and careful modification of treatment consent forms highlighting the risk of virus transmission, self-responsible monitoring, and alarming dentist if any symptoms arise post-treatment is necessary to curtail legal and professional indemnity.
Although various infection control protocols had have been recommended to avoid transmission of COVID-19 disease in dental practice (Meng et al. 2020; Peng et al. 2020), it has been reported that COVID-19 can be spread through direct and indirect communication, predominantly through respiratory droplets, and spatter from saliva and blood (Meng et al. 2020; Mallineni et al. 2020) and this makes dentists in potentially high risk. Most of the dental procedures involve aerosols, which increase the chances of the cross contamination of acute respiratory infections (Meng et al. 2020; Peng et al. 2020). Besides that, the dental operatory has a more number of contaminated surfaces which include the dental instruments, the spittoon, doctor stools, and dental chairs and their handles, and these are potential sources for transmission. However, adhering to stringent protocols like environmental surface disinfection, compulsory cough etiquette instruction, meticulous hand hygiene, pre-procedural mouth rinse, rubber dam isolation, use of appropriate particulate respirator masks like certified N95, European Standard Filtering Face Piece 2 (EU FFP2), or European Standard Filtering Face Piece 3 (EU FFP3) respirators in case of dental emergencies (Mallineni et al. 2020). The use of inexpensive high-volume evacuator (HVE) and the expensive high-efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) filters is highly recommended during and post COVID-19 pandemic (Ge et al. 2020). Nevertheless, dentists cannot avoid the production of aerosols while providing quality dental treatment, and they can only limit their production by following specific guidelines on urgent/emergency dental care and adhering to stringent protocols. The recent COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has impaired socio-economic and ethnic disproportions and will unquestionably deteriorate dental practice globally. Currently, it is very essential to be more approachable to the oral healthcare needs of people and prioritize oral care for groups with high demand. It is more important to introduce virtual consultation using the teledentistry model for the benefit of society and oral healthcare professionals. The present emergency has evidently exposed dental practitioners, and the dental profession could be incorporated into the broader system, and the challenge ahead is to be outlined the clinical roles of dentists in a more cohesive model of care.