Abstract
Determining water ecological carrying capacity (WECC) is of great significance to ensure inter-regional green development. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation framework for WECC assessment in the Yangtze River Economic Zone (YREZ), China. Effects of water resources, socio-economic, and ecological elements on WECC can be evaluated based on multi-criteria decision analysis. Gini and unbalance coefficients are used for measuring the regional fairness between WECC and socio-economic development. Surface water production pressure (SWPP) and groundwater pollution risk (GPR) are further regarded as indicators for expressing water resources constraint on shale gas extraction in the YREZ. Results disclose that the average WECC level decreases from 0.439 in 2000 to 0.4007 in 2016, which is the opposite of the changing trend in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. A high WECC level appears in Zhejiang (0.5126) with a good state, but that of Guizhou (0.3983), Anhui (0.3968), Hunan (0.3914), and Chongqing (0.3651) are at the alert state. The obstacle factors of WECC in the eastern YREZ mostly originate from socio-economic and water resource subsystems, while that in the middle and western YREZ mainly arise from water resources and ecological subsystems. Fairness analysis shows a well-matching characteristic between the overall WECC and socio-economic performances due to a majority of their Gini coefficients lower than 0.4, while a poor matching characteristic exists in terms of provincial differences owing to their varied unbalance coefficients, especially in Guizhou, Jiangsu, and Shanghai. Moreover, Chongqing with most of shale gas reserves is characterized by slight SWPP (1.0202) and GPR (0.0188), but the prospect of shale gas development in Sichuan is not optimistic due to its high SWPP (1.0846) and GPR (0.0647). Recycling of flowback and product waters can significantly lighten regional water resources pressure. This presented framework can be applied into many other Chinese cities (e.g., Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region) with slight modifications according to their actual situations for supporting water resource managers and government with decision making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhbari M, Grigg NS (2015) Managing water resources conflicts: modelling behavior in a decision tool. Water Resour Manag 29(14):5201–5216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1113-9
Alvisi S (2015) A new procedure for optimal design of district metered areas based on the multilevel balancing and refinement algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29(12):4397–4409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1066-z
Annevelink MPJA, Meesters JAJ, Hendriks AJ (2016) Environmental contamination due to shale gas development. Sci Total Environ 550:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.131
Bai L, Jiang L, Yang DY, Liu YB (2019) Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity influences of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactions on air pollution using the geographical detector method: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. J Clean Prod 232:692–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.342
Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2018) The impact of electricity consumption on CO2, emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manag 219:218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101
Boutkan E, Stikker A (2004) Enhanced water resource base for sustainable integrated water resource management. Nat Resour Forum 28(2):150–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00082.x
Brittingham MC, Maloney KO, Farag AM, Harper DD, Bowen ZH (2014) Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. Environ Sci Technol 48:11034–11047. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5020482
Chen NC, Xu L, Chen ZQ (2017a) Environmental efficiency analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone using super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SEDEA) and tobit models. Energy 134:659–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.076
Chen Y, He L, Guan Y, Lu H, Li J (2017b) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and water-energy optimization for shale gas supply chain planning based on multi-level approach: case study in Barnett, Marcellus, Fayetteville, and Haynesville shales. Energ Convers Manage 134:382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.019
Chen YZ, He L, Li J, Zhang SY (2018) Multi-criteria design of shale-gas-water supply chains and production systems towards optimal life cycle economics and greenhouse gas emissions under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 109:216–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.11.014.
Choong SM, El-Shafie A (2015) State-of-the-art for modelling reservoir inflows and management optimization. Water Resour Manag 29(4):1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0872-z
Feng LH, Zhang XC, Luo GY (2008) Application of system dynamics in analyzing the carrying capacity of water resources in Yiwu City, China. Math Comput Simulat 79(3):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.018
Gao R, Yao K (2016) Importance index of components in uncertain random systems. Knowledge-Based Syst 109:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.07.006
Garfì M, Ferrer-Martí L, Bonoli A, Tondelli S (2011) Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manag 92:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.007
Habib H, Anceno AJ, Fiddes J, Beekma J, Ilyuschenko M, Nitivattananon V, Shipin OV (2013) Jumpstarting post-conflict strategic water resources protection from a changing global perspective: gaps and prospects in Afghanistan. J Environ Manag 129:244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.019
Hasaneen R, El-Halwagi MM (2017) Using integrated process and microeconomic analyses to enable effective environmental policy for shale gas in the USA. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19(6):1775–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1366-5
He L, Chen YZ, Li J (2018) A three-level framework for balancing the tradeoffs among the energy, water, and air-emission implications within the life-cycle shale gas supply chains. Resour Conserv Recy 133:206–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.015
He L, Chen YZ, Zhao HH, Tian PP, Xue YX, Chen L (2018) Game-based analysis of energy-water nexus for identifying environmental impacts during Shale gas operations under stochastic input. Sci Total Environ 627:1585–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.004
Huo TF, Ren H, Zhang XL, Cai WG, Feng W, Zhou N, Wang X (2018) China’s energy consumption in the building sector: A Statistical Yearbook-Energy Balance Sheet based splitting method. J Clean Prod 185:665–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.283
Hussain MI, Muscolo A, Farooq M, Ahmad W (2019) Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments. Agr Water Manage 221:462–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.014
Ingraffea AR, Wells MT, Santoro RL, Shonkoff SBC (2014) Assessment and risk analysis of casing and cement impairment in oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania, 2000-2012. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(30):10955–10960. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323422111
Jankauskas K, Farid SS (2019) Multi-objective biopharma capacity planning under uncertainty using a flexible genetic algorithm approach. Comput Chem Eng 128:35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.023
Kong B, Fathi E, Ameri S (2015) Coupled 3-D numerical simulation of proppant distribution and hydraulic fracturing performance optimization in Marcellus shale reservoirs. Int J Coal Geol 147:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.06.006
Li H, Lu J (2020) Can regional integration control transboundary water pollution? A test from the Yangtze River economic belt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:28288–28305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09205-1
Liu HM (2012) Comprehensive carrying capacity of the urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat Int 36:462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.003
Liu H, Jiang D, Yang X et al (2005) Spatialization approach to 1km grid GDP supported by remote sensing. Geo-informat Sci 7(2):120–123. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2005.02.025
National Statistical Bureau (2000-2016) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press
National Statistical Bureau (2000-2016) China Statistical Yearbook on Environment. Beijing: China Statistics Press
Nicot JP, Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Costley RA (2014) Source and fate of hydraulic fracturing water in the Barnett shale: a historical perspective. Environ Sci Technol 48:2464–2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404050r
Onishi VC, Carrero-Parreno A, Reyes-Labarta JA, Fraga ES, Caballero JA (2017) Desalination of shale gas produced water: a rigorous design approach for zero-liquid discharge evaporation systems. J Clean Prod 140:1399–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.012
Peng L, Xia J, Li ZH et al (2020) Spatio-temporal dynamics of water-related disaster risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015. Resour Conserv Recycl 161(104851):104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104851
Pérez-Uresti SI, Ponce-Ortega JM, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A (2019) A multi-objective optimization approach for sustainable water management for places with over-exploited water resources. Comput Chem Eng 121:158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.10.003
Pu CY, Addai B, Pan XJ et al (2017) Securitization product design for China’s environmental pollution liability insurance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:3336–3351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8172-1
Schaefer T, Udenio M, Quinn S, Fransoo JC (2019) Water risk assessment in supply chains. J Clean Prod 208:636–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.262
Sharif M, Burn DH, Hofbauer KM (2013) Generation of daily and hourly weather variables for use in climate change vulnerability assessment. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1533–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0253-4
She Y, Liu YB, Jiang L, Yuan HX (2019) Is China’s River Chief Policy effective? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. J Clean Prod 220:919–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.031
Skuras D, Tyllianakis E (2018) The perception of water related risks and the state of the water environment in the European Union. Water Res 143:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.045
Wang TX, Xu SG (2015) Dynamic successive assessment method of water environment carrying capacity and its application. Ecol Indic 52:134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.002
Wang CH, Hou YL, Xue YJ (2017) Water resources carrying capacity of wetlands in Beijing: analysis of policy optimization for urban wetland water resources management. J Clean Prod 161:1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.204
Wang YX, Wang Y, Su XL, Qi L, Liu M (2019) Evaluation of the comprehensive carrying capacity of interprovincial water resources in China and the spatial effect. J Hydrol 575:794–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.076
Wu L, Su XL, Ma XY, Kang Y, Jiang YN (2018) Integrated modeling framework for evaluating and predicting the water resources carrying capacity in a continental river basin of Northwest China. J Clean Prod 204:366–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.319
Xu X, Yang G, Tan Y, Liu J, Hu H (2018) Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015. Sci Total Environ 634:1601–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.046
Yang G, Wang YJ, He XL, Li JF (2010) The study of three evaluation models of water resources carrying capacity in manas river basin. Adv Mater Res 113-116:442–449. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.113-116.442
Yang ZY, Song JX, Cheng DD, Xia J, Li Q, Ahamad MI (2019) Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for the water resources carrying capacity in Xi’an city, China. J Environ Manage 230:221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.085
Yazdi M (2018) Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf Sci 110:438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005
Yu S, He L, Lu HW (2016) An environmental fairness based optimisation model for the decision-support of joint control over the water quantity and quality of a river basin. J Hydrol 535:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.051
Yu HZ, Li LJ, Li JY (2020) Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on quantity-quality water bodies-flow (in Chinese). Resourc Sci 42(2):358–371. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2020.02.14
Zhang J, Zhang CL, Shi WL, Fu YC (2019) Quantitative evaluation and optimized utilization of water resources-water environment carrying capacity based on nature-based solutions. J Hydrol 568:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.059
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41890824), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2020202117), Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK1003), Youth Top Talent Program of Hebei Provincial Department of Education (BJ2020019), Science Foundation of Hebei Normal University (L2019B36), Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (QN2019054), Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (2020L0731), and Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. WL2018003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yizhong Chen: Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft; Hongwei Lu: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision; Jing Li: Data curation, Writing—review & editing; Yiyang Yang: Investigation; Jun, Xia: Resources
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Xianliang Yi
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Lu, H., Li, J. et al. Multi-criteria decision making and fairness evaluation of water ecological carrying capacity for inter-regional green development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 6470–6490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10946-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10946-2