Skip to main content

Suppressing SO3 formation in copper smelting flue gas by ejecting pyrite into flue

Abstract

SO3 in the copper smelting flue gas not only causes serious corrosion in heat exchange and dust collection equipment but also increases the amount of sewage acid (waste acid or polluted acid from copper smelting). In this study, we attempted to reduce the damage by ejecting pyrite into the flue to suppress SO3 formation in the flue. First, the Gibbs free energy for the chemical reactions between the substances was obtained after ejecting pyrite. Subsequently, the thermodynamic study of SO2–O2–H2O–N2–CO2–CO system was performed. Then, a kinetic study on the decomposition and oxidation behaviour of pyrite in the flue system was performed through thermogravimetric experiments. Results show that pyrite decomposition and oxidation in the flue system have a very strong oxygen consumption capacity. The SO3 formation in the copper smelting flue gas is suppressed by the consumption of oxygen in the flue to control the reaction direction of 2SO2 + O2 ⇋ 2SO3 and the partial pressure of SO3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in published article

References

  • Bahadori A (2011) Estimation of combustion flue gas acid dew point during heat recovery and efficiency gain Applied. Therm Eng 31:1457–1462

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belo LP, Elliott LK, Stanger RJ, Spörl R, Shah KV, Maier J, Wall TF (2004) High-temperature conversion of SO2 to SO3: homogeneous experiments and catalytic effect of fly ash from air and oxy-fuel firing. Energy Fuel 11:7243–7251

  • Benson LB, Smith KJ, Roden RA, Loch E, Potts J (2003) Control of sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide using by-product of a magnesium-enhanced lime FGD system. 2003:14–15

  • Cullis CF, Mulcahy MFR (1972) The kinetics of combustion of gaseous sulphur compounds. Combust Flame 18:225–292

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JP, Koppula PR, Stenger HG, Wachs IE (1998) Oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide over supported vanadia catalysts. Appl Cat B 19:103–117

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everson RC, Stander BF, Neomagus HWJP, Merwe AFVD, Grange LL, Tietz MR (2015) Sulphur trioxide decomposition with supported platinum/palladium on rutile catalysts: 1. Reaction kinetics of catalyst pellets. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:85–94

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan F, Zhang MX, Chen QR (2007) Non-isothermal kinetics of pyrolysis of three kinds of fresh biomass. J China Univ Min Technol 17:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway BD, Sasmaz E, Padak B (2015) Binding of SO3 to fly ash components: CaO, MgO, Na2O and K2O. Fuel 145:79–83

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson LJ, Kuno M, Tao FM (2000) Hydrolysis of sulfur trioxide to form sulfuric acid in small water clusters. J Chem Phys 112:8830–8838

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marier P, Dibbs HP (1974) The catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3 by fly ash and the capture of SO2 and SO3 by CaO and MgO. Thermochim Acta 8:155–165

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okkes AG (1987) Get acid dew point of flue gas. Hydrocarb Process 66:145–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu C (1996) Integral method to analyze the kinetics of heterogeneous reactions under non-isothermal conditions A variant on the Ozawa-Flynn-Wall method. Thermochim Acta 285(2):309–323

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbassov Y, Lunbo D, Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2018) Sulfur trioxide formation/emissions in coal-fired air- and oxy-fuel combustion processes: a review. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 8:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stander BF, Everson RC, Neomagus HWJP, Merwe AFVD, Tietz MR (2015) Sulphur trioxide decomposition with supported platinum/palladium on rutile catalyst: 2. Performance of a laboratory fixed bed reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:2493–2499

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Luis AP, Sbirrazzuolin N (2011) ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta 520:1–19

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu QR, Sun XH, Yb S, Wen MN, Guoliang L, Xu LW, Li ZJ, Ren YJ, Zou J, Zheng HT, Tang Y, Duan L, Wang SX, Zhang Q (2019) Behavior of sulfur oxides (SOX) in nonferrous metal smelters and implications on future control and emission estimation. Environ Sci Technol 53:8796–8804

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang BX, Man Z, Yang HR, Lu JF (2016) Prediction of acid dew point in flue gas of boilers burning fossil fuels. Energy Fuel 30:3365–3373

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Zhou HC, Jiang W, Chen CW, Pan WP (2010) Studies of the fate of sulfur trioxide in coal-fired utility boilers based on modified selected condensation methods. Environ Sci Technol 44:3429–3434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY, Zhuang GS, Chen JM, Wang Y, Wang X, An ZS, Zhang P (2006) Heterogeneous reactions of sulfur dioxide on typical mineral particles. J Phys Chem B 110:12588–12596

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0210403).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Qin Zhang proposed the topic and comprehensively directed and wrote the manuscript, Jiacheng Chen performed the main experiment and analysis, Yanan WU did the dynamic experiment and the given data analysis and others participated in the construction of the experimental platform, data discussion, paper revision and assisted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qin Zhang or Hongying Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Chen, J., Wu, Y. et al. Suppressing SO3 formation in copper smelting flue gas by ejecting pyrite into flue. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 4307–4316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10796-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10796-y

Keywords

  • Pyrite
  • Copper smelting
  • Flue gas
  • SO3
  • SO2