Skip to main content

The role of income inequality on consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions under different stages of economic development

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 27, pages 43067–43076 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

In recent decades, a large number of authors investigated whether income inequality level and climate change were compatible. However, the relationship between inequality level impact and consumption-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was scarcely analysed. Thus, the objective of the present paper was to analyse the relationship between income inequality level and consumption-based GHG emissions from 1990 to 2014 under different stages of economic development. The results revealed a large gap between consumption-based GHG emissions at different economic development stages. Economic growth contributed to the growth of consumption-based GHG emissions in all income groups, and the largest effect was observed in middle-low- and low-income countries. Higher income inequality level was associated with lower negatively influenced consumption-based emissions in high- and middle-high-income countries, confirming the marginal propensity to emit and ‘Veblen effect’ theories. Meanwhile, regarding the middle-low- and low-income groups, the relationships between inequality level and GHG emissions were insignificant. Urbanisation level contributed to the growth of consumption-based GHG emissions in middle- and low-income countries. Education level contributed to the reduction of consumption-based GHG emissions in high-, middle-high-, and middle-low-income countries, and growth of emissions in low-income countries. Therefore, our analysis revealed that income inequality and climate change are still incompatible in all income groups, and we suggested how to achieve the reduction of income inequality and climate change simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Baiocchi G, Minx J, Hubacek K (2010) The impact of social factors and consumer behavior on carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom. J Ind Ecol 14(1):50–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch A, Shah SZ, Noor ZM, Magsi HB (2018) The nexus between income inequality, economic growth and environmental degradation in Pakistan. Geochem J 83:207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (2000) Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. J Econ Growth 5(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthe A, Elie L (2015) Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecol Econ 116:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi S (2006) Income inequality and the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Inequal Collect Action 33

  • Bowles S, Park Y (2005) Emulation, inequality, and work hours: was Thorsten Veblen right? Econ J 115(507):F397–F412

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Casaló LV, Escario J-J (2018) Heterogeneity in the association between environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior: a multilevel regression approach. J Clean Prod 175:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancel L, Hough A, Voituriez T (2018) Reducing inequalities within countries: assessing the potential of the sustainable development goals. Glob Pol 9(1):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna URL https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant Y, Millo G 2008 Panel data econometrics in R: the plm package, post-print, HAL, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01245304

  • Golley J, Meng X (2012) Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Chinese urban households. Energy Econ 34(6):1864–1872

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith R, Redding S, van Reenen J (2004) Mapping the two faces of RandD: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Rev Econ Stat 86(4):883–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald N, Harteisen M, Lay J, Minx J, Renner S (2012) The carbon footprint of Indian households. 32nd General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, pp. 5-11

  • Grunewald N, Klasen S, Martínez-Zarzoso I, Muris C (2017) The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecol Econ 142:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67(8):533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerink N, Mulatu A, Bulte E (2001) Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 38:359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Lee T, Ullah A (2019) A combined random effect and fixed effect forecast for panel data models. J Manag Sci Eng 4(1):28–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Muñoz Castillo R, Sun L, Xue J (2017a) Global carbon inequality. Energy Ecol Environ 2(6):361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Patwardhan A (2017b) Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nat Commun 8(1):912

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübler M (2016) How to curb poverty-related deforestation? Appl Econ Lett 24(6):374–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübler M (2017) The inequality–emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: a quantile regression approach. Ecol Econ 134:174–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam SN Inequality and Environmental Sustainability 2015. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. DESA Working Paper No. 145,ST/ ESA/2015/DWP/145. http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2015/wp145_2015.pdf

  • Jorgenson AK, Schor JB, Knight KW, Huang X (2016) Domestic inequality and carbon emissions in comparative perspective. Sociol Forum 31:770–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson A, Schor J, Huang X (2017) Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997-2012. Ecol Econ 134:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson AK, Fiske S, Hubacek K, Li J, McGovern T, Rick T, Schor JB, Solecki W, York R, Zycherman A (2019) Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change. WIREs Clim Chang 10:554

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashwan P (2017) Inequality, democracy, and the environment: a cross-national analysis. Ecol Econ 131:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuga H, Takaya M (2017) Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. J Clean Prod 142:3689–3701

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AQ, Saleem N, Fatima ST (2018) Financial development, income inequality, and CO2 emissions in Asian countries using STIRPAT model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6308–6319

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight KW, Schor JB, Jorgenson AK (2017) Wealth inequality and carbon emissions in high-income countries. Soc Curr 4:403–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Butkus M (2018) The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci Total Environ 642:999–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Juknys R (2016) The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: the Lithuanian case. J Clean Prod 112:3413–3422

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Jiang Y, Xie R (2019a) Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US? J Clean Prod 217:380–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Li J, Kong Y (2019b) Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives. Appl Energy 236:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader S (2018) The nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions revisited: challenging its empirical validity. Environ Sci Policy 89:322–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani E (2000) The environmental Kuznets curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecol Econ 32(3):431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo PC, Ge J, Craig T, Brewer MJ, Tronicker I (2018) Does work–life balance affect pro-environmental behaviour? Evidence for the UK using longitudinal microdata. Ecol Econ 145:170–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves Sequeira T, Campos C (2005) International tourism and economic growth: a panel data approach. FEEM Working Paper No. 141.05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=855985 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.855985

  • Nistor L (2008) Rootless and clustered environmentally significant consumption. Sustainable Consumption 2008 Conference; Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary; October 8, 2008: Academic conference proceedings, p. 101–118.

  • Olsson L, Opondo M, Tschakert P, Agrawal A, Eriksen SH, Ma S, Perch LN, Zakieldeen SA (2014) Livelihoods and poverty. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 793–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison A, Habans R, Clement M (2014) Ecological modernization or aristocratic conservation? Exploring the impact of affluence on carbon emissions at the local level. Soc Nat Resour 27:850–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao ND, Min J (2018) Less global inequality can improve climate outcomes. WIREs Clim Chang:9–13

  • Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxf Econ Pap 52:651–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor J (1998) The overspent American: when buying becomes you. Basic Books

  • Scruggs LA (1998) Political and economic inequality and the environment. Ecol Econ 26:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1934) Theory of the leisure class. Modern Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (2009) The theory of the leisure class. Oxford University Press

  • Wolde-Rufael Y, Idowu S (2017) Income distribution and CO2 emission: a comparative analysis for China and India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:1336–1345

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhao W (2014) Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Appl Energy 136:382–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H-H, Gao Q, Wu Y-P, Wang Y, Zhu X-D (2014) What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. J Clean Prod 63:143–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Vileikos st. 8, LT-44404, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Genovaitė Liobikienė

  2. Centre of Mathematics, Physics and Information Technology, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Studentų str. 11, LT-53361, Akademija, Kauno r., Lithuania

    Daiva Rimkuvienė

Authors
  1. Genovaitė Liobikienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daiva Rimkuvienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genovaitė Liobikienė.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liobikienė, G., Rimkuvienė, D. The role of income inequality on consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions under different stages of economic development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 43067–43076 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10244-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10244-x

Keywords

  • Income inequality
  • Climate change
  • Economic growth
  • Veblen effect
  • Marginal propensity to emit
  • Sustainable consumption