Abstract
In this study, the efficiency of contaminant removal from a compact wastewater treatment plant (CWTP) in a university campus under different rain conditions was evaluated. Wastewater samples were collected weekly for 1 year and the physicochemical parameters were monitored. Removal efficiency higher than 77%, reaching values above 95% for samples with lower wastewater flow rates, was found for biological oxygen demand (BOD) and total and fecal coliforms. The pH values remained in the range of 6.0–8.0. However, pH values below 6.8 impaired the nitrification rate and, therefore, the removal of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and ammonia was lower than the expected, with concentration values above those set by the Brazilian regulation for wastewater discharge. The results show that the flow rate of wastewater at the entrance of the CWTP is directly related to the rain events, thus affecting its efficiency, mainly in the removal of total solids, turbidity, and organic matter. The assessment of the treated wastewater reuse on site for agricultural purposes showed to be a prominent and more sustainable alternative regarding the discharge of wastewater into water bodies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-Elela SI, Hellal MS, Aly OH, Abo-Elenin SA (2019) Decentralized wastewater treatment using passively aerated biological filter. Environ Technol 40:250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1385648
Albornoz LL, Marder L, Benvenuti T, Bernardes AM (2019) Electrodialysis applied to the treatment of an university sewage for water recovery. J Environ Chem Eng 7:102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.102982
Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Farto M, Santos T, Palma P, Sengo J, Morais MC, Cunha-Queda C (2015) Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: benefits versus limiting factors. Waste Manag 40:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.027
Anirudhan TS, Ramachandran M (2007) Surfactant-modified bentonite as adsorbent for the removal of humic acid from wastewaters. Appl Clay Sci 35:276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLAY.2006.09.009
APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, & Water Environment Federation, Washington DC
Chernicharo CAL (2016) Princípios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias: reatores anaeróbios, 2nd edn. UFMG, Belo Horizonte
Chernicharo CAL, van Lier JB, Noyola A, Bressani Ribeiro T (2015) Anaerobic sewage treatment: state of the art, constraints and challenges. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:649–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9377-3
CNRH-121 (2010) Resolução n. 121, de 16 de dezembro de 2010. Estabelece diretrizes e critérios para a prática de reúso direto não potável de água na modalidade agrícola e florestal, definida na Resolução CNRH n. 54, de 28 de novembro de 2005. Conselho Nacional de Recursos Hídricos (CNRH), Brazil
CNRH-54 (2005) Resolução n. 54, de 28 de novembro de 2005. Estabelece critérios gerais para reuso de água potável. Conselho Nacional de Recursos Hídricos (CNRH), Brazil
CONAMA-430 (2011) Resolulção n. 430, de maio de 2011. Dispõe sobre as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA), Brasília, Brazil
CONSEMA-355 (2017) Resolulção n. 355, de 13 de julho de 2017. Dispõe sobre os critérios e padrões de emissão de efluentes líquidos para as fontes geradoras que lancem seus efluentes em águas superficiais no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Conselho Estadual do Meio Ambiente (CONSEMA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
CONSEMA-419 (2020) Resolução n. 419, de 13 de fevereiro de 2020. Estabelece critérios e procedimentos para a utilização de água de reúso para fins urbanos, industriais, agrícolas e florestais no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Conselho Estadual do Meio Ambiente (CONSEMA), Brazil
de Feo G, Ferrara C (2017) A procedure for evaluating the most environmentally sound alternative between two on-site small-scale wastewater treatment systems. J Clean Prod 164:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.205
de Souza Celente G, Colares GS, Machado ÊL et al (2019) Algae turf scrubber and vertical constructed wetlands combined system for decentralized secondary wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:9931–9937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04425-6
Fane AG, Fane SA (2005) The role of membrane technology in sustainable decentralized wastewater systems. Water Sci Technol 51:317–325. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0381
Giokas DL, Vlessidis AG, Angelidis MO, Tsimarakis G, Karayannis M (2002) Systematic analysis of the operational response of activated sludge process to variable wastewater flows. A case study. Clean Techn Environ Policy 4:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-002-0145-z
Govere S, Chikazhe J, Mandipa CT (2010) Nutrient removal capacities of a domestic wastewater treatment plant under varying rainfall intensities. Electron J Environ Agric Food Chem 9:1619–1630
Hassen A, Heyouni A, Shayeb H, Cherif M, Boudabous A (2000) Inactivation of indicator bacteria in wastewater by chlorine—a kinetics study. Bioresour Technol 72:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00086-3
Howarth RW, Marino R (2006) Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:364–376. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0364
INMET (2019) Instituto Nacional de Metereologia [Online Archive of National Institute of Meteorology]. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=estacoes/estacoesAutomaticas. Accessed 11 Mar 2019
International Water Association – IWA (2018) Wastewater report 2018. The Reuse Opportunity. Cities Seizing the Reuse Opportunity in a Circular Economy. IWA Publishing, London
Magalhães JL, Simon GA, Menezes JFS et al (2016) Growth of eucalyptus seedlings irrigated with different wastewaters. African J Agric Res 11:4779–4785. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11869
Magwaza ST, Magwaza LS, Odindo AO, Mditshwa A (2020) Hydroponic technology as decentralised system for domestic wastewater treatment and vegetable production in urban agriculture: a review Sci Total Environ 698
Mai L, Lian Y, van den Akker B, Fallowfield HJ (2019) Nitrification performance of high rate nitrifying trickling filters at low ammonia concentrations: does the aspect ratio matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:20520–20529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05256-1
Marinho LEdO, Filho BC, Roston DM et al (2014) Evaluation of the productivity of irrigated Eucalyptus grandis with reclaimed wastewater and effects on soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1830-8
Masmoudi Jabri K, Nolde E, Ciroth A, Bousselmi L (2020) Life cycle assessment of a decentralized greywater treatment alternative for non-potable reuse application. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02511-3
Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90:652–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001
Matamoros V, Arias C, Brix H, Bayona JM (2009) Preliminary screening of small-scale domestic wastewater treatment systems for removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Water Res 43:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2008.10.005
Matos C, Pereira S, Amorim EV, Bentes I, Briga-Sá A (2014) Wastewater and greywater reuse on irrigation in centralized and decentralized systems-an integrated approach on water quality, energy consumption and CO 2 emissions. Sci Total Environ 493:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.129
Minhas PS, Yadav RK, Lal K, Chaturvedi RK (2015) Effect of long-term irrigation with wastewater on growth, biomass production and water use by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) planted at variable stocking density. Agric Water Manag 152:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.009
Moretti M, Van Passel S, Camposeo S et al (2019) Modelling environmental impacts of treated municipal wastewater reuse for tree crops irrigation in the Mediterranean coastal region. Sci Total Environ 660:1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.043
Moura MN, Martín MJ, Burguillo FJ (2007) A comparative study of the adsorption of humic acid, fulvic acid and phenol onto Bacillus subtilis and activated sludge. J Hazard Mater 149:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2007.02.074
Myers BJ, Theiveyanathan S, O’Brien ND, Bond WJ (1996) Growth and water use of Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus radiata plantations irrigated with effluent. Tree Physiol 16:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.211
Paulus D, Toffoli E, Pereira CER et al (2019) Potential use of eucalyptus seedling in recycling of fish farming wastewater in agriculture. J Exp Agric Int 36:1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/JEAI/2019/v36i130229
Petousi I, Daskalakis G, Fountoulakis MS, Lydakis D, Fletcher L, Stentiford EI, Manios T (2019) Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on the establishment of young grapevines. Sci Total Environ 658:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.065
Roefs I, Meulman B, Vreeburg JHG, Spiller M (2017) Centralised, decentralised or hybrid sanitation systems? Economic evaluation under urban development uncertainty and phased expansion. Water Res 109:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.051
SBCS (2004) Manual de adubação e calagem para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS). Porto Alegre, Brazil
Shifflett SD, Hazel DW, Frederick DJ, Nichols EG (2014) Species trials of short rotation woody crops on two wastewater application sites in North Carolina, USA. BioEnergy Res 7:157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9351-2
Singh NK, Kazmi AA, Starkl M (2015) A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: techno-economical approach. Water Sci Technol 71:468–478. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.413
Stewart HTL, Hopmans P, Flinn DW, Hillman TJ (1990) Nutrient accumulation in trees and soil following irrigation with municipal effluent in Australia. Environ Pollut 63:155–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(90)90065-K
Svehla P, Radechovsky J, Hrncirova H, Pacek L, Bartacek J (2015) Effect of influent nitrogen concentration on feasibility of short-cut nitrification during wastewater treatment in activated sludge systems. Chem Pap 69:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1515/chempap-2015-0095
Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. Metcalf & Eddy Inc, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
UNDP (2020) Goal 6: clean water and sanitation. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-6-clean-water-and-sanitation.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2020
US EPA (2009) Nutrient control design manual: state of technology review report. EPA/600/R-09/012. Cincinnati
Von Sperling M (2007) Activated sludge and aerobic biofilm reactors. IWA Publishing, London
Wilén BM, Lumley D, Mattsson A, Mino T (2006) Rain events and their effect on effluent quality studied at a full scale activated sludge treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 54:201–208. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.721
WWAP (UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme) (2019) The United Nations world water development report 2019: leaving no one behind. UNESCO, Paris
Zhou JL, Banks CJ (1993) Mechanism of humic acid colour removal from natural waters by fungal biomass biosorption. Chemosphere 27:607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(93)90096-N
Funding
The authors received financial support from the Brazilian funding agencies (FINEP, FAPERGS, CNPq, and CAPES) and the Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarollo (CYTED).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albornoz, L.L., Centurião, T.C., Giacobbo, A. et al. Influence of rain events on the efficiency of a compact wastewater treatment plant: a case study on a university campus aiming water reuse for agriculture. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 41350–41360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10102-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10102-w