Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How China is fostering sustainable growth: the interplay of green investment and production-based emission

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To mitigate environmental problems and to achieve sustainability, China is striving to transition to low-carbon urban economies. Among several significant steps, the country has made remarkable success in controlling the emissions from transportation, buildings, and energy by shutting down or relocating several polluting industries. This study contributes to the issue of sustainable growth debate using time series data from China for the period 1998–2017 and empirically examines the effects of green investment and renewable energy consumption on production-based carbon emissions for China. The strength of this study is that it tested some new variables such as production-based carbon emissions and green investment. Using autoregressive distributed lag model (ARDL) cointegration technique, we found that production-based emission and its determinants move together in the long run. The study found that green investment and renewable energy consumption are both helpful in controlling production-based carbon emissions, while trade openness increases production-based carbon emissions. Hence, green investment and renewable energy consumption contribute to the achievement of sustainable growth. Moreover, based on a robustness check, human capital, financial development, and environment-specific technological innovation are found to be helpful in curbing production-based carbon emissions. Our study recommends financial technology (fin-tech), green investment, and public-private partnership investment in renewable energy to mitigate the effect of production-based carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agena T (2007) The relationship between economic activities and environmental degradation in Africa. J Hist Soc Niger 17:28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad MH, Azhar U, Wasti SA, Inam Z (2005) Interaction between population and environmental degradation. Pak Dev Rev 44:1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.30541/v44i4iipp.1135-1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Sheau-Ting L (2014) Econometric analysis of trade, exports, imports, energy consumption and CO2 emission in six regions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33:484–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. 15:91–95

  • Azhgaliyeva D, Kapsalyamova Z, Low L (2019) Implications of fiscal and financial policies on unlocking green finance and green investment. ADBI Working Paper Series

  • Baiardi D (2012) Innovation and the environmental Kuznets curve: the case of CO, NMVOCs and SOx in the Italian regions. Quaderni di Dipartimento

  • Balogh JM, Jámbor A (2017) Determinants of CO. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden T A, Marland G, Andres RJ (2009) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Inf Anal Cent Oak Ridge Natl Lab USA Oak Ridge TN Dep Energy 10:U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2015a) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2015b) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Le Quéré C, Raupach MR (2007) Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 104(47):18866–18870. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702737104

  • Chen S (2013) Green finance and development of low carbon economy. In: LTLGB 2012. Springer, pp 457–461

  • Chen W (2008) An empirical test on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in China. IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Datta TK (2017) Effect of green technology investment on a production-inventory system with carbon tax. Adv Oper Res 2017:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4834839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David D, Venkatachalam A (2019) A comparative study on the role of public–private partnerships and green investment banks in boosting low-carbon investments. ADBI Working Paper Series

  • Dhruba P (2018) Managing credit risk and improving access to finance in green energy projects

  • Dikau S, Volz U (2019) Central banking, climate change, and green finance. Handb Green Finance:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5_17

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:12717–12724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30:1065–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguma L, Atela J, Minang P, Ayana A, Gizachew B, Nzyoka J, Bernard F (2019) Deforestation and forest degradation as an environmental behavior: unpacking realities shaping community actions. Land 8:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8020026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge. Mass, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (2015) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Appl Econ 39:107–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH, Cross ML, MacLean B, Osberg L (2005) Principles of microeconomics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1994) Economic growth and the environment (No. w4634). NBER Work Pap Ser Camb MA

  • Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37:1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine D, Semmler W, Mazzucato M, et al (2019) Financing low-carbon transitions through carbon pricing and green bonds. The World Bank

  • Höhne BN, Khosla S, Fekete H, Gilbert A (2012) Mapping of green finance delivered by IDFC members in 2011. 26

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Selden TM (1992) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Hongo H (2013) Renewable and green energy resources technologies: lessons learnt in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Renew Energy Sources Their Appl 17

  • Hossain MS (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39:6991–6999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Xie N, Fang D, Zhang X (2018a) The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: evidence from 25 developing countries. Appl Energy 211:1229–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Xie N, Fang D, Zhang X (2018b) The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: evidence from 25 developing countries. Appl Energy 211:1229–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Liu Y, Hou H, et al (2008) Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine, uric acid and ascorbic acid using palladium nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofibers modified electrode. 24:632–637

  • Hyung K, Baral P (2019) Use of innovative public policy instruments to establish and enhance the linkage between green technology and finance. Springer Tokyo

  • Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub-Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy 123:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers, In: Climate change 2014, mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Clim Change 2014 Mitig Clim Change Contrib Work Group III Fifth Assess Rep Intergov Panel Clim Change 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324

  • IRENA RES (2015) International renewable energy agency. Renew Energy Target Setting Abu Dhabi UAE

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration — with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson AK, Clark B, Kentor J (2010) Militarization and the environment: a panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970-2000. Glob Environ Polit 10:7–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya E, Yılmaz B, Alataş S (2019) How production-based and consumption-based emissions accounting systems change climate policy analysis: the case of CO2 convergence. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:16682–16694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05007-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, Ali S, Ali S, Umar M, Kirikkaleli D, Jiao Z (2020). Consumption-based carbon emissions and international trade in G7 countries: the role of environmental innovation and renewable energy. Sci of the Tot Env 730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945

  • Khan NS, Zuhra S, Shah Z, Bonyah E, Khan W, Islam S, Khan A (2019) Hall current and thermophoresis effects on magnetohydrodynamic mixed convective heat and mass transfer thin film flow. J Phys Commun 3:35009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/aaf830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econ 54:159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde C, Gaspar V (2019) Getting real on meeting Paris climate change commitments. IMF Blog

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2009) Stochastic convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions and multiple structural breaks in OECD countries. Econ Model 26:1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Song Y, Yao Z, Xiao R (2018) Forecasting China’s CO2 emissions for energy consumption based on cointegration approach. Discret Dyn Nat Soc 2018:

  • Li X, Du J, Long H (2019) Green development behavior and performance of industrial enterprises based on grounded theory study: evidence from china. Sustainability 11(15):4133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154133

  • Li X, Du J, Long H (2020) Understanding the green development behavior and performance of industrial enterprises (GDBP-IE): scale development and validation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(5):1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051716

  • Li J, Zhang X, Ali S, and Khan Z (2020). Eco-innovation and energy productivity: New determinants of renewable energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management. 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111028

  • Maroušek J, Strunecký O, Stehel V (2019) Biochar farming: defining economically perspective applications. Clean Techn Environ Policy:1–7

  • Mazzucato M (2016) From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Ind Innov 23:140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (2018) The limits to growth. Green Planet Blues Crit Perspect Glob Environ Polit 102:25–29. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mi ZF, Pan SY, Yu H, Wei YM (2015) Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO2 emission: a case study of Beijing. J Clean Prod 103:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michieka NM, Fletcher J, Burnett W (2013) An empirical analysis of the role of China’s exports on CO2 emissions. Appl Energy 104:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38:661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBS (2017) National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Stat Yearb

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh HJ (2010) Financial strategy to accelerate innovation for green growth. Oecdorg:2–3

  • OECD (2018) Taxing energy use 2018: companion to the taxing energy use database. OECD Publishing, Paris, France

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oh KY, Bhuyan MI (2018) Trade openness and CO2 emissions: evidence of Bangladesh. Asian J Atmospheric Environ 12:30–36. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2018.12.1.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) The causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania: evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Appl Energy 87:1938–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panwar NL, Kaushik SC, Kothari S (2011) Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:1513–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCA (2016). https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-parisagreement.

  • Peng H, Luo X, Zhou C (2018) Introduction to China’s green finance system. J Serv Sci Manag 11:94–100. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2018.111009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punzi MT (2019) Role of bank lending in financing green projects. Handb Green Finance:237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5_24

  • Retallack S, Johnson A, Brunert J, et al (2018) Energy efficiency finance programs: Best practices to leverage private green finance. ADBI Working Paper Series.

  • Rustam A, Wang Y, Zameer H (2019) Does foreign ownership affect corporate sustainability disclosure in Pakistan? A sequential mixed methods approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:31178–31197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J, Woo WT, Yoshino N, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2019) Importance of green finance for achieving sustainable development goals and energy security. Handb Green Finance Energy Secur Sustain Dev

  • Shahbaz M, Khan S, Tahir MI (2013) The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Econ 40:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes AJG, Hidalgo CA (2011) The economic complexity observatory: an analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. AAAI Workshop - Technical Report, In, pp 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDI T (2019) World development indicators (DataBank)

  • World Bank T (2018) World Bank open data. World Bank Web Site INTERNET

  • Wuester H, Jungmin Lee J, Lumijarvi A (2016) Unlocking renewable energy investment: the role of risk mitigation and structured finance. Int Renew Energy Agency IRENA

  • York R (2007) Structural influences on energy production in South and East Asia, 1971-2002. Sociological Forum. Wiley Online Library, In, pp 532–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek S, Flynn C (2013) South-originating green finance: exploring the potential. UNEP: SDC: IISD

  • Zhang Y, Zhang S (2018) The impacts of GDP, trade structure, exchange rate and FDI inflows on China’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy 120:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39:2197–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Peng X, Wu K (2012) Calculation and decomposition of indirect carbon emissions from residential consumption in china based on the input-output model. Energy Policy 48:618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would also like to thank the editor and three anonymous referees for their highly constructive suggestions, which helped in improving earlier versions of this paper.

Funding

This research has been supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 18YJC790164), the Shandong Social Science Planning Project (Grant Nos. 18CGLJ15, 18CCXJ08), and the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 17BJY104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsu-Ling Chang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Su, CW., Ali, S. et al. How China is fostering sustainable growth: the interplay of green investment and production-based emission. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 39607–39618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09933-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09933-4

Keywords

Navigation