Abstract
This paper seeks to answer an empirical question of whether clean biomass energy consumption lowers CO2 emissions while controlling for technical innovation in eight selected countries from Africa for the 1980–2015 period. The countries which are chosen based on availability of data on biomass energy and technological innovation include Egypt, Algeria, South Africa, Mauritius, Kenya, Morocco, Tunisia, and Zambia. Applying pooled mean group, mean group, and dynamic fixed effect panel estimators, the results indicate that clean biomass energy use decreases CO2 emission in the long run. But the effect of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emission is insignificant in the short run. The findings imply that CO2 emission can be reduced by increasing clean biomass energy in the energy mix of these countries. Similarly, environmental quality and economic growth can be achieved simultaneously by increasing the share of biomass energy in large-scale production process. Furthermore, the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC), which hypothesizes an inverted U-shaped relationship between CO2 emission and economic growth, was validated in the long run. This suggests that the EKC pattern is only observed in the long run. Thus, as part of recommendation from this study, policy makers in these countries should formulate more policies that will enhance clean biomass energy production and its usage to substitute significant percentage of fossil fuel use in production process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that South Africa, Egypt, and Algeria are part of this study’s sample.
References
Abu-Bakar NB, Raji JO, Adeel-Farooq RM (2019) Greenfield, mergers and acquisitions, energy consumption, and environmental performance in selected SAARC and ASEAN countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(2):216–224
Acaroglu M, Aydogan H (2012) Biofuels energy sources and future of biofuels energy in Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 36:69–76
Adeel-Farooq RM, Abu Bakar NA, Olajide Raji J (2018) Green field investment and environmental performance: a case of selected nine developing countries of Asia. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37(3):1085–1092
Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 90:202–208
Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131
Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80(3):1729–1747
Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22
Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy 38(1):650–655
Atici C (2009) Carbon emissions in central and eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 17:155–160
Bildirici ME (2013) Economic growth and biomass energy. Biomass Bioenergy 50(2013):19–24
Bilgili F (2012) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions: cointegration analyses with regime shifts. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(7):5349–5354
Bilgili F, Ozturk I (2015) Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: evidence from dynamic panel data. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49(2015):132–138
Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453
Chindo S, Abdulrahim A, Waziri SI, Huong WM, Ahmad AA (2015) Energy consumption, CO 2 emissions and GDP in Nigeria. GeoJournal 80(3):315–322
Cho CH, Chu YP, Yang HY (2014) An environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: a panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sour B: Econ Plan Policy 9(2):120–129
Chow GC (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve: conclusive econometric evidence for CO2. Pac Econ Rev 19:1–7
Energy Information Administration, EIA (2014) US Energy Information Administration Database. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, Available at:http://www.eia.gov/
Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276
Euromonitor international from national statistics (2014) Global Market Information (GIMD). [Online] [accessed on 20.07.18] Available from http://www.portal.euromonitor.com/portal/server.pt?space=Login&control=Redirect
Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO 2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676
Farhani S, Shahbaz M (2014) What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in MENA region? Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:80–90
Fosten J, Morley B, Taylor T (2012) Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecol Econ 76(2012):25–33
Govindaraju VGR, Tang CF (2013) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl Energy 104:310–318
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377
Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(1978):1251–1271
IEA (2019) Africa energy outlook 2019 – world energy outlook special report, November 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2019
Iiyama M, Neufeldt H, Dobie P, Njenga M, Ndegwa G, Jamnadass R (2014) The potential of agroforestry in the provision of sustainable woodfuel in sub-Saharan Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:138–147
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ. 115(2003):53–74
Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37:5167–5172
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210
Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103
Khanna M, Önal H, Dhungana B, Wander M (2011) Economics of herbaceous bioenergy crops for electricity generation: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1474–1484
Lee C-C, Chang C-P (2008) Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resour Energy Econ 30:50–65
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CS (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24
Maji IK, Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2019) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus: a fresh evidence from West Africa. Energy Rep 5(2019):384–392
Musolesi A, Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2010) A Bayesian approach to the estimation of EKC for CO2. Appl Econ 42:2275–2287
Osabuohien ES, Efobi UR, Gitau CMW (2014) Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: evidence from panel cointegration. J Environ Policy Plan 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.867802
Ozcan, B. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 62:1138–1147
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267
Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330
Ozturk I, Bilgili F (2015) Economic growth and biomass consumption nexus: dynamic panel analysis for sub-Sahara African countries. Appl Energy 137:110–116
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38:7850–7860
Pao HT, Yu CH, Yang YH (2011) Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy 36:5094–5100
Paramati SR, Bhattacharya M, Ozturk I, Zakari A (2018) Determinants of energy demand in African frontier market economies: an empirical investigation. Energy 148(2018):123–133
Payne JE (2011) On biomass energy consumption and real output in the US, energy sources part B econ. Plan Policy 6(2011):47–52
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670
Pesaran H, Shin Y (1999) An autoregressive distributed lagmodelling approach to cointegration in econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century. In the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium 371–413. Cambridge University Press
Pesaran H, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68(1):79–113
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Rafindadi AA, Ilhan O (2017) Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: evidence from South Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(3):74–85
Roodman D (2006) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development working paper 2006 (103)
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013a) Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy 2013(60):892–905
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013b) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822
Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51(2012):184–191
Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Econ 31(2009):456–462
Samargandi N, Finrmuc J, Ghosh S (2015) Is the relationship between financial development and economic growth monotonic? Evidence from a sample of middle-income countries. World Dev 68(2015):66–81
Sarkodie SA, Ozturk I (2020) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: a multivariate analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 117(2020):109481
Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556
Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336
Shahbaz M, Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015a) Do coal consumption and industrial development increase environmental degradation in China and India? Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(5):3895–3907
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015b) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67(2016):623–636
Sohag K, Begum RA, Abdullah SMS (2014) Dynamic impact of household consumption on its CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environ Dev Sustain 17(2014):1–13
Sulaiman C (2014) The causality between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Nigeria: an application of Toda and Yamamoto procedure. Adv Nat Appl Sci 8(8):75–82
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2017) The relationship between CO 2 emission, energy consumption and economic growth in Malaysia: a three-way linkage approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(32):25204–25220
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2018) Population growth and CO2 emission in Nigeria: a recursive ARDL approach. SAGE Open 8(2):2158244018765916. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018765916
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS, Ofozor CA (2020) Does wood biomass energy use reduce CO2 emissions in European Union member countries? Evidence from 27 members. J Clean Prod 253(2020):119996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119996
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145
Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253
Tan F, Lean HH, Khan H (2014) Growth and environmental quality in Singapore: is there any trade-off? Ecol Indic 47:149–155
UNDP (2009) The energy access in situation in developing countries: a review focusing on the least developed countries and sub-Saharan Africa. UNDP, New York, p 2009
Woods J, Lynd LR, Laser M, Batistella M, De Castro D, Kline KL, Faaij A (2015) Land and bioenergy in scientific committee on problems of the environment (SCOPE), bioenergy & sustainability: bridging the gaps. Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge
World Bank (2014) World development indicators on CD-ROM, Washington, DC
Yahaya NS, Mohd-Jali MR, Raji JO (2020) The role of financial development and corruption in environmental degradation of Sub-Saharan African countries. Manag Environ Qual Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2019-0190
Yavuz NC (2014) CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sour B Econ Plan Policy 9:229–235
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial Responsibility: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulaiman, C., Abdul-Rahim, A.S. Can clean biomass energy use lower CO2 emissions in African economies? Empirical evidence from dynamic long-run panel framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 37699–37708 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09866-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09866-y