Abstract
Vapor intrusion (VI) risk assessments determine the cleanup level of groundwater in the absence of ingestion. In recent VI investigations, the building pressure cycling (BPC) method has been applied to help minimize ambiguity caused by temporal variability of indoor air samples that are important to risk assessments, and, consequently, determine groundwater cleanup level accurately. In this study, we use a three-dimensional numerical model to examine the dynamic migration of VOCs from groundwater after the application of BPC. First, we validated the numerical model with field measurements. Then, the verified model is used to investigate the effects of site-specific features in determining the performance of BPC operation. At last, we summarize past field applications of BPC to examine the simulated results. Our study indicates that the BPC-induced indoor depressurization can increase the building loading rate in the first 2–3 h, which would then drop to 2–3 times of that with natural conditions in most cases of groundwater contamination. In some cases involving a strong source, e.g., a vapor source above the capillary fringe or a groundwater source with sandy soil above the groundwater level, the normalized building loading rates can be maintained as high as 4–9 without decrease after the first 2–3 h. Significantly higher increase in building loading rate may indicate a potential presence of a preferential pathway between the groundwater contamination and concerned building.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu LD, Johnson PC (2005) Effect of vapor source-building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model. Environ Sci Technol 39:4550–4561
Arthur MAT, John G, Gordon T, William W, Darius M, Helen D (2018a) Fluid flow model for predicting the intrusion rate of subsurface contaminant vapors into buildings. Environ Sci Technol 52:8438–8445
Arthur MAT, William W, Darius M (2018b) Final report: demonstration / validation of more cost-effective methods for mitigating radon and VOC subsurface vapor intrusion to indoor air. ESTCP Project ER-201322. GSI Environmental.
Beckley L, Gorder K, Dettenmaier E, Rivera-Duarte I, McHugh T (2014) On-site gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis to streamline vapor intrusion investigations. Environ Forensics 15:234–243
Bozkurt O, Pennell KG, Suuberg EM (2009) Simulation of the vapor intrusion process for non-homogeneous soils using a three-dimensional numerical model. Groundwater Monit Rem 29:92–104
Dawson H, Wertz W, McAlary T, Gabris T, Carr D (2018) Assessing building susceptibility to vapor intrusion with building pressure cycling. Poster presented at SERDP & ESTCP Symposium: Washington, DC.
Fischer ML, Bentley AJ, Dunkin KA, Hodgson AT, Nazaroff WW, Sextro RG, Daisey JM (1996) Factors affecting indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds at a site of subsurface gasoline contamination. Environ Sci Technol 30:2948–2957
Genuchten MTV (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898
Guo Y, Holton C, Luo H, Dahlen P, Gorder K, Dettenmaier E, Johnson PC (2015) Identification of alternative vapor intrusion pathways using controlled pressure testing, soil gas monitoring, and screening model calculations. Environ Sci Technol 49:13472–13482
Healey S, Petrisor IG, Morrison R (2004) Vapor intrusion—forensic approaches and recent developments. Environ Claims J 16:237–248
Holton C, Guo Y, Luo H, Dahlen P, Gorder K, Dettenmaier E, Johnson PC (2015) Long-term evaluation of the controlled pressure method for assessment of the vapor intrusion pathway. Environ Sci Technol 49:2091–2098
Hu M, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Dahlgren RA, Chen D (2019) Coupling stable isotopes and water chemistry to assess the role of hydrological and biogeochemical processes on riverine nitrogen sources. Water Res 150:418–430
Johnson PC, Ettinger RA (1991) Heuristic model for predicting the intrusion rate of contaminant vapors in buildings. Environ Sci Technol 25:1445–1452
Man J, Zheng Q, Wu L, Zeng L (2019) Improving parameter estimation with an efficient sequential probabilistic collocation-based optimal design method. J Hydrol 569:1–11
McHugh TE, Nickels TN (2008) Final report: detailed field investigation of vapor intrusion processes. ESTCP Project ER-0423. GSI Environmental.
McHugh TE, Beckley L, Bailey D, Gorder K, Dettenmaier E, Rivera-Duarte I, Brock S, MacGregor IC (2012) Evaluation of vapor intrusion using controlled building pressure. Environ Sci Technol 46:4792–4799
McHugh T, Loll P, Eklund B (2017) Recent advances in vapor intrusion site investigations. J Environ Manage 204:783–792
Millington RJ, Quirk JP (1961) Permeability of porous solids. Trans Faraday Soc 57:1200–1207
Nazaroff WW, Lewis SR, Doyle SM, Moed BA, Nero AV (1987) Experiments on pollutant transport from soil into residential basements by pressure-driven airflow. Environ Sci Technol 21:459–466
Pennell KG, Bozkurt O, Suuberg EM (2009) Development and application of a three-dimensional finite element vapor intrusion model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59:447–460
Shen R, Suuberg EM (2016) Impacts of changes of indoor air pressure and air exchange rate in vapor intrusion scenarios. Build Environ 96:178–187
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER), vapor intrusion. EPA, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/vaporintrusion.
Yao Y, Shen R, Pennell KG, Suuberg EM (2011) Comparison of the Johnson-Ettinger vapor intrusion screening model predictions with full three-dimensional model results. Environ Sci Technol 45:2227–2235
Yao Y, Wang Y, Zhong Z, Tang X (2017) Evaluation of land drain as a preferential vapor intrusion pathway with three-dimensional simulations. J Environ Qual 46:1424–1433
Yao Y, Mao F, Xiao Y, Chen H, Verginelli I, Luo J (2018a) Investigating the role of soil texture in petroleum vapor intrusion. J Environ Qual. 47:1179–1185
Yao Y, Xiao Y, Mao F, Chen H, Verginelli I (2018b) Examining the role of sub-foundation soil texture in chlorinated vapor intrusion from groundwater sources with a two-layer numerical model. J Hazard Mater 359:544–553
Yao Y, Mao F, Xiao Y, Luo J (2019a) Modeling capillary fringe effect on petroleum vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination. Water Res 150:111–119
Yao Y, Zuo J, Luo J (2019b) An examination of the building pressure cycling technique as a tool in vapor intrusion investigations. J Hazard Mater [Online] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389419318692
Funding
This work was funded in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2018YFC1801100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.41771494).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Man, J., Wang, Y. et al. Numerical study of the building pressure cycling method for evaluating vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35416–35427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09746-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09746-5