Skip to main content

Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 27, pages 35474–35487 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) and the consumption of non-renewable energy have been on the increase in the coastal Mediterranean countries (CMCs) over the last few decades. Both trigger growth, but the environmental impact could be far-reaching as environmental distortions are mainly human-induced. This study examines the environmental issues facing CMCs. Specifically, we investigate whether the pollution haven hypothesis holds for CMCs. We employ a quantile panel data analysis for CMCs to account for heterogeneity and distributional effects of socioeconomic factors. The result reveals that the influence of FDI on environmental degradation is a function of the indicators utilized and also depends on the initial levels of environmental degradation. The results suggest that the pollution haven hypothesis does not hold for CMCs. However, we also find that energy consumption significantly increases environmental degradation for all indicators and across the observed quantiles. The effects of economic growth and urbanization on the environment were mixed for the different indicators and across quantiles. We recommend that it is pertinent for CMCs to limit their “dirty” energy sources and substitute them with renewables to promote environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Abdouli M, Hammami S (2018) The dynamic links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment, and economic growth in the Middle Eastern and North African countries (MENA Region). J Knowl Econ 9(3):833–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrevaya J (2001) Nonparametric Econometrics. Econ J 111(472)471–471

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(26):26782–26796

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–18

  • Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anser MK (2019) Impact of energy consumption and human activities on carbon emissions in Pakistan: application of STIRPAT model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(13):13453–13463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208

    Google Scholar 

  • Belaid F, Zrelli MH (2019) Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, environmental degradation and economic development: evidence from Mediterranean countries. Energy Policy 133:110929

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2018) The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manag 219:218–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera AK, Galvao AF, Montes-Rojas GV, Park SY (2016) Asymmetric laplace regression: maximum likelihood, maximum entropy and quantile regression. Journal of Econometric Methods 5(1):79–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckely PJ, Casson M (1976) The future of multinational experience. Homes and Meier Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, Yu L (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J Dev Econ 123:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel Data. Handbook of Economics, 2; 1274 – 1318. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Chang SC, Li M-H (2019) Impacts of foreign direct investment and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions across different population regimes. Environ Resour Econ 72(2):583–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Dev Econ 9(4):530–548

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JC (1998) Population growth and air quality in California. Demography 35(1)45–56

  • Danish Ulucak R, Khan SU (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 101996

  • Danish, & Wang, Z. (2019) Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: what we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustain Cities Soc 49

  • De Silva PNK, Simons SJR, Stevens P (2016) Economic impact analysis of natural gas development and the policy implications. Energy Policy 88:639–651

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHart JL, Soule PT (2000) Does I=PAT work in local place? Prof Geogr 52(91):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 94:–175, 179

  • Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO 2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(11):10846–10854

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2019). Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment, 0958305X19834279.

  • Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO 2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 94:419–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakher HA (2019) Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(10):10276–10291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2019). Global Footprint Network. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/(2019), Accessed 1st May 2019.

  • Gorus MS, Aslan M (2019) Impacts of economic indicators on environmental degradation: evidence from MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 103:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorus MS, Aydin M (2019) The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: Causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy 168:815–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B.S., J. Hahn, A. Poirier & J.L. Powell (2015). Quantile regression with panel data. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper, No. 21034, Cambridge: Massachusetts.

  • Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991). Environmental impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 3914, Cambridge: Massachusetts.

  • Hammoudeh S, Nguyen DK, Sousa RM (2014) Energy prices and CO2 emission allowance prices: a quantile regression approach. Energy Policy 70:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938

    Google Scholar 

  • He FS, Gan GGG, Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA (2019) The influences of economic indicators on environmental pollution in Malaysia. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(2):123–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Guan D, Barrett J, Wiedmann T (2009) Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. J Clean Prod 17(14):1241–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübler M (2017) The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: a quantile regression approach. Ecol Econ 134:174–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan Y, Bin Q (2019) The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions and trade on belt and road initiative countries: A spatial panel data approach. The Singapore Economic Review 1–28

  • Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(1):790–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Kim H (2018) Ecological footprint, foreign direct investment, and gross domestic production: evidence of Belt & Road Initiative countries. Sustainability 10(10):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikayilov JI, Mukhtarov S, Mammadov J, Azizov M (2019) Re-evaluating the environmental impacts of tourism: does EKC exist? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Nathaniel SP (2019) Modelling urbanization, trade flow, economic growth and energy consumption with regards to the environment in Nigeria. GeoJournal:1–15

  • Nathaniel SP (2020) Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal:1–14

  • Nathaniel, S. P., & Bekun, F. V. (2019). Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: the Nigerian experience. Journal of Public Affairs, e2037.

  • Nathaniel SP, Iheonu CO (2019) Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci Total Environ 679:337–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, Sharma G, Shah M, Adeleye N (2019) Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12

  • Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M (2020a) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Sharma G, Shah M (2020b) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Nathaniel, S., Barua, S., Hussain, H., & Adeleye, N. (2020c). The determinants and interrelationship of carbon emissions and economic growth in African economies: fresh insights from static and dynamic models. Journal of Public Affairs, e2141.

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Muhammad S (2019) Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Sci Total Environ 686:1019–1029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(22):21993–22022

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Q, Wang X, Zhou Q, Balogh L (2019) Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: a comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach. J Clean Prod 227:724–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Wei YD, Yang Z (2017) The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. J Clean Prod 148:785–794

  • Sherwood B, Wang L (2016) Partially linear additive quantile regression in ultra-high dimension. Ann Stat 44(1):288–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi A (2003) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975/1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44(1):24–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Gupta M, Shahbaz M, Sengupta T (2019) Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. J Clean Prod

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(25):24845–24859

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé PT, DeHart JL (1998) Assessing IPAT using production- and consumption-based measures of I. Soc Sci Q 79(4):754–765 JSTOR

    Google Scholar 

  • Ssali MW, Du J, Mensah IA, Hongo DO (2019) Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11245–11260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhang F, Xu M (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. J Clean Prod 161:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2019). Foreign direct investment: inward and outward flows and stock, annual, United Nations conference on trade and development, Available online: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740.

  • Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80(20):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993) Foreign direct investments - benefits beyond insurance. Development Brief Number 14

  • World Development Indicator (WDI) (2019). World Bank Development Indicators database (online) available at https://data.worldbank.org/ Accessed date 24.10.2019.

  • Xie R, Yuan Y, Huang J (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lin B (2018) Investigating the differences in CO2 emissions in the transport sector across Chinese provinces: evidence from a quantile regression model. J Clean Prod 175:109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 68(2):279–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xi L, Bin S, Yuhuan Z, Song W, Ya L et al (2019) Energy, CO2 emissions, and value added flows embodied in the international trade of the BRICS group: a comprehensive assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 116:109432

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016a) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Guo Y, You W, Xu Y (2016b) The heterogeneity dependence between crude oil price changes and industry stock market returns in China: evidence from a quantile regression approach. Energy Econ 55:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Zrelli MH (2017) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in selected Mediterranean countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 19(4):691–709

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria

    Solomon Nathaniel

  2. School of Foundation, Lagos State University, Badagry, Nigeria

    Solomon Nathaniel

  3. Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Ekene Aguegboh

  4. Department of Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

    Chimere Iheonu

  5. University School of Management Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi, India

    Gagan Sharma

  6. Centre on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Muhammad Shah

Authors
  1. Solomon Nathaniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ekene Aguegboh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chimere Iheonu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gagan Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solomon Nathaniel.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nathaniel, S., Aguegboh, E., Iheonu, C. et al. Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35474–35487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6

Keywords

  • FDI
  • Carbon emissions
  • Carbon footprint
  • Ecological footprint
  • Energy consumption
  • Urbanization
  • Quantile regression method

JEL classification

  • Q45
  • Q40
  • Q35