Skip to main content

Analyzing the association between innovation, economic growth, and environment: divulging the importance of FDI and trade openness in India

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore the nexus of innovation–environment and economic growth in the context of the Indian economy. To achieve the study objective, we explored the role of technological innovation, FDI, trade openness, energy use, and economic growth toward carbon emissions. Using the data of 1985–2017, the study employed ARDL bound testing and vector error correction model (VECM) methods to capture the effects of technological innovation, trade openness, FDI, energy use, and economic growth on CO2 emissions. Empirical estimation has confirmed the existence of long-run cointegration. Similarly, in the long run, it is found that trade openness, energy use, and economic growth positively reinforce CO2 emissions. In contrast, technological innovation and FDI negatively reinforce CO2 emissions in the long run. Furthermore, VECM indicates that the relationship among innovation, trade openness, and energy use is bidirectional in the long run. Whereas, unidirectional relation has been found that is coming from GDP to carbon emissions, FDI, innovation, trade, and energy use. In the short run, unidirectional link found which is coming from FDI, innovation, and energy use to carbon emission. However, the association between emissions and trade openness is bidirectional. The conclusions put forward policy implications that innovation is a way to reduce environmental degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adeel Farooq MR, Bakar A, Aznin N, Raji O, Jimoh (2018) Green field investment and environmental performance: a case of selected nine developing countries of Asia. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37(3):1085–1092

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad N, Du L, Lu J, Wang J, Li H-Z, Hashmi MZ (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy 123:164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017) Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari MA, Khan NA, Ganaie AA (2019) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in Asian countries? A panel data analysis. OPEC Energy Rev

  • Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir O, Zeren F (2017) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission: evidence from selected G-20 countries. In: Handbook of research on global enterprise operations and opportunities. IGI Global, pp 81–92

  • Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali MF, Ahmad N, Shahbaz M (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manag 196:627–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento JPC, Moutinho V (2016) CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:142–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco L, Gonzalez F, Ruiz I (2013) The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxf Dev Stud 41(1):104–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 37(2):149–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Sam CY, Chang T (2018) Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 182:1001–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Lei Y (2018) The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: new evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renew Energy 123:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhong Z (2019) CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renew Energy 131:208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2018) Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China’s provinces. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2935–2946

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Smyth R, Zhang X (2019) R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 80:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M (2019) The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO 2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15028–15038

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoðan S, Yýldýrým DÇ, Gedikli A (2019) Investigation of causality analysis between economic growth and CO2 emissions: the case of BRICS–T countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(6):430–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan S, Gedikli A, Kırca M (2019) A note on time-varying causality between natural gas consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Res Policy 64:101504

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoǧan S, Gedikli A, Yılmaz AD, Haider A, Zafar MW (2019) Investigation of energy consumption–economic growth nexus: a note on MENA sample. Energy Rep 5:1281–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan S, Çevik Eİ, Gedikli A (2020) Relationship between oil price volatility and military expenditures in GCC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Fan H, Hossain MI (2018) Technological innovation, trade openness, CO2 emission and economic growth: comparative analysis between China and India. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8(6):240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei L, Dong S, Xue L, Liang Q, Yang W (2011) Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy 39(2):568–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández YF, López MF, Blanco BO (2018) Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 172:3459–3467

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganda F (2019) The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 217:469–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasanov F, Bulut C, Suleymanov E (2017) Review of energy-growth nexus: a panel analysis for ten Eurasian oil exporting countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari H, Katircioğlu ST, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille E, Shahbaz M, Moosa I (2019) The impact of FDI on regional air pollution in the Republic of Korea: a way ahead to achieve the green growth strategy? Energy Econ 81:308–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Zhou H-F, Bai L, Zhou P (2018) Does foreign direct investment drive environmental degradation in China? An empirical study based on air quality index from a spatial perspective. J Clean Prod 176:864–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasoy A, Akçay S (2019) Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution: the Turkish case. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 30(2):437–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Perron P (2009) Assessing the relative power of structural break tests using a framework based on the approximate Bahadur slope. J Econ 149(1):26–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(1):790–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling CH, Ahmed K, Muhamad RB, Shahbaz M (2015) Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: what do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate? Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(24):20131–20142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Hao Y, Gao Y (2017) The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: evidence from China. Energy Policy 108:271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Zhan D, Li J (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Long X, Luo Y, Wu C, Zhang J (2018) The influencing factors of CO 2 emission intensity of Chinese agriculture from 1997 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(13):13093–13101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28(3):317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood H, Maalel N, Zarrad O (2019) Trade openness and CO2 emissions: evidence from Tunisia. Sustainability 11(12):3295

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar D, Bhattacharjee M, Chowdhury JR (2019) Trade and environment nexus: a theoretical appraisal. In: Handbook of research on economic and political implications of green trading and energy use. IGI Global, pp 1–17

  • McNown R, Sam CY, Goh SK (2018) Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Appl Econ 50(13):1509–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Merican Y, Yusop Z, Noor ZM, Hook LS (2007) Foreign direct investment and the pollution in five ASEAN nations. Int J Econo Manage 1(2):245–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir K, Ameer A (2018) Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 29(6):1123–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Omri A, Euchi J, Hasaballah AH, Al-Tit A (2019) Determinants of environmental sustainability: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sci Total Environ 657:1592–1601

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Econ 56:29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H, Tan X, Li Y, Hu L (2016) Economic growth, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in China: a panel Granger causality analysis. Sustainability 8(3):233

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana R, Sharma M (2019) Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. J Int Trade Econ Dev 28(3):348–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Gow J, Ali MI, Hossain MR, Al-Azami KS, Akbar D, Gedikli A (2019) Urbanization-globalization-CO2 emissions nexus revisited: empirical evidence from South Africa. Heliyon 5(6):e01974

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt J, Wilson R (2018) Growth policy in the age of high technology, vol 46. Routledge

  • Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A (2019) Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod 217:603–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ 104664

  • Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2019) Data selection and environmental Kuznets curve models-environmental Kuznets curve models, data choice, data sources, missing data, balanced and unbalanced panels. In: Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Elsevier, pp 65–83

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24(7):1151–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretesky PB, Lynch MJ (2009) A cross-national study of the association between per capita carbon dioxide emissions and exports to the United States. Soc Sci Res 38(1):239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam VW, Le KN, Tran CN, Illankoon ICS (2019) A review on international ecological legislation on energy consumption: greenhouse gas emission management. International Journal of Construction Management:1–12

  • Wang H, Ang B (2018) Assessing the role of international trade in global CO2 emissions: an index decomposition analysis approach. Appl Energy 218:146–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Sun Y, Wang Z (2018) Agglomeration effect of CO2 emissions and emissions reduction effect of technology: A spatial econometric perspective based on China’s province-level data. Journal of Cleaner Production 204:96–106

  • Westerlund J (2007) A panel CUSUM test of the null of cointegration. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 67(2):231–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen H, Wang Y, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2019) Does oil price volatility influence real sector growth? Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Energy Rep 5:688–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen H, Wang Y, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2020) Decomposing factors affecting CO2 emissions in Pakistan: insights from LMDI decomposition approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(3):3113–3123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yii K-J, Geetha C (2017) The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from Granger causality test. Energy Procedia 105:3118–3124

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Du Y (2019) Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’economy in China. Atmospheric Pollut Res 10(1):152–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf M, Sabara Z, Wekke IS (2018) Role of innovation in testing environment kuznets curve: a case of indonesian economy. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(1):276–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y, Yasmeen H (2019) Transformation of firm innovation activities into brand effect. Mark Intell Plan 37(2):226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y, Yasmeen H (2020) Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: implications for cleaner production in China. J Clean Prod 247:119119

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017) Does trade openness affect CO 2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(21):17616–17625

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was received funding from the College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and is supported by the Young Teachers Research Supporting fund Project number (1009-56SYAH19058).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Wasif Zafar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zameer, H., Yasmeen, H., Zafar, M.W. et al. Analyzing the association between innovation, economic growth, and environment: divulging the importance of FDI and trade openness in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 29539–29553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09112-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09112-5

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Trade
  • CO2 emissions
  • Growth
  • Environment