Skip to main content

Environmental Phillips curve: OECD and Asian NICs perspective

Abstract

This research aims to explore the existence of a new concept known as “environmental Phillips curve” (EPC) developed by the authors. Taking annual data of 30 countries for 26 years, a panel data estimation method is applied. The invented function shows an inverse relationship between pollution and unemployment. In most of the cases, the industrialized countries show that the relationship is valid. The notion is proved effective in every format of investigation. It seems that curbing pollution in the world is only possible at the cost of human employment. Therefore, if countries want to curb environmental pollution without affecting the generation of employment and reducing poverty, they should contemplate both innovation and enforcement alternative technologies that would be less polluting but employment friendly. Moreover, this research also suggests that if a country can treat pollution efficiently, it can increase the national income without a deteriorating unemployment level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1

References

  1. Aldy JE (2005) An environmental Kuznets curve analysis of U.S. state-level carbon dioxide emissions. J Env Dev 14:48–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Awad A (2019) Does economic integration damage or benefit the environment? Africa’s Experience Energy Pol 132:991–999

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econom 170(1):164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time series cross section data? Amer Pol Sc Rev 89:634–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Adv Econ 15:161–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breusch T, Pagan A (1980) The lagrange multiplier Ttest and its application to model specification in econometrics. Rev of Econ Stud 47:239–254

  7. Buzkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: the Turkey case. Int J En Econ and Pol 4(3):484–495

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chebbi HE, Boujelbeane Y (2008) CO2 emissions, energy consumptions and economic growth in Tunisia. Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. August 26-29, European Association of Agricultural Economists

  9. Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emission: a panel data-based co-integration analysis. Ecol Econ 57:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Driscoll D, Kraay A (2001) Trade, growth, and poverty. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank, Washington No. 2615

  11. Farhani S, Rejeb JB (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel data from MENA region. Int J Energy Econ Pol 2(2):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grossman G, Krueger A (1995) Environment and the economic growth. Quart J Econ 110:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. J Econom 3:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton C, Turton H (2002) Determinant of emissions growth in OECD countries. J Energy Pol:63–71

  15. Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271

  16. Hossain S (2012) An econometric analysis of energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, Foreign Trade and Urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Econ 3:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Islam F, Shahbaz M (2012) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Bangladesh? Utah Vally University, Comsats Institute of Information (Working Paper)

  19. Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed MSU (2013) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Bangladesh? Evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach Bangladesh Dev Stud XXXVI, 4

  20. Kashem MA, Rahman MM (2019) CO2 emissions and development indicators: a causality analysis for Bangladesh. Env Proc 6(2):433–455

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lean HH, Smyth R (2009) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN, Department of Economics, Monash University, Australia, Development Research Unit discussion paper, 09–13

  22. Levin A, Lin C, Chu CJ (2002) Unit root test in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mercan M, Karakaya E (2015) Energy consumption economic growth carbon emissions: dynamic panel cointegration for selected OECD countries. Procedia Econ Fin 23:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohapatra G, Giri AG (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from India. Emp Econ Quant Econ Letters 4(1):17–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Okun AM (1962) Real GDP Growth and the Unemployment Rate . Cowles Foundation, Yale University

  26. Ozturk I, Uddin GS (2002) Causality among carbon emissions, energy consumption and growth in India, Occasional paper, Faculty of Economics, Mersin University, Turkey

  27. Pesaran MH (2004) General Diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240

  28. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-sectional dependence. J App Econ 27:265–312

  29. Phillips AW (1958) The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom. Economica. 283:1861–1957

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rahman MM (2017) Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rahman MM (2020) Environmental degradation: the role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalization. J Environ Manag 253

  32. Rahman MM, Kashem MA (2017) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL co-integration and Granger causality analysis. En Policy 110:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rahman MM, Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2017) The effects of population growth, environmental quality and trade openness on economic growth: a panel data application. J Econ Stud 44(3)

  34. Reed RW, Ye H (2011) Which panel data estimator should I use? J Appl Econ 43(8)

  35. Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth in energy consumption in 58 countries. Ener Report 1:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shahbaz M, Kumar M, Shah SH, Sado, JR (2016) Time-varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumptions and economic growth nexus: statistical analysis of NEXT-11 countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive

  37. Tiwari AK (2012) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: a revisit of the evidence from India. Applied econometrics and international development, 11-2

  38. World Bank (2019) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zaman RZ (2012) CO2 emissions, trade openness and GDP per capita: Bangladesh perspective. MPRA

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.A. Kashem: Study plan; literature review; data collection; writing main sections of the paper; econometric estimation, and data and result analysis.

M.M. Rahman: Conceptual and methodological development; variable selection; result analysis, polishing and editing, and improving the quality of the manuscript; and undertaking the responsibility of corresponding author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mafizur Rahman.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 The results of cross-sectional dependence tests
Table 5 The results of unit root test

Appendix 2. Bi-variate graphs (unemployment vs CO2 emissions)

figurea
figureb
figurec

Appendix 3. All estimated models

Table 6 Model 1: the results of FEM
Table 7 Model 2: the results of REM
Table 8 Model 3: the results of PCSEs
Table 9 The results of Hausman test

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashem, M.A., Rahman, M.M. Environmental Phillips curve: OECD and Asian NICs perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 31153–31170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08620-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environmental Phillips curve (EPC)
  • CO2 emissions
  • Unemployment
  • Panel data
  • OECD

JEL codes

  • Q53
  • E24
  • C23