Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the impact of environmental regulations on happiness: new evidence from China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lower happiness caused by environmental pollution has attracted widespread attention, but existing studies have ignored the impact of environmental governance on happiness, and hardly a research has discussed whether environmental regulations will affect happiness. To make up for the above shortfall, based on the micro data come from Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) in 2015 and the macro data of 28 provinces in China from 2013 to 2015, this study distinguishes three types of environmental regulations which are economical environmental regulation (EER), legal environmental regulation (LER) and supervised environmental regulation (SER), and the econometrical analysis of the linear relationship or potential nonlinear relationship between them and happiness is carried by ordinary least square (OLS) and ordered probit (Oprobit). Considering the time lag of policy implementation, this paper further tests the lagging effects. The results show that EER significantly improves happiness in the long run after implementation, and LER has no significant effect on happiness in the current year and the following year, while the significant nonlinear relationship appear after 2 years, whereas SER has a negative effect on happiness in the year and 2 years later. Therefore, in addition to continuing to increase government investment in environmental administration with adequate budgets, local governments should strengthen the environmental legal system and administrative accountability. And the most important of all, the government should create more avenues for public participation and pay enough attention to the supervision of the public. Finally, this research has great theoretical and realistic significance for the government to control environmental pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpretation interactions. SAGE Publications

  • Alesina A, Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2004) Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J Public Econ 88:2009–2042

    Google Scholar 

  • Altindag DT, Xu J (2011) The impact of institutions and development on happiness. Auburn Economics Working Paper. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/abnwpaper/

  • Brickman P, Campbell D (1971) Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. Adaptation Level Theory: A Symposium. New York: Academic Press

  • Chen G, Li S (2012) How can the government make people happy? ——an empirical study on the influence of government quality on residents' happiness. Manag World 8:55–67

  • Chen G (2011) Corruption and income inequality: evidence from China. Nankai Economic Studies 5:113–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HY, Hao Y, Li JW, Song XJ (2018) The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 195:200–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang HH, Lee SH (2018) Family relations, sense of coherence, happiness and perceived health in retired taiwanese: analysis of a conceptual model. Geriatr Gerontol Int 18(1):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Christainsen GB, Haveman RH (1981) Public regulations and the slowdown in productivity growth. Am Econ Rev 71(2):320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50:121–143

  • Easterlin, R. A., (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Féres J, Reynaud A (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 52:65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Shi BB, Kang R (2017) Does environmental policy reduce enterprise innovation--evidence from China. Sustainability. 9(6):872

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavin P (2018) State government public goods spending and citizens' quality of life. Soc Sci Res 19

  • Flavin P, Pacek AC, Radcliff B (2014) Assessing the impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being. Soc Forces 92(4):1241–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40(2):402–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcés-Ayerbe C, Cañón-de-Francia J (2017) The relevance of complementarities in the study of the economic consequences of environmental proactivity: analysis of the moderating effect of innovation efforts. Ecol Econ 142:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, Xiao YZ (2016) A study on influence of government regulation reform on the residents’ happiness: empirical evidence based on water industry regulation reform data. Social Sciences in Nanjing 8:74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessami Z (2010) The size and composition of government spending in Europe and its impact on well-being. Kyklos. 63(3):346–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H.S., Lu, Y.P., 2012. Income inequality, Health and Subjective Well-being among the Elderly: Empirical Evidence on the Aging of China China Soft Science 11, 41–56

  • Huang T, Liu L, Wang D, Zhang W (2016) Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-being. Acta Psychol Sin 48(9):1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang YM, He LY (2013) Urbanization, environmental pollution and subjective well-being: an empirical study on China. China Soft Science 12:82–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Yu ZH (2018) The effect on environmental governance investment and financial environmental expenditure for the environmental pollution: the comparative analysis of the panel model. Ecol Econ 34(07):83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J (2006) Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos. 59:43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen MJ, Boyle KJ, Leiserowitz AA (2013) Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy 55:617–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Ramanathan R (2018) Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 196:1329–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Daniel S (2006) How elections matter: theory and evidence from environmental policy. Q J Econ 121(4):1249–1281

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YL, Li ZH, Yin XM (2018) The effects of three types of environmental regulation on energy consumption—evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:27334–27351

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu JH, Sun XL (2017) An exploration on the influencing mechanism of environmental pollution on the well-being of Chinese residents. Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute 94:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma L (2013) Public service performance and Citizen's happiness: an empirical study of Chinese prefecture-level cities. Chinese Public Administration 02:104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Oishi S, Kushlev K, Schimmack U (2018) Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. Am Psychol 73(2):157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • He LX, Pan CY (2011) Uncover the “Easterlin paradox” of China: income gap, inequality of opportunity and happiness. Manag World 08:11-22+187

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng YZ, Tong J, Wu M (2014) What exactly promotes the transformation of China’s economic growth pattern? The journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics 31(6):20–35

  • Picazo-Tadeo AJ, García-Reche A (2007) What makes environmental performance differ between firms? Empirical evidence from the Spanish tile industry. Environ Plan 39:2232–2247

    Google Scholar 

  • Qing-Guo Z, O'Shea B, Willis M, Yu-Wen Y (2011) Subjective well-being, personality and environmental satisfaction in urban China. International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. IEEE

  • Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Eek D (2009) Political corruption and social trust: an experimental approach. Ration Soc 21:81–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Song DY, Yang QY, Chen X (2019a) Does environmental regulation improve residents' subjective well-being: an empirical study of China. Mod Econ Res 01:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y., Guo S., Zhang M., (2019b). Assessing customers' perceived value of the anti-haze cosmetics under haze pollution. The Science of the total environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:29191–29211

  • Song Y., Guo S., Zhang M., 2019c. Will environmental regulations affect subjective wellbeing?—a cross-region analysis in China. Science of the Total Environment 685:753–762

  • Sun C, Zhu X (2014) Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy 69:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Tian ZH, Fan MT (2018) Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China. World Dev 105:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hao CH, Shi MC (2018) Does environmental pollution provoke public environmental concern? J Financ Econ 11:106–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu KP, Tong J, Chu CJ (2015) Impact of environment quality on people’s happiness. Technol Econ 34:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesselink A, Paavola J, Fritsch O, Renn O (2011) Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives. Environ Plan 43:2688–2704

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shen N (2016) Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: the case of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:758–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie R, Yuan Y, Huang J (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JK, Zhang YR (2014) Air pollution pricing: analysis based on happiness data. J World Econ 37(12):162–188

  • Yin J, Zheng M, Chen J (2015) The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: an evidence from China. Energy Pol 77:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Bi J, Yuan Z, Ge J, Liu B, Bu M (2008) Why do firms engage in environmental management? An empirical study in China. J Clean Prod 16:1036–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang XB, Chen X (2017) Valuing air quality using happiness data: the case of China. Ecol Econ 137:29–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Guo S, Bai CY, Wang WW (2019) Study on the impact of haze pollution on residents' green consumption behavior: the case of Shandong province. J Clean Prod 219:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YM, Zhu FM, He LL (2009) Definition, classification and evolution of environmental regulations. China population resources and environment. (6):85–90

  • Zhao XY, Fan X (2016) The correlation between People’s sense of happiness and governance. Jilin University journal social science 56(1):60–70

  • Zhao D, Jiang J, Yin Z (2019) Can entrepreneurship bring happiness? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.12.009

  • Zheng D, Shi M (2017) Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from China's polluting industries. J Clean Prod 141:295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu ZK, Leng CX (2018) The impact of internet use on the subjective well-being of residents: evidence from CSS2013. Econ Rev 209:78–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu BZ, Jiang MX, Zhang SF et al (2019) Resource and environment economic complex system: models and applications. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions and valuable comments on the earlier draft of our paper, upon which we have improved the content.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71804182), and Jiangsu social science outstanding youth fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Shu Guo & Ming Zhang

  2. School of Math, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Wenwen Wang

  3. Center for Environmental Management and Economics Policy Research, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Shu Guo, Wenwen Wang & Ming Zhang

Authors
  1. Shu Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenwen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenwen Wang or Ming Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, S., Wang, W. & Zhang, M. Exploring the impact of environmental regulations on happiness: new evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 19484–19501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08508-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08508-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation