Skip to main content

The environmental sustainability effects of income, labour force, and tourism development in OECD countries

Abstract

The impacts of the increasing human activities mostly through socio-economic and environment interactions have continued to generate more scientific studies and contemporary discussion on issues ranging from the climate change to income and gender gap. Accordingly, the current study employed the cointegration and a two-step (system) SYS-Generalized Method of Moments to examine the environmental sustainability effects of income, international tourism arrivals, and labour force vis-à-vis gender unemployment in the panel of (32) Organization for Economic Development and Corporation (OECD) for the period 1995–2016. The study revealed that income growth in the OECD countries and increase in the inflow of international tourists into the OECD member countries are significant endangering factors for the bloc’s environmental sustainability. More striking is the environmental impact of labour force in the panel countries. Intuitively, a positive labour force-environmental degradation nexus is expected; the negatively desirable labour force-environmental degradation nexus in the current study is a justification of (1) the prevailing gender employment/unemployment classifications in the OECD member countries, and (2) the increasing adoption of more environmental friendlier working conditions or operation among the member countries. Moreover, the current study strongly posits a significant policy framework for the governments and stakeholders of the OECD member countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The step-by-step procedure of the LLC test is provided in Levin, A., Lin, C. F., and Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

  2. The step-by-step procedure of the LLC test is provided in Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

  3. A more detailed and step-by-step presentation of the two-step system-GMM estimation procedure is available in the work of Arellano and Bover (1995).

  4. Another source of the step-by-step presentation of the estimation and diagnostic procedure is put forward by Blundell and Bond (1998)

References

  • Abdullahi MM, Maji KI (2019) Renewable energy, regulation, employment and environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa. Renew Energy 9(7)

  • Akadiri SS, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2018) Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globalization, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis. Curr Issue Tour:1–15

  • Akalpler E, Hove S (2019) Carbon emissions, energy use, real GDP per capita and trade matrix in the Indian economy-an ARDL approach. Energy 168:1081–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: the role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA (2019a) The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: accounting for environmental sustainability. Sci Total Environ 658:260–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA (2019b) Carbon emissions and the trilemma of trade policy, migration policy and health care in the US. Carbon Management 10(2):209–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Alola UV (2018) Agricultural land usage and tourism impact on renewable energy consumption among Coastline Mediterranean Countries. Energy & Environment 29(8):1438–1454

    Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Alola UV (2019) The dynamics of tourism—refugeeism on house prices in Cyprus and Malta. J Int Migr Integr 20(2):521–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Alola UV, Saint Akadiri S (2019a) Renewable energy consumption in Coastline Mediterranean Countries: impact of environmental degradation and housing policy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(25):25789–25801

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Yalçiner K, Alola UV, Saint Akadiri S (2019b) The role of renewable energy, immigration and real income in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Europe largest states. Science of The Total Environment 674:307–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68(1):29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford NA, Hall RP, Ashford RH (2012) The crisis in employment and consumer demand: reconciliation with environmental sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan MA, Zaman K, Shoukry AM, Gani S, Sharkawy MA, Sasmoko, … Hishan SS (2018) Energy, tourism, finance, and resource depletion: panel data analysis. Energy Sources B: Econ Plan Policy 13(11–12):463–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87(1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone L (2019) The time for reform is now to respond to global challenges. Retrieved December 16, 2019, from Oecdecoscope website: https://oecdecoscope.blog/2019/07/12/the-time-for-reform-is-now/

  • Bulavskaya T, Reynès F (2018) Job creation and economic impact of renewable energy in the Netherlands. Renew Energy 119:528–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2019) Renewable energy investment and employment in China. Int Rev Appl Econ 33(3):314–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Zhang J, Hassan ST, Iqbal K Toward achieving environmental sustainability target in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries: The role of real income, research and development, and transport infrastructure Sustainable Development

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1(2):277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, B. (2013). Energy Outlook 2030. In BP Energy Outlook https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.ppl.18012013.8

  • Dvořák P, Martinát S, der Horst D, Frantál B, Turečková K (2017) Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:360–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Eluwole KK, Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Etokakpan MU (2019) Does the interaction between growth determinants a drive for global environmental sustainability? Evidence from world top 10 pollutant emissions countries. Sci Total Environ 135972

  • Ganda F (2019) The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(7):6758–6772

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2019) World Energy Balances. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from International Energy Agency website: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-2019#oecd-countries

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) (2018) Employment and environmental sustainability in Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved December 15, 2019, from Employment and environmental sustainability fact sheet website: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-asia/%2D%2D-ro-bangkok/documents/publication/wcms_624556.pdf

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis G, Panayiotou A, Dimou A, Katsifaraki G (2016) Gender and environmental sustainability: a longitudinal analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(6):399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu S, Gokmenoglu KK, Eren BM (2018) Testing the role of tourism development in ecological footprint quality: evidence from top 10 tourist destinations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(33):33611–33619

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasisi TT, Eluwole KK, Ozturen A, Avci T (2019) Explanatory investigation of the moderating role of employee proactivity on the causal relationship between innovation-based human resource management and employee satisfaction. J Public Aff. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2051

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Li M, Zhang L, Li T, Ouyang H, Na S (2019) Has the high-tech industry along the belt and road in China achieved green growth with technological innovation efficiency and environmental sustainability? Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(17):3117

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie N, Gannon MJ (2019) Exploring the antecedents of sustainable tourism development. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0384

  • Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):631–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal R, al Irsyad MI, Nepal SK (2019) Tourist arrivals, energy consumption and pollutant emissions in a developing economy--implications for sustainable tourism. Tour Manag 72:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • OCED (2013) Environment at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) “Foreword”, in OECD tourism trends and policies 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/tour-2018-1-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019a). OECD Tourism Committee. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/oecd-tourism-committee.htm

  • OECD (2019b). Employment: unemployment rate, by sex and age group. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54743. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/oecd-tourism-committee.htm

  • Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1916–1928

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Shahbaz M, Alam MS (2017) Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 50:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20(3):597–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulido-Fernández JI, Cárdenas-García PJ, Espinosa-Pulido JA (2019) Does environmental sustainability contribute to tourism growth? An analysis at the country level. J Clean Prod 213:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza SA, Sharif A, Wong WK, Karim MZA (2017) Tourism development and environmental degradation in the United States: evidence from wavelet-based analysis. Curr Issue Tour 20(16):1768–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA, York R, Dietz T (2004) Tracking the anthropogenic drivers of ecological impacts. AMBIO 33(8):509–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Akadiri S, Alkawfi MM, Uğural S, Akadiri AC (2019a) Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization. Sci Total Environ 671:1293–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Akadiri AC (2019b) The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey. Science of the Total Environment 687:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Akadiri AC, Alola UV (2019c) Renewable energy consumption in EU-28 countries: policy toward pollution mitigation and economic sustainability. Energy Policy 132:803–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Olasehinde-Williams G, Etokakpan MU (2019d) The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Sci Total Environ 134653

  • Saint Akadiri S, Lasisi TT, Uzuner G, Akadiri AC (2019e) Examining the impact of globalization in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the case of tourist destination states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(12):12605–12615

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1226–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(22):21993–22022

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Adams S (2018) Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 643:1590–1601

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani ZD, Shahnazi R (2019) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis. Energy 169:1064–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakouri B, Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Ghorchebigi E (2017) Does tourism development promote CO2 emissions? Anatolia 28(3):444–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham A, Almor T, Lee SM, Ahammad MF (2017) Encouraging environmental sustainability through gender: a micro-foundational approach using linguistic gender marking. J Organ Behav 38(9):1356–1379

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Bello MO (2019) Energy innovations and environmental sustainability in the US: the role of immigration and economic expansion using a maximum likelihood method. Sci Total Environ 135594

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Gan GGG, Shahbaz M (2018) The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):22641–22657

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tatli H, Barak D (2019) The relationship between female unemployment and energy consumption: the case of OECD countries. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 24:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Udemba EN (2019) Triangular nexus between foreign direct investment, international tourism, and energy consumption in the Chinese economy: accounting for environmental quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(24):24819–24830

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Monfreda C (2004) Ecological footprints and energy. Encyclopedia of energy 2(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Patadia S, Kammen DM (2010) Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: how many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy 38(2):919–931

    Google Scholar 

  • WTTC (2019) Travel and tourism economic impact. London. https://www.wttc.org/economic-impact/country-analysis/country-data/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman K, Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Raza SA (2016) Tourism development, energy consumption and Environmental Kuznets Curve: trivariate analysis in the panel of developed and developing countries. Tour Manag 54:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Luo D (2017a) Driving force of rising renewable energy in China: environment, regulation and employment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Luo D (2017b) Driving force of rising renewable energy in China: environment, regulation and employment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:48–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Alola.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 2
figure 2

The time plot illustrating the relationship between carbon emissions (CO2) with GDP per capita (a), with international tourism arrivals (b), with labour force (c), with male unemployment (d), and with female unemployment (d)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lasisi, T.T., Alola, A.A., Eluwole, K.K. et al. The environmental sustainability effects of income, labour force, and tourism development in OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 21231–21242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08486-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08486-w

Keywords

  • Sustainable environment
  • Income
  • Labour force
  • Gender (un)employment
  • OECD