Abstract
The increasing attention to agricultural exports and sustainability issues is driving a surge of interest in the life cycle assessment (LCAs) of greenhouse crop production in Albania. Meanwhile, most of the reported agricultural LCAs tend to be generic without considering regionalized environmental sensitivities. In this study, ReCiPe 2016, covering 18 midpoint indicators and 3 endpoint indicators was used to generate a full-fledged cradle-to-farm gate LCA of greenhouse tomatoes in a typical Albanian farm including spatial differentiation and indicators not covered by contemporary LCAs. The most important midpoint categories per 1 ha identified from foreground–background analysis were global warming (2660.4 kg CO2-eq), stratospheric ozone depletion (0.0308 kg CFC11-eq), particulate matter formation (7.99 kg PM2.5-eq), human health and ecosystem ozone formation (8.47 and 14.95 kg NOx-eq), water consumption (2293.23 m3), and terrestrial acidification (42.28 kg SO2-eq). The application of spatial differentiation resulted in higher impacts with about 21% for particulate matter formation, 12% for human health ozone formation, 134% for ecosystem ozone formation, 19% for terrestrial acidification, and 13% for water consumption. The impacts primarily originated from nitrogen-based fertilizer emissions and diesel fuel with the origin of the impact from nitrous oxide (N2O), ammonia volatilization (NH3), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). Water consumption was dominated by irrigation water use. Overall, at the endpoint level, 9% and 24% less cumulative damage to human health and ecosystem quality were calculated with respect to the site-generic analysis primarily from the cause-and-effect chain of water consumption (mainly lower water stress index). This affirms the importance of regional considerations in LCA calculations to reflect the impacts accordingly (i.e., the magnitude of impacts, the most relevant midpoint categories, and their relevance on endpoint level) and increase the possibility of making correct conclusions and sub-optimizations, i.e., increase the discriminating power of LCA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida J, Achten WMJ, Verbist B, Heuts RF, Schrevens E, Muys B (2014) Carbon and water footprints and energy use of greenhouse tomato production in northern Italy. J Ind Ecol 18(6):898–908
Antón A, Torrellas M, Núñez M, Sevigné E, Amores MJ, Muñoz P, Montero JI (2014) Improvement of agricultural life cycle assessment studies through spatial differentiation and new impact categories: case study on greenhouse tomato production. Environ Sci Technol 48(16):9454–9462
Balliu A, Sallaku G (2016) An overview of current situation and trends in Albanian vegetables protected cultivation sector. Acta Hortic
Bartzas, G., Zaharaki, D., and Komnitsas, K. (2015). “Life cycle assessment of open field and greenhouse cultivation of lettuce and barley.” Information Processing in Agriculture
Bojacá CR, Wyckhuys KAG, Schrevens E (2014) Life cycle assessment of Colombian greenhouse tomato production based on farmer-level survey data. J Clean Prod 69:26–33
Bosona T, Gebresenbet G (2018) Life cycle analysis of organic tomato production and supply in Sweden. J Clean Prod 196:635–643
Boulard T, Raeppel C, Brun R, Lecompte F, Hayer F, Carmassi G, Gaillard G (2011) Environmental impact of greenhouse tomato production in France. Agron Sustain Dev 31(4):757–777
Canaj, K. (2016). “Evaluating the performance of Participatory irrigation management in Albania : The case study of Çukas water user association.” Istituto Agronomico Mediterraneo <Bari>
Corrado S, Castellani V, Zampori L, Sala S (2017) Systematic analysis of secondary life cycle inventories when modelling agricultural production: a case study for arable crops. J Clean Prod 172:3990–4000
De Luca AI, Molari G, Seddaiu G, Toscano A, Bombino G, Ledda L, Milani M, Vittuari M (2015) Multidisciplinary and innovative methodologies for sustainable management in agricultural systems. Environ Eng Manag J 14(7):1571–1581
Del Borghi A, Gallo M, Strazza C, Del Borghi M (2014) An evaluation of environmental sustainability in the food industry through life cycle assessment: the case study of tomato products supply chain. J Clean Prod 78:121–130
Dias GM, Ayer NW, Khosla S, Van Acker R, Young SB, Whitney S, Hendricks P (2017) Life cycle perspectives on the sustainability of Ontario greenhouse tomato production: benchmarking and improvement opportunities. J Clean Prod 140:831–839
Grant, T., Cruypenninck, H., Eady, S., and Mata, G. (2014). AusAgLCI methodology for developing life cycle inventory AusAgLCI methodology for developing life cycle inventory
GreenDelta. (2014). “openLCA 1.8.” GreenDelta Berlin
Guri, F., Kapaj, I., Musabelliu, B., MeÃ, M., Topulli, E., Keco, R., Hodaj, N., Domi, S., Mehmeti, G., y Paloma, S. G., And others. (2015). Characteristics of farming systems in Albania
Hendricks, P. (2012). “Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L .) Production in Southwestern Ontario.” M.Sc University of Guelph
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J, Elshout, P. M. F, Stam, G, Verones, F, Vieira, M. D. M, Hollander, A, Zijp, M, and van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level Report I: Characterization. RIVM Report 2016-0104a
Ingram DL, Thomas Fernandez R (2012) Life cycle assessment: a tool for determining the environmental impact of horticultural crop production. HortTechnology 22(3):275–279
INSTAT. (2018). “http://instat.gov.al/al/temat/bujq%C3%ABsia-dhe-peshkimi/bujq%C3%ABsia/”
IPCC. (2006). “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.” 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 3(Chapter 2: Mineral Industry Emissions), 1–40
ISO 14045. (2012). ISO 14045:2012 - Environmental management - Eco-efficiency assessment of product systems--Principles, requirements and guidelines. 2012
Jones CD, Fraisse CW, Ozores-Hampton M (2012) Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from open field-grown Florida tomato production. Agric Syst 113:64–72
Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H, Clark S (2014) Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Clean Prod 73:183–192
Lika A, Galioto F, Scardigno A, Zdruli P, Viaggi D (2016) Pricing unmetered irrigation water under asymmetric information and full cost recovery. Water (Switzerland) 8(12)
Manfredi M, Vignali G (2014) Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: a comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases. J Clean Prod 73:275–284
Mehmeti, A., and Todorović, M. (2014). “Carbon footprint of farm inputs used in agriculture sector in Albania.” Fifth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium „Agrosym 2014″
Mutel C, Liao X, Patouillard L, Bare J, Fantke P, Frischknecht R, Hauschild M, Jolliet O, Maia de Souza D, Laurent A, Pfister S, Verones F (2018) Overview and recommendations for regionalized life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess
Nemecek T, Kagi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems, ecoinvent report no. 15. Final report of Ecoinvent V2.0(15):1–360
Notarnicola B, Sala S, Anton A, McLaren SJ, Saouter E, Sonesson U (2017) The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: a review of the challenges. J Clean Prod 140:399–409
Ntinas GK, Neumair M, Tsadilas CD, Meyer J (2017) Carbon footprint and cumulative energy demand of greenhouse and open-field tomato cultivation systems under southern and central European climatic conditions. J Clean Prod 142:3617–3626
Page G, Ridoutt B, Bellotti B (2012) Carbon and water footprint tradeoffs in fresh tomato production. J Clean Prod 32:219–226
Pan, B., Lam, S. K., Mosier, A., Luo, Y., and Chen, D. (2016). “Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: A global synthesis.”, Elsevier B.V., 232, 283–289
Payen S, Basset-Mens C, Perret S (2015) LCA of local and imported tomato: an energy and water trade-off. J Clean Prod 87(1):139–148
Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW (2009) Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326(5949):123–125
Sala, S., Mathieux, F., and Pant, R. (2015). “Life cycle assessment and sustainability supporting decision making by business and policy.” Sustainability Assessment of Renewables-Based Products: Methods and Case Studies, 201–214
Sala S, Anton A, McLaren SJ, Notarnicola B, Saouter E, Sonesson U (2017) In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption. J Clean Prod 140:387–398
Thies, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Spengler, T. S., and Sodhi, M. S. (2019). “Spatially differentiated sustainability assessment of products.” Progress in Life Cycle Assessment, Springer International Publishing, 155–164
Todorović M, Mehmeti A, and Cantore V (2018) Impact of different water and nitrogen inputs on the eco-efficiency of durum wheat cultivation in mediterranean environments. Journal of cleaner production. 183:1276–1288.
Torrellas M, Antón A, López JC, Baeza EJ, Parra JP, Muñoz P, Montero JI (2012) LCA of a tomato crop in a multi-tunnel greenhouse in Almeria. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):863–875
Zarei, M. J., Kazemi, N., and Marzban, A. (2018). “Life cycle environmental impacts of cucumber and tomato production in open-field and greenhouse.” Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Funding
This research was made possible by a research grant from Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM- Bari) in the framework of project IR2MA – Large Scale Irrigation Management Tools for Sustainable Water Management in Rural Areas and Protection of Receiving Aquatic Ecosystems (www.irrigation-management.eu) funded by the European Union Cooperation Program INTERREG Greece-Italy 2014-2020. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the funding agency and the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM- Bari).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Loubet
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 81 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canaj, K., Mehmeti, A., Cantore, V. et al. LCA of tomato greenhouse production using spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment indicators: an Albanian case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 6960–6970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07191-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07191-7