Skip to main content

Factor price distortion and ecological efficiency: the role of institutional quality

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 27, pages 5293–5304 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

There is a lack of studies on whether market distortions inhibit the ecological efficiency. This study introduces the ecological efficiency based on the bootstrap-data envelopment analysis (DEA) method as the indicator of environmental performance in China, uses the transcendental logarithmic production function to calculate factor price distortion, and further identifies whether the factor price distortion has a negative impact on the ecological efficiency using the system generalized method of moments (GMM) method. Meanwhile, institutional quality is considered a threshold variable to examine the relationship between factor price distortion and ecological efficiency based on the threshold model. The result shows that factor price distortion significantly inhibits the improvement of ecological efficiency. Moreover, institutional quality is considered to be the threshold of factor price distortion affecting ecological efficiency. Further investigation of heterogeneity effect suggests that the inhibitory impact of factor price distortion on ecological efficiency is more significant in the central and western regions. This study provides a supplement to the study on environmental performance from the perspective of factor distortions and expands the framework of the influence mechanism of factor price distortion affecting ecological efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. factori, t = [max(factori, t) − factori, t]/ max(factori, t) ∗ 100%, factori,t is the index of factor market.

References

  • Atkinson S, Halvorsen R (1984) Parametric efficiency tests, economies of scale, and input demand in U.S. electric power generation. Int Econ Rev 25(3):647–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi M, Zhuang LJ (2016) Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in Chinese litchi farm using bootstrap-DEA. Custos E Agronegocio Line 12(4):378–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi Churchill S, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2, emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data model. J Econ 87:115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Boedo HJ, Mukoyama T (2012) Evaluating the effects of entry regulations and firing costs on international income differences. J Econ Growth 17(2):143–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyreau-Debray G, Wei SJ (2005) Pitfalls of a state-dominated financial system: the case of China. NBER Working Paper, No. 11214

  • Brandt L, Tombe T, Zhu X (2013) Factor market distortions across time, space, and sectors in China. Rev Econ Dyn 16(1):39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Guariglia A (2013) Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? J Comp Econ 41(4):1123–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Ai H, Zhang Y, Hou J (2019) Marketization and water resource utilization efficiency in China. Sustain Comput Infor 22:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS et al (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Liao H, Wei YM (2007) Can market oriented economic reforms contribute to energy efficiency improvement? Evidence from China. Energ Policy 35(4):2287–2295

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Bai B, Qiao Q, Kang P, Zhang Y, Guo J (2017) Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in China based on data envelopment analysis. J Environ Manag 192:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-vanden K (2003) The effects of market reforms on structural change: implications for energy use and carbon emissions in China. Energy J 24(3):27–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-vanden K, Jefferson GH, Liu H et al (2004) What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity? Resour Energy Econ 26(1):77–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist S, Sim JW, Egon Z (2013) Misallocation and financial market frictions: some direct evidence from the dispersion in borrowing costs. Rev Econ Dyn 16(1):159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Herrala R, Mazhar U (2013) Institutional quality and environmental pollution: MENA countries versus the rest of the world. Econ Syst 37(4):508–521

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Liu Y, Wang J et al (2014) Low-carbon-oriented dynamic optimization of residential energy pricing in China. Energ 66:610–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 124(4):1403–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaraite J, Di Maria C (2012) Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: a case study of power generation in the EU. Energy Econ 34(5):1557–1568

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LE, Manuelli RE (2001) Endogenous policy choice: the case of pollution and growth. Rev Econ Dyn 4(2):369–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju K, Su B, Zhou D et al (2017) Does energy-price regulation benefit China’s economy and environment? Evidence from energy-price distortions. Energ Policy 105:108–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau LJ, Yotopoulos PA (1971) A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. Am Econ Rev 61(1):94–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: eEmpirical evidence in Malaysia. Renew Energy 68(7):276–281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Lin B (2014) The nonlinear impacts of industrial structure on China’s energy intensity. Energ 69:258–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Lin B (2015) How does administrative pricing affect energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China? Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:952–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Chen Z (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Du K (2013) The energy effect of factor market distortion in China. Econ Res J 9:125–136 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Tian P (2017) Energy conservation in China’s light industry sector: evidence from inter-factor and inter-fuel substitution. J Clean Prod 152:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Wang D, Zhang L et al (2019) Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China. Nat Hazards 95:325–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou D (2014) Understanding China’s electricity market reform from the perspective of the coal-fired power disparity. Energ Policy 74:224–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano M, Managi S (2008) Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry. Energ Policy 36(1):201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Sun C (2015) Energy savings potential in China’s industrial sector: from the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency. Energy Econ 48:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Wei X, Sun C, Du G (2018) Impact of factor price distortions on energy efficiency: evidence from provincial-level panel data in China. Energ Policy 118:573–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Racicot F (2015) Engineering robust instruments for GMM estimation of panel data regression models with errors in variables: a note. Appl Econ 47(10):981–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (1996) Corporate environmental accounting. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 27(6):779–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton JE, Fridley DG (2000) What goes up: recent trends in China’s energy consumption. Energ Policy 28(10):671–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Song ML, Zhang LL, Liu W et al (2013) Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Appl Energy 112:1049–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun CW, Lin B (2014) Energy resource allocation efficiency and energy conservation potential of China’s industrial sectors. J Quant Tech Econ 5:86–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Loh L (2019) Sustainability governance in China: an analysis of regional ecological efficiency. Sustainability 11(7):1958 forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q, Xu L, Yin H (2016) Energy pricing reform and energy efficiency in China: evidence from the automobile market. Resour Energy Econ 44:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombe T, Winter J (2015) Environmental policy and misallocation: the productivity effect of intensity standards. J Environ Econ Manag 72:137–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Chen X (2012) China’s electricity market-oriented reform: from an absolute to a relative monopoly. Energ Policy 51:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Chen X (2015) Energy policies for managing China’s carbon emission. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:470–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Qiu HN, Kuang Y (2009) Market-driven energy pricing necessary to ensure China’s power supply. Energ Policy 37(7):2498–2504

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Sun X, Song M (2019a) Environmental regulation, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Emerg Mark Financ Tr, 1–20

  • Wang D, Wan K, Yang J (2019b) Ecological efficiency of coal cities in China: evaluation and influence factors. Nat Hazards 95:363–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesiri M, Vigano L, Meoli M (2015) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Econ Model 47:74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Chen W (2006) The reform of electricity power sector in the PR of China. Energ Policy 34(16):2455–2465

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Yang F, Sun C (2018) Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: an empirical study on China’s heavy industry sector. Energy Econ 69:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A (2000) The razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform in the People’s Republic of China. Q J Econ 115(4):1091–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Chen D, Zhu B et al (2013) Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978–2010: decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecol Indic 24(1):177–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria M, Bibi S (2019) Financial development and environment in South Asia: the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7926–7937

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Ma C (2013) Deregulation, vertical unbundling and the performance of China’s large coal-fired power plants. Energy Econ 40:474–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Sun C, Liu F (2017) Interprovincial two-stage water resource utilization efficiency under environmental constraint and spatial spillover effects in China. J Clean Prod 164(15):715–725

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, University Town, Fuzhou, 350116, China

    Xiangxiang Sun, Zhangwang Chen & Xiaoliang Zhou

  2. Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, 1 Business Link, Singapore, 117592, Singapore

    Lawrence Loh

Authors
  1. Xiangxiang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence Loh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhangwang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoliang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangxiang Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Loh, L., Chen, Z. et al. Factor price distortion and ecological efficiency: the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 5293–5304 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07147-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07147-x

Keywords

  • Factor price distortion
  • Ecological efficiency
  • Institutional quality
  • Threshold model
  • System GMM method