Abstract
There is a lack of studies on whether market distortions inhibit the ecological efficiency. This study introduces the ecological efficiency based on the bootstrap-data envelopment analysis (DEA) method as the indicator of environmental performance in China, uses the transcendental logarithmic production function to calculate factor price distortion, and further identifies whether the factor price distortion has a negative impact on the ecological efficiency using the system generalized method of moments (GMM) method. Meanwhile, institutional quality is considered a threshold variable to examine the relationship between factor price distortion and ecological efficiency based on the threshold model. The result shows that factor price distortion significantly inhibits the improvement of ecological efficiency. Moreover, institutional quality is considered to be the threshold of factor price distortion affecting ecological efficiency. Further investigation of heterogeneity effect suggests that the inhibitory impact of factor price distortion on ecological efficiency is more significant in the central and western regions. This study provides a supplement to the study on environmental performance from the perspective of factor distortions and expands the framework of the influence mechanism of factor price distortion affecting ecological efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
factori, t = [max(factori, t) − factori, t]/ max(factori, t) ∗ 100%, factori,t is the index of factor market.
References
Atkinson S, Halvorsen R (1984) Parametric efficiency tests, economies of scale, and input demand in U.S. electric power generation. Int Econ Rev 25(3):647–662
Bagchi M, Zhuang LJ (2016) Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in Chinese litchi farm using bootstrap-DEA. Custos E Agronegocio Line 12(4):378–393
Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi Churchill S, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2, emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data model. J Econ 87:115–143
Boedo HJ, Mukoyama T (2012) Evaluating the effects of entry regulations and firing costs on international income differences. J Econ Growth 17(2):143–170
Boyreau-Debray G, Wei SJ (2005) Pitfalls of a state-dominated financial system: the case of China. NBER Working Paper, No. 11214
Brandt L, Tombe T, Zhu X (2013) Factor market distortions across time, space, and sectors in China. Rev Econ Dyn 16(1):39–58
Chen M, Guariglia A (2013) Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? J Comp Econ 41(4):1123–1140
Chen Q, Ai H, Zhang Y, Hou J (2019) Marketization and water resource utilization efficiency in China. Sustain Comput Infor 22:32–43
Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS et al (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259
Fan Y, Liao H, Wei YM (2007) Can market oriented economic reforms contribute to energy efficiency improvement? Evidence from China. Energ Policy 35(4):2287–2295
Fan Y, Bai B, Qiao Q, Kang P, Zhang Y, Guo J (2017) Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in China based on data envelopment analysis. J Environ Manag 192:107–115
Fisher-vanden K (2003) The effects of market reforms on structural change: implications for energy use and carbon emissions in China. Energy J 24(3):27–63
Fisher-vanden K, Jefferson GH, Liu H et al (2004) What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity? Resour Energy Econ 26(1):77–97
Gilchrist S, Sim JW, Egon Z (2013) Misallocation and financial market frictions: some direct evidence from the dispersion in borrowing costs. Rev Econ Dyn 16(1):159–176
Goel RK, Herrala R, Mazhar U (2013) Institutional quality and environmental pollution: MENA countries versus the rest of the world. Econ Syst 37(4):508–521
He Y, Liu Y, Wang J et al (2014) Low-carbon-oriented dynamic optimization of residential energy pricing in China. Energ 66:610–623
Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 124(4):1403–1448
Jaraite J, Di Maria C (2012) Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: a case study of power generation in the EU. Energy Econ 34(5):1557–1568
Jones LE, Manuelli RE (2001) Endogenous policy choice: the case of pollution and growth. Rev Econ Dyn 4(2):369–405
Ju K, Su B, Zhou D et al (2017) Does energy-price regulation benefit China’s economy and environment? Evidence from energy-price distortions. Energ Policy 105:108–119
Lau LJ, Yotopoulos PA (1971) A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. Am Econ Rev 61(1):94–109
Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: eEmpirical evidence in Malaysia. Renew Energy 68(7):276–281
Li K, Lin B (2014) The nonlinear impacts of industrial structure on China’s energy intensity. Energ 69:258–265
Li K, Lin B (2015) How does administrative pricing affect energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China? Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:952–962
Lin B, Chen Z (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33
Lin B, Du K (2013) The energy effect of factor market distortion in China. Econ Res J 9:125–136 (In Chinese)
Lin B, Tian P (2017) Energy conservation in China’s light industry sector: evidence from inter-factor and inter-fuel substitution. J Clean Prod 152:125–133
Liu R, Wang D, Zhang L et al (2019) Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China. Nat Hazards 95:325–341
Mou D (2014) Understanding China’s electricity market reform from the perspective of the coal-fired power disparity. Energ Policy 74:224–234
Nakano M, Managi S (2008) Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry. Energ Policy 36(1):201–209
Ouyang X, Sun C (2015) Energy savings potential in China’s industrial sector: from the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency. Energy Econ 48:117–126
Ouyang X, Wei X, Sun C, Du G (2018) Impact of factor price distortions on energy efficiency: evidence from provincial-level panel data in China. Energ Policy 118:573–583
Racicot F (2015) Engineering robust instruments for GMM estimation of panel data regression models with errors in variables: a note. Appl Econ 47(10):981–989
Schaltegger S (1996) Corporate environmental accounting. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester
Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 27(6):779–802
Sinton JE, Fridley DG (2000) What goes up: recent trends in China’s energy consumption. Energ Policy 28(10):671–687
Song ML, Zhang LL, Liu W et al (2013) Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Appl Energy 112:1049–1055
Sun CW, Lin B (2014) Energy resource allocation efficiency and energy conservation potential of China’s industrial sectors. J Quant Tech Econ 5:86–99
Sun X, Loh L (2019) Sustainability governance in China: an analysis of regional ecological efficiency. Sustainability 11(7):1958 forthcoming
Sun Q, Xu L, Yin H (2016) Energy pricing reform and energy efficiency in China: evidence from the automobile market. Resour Energy Econ 44:39–51
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145
Tombe T, Winter J (2015) Environmental policy and misallocation: the productivity effect of intensity standards. J Environ Econ Manag 72:137–163
Wang Q, Chen X (2012) China’s electricity market-oriented reform: from an absolute to a relative monopoly. Energ Policy 51:143–148
Wang Q, Chen X (2015) Energy policies for managing China’s carbon emission. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:470–479
Wang Q, Qiu HN, Kuang Y (2009) Market-driven energy pricing necessary to ensure China’s power supply. Energ Policy 37(7):2498–2504
Wang S, Sun X, Song M (2019a) Environmental regulation, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Emerg Mark Financ Tr, 1–20
Wang D, Wan K, Yang J (2019b) Ecological efficiency of coal cities in China: evaluation and influence factors. Nat Hazards 95:363–379
Wijesiri M, Vigano L, Meoli M (2015) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Econ Model 47:74–83
Xu S, Chen W (2006) The reform of electricity power sector in the PR of China. Energ Policy 34(16):2455–2465
Yang M, Yang F, Sun C (2018) Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: an empirical study on China’s heavy industry sector. Energy Econ 69:270–279
Young A (2000) The razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform in the People’s Republic of China. Q J Econ 115(4):1091–1135
Yu Y, Chen D, Zhu B et al (2013) Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978–2010: decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecol Indic 24(1):177–184
Zakaria M, Bibi S (2019) Financial development and environment in South Asia: the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7926–7937
Zhao X, Ma C (2013) Deregulation, vertical unbundling and the performance of China’s large coal-fired power plants. Energy Econ 40:474–483
Zhao L, Sun C, Liu F (2017) Interprovincial two-stage water resource utilization efficiency under environmental constraint and spatial spillover effects in China. J Clean Prod 164(15):715–725
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Loh, L., Chen, Z. et al. Factor price distortion and ecological efficiency: the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 5293–5304 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07147-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07147-x