Skip to main content

Effect of market fragmentation on ecological efficiency: evidence from environmental pollution in China

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 27, pages 4944–4957 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Local governments restrict cross-regional flows of factors and products for achieving the purpose of profit, which lead to market fragmentation. China’s domestic market is fragmented, leading to the situation that market boundaries are demarcated. We use the relative price method to measure market fragmentation and find that market fragmentation is indeed a serious problem in China. This study evaluates the ecological efficiency using the bootstrap DEA method that takes air and water pollution into account and investigates the effect of market fragmentation on ecological efficiency based on the system GMM approach by employing data from a panel of 29 provinces in China during the period 2000–2015. The results indicate that there are differences in ecological efficiency among provinces. The market fragmentation has negative impact on ecological efficiency, which shows market fragmentation significantly inhibits the improvement of ecological efficiency. The similar findings are confirmed by a series of robustness tests, which include the alternative indicator and sub-sample regression. Based on the above findings, the central government should reduce market fragmentation, promote market integration, increase the efficiency of resource allocation, and improve environmental quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. These commodities are food, tobacco and alcohol, clothing, shoes and hats, cultural office supplies, daily necessities, Chinese and Western medicines and medical and health care supplies, books, magazines and electronic publications, and fuel, which are consistent with Zhang and Lu (2017).

References

  • Adler M, Qi R (2003) Mexico’s integration into the North American capital market. Emerg Mark Rev 4(2):91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Du M, Tao Z et al (2004) Local protectionism and regional specialization: evidence from China’s industries. J Int Econ 63(2):397–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Deng X, Jiang S, Zhang Q et al (2018) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. J Clean Prod 195:1487–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán-Esteve M, Gómez-Limón JA, Picazo-Tadeo AJ et al (2014) A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency. J Prod Anal 41(1):69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, Koubi V (2009) Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol Econ 68(5):1355–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y, Song K, Bai J (2019) Market segmentation, resource misallocation and environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 228:376–387

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bigsten A, Durevall D (2006) Openness and wage inequality in Kenya, 1964-2000. World Dev 34(3):465–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data model. J Econometrics 87(1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt L, Tombe T, Zhu X (2013) Factor market distortions across time, space, and sectors in China. Rev Econ Dynam 16(1):39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai F, Du Y, Wang M (2008) The political economy of emission in China: will a low carbon growth be incentive compatible in next decade and beyond? Econ Res J 6:4–11 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero M, Castillo J, Picazo-Tadeo AJ et al (2013) Eco-efficiency and convergence in OECD countries. Environ Resour Econ 55(1):87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CP, Wen J, Zheng M et al (2018) Is higher government efficiency conducive to improving energy use efficiency? Evidence from OECD countries. Econ Model 72:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:138–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):338–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebbi HE (2010) Long and short-run linkages between economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Tunisia. Mid East Dev J 2(1):139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Guariglia A (2013) Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: Do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? J Comp Econ 41(4):1123–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu J, Wu J, Zhu Q et al (2016) Analysis of China’s regional eco-efficiency: a DEA two-stage network approach with equitable efficiency decomposition. Comput Econ 1:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai X, Cheng L (2016) Market distortions and aggregate productivity: evidence from Chinese energy enterprises. Energ Policy 95:304–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding C, Niu Y (2019) Market size, competition, and firm productivity of manufacturing in China. Reg Sci Urban Econ 74:81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding C, Niu Y, Lichtenberg E (2014) Spending preferences of local officials with off-budget land revenues of Chinese cities. China Econ Rev 31:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabo A (2017) Climate change mitigation and agricultural development models: primary commodity exports or local consumption production? Ecol Econ 137:110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS et al (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S (1993) Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries. J Econ Lit 31(3):1358–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S (1998) Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know? Econ J 108:383–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Epifani P, Gancia G (2011) Trade, markup heterogeneity and misallocations. J Int Econ 83(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Zhang X, Robinson S (2003) Structural change and economic growth in China. Rev Dev Econ 7(3):360–377

    Google Scholar 

  • González PF, Landajo M, Presno MJ (2014) Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LMDI decomposition. The activity revaluation approach. Energ 73(7):741–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison AE (1996) Openness and growth: a time-Series, cross-country analysis for, developing countries. J Dev Econ 48(2):419–447

    Google Scholar 

  • He C, Wei Y, Xie X (2008) Globalization, institutional change and industrial location: Economic transition and industrial concentration in China. Reg Stud 42:923–945

    Google Scholar 

  • He C, Pan F, Yan Y (2012) Is economic transition harmful to China’s urban environment? Evidence from industrial air pollution in Chinese cities. Urban Stud 49(8):1767–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel T, Zhai F (2006) Labor market distortions, rural-urban inequality and the opening of China’s economy. Econ Model 23:76–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Horii N (2011) Energy bottlenecks and cooperation. In: Fujita M, Kuroiwa I, Kumagai S (eds) The economics of East Asian integration: a comprehensive introduction to regional issues. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y et al (2019) Does ‘Forage-Livestock Balance’ policy impact ecological efficiency of grasslands in China? J Clean Prod 207:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen R, Miller NH (2018) Market integration, demand and the growth of firms: evidence from a natural experiment in India. Am Econ Rev 108(12):3583–3625

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Yao Y, Long X (2018) What causes PM2.5 pollution? Cross-economy empirical analysis from socioeconomic perspective. Energ Policy 119:458–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson AC, Ljungwall C (2009) Spillover effects among the greater China stock markets. World Dev 37(4):839–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju K, Su B, Zhou D, Wu J (2017) Does energy-price regulation benefit China’s economy and environment? Evidence from energy-price distortions. Energ Policy 105:108–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke S (2015) Domestic market integration and regional economic growth—China’s recent experience from 1995-2011. World Dev 66:588–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss B, Neij L (2011) The importance of learning when supporting emergent technologies for energy efficiency—a case study on policy intervention for learning for the development of energy efficient windows in Sweden. Energ Policy 39(10):6514–6524

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Li S (2005) Wages, firm profitability and labor market segmentation in urban China. China Econ Rev 16(3):205–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocaoglu DF, Lutzenhiser L, Sheikh NJ (2016) Social and political impacts of renewable energy: literature review. Technol Forecast Soc 108:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Korol J, Burchart-Korol D, Pichlak M (2016) Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of biocomposites for industrial application. J Clean Prod 113:144–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamas WDQ, Palau JCF, Camargo JRD (2013) Waste materials co-processing in cement industry: ecological efficiency of waste reuse. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19(1):200–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Oh D (2015) Economic growth and the environment in China: empirical evidence using prefecture level data. China Econ Rev 36:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Lin B (2016) Impact of energy technology patents in China: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energ Policy 89:214–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Qiu LD, Sun Q (2003) Interregional protection: implications of fiscal decentralization and trade liberalization. China Econ Rev 14(3):227–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ouyang X, Du K et al (2017) Does government transparency contribute to improved eco-efficiency performance? An empirical study of 262 cities in China. Energ Policy 110:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Chen ZY (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Du K (2013) The energy effect of factor market distortion in China. Econ Res J 9:125–136 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Ye G (2019) Competition policy and trade barriers: empirical evidence from China. Rev Ind Organ 54:193–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Wang C, Yu Y et al (2018) Ecological efficiency in China and its influencing factors-a super-efficient SBM metafrontier-Malmquist-Tobit model study. Envir Sci Pollut R 25:20880–20898

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnabb R, Said R (2013) Trade openness and wage inequality: evidence for Malaysia. J Dev Stud 49(8):1118–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Smyth R, Prasad A (2007) Electricity consumption in G7 countries: a panel co-integration analysis of residential demand elasticities. Energ Policy 35(9):4485–4494

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie PY, Wang C, Yang YC (2017) Comparison of energy efficiency subsidies under market power. Energ Policy 110:144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Sun C (2015) Energy savings potential in China’s industrial sector: from the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency. Energ Econ 48(9):117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsley D, Wei S (2001) Limiting currency volatility to stimulate goods market integration: a price based approach. IMF Working Papers, 01(197) 

    Google Scholar 

  • Passetti E, Tenucci A (2016) Eco-efficiency measurement and the influence of organisational factors: evidence from large Italian companies. J Clean Prod 122:228–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncet S (2003) Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration. China Econ Rev 14(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncet S (2005) A fragmented China: measure and determinants of Chinese domestic market disintegration. Rev Int Econ 13(3):409–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Que W, Zhang Y, Liu S, Yang C (2018) The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and factor market segmentation on environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 2018(184):402–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi K, Saen FR (2015) Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energ Econ 50:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Sturm A (1990) Ecological rationality: approaches to design of ecology-oriented and management instruments. Unternehmung 4(4):273–290 (In German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Sun S (2017) Energy price, regulatory price distortion and economic growth: a case study of China. Energ Policy 63:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (1999) Of course we can bootstrap DEA scores! But does it mean anything? Logic trumps wishful thinking. J Prod Anal 11(1):93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Zhang L, Liu W et al (2013) Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Appl Energ 112:1049–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Song F, Bi D, Wei C (2019) Market segmentation and wind curtailment: An empirical analysis. Energ Policy 132:831–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2015) The political economy of pollution markets: historical lessons for modern energy and climate planners. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:943–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Lin B (2014) Energy resource allocation efficiency and energy conservation potential of China’s industrial sectors. J Quant Tech Econ 5:86–99 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhang W, Luo Y, Xu Y (2019) The improvement and substitution effect of transportation infrastructure on air quality: an empirical evidence from China’s rail transit construction. Energ Policy 129:949–957

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Liu J, Hansson L et al (2011) Implementing stricter environmental regulation to enhance eco-efficiency and sustainability: a case study of Shandong Province’s pulp and paper industry, China. J Clean Prod 19(4):303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Lu B, Wei YM (2013) China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: a range-adjusted measure based analysis. Appl Energ 112:1403–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei C, Zheng X (2017) A new perspective of energy efficiency improvement: based on the test of market fragmentation. China Soc Sci 10:90–111 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen J, Hao Y, Feng GF et al (2016) Does government ideology influence environmental performance? Evidence based on a new dataset. Econ Syst 40(2):232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesiri M, Vigano L, Meoli M (2015) Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Econ Model 47:74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P (2008) FEAR: a software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Socio Econ Plan Sci 42(4):247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Ma X, Ji J (2019) The impact of industrial structure efficiency on provincial industrial energy efficiency in China. J Clean Prod 215:952–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X (2002) Have the Chinese provinces become integrated under reform? China Econ Rev 13(2):116–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, He C (2014) The productivity puzzle of Chinese exporters: perspectives of local protection and spillover effects. Pap Reg Sci 93(2):367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Yang F, Sun C (2018) Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: an empirical study on China’s heavy industry sector. Energ Econ 69:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A (2000) The razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform in the people’s republic of China. Q J Econ 115(4):1091–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Chen D, Zhu B et al (2013) Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978-2010: decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecol Indic 24(1):177–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Huang J, Zhang N (2018) Industrial eco-efficiency, regional disparity, and spatial convergence of China’s regions. J Clean Prod 204:872–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Kang J, Zhao C, Hu Z (2008) Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. Energ Econ 30(6):3077–3094

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Lu Y (2017) Study on the impact of market segmentation on energy efficiency. China Popul Resour Environ 1:65–72 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z et al (2008) Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68(1):306–316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, University Town, Fuzhou, 350116, China

    Xiangxiang Sun & Zhangwang Chen

  2. Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, 1 Business Link, Singapore, 117592, Singapore

    Lawrence Loh

Authors
  1. Xiangxiang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence Loh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhangwang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangxiang Sun.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Loh, L. & Chen, Z. Effect of market fragmentation on ecological efficiency: evidence from environmental pollution in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 4944–4957 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06548-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06548-2

Keyword

  • Market fragmentation
  • Ecological efficiency
  • Bootstrap DEA
  • Relative price method
  • Air and water pollution