Optimized methods for diffusive greenhouse gas flux analyses in inland waters
- 38 Downloads
Inland waters are considered hotspots of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and have been extensively researched. Static chamber (STAT) and thin boundary layer (BLE) are two commonly used methods for analyzing diffusive GHG emissions from inland waters. However, the STAT method is often disturbed by GHG bubbles; meanwhile, many kinds of headspace gas are used in the BLE method, but the differences between their diffusive GHG emission analysis results are not understood. In this study, the chamber in the STAT method was modified to combat the disturbances from GHG bubbles, and the typically used gases for the BLE method, namely, pure nitrogen, air, and filtered air, were comparatively studied. Results demonstrated that the modified chamber could effectively prevent the invasion of GHG bubbles; it increased the success rate from 67 to 90% in the field test, with no obvious impacts on the results of the GHG emission analyses. The use of air and filtered air in the BLE method yielded the lower values of GHG emissions relative to pure nitrogen, and this finding was potentially attributed to the inhibition effects of the residual GHGs and high humidity in air and filtered air on the extraction of diffusive GHGs from the surface water. This study improved the commonly used methods for diffusive GHG emission analysis, and the current findings are beneficial to the study of GHG emissions from inland waters.
KeywordsInland waters Greenhouse gas Static chamber Thin boundary layer Greenhouse gas bubble Diffusive greenhouse gas
Funding for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41701112).
- Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P, Dubash NK (2014) IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report-climate change 2014 synthesis reportGoogle Scholar
- Barbosa PM, Melack JM, Farjalla VF, Amaral JHF, Scofield V, Forsberg BR (2016) Diffusive methane fluxes from Negro, Solimões and Madeira rivers and fringing lakes in the Amazon basin. Limnol Oceanogr 61(S1): S221–S237Google Scholar
- Erkkilä K-M, Ojala A, Bastviken D, Biermann T, Heiskanen JJ, Lindroth A, Peltola O, Rantakari M, Vesala T, Mammarella I (2018) Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method. Biogeosciences 15(2):429–445Google Scholar
- Read JS, Hamilton DP, Desai AR, Rose KC, MacIntyre S, Lenters JD, Smyth RL, Hanson PC, Cole JJ, Staehr PA, Rusak JA, Pierson DC, Brookes JD, Laas A, Wu CH (2012) Lake-size dependency of wind shear and convection as controls on gas exchange. Geophys Res Lett 39(9):L09405Google Scholar
- Solomon S (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, 4. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Vachon D, Prairie YT, Cole JJ (2010) The relationship between near-surface turbulence and gas transfer velocity in freshwater systems and its implications for floating chamber measurements of gas exchange. Limnol Oceanogr 55(4):1723–1732Google Scholar
- Van Dam BR, Tobias C, Holbach A, Paerl HW, Zhu G (2018) CO2 limited conditions favor cyanobacteria in a hypereutrophic lake: an empirical and theoretical stable isotope study. Limnol Oceanogr 63(4):1643–1659Google Scholar
- Yu J, Zhang J, Chen Q, Yu W, Hu L, Shi W, Zhong J, Yan W (2018) Dramatic source-sink transition of N 2 O in the water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir during flooding-drying processes. Environ Sci Pollut R:1–9Google Scholar
- Zhu L, Qin B, Zhou J, Van Dam B, Shi W (2018) Effects of turbulence on carbon emission in shallow lakes. J Environ Sci 69:166–172Google Scholar