Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The motivations of Chinese firms in response to the Carbon Disclosure Project

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through an analysis of data gathered from Chinese firms surveyed by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), this paper studies the motivations of Chinese firms to respond to the CDP. The results indicate that (1) Chinese firms are more inclined to respond to the CDP survey for the sense-making motivation; (2) Chinese firms are less inclined to respond to the CDP survey due to the existence of proprietary costs for information disclosure; (3) self-interested political motivation is a negative motivation for Chinese firms to respond to the CDP survey; state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are less inclined to respond to the CDP survey than are non-SOEs; and (4) Chinese firms did not consider a financing motivation when deciding whether to respond to the CDP survey. However, the results of our further research show that if firms actively respond to the CDP survey, their financing constraints can be significantly reduced. This paper studies the four motivations for Chinese firms to respond to the CDP survey, contributing to the research of carbon emission disclosure. This paper highlights the importance of corporate carbon awareness for carbon emission disclosure, builds an understanding of the internal driving forces of response to the CDP survey among Chinese firms, and thus promotes the increase of Chinese corporate disclosure of carbon emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albu OB, Wehmeier S (2014) Organizational transparency and sense-making: the case of Northern Rock. J Public Relat Res 26(2):117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida H, Campello M, Weisbach MS (2004) The cash flow sensitivity of cash. J Financ 59(4):1777–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascui F, Lovell H (2012) Carbon accounting and the construction of competence. J Clean Prod 36:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CE, Lu J, Tao Z (2006) The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: empirical evidence from China. Am Econ Rev 96(2):353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright JR (2009) Rent seeking in a market with morality: solving a puzzle about corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 88(4):541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ, Li Z, Su X, Sun Z (2011a) Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. J Corp Finan 17(2):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Sun Z, Tang S, Wu D (2011b) Government intervention and investment efficiency: evidence from China. J Corp Finan 17(2):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strateg Manag J 35(1):1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi BB, Lee D, Psaros J (2013) An analysis of Australian company carbon emission disclosures. Pac Account Rev 25(1):58–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z (2011) Research on the thought and policy of the regulation of internal control: based on the view of the selection from motivation to analyze the information disclosure of internal control. Account Res 11:53–56 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrough MN (1993) Disclosure policy and competition: Cournot vs Bertrand. Account Rev 68(3):534–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C (2002) Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Account Audit Account J 15(3):282–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C (2006) Financial Accounting Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin B (1976) Strategies for dealing with human information needs: information or communication? J Broadcast Electron Media 20(3):323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account Rev 86(1):59–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye RA (1986) Proprietary and nonproprietary disclosures. J Bus 59(2):331–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JA, Fee CE, Thomas SE (2012) Proprietary costs and the disclosure of information about customers. J Account Res 50(3):685–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Johansson AC (2014) Escaping political extraction: political participation, institutions, and cash holdings in China. China Econ Rev 30:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman M, Jaggi B (2005) Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting 40 (3):215–232

  • Freedman M, Jaggi B (2011) Global warming disclosures: impact of Kyoto protocol across countries. J Int Financ Manag Acc 22(1):46–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego Alvarez I, María García Sánchez I, Rodríguez Domínguez L (2008) Voluntary and compulsory information disclosed online: the effect of industry concentration and other explanatory factors. Online Inf Rev 32(5):596–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauel J, Gotthardt D (2016) The relevance of national contexts for carbon disclosure decisions of stock-listed companies: a multilevel analysis. J Clean Prod 133:1204–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque S, Deegan C (2010) Corporate climate change-related governance practices and related disclosures: evidence from Australia. Aust Account Rev 20(4):317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. J Account Econ 31(1-3):405–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Karam C (2018) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. Int J Manag Rev 20(1):32–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. S. (2005). Signaling social responsibility: on the law and economics of market incentives for corporate environmental performance. U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper, 05-16.

  • Jovanovic B (1982) Truthful disclosure of information. Bell J Econ 13(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalu JU, Buang A, Aliagha GU (2016) Determinants of voluntary carbon disclosure in the corporate real estate sector of Malaysia. J Environ Manag 182:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim EH, Lyon TP (2011) Strategic environmental disclosure: evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J Environ Econ Manag 61(3):311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo L, Yu HC, Chang BG (2015) The signals of green governance on mitigation of climate change–evidence from Chinese firms. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manage 7(2):154–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E, Walker M, Zeng CC (2017) Do Chinese state subsidies affect voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure? J Account Public Policy 36(3):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng Chu C, Chatterjee B, Brown A (2012) The current status of greenhouse gas reporting by Chinese companies: a test of legitimacy theory. Manag Audit J 28(2):114–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Huang M, Ren S, Chen X, Ning L (2018) Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: evidence from CDP China 100. J Bus Ethics 150(4):1089–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Ding DZ (2013) The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review 19(4):506–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Chen Z, Fu S (2016a) Technical implementation of carbon disclosure quality evaluation. Statist Decision 17:70–72 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Fu S, Gao P (2016b) Media attention, carbon disclosure and corporate value. Statist Res 33(9):63–69 (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Liu Q, Tang D, Xiong J (2017) Media reporting, carbon information disclosure, and the cost of equity financing: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(10):9447–9459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian Y, Sepehri M, Foley M (2011) Corporate cash holdings and financial crisis: an empirical study of Chinese companies. Eur Bus Rev 1(2):112–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Anbumozhi V (2009) Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. J Clean Prod 17(6):593–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Lan YC, Tang Q (2012) Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: evidence from the CDP Global 500 report. J Int Financ Manag Acc 23(2):93–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • María González-González J, Zamora-Ramírez C (2013) Influencing factors on carbon reporting: an empirical study in Spanish companies. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 10(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC (2013) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account Rev 89(2):695–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momin MA, Northcott D, Hossain M (2017) Greenhouse gas disclosures by Chinese power companies: trends, content and strategies. J Account Organ Chang 13(3):331–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motoshita M, Sakagami M, Kudoh Y, Tahara K, Inaba A (2015) Potential impacts of information disclosure designed to motivate Japanese consumers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions on choice of shopping method for daily foods and drinks. J Clean Prod 101:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof A, Jeurissen R (2006) A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4):316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten DM, Ren Y, Zhao N (2015) Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social Environ Account J 35(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Sun J, Luo R (2015) Corporate voluntary carbon information disclosure: evidence from China’s listed companies. World Econ 38(1):91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe A (2004) Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: evidence from Italian listed companies. Eur Account Rev 13(2):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strateg Manag J 30(11):1157–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romar EJ (2009) Snapshots of the future: Darfur, Katrina, and maple sugar (climate change, the less well-off and business ethics). J Bus Ethics 85(1):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka C, Oshika T (2014) Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 5(1):22–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck P (2013). Disclosure (CSR reporting). Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 801-810.

  • Stanny E, Ely K (2008) Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(6):338–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE, & Weiss A (1988). Banks as social accountants and screening devices for the allocation of credit. NBER Working Paper No. 2710.

  • Sullivan R, Gouldson A (2012) Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors’ needs? J Clean Prod 36:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Demeritt D (2018) Climate change and mandatory carbon reporting: impacts on business process and performance. Bus Strateg Environ 27(4):437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Wang Y (2014) Business of carbon assurance is a natural field of auditing. Audit Research 4:49–53 (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16(4):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, & Xu N (2013). Managerial power, opportunism motivation and internal control deficiency information disclosure. Aud Res, (04), 101-109. (In Chinese)

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (18ATJ003), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (9192020), and Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People’s Republic of China

    Huiyun Li, Shaoyan Fu, Zheng Chen & Jing Shi

  2. Said Business School, University of Oxford, Park End St, Oxford, OX1 1HP, UK

    Zheyuan Yang

  3. Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Phillips Hall 801 22nd St NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA

    Zhaohai Li

Authors
  1. Huiyun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaoyan Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zheyuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhaohai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiyun Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 11 Evaluation criteria of Carbon Disclosure Index (CDI)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Fu, S., Chen, Z. et al. The motivations of Chinese firms in response to the Carbon Disclosure Project. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 27792–27807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05975-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05975-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation