Skip to main content

Rural household preferences for cleaner energy sources in Pakistan

Environmental Science and Pollution Research volume 26, pages 22783–22793 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Dependence of rural population on traditional fuel sources namely biomass has increased because of easy accessibility and affordability. The use of biomass fuels results in many environmental and health-related hazards. Rural households have little awareness about the ill effects of using biomass energy sources. This study investigated the patterns of rural household energy use and identified the role of information on the effects of biomasses on human health, in addition to other factors influencing households’ choices of energy sources. For this purpose, primary data from 196 households were collected from four districts of the Punjab province in Pakistan. Results showed that use of clean energy sources was limited to basic appliances and 90% of the respondents depended on biomass fuels. Estimates of the multivariate probit model showed that awareness about adverse impacts of biomass fuels as energy sources were significantly related with the choice of energy sources. Further, household head’s education level, household income, landholding, children under the age of 5 years and higher number of adult females were significantly related with the cleaner energy source choices. Distance to market increased the probability of the use of biomass energy sources. The study concluded that awareness campaigns regarding the benefits of using clean energy sources should be launched through print and electronic media while targeting rural women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Akpalu W, Dasmani I, Aglobitse PB (2011) Demand for cooking fuels in a developing country: to what extent do taste and preferences matter? Energy Policy 39:6525–6531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algina J, Olejnik S (2003) Sample size tables for correlation analysis with applications in partial correlation and multiple regression analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 38:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archar G (1993) Biomass resource assessment. Pakistan Household Energy Strategy Study (HESS). Prepared for Government of Pakistan under United Nations Development Program. Islamabad: Energy sector management assistance program in association with energy wing; May 1993. p. 1-4.

  • Arntzen JW, Kgathi DL (1984) Some of the determinants of the consumption of firewood energy in developing countries: the case of rural Botswana. Botswana J Afr St 4:24–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiyegunhi LJS, Hassan MB (2014) Rural household fuel energy transition: evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy for Sustainable Development 20:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhsh K, Sana F, Ahmad N (2018) Dengue fever in Punjab, Pakistan: knowledge, perception and adaptation among urban adults. Science of the Total Environment 644:1304–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behera B, Rahut DB, Jeetendra A, Ali A (2015) Household collection and use of biomass energy sources in South Asia. Energy 85:468–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos R, Carree M, Diederen B, Lokshin B, Veugelers R (2004) Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. Int J Industrial Organization 22:1237–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SC, Salam AP (2002) Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries. Biomass and Bioenergy 22(4):305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutto AW, Bazmi AA, Zahedi G (2011) Greener energy: issues and challenges for Pakistan biomass energy Prospective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(6):3207–3219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisu DY, Kuhe A, Iortyer HA (2016) Urban household cooking energy choice: an example of Bauchi metropolis, Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6(1)

  • Capellari L, Jenkins S (2003) Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal 3:278–294

  • Colbeck I, Nasir ZA, Ali Z (2010) The state of indoor air quality in Pakistan—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:1187–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cvijetiæ SD, Pattie M, Smitall F, Meneghetti G, Kopolo, and Candelori M (2004) The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD): a carrying pillar in the global combat against land degradation and food insecurity. Background paper for the San Rossore meeting ‘Climate change: a new global vision’ Pisa, Italy, 15 - 16 July 2004.

  • Dash M, Behera B, Rahut DB (2018) Understanding the factors that influence household use of clean energy in the Similipal Tiger Reserve, India. Natural Resources Forum 42:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, (1998) Rural household energy consumption. Energy Policy 26(3):207–217

  • Ejigie DA (2008) Household determinants of fuelwood choice in urban Ethiopia: a case study of Iimma town. The J of Developing Areas 41:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm T, Krey V, Pachauri S, Riahi K (2010) Determinants of household energy consumption in India. Energy Policy 38:5696–5707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESMAP (2003) Household energy use in developing countries: a multi country study. Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP), Washington

  • Farhar BC (1998) Gender and renewable energy: policy, analysis, and market implications. Renewable Energy 15:230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOP (2014) Population Census, Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad Pakistan

  • Green SB (1991) How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 26:499–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg R (2004) Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Economics 26:869–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg R (2005) Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Environment and Development Economics 10:337–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg R, Arndt TC, Sekhar NU (2000) Fuelwood consumption and forest degradation: a household model for domestic energy substitution in rural India. Land Econ 76:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst GH-VD, Hovorka AJ (2008) Reassessing the “energy ladder”: Household energy use in Maun, Botswana. Energy Policy 36(9):3333–3344

  • Hou B-D, Tang X, Ma C, Liu L, Wei Y-M, Liao H (2017) Cooking fuel choice in rural China: results from microdata. Journal of Cleaner Production 142:538–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013).World Energy Outlook 2013. Available at; https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2013.pdf

  • Jan I (2012) What makes people adopt improved cook stoves? Empirical evidence from rural North West Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(5):3200–3205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan I, Akram W (2018) Willingness of rural communities to adopt biogas system in Pakistan: critical factors and policy implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81:3178–3185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan I, Ullah S, Akram W, Khan NP, Asim SM, Mahmood Z, Ahmad MN, Ahmad SS (2017) Adoption of improved cookstoves in Pakistan. A logit analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy 103:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirubi C, Jacobson A, Kammen DM, Mills A (2009) Community based electric micro-grids can contribute to rural development: evidence from Kenya. World Development 73:1208–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowsari R, Zerriffi H (2011) Three-dimensional energy profile: a conceptual framework for assessing household energy use. Energy Policy 39:7505–7517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon BVD, Brouwer R, Beukering PJHV (2013) The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:504–513

  • Leach G (1992) (1992) The energy transition. Energy Policy 20:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiwen J, O’Neill BC (2003) The Energy Transition in Rural China_Interim Report. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria

  • Lin C-TJ, Jensen KL, Yen ST (2005) Awareness of foodborne pathogens among US consumers. Food Qual Prefer 16(5):401–412

  • Masera OR, Saatkamp BD, Kammen DM (2000) From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model. World Dev 28(12):2083–2103

  • Mensah JT (2014) Modelling demand for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Ghana: current dynamics and forecast. OPEC Energy Review 38:398–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah JT, Adu G (2012) An empirical analysis of household energy choice in Ghana. Working paper 06/2012 Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Department of Economics. Available at; https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/slueko/2013_006.html

  • Moeen SM, Sheikh TA, Saleem SSM, Rashid S (2016) Factors influencing choice of energy sources in rural Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review 55:905–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottaleb KA, Rahut DB, Ali A (2017a) An exploration into the household energy choice and expenditure in Bangladesh. Energy 135:767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottaleb KA, Rahut DB, Ali A (2017b) An exploration into the household energy choice and expenditure in Bangladesh. Energy 135:767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal M, Nepal A, Grimsrud K (2010) Unbelievable but improved cookstoves are not helpful in reducing firewood demand in Nepal. Environment and Development Economics 16:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onoja AO, Idoko O (2012) Econometric analysis of factors influencing fuel Wood demand in rural and Peri-urban farm households of Kogi state. Consilience: J Sustain Dev 8:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo B (2006) Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy 34:3787–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri S, Spreng D (2011) Measuring and monitoring energy poverty. Energy Policy 39(12):7497–7504

  • Parikh JK (1995) Gender issues in energy policy. Energy Policy 23:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahut DB, Das S, Groote HD, Behera B (2014) Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan. Energy 69:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahut DB, Behera B, Ali A (2016a) Household energy choice and consumption intensity: empirical evidence from Bhutan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahut DB, Behera B, Ali A (2016b) Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 117:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahut BD, Ali A, Mottaleb AK, Aryal PJ (2019) Wealth, education and cooking-fuel choices among rural households in Pakistan. Energy Strategy Review 24:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauf S, Bakhsh K, Abbas A, Hassan S, Ali A, Kächele H (2017) How hard they hit? Perception, adaptation and public health implications of heat waves in urban and peri-urban Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 24:10630–10639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy BS, Srinivas T (2009) Energy use in Indian household sector – an actor-oriented approach. Energy 34:992–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehjpal R, Ramji A, Soni A, Kumar A (2014) Going beyond incomes: dimensions of cooking energy transitions in rural India. Energy 68:470–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding-Fecher R, Winkler H, Mwakasonda S (2005) Energy and the World Summit on Sustainable Development: what next? Energy Policy 33:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir SNA, Rafique M, Alaamer AS (2010) Biomass fuel burning and its implications: deforestation and greenhouse gases emission in Pakistan. Environmental Pollution 158(7):2490–2495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takama T, Lambe F, Johnson FX, Arvidson A, Atanassov B, Debebe M, Nilsson L, Tella P, Tsephel S (2011) Will African Consumers Buy Cleaner Fuels and Stoves? A Household Energy Economic Analysis Model for the Market Introduction of Bio-Ethanol Cooking Stoves in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Mozambique. Research Report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden

  • United Nation (2016) The sustainable development goals report. United Nations, New York, p 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan B, Kumar KK (2005) Cooking fuel use patterns in India: 1983–2000. Energy Policy 2005 33:1021–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen-Hsiu H (2015) The determinants of household electricity consumption in Taiwan: evidence from quantile regression. Energy 87:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Outlook (2008) International Energy Agency: OECD Available at; https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2008

Download references

Funding

This study received financial support from the Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Unit.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Business Management, UVAS Business School, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammad Imran

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Akdeniz University, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Orhan Özçatalbaş

  3. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari Campus, Vehari, Pakistan

    Khuda Bakhsh

Authors
  1. Muhammad Imran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Orhan Özçatalbaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khuda Bakhsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Imran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imran, M., Özçatalbaş, O. & Bakhsh, K. Rural household preferences for cleaner energy sources in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 22783–22793 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05588-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05588-y

Keywords

  • Rural households
  • Energy choice
  • Clean energy
  • Multivariate probit
  • Pakistan

JEL classification

  • D01
  • Q01
  • Q40
  • Q42