Advertisement

Innovation and CO2 emissions: the complimentary role of eco-patent and trademark in the OECD economies

  • Claudia Nyarko MensahEmail author
  • Xingle Long
  • Lamini Dauda
  • Kofi Baah Boamah
  • Muhammad Salman
Research Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing global emissions has led to research on the role of innovations play combating emissions. Mitigations from innovation perspective have mainly been focused on the role of patent, ignoring the role of trademarks. We therefore investigate the mitigating power of patent and trademarks in the OECD economies, benchmarking patent as the traditional mitigation strategy. Examining the complimentary role, we created an interaction term between patent and trademark. Our study divided the OECD economies into four subpanels which are OECD America, OCED Asia, OECD Europe, and OECD Oceania. We employed the Im, Pesaran and Shin W-stat, Augmented Dickey-Fuller, and Phillips Perron unit root tests, as well as cross-sectional dependence and Westerlund cointegration tests for the preliminary test on the variables. We also adopted ARDL approach to cointegration, Granger causality test, and OLS in examining the relationship between CO2 and patent, trademark, urbanization, and economic growth. Findings show that jointly, eco-patents and trademarks mitigate CO2 emissions. Also, bidirectional or unidirectional causal relationship was established between our variables of study, an indication that most of our variables can be used in forecasting one other.

Keywords

CO2 emissions Patent Trademark Economic growth Urbanization 

Notes

Funding

We appreciate the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of 327 China (Nos. 71603105, 71673117), the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and 328 the National Research Foundation of Korea (No. NRF-2018S1A5A2A03036952), Natural 329 Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China (No. SBK2016042936), Science Foundation of 330 Ministry of Education of China (No. 16YJC790067), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 331 (Nos. 2017M610051, 2018T110054).

References

  1. Abdallh AA, Abugamos H (2017) A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanisation-carbon emissions nexus for the MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:1350–1356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adom PK, Bekoe W, Amuakwa-Mensah F, Mensah JT, Botchway E (2012) Carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, industrial structure, and technical efficiency: empirical evidence from Ghana, Senegal, and Morocco on the causal dynamics. Energy 47:314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad N, Du L (2017) Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach. Energy 123:521–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albino V, Ardito L, Dangelico RM, Messeni Petruzzelli A (2014) Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: a patent analysis. Appl Energy 135:836–854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali HS, Abdul-Rahim A, Ribadu MB (2017) Urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions in Singapore: evidence from the ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1967–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7935-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appiah MO (2018) Investigating the multivariate Granger causality between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Ghana. Energy Policy 112:198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appiah K, Du J, Yeboah M, Appiah R (2019) Causal correlation between energy use and carbon emissions in selected emerging economies—panel model approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7896–7912.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04140-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Artmann M, Kohler M, Meinel G, Gan J, Ioja I-C (2019) How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other—a conceptual framework for compact and green cities. Ecol Indic 96:10–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bekhet HA, Matar A, Yasmin T (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:117–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block JH, De Vries G, Schumann JH, Sandner P (2014) Trademarks and venture capital valuation. J Bus Ventur 29:525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boadu FO (2016) Chapter 7—trademarks and patents. In: Boadu FO (ed) Agricultural law and economics in Sub-Saharan Africa. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 215–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801771-5.00007-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boamah KB, Du J, Bediako IA, Boamah AJ, Abdul-Rasheed AA, Owusu SM (2017) Carbon dioxide emission and economic growth of China—the role of international trade. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13049–13067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8955-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boamah KB, Du J, Boamah AJ, Appiah K (2018) A study on the causal effect of urban population growth and international trade on environmental pollution: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5862–5874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton E (2000) The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Stud 37:1969–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castaldi C (2018a) To trademark or not to trademark: the case of the creative and cultural industries. Res Policy 47:606–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castaldi C (2018b) To trademark or not to trademark: the case of the creative and cultural industries. Res Policy 47:606–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang C-C (2010) A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 87:3533–3537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M (2019) The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:15028–15038.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300Google Scholar
  21. Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernández Fernández Y, Fernández López MA, Olmedillas Blanco B (2018) Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 172:3459–3467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flikkema M, Castaldi C, de Man A-P, Seip M (2019) Trademarks’ relatedness to product and service innovation: a branding strategy approach. Res Policy 48:1340–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fraj E, Matute J, Melero I (2015) Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: the role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tour Manag 46:30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gotsch M, Hipp C (2012) Measurement of innovation activities in the knowledge-intensive services industry: a trademark approach. Serv Ind J 32:2167–2184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.574275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanif I (2018) Impact of economic growth, nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, and urbanization on carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15057–15067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1753-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodson EL, Brown M, Cohen S, Showalter S, Wise M, Wood F, Caron J, Feijoo F, Iyer G, Cleary K (2018) U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO2 policy: results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study. Energy Econ 73:352–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansson DJA, Lucas PL, Weitzel M, Ahlgren EO, Bazaz AB, Chen W, den Elzen MGJ, Ghosh J, Grahn M, Liang QM, Peterson S, Pradhan BK, van Ruijven BJ, Shukla PR, van Vuuren DP, Wei YM (2015) Multi-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:1335–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li F, Dong S, Li S, Li Z, Li Y (2015) Measurement and scenario simulation of effect of urbanisation on regional CO2 emissions based on UEC-SD model: a case study in Liaoning Province, China. Chin Geogr Sci 25:350–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0729-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liddle B (2014) Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses. Popul Environ 35:286–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-013-0198-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Llerena P, Millot V (2013) Are trade marks and patents complementary or substitute protections for innovation. In: Bureau d′économie théorique et appliquée Document de Travail, 1Google Scholar
  32. Malmberg, Claes (2018) Trademarks statistics as innovation indicator?: a micro studyGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsillac E, Roh JJ (2014) Connecting product design, process and supply chain decisions to strengthen global supply chain capabilities. Int J Prod Econ 147:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mendonça S, Pereira TS, Godinho MM (2004) Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Res Policy 33:1385–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mikayilov JI, Galeotti M, Hasanov FJ (2018) The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. J Clean Prod 197:1558–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Millot V (2011) Firms’ intangible assets: who relies on trademarks? Analysis of French and German firms’ trademarking behaviourGoogle Scholar
  38. Naz S, Sultan R, Zaman K, Aldakhil AM, Nassani AA, Abro MMQ (2019) Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2806–2819.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ouyang X, Shao Q, Zhu X, He Q, Xiang C, Wei G (2019) Environmental regulation, economic growth and air pollution: panel threshold analysis for OECD countries. Sci Total Environ 657:234–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pata UK (2018) The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:7740–7747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patel P, Vega M (1999) Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages. Res Policy 28:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Popp D, Hascic I, Medhi N (2011) Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy. Energy Econ 33:648–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qin B, Wu J (2015) The form of urbanization and carbon emissions in China: a panel data analysis across the provinces 2000–2008. In: Wong T-C, Han SS, Zhang H (eds) Population mobility, urban planning and management in China. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 113–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15257-8_7 Google Scholar
  44. Raza SA, Shah N, Sharif A (2019) Time frequency relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in the United States: evidence from transportation sector. Energy 173:706–720.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richter B, Behnisch M (2019) Integrated evaluation framework for environmental planning in the context of compact green cities. Ecol Indic 96:38–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saboori B, Sapri M, bin Baba M (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)’s transport sector: a fully modified bi-directional relationship approach. Energy 66:150–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sandner PG, Block J (2011) The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Res Policy 40:969–985.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmoch U (2003) Service marks as novel innovation indicator. Res Eval 12:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schumpeter JA (1961) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934) Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Seip M, Castaldi C, Flikkema M, De Man A-P (2018) The timing of trademark application in innovation processes. Technovation 72-73:34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solarin SA, Lean HH (2016) Natural gas consumption, income, urbanization, and CO2 emissions in China and India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18753–18765.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7063-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solarin SA, Shahbaz M (2013) Trivariate causality between economic growth, urbanisation and electricity consumption in Angola: cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy 60:876–884.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Song C, Liu Q, Gu S, Wang Q (2018) The impact of China’s urbanization on economic growth and pollutant emissions: an empirical study based on input-output analysis. J Clean Prod 198:1289–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sua H-N, Moanibab IM (2017) Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 122:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thoma G (2015) Trademarks and the patent premium value: evidence from medical and cosmetic products. World Patent Inf 41:23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2015.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomä J, Bizer K (2013) To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Res Policy 42:35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2005) Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsai W-T (2017) Green public procurement and green-mark products strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions—experience from Taiwan. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 22:729–742.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9695-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang J, He D (2015) Sustainable urban development in China: challenges and achievements. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:665–682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9644-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang Y, Zhao T (2018) Impacts of urbanization-related factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from China’s three regions with varied urbanization levels. Atmos Pollut Res 9:15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang S, Fang C, Guan X, Pang B, Ma H (2014) Urbanisation, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in China: a panel data analysis of China’s provinces. Appl Energy 136:738–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang S, Fang C, Wang Y, Huang Y, Ma H (2015) Quantifying the relationship between urban development intensity and carbon dioxide emissions using a panel data analysis. Ecol Indic 49:121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang S, Liu X, Zhou C, Hu J, Ou J (2017) Examining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO2 emissions in China’s megacities. Appl Energy 185:189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webster E, Jensen P (2004) Patterns of trademarking activity in Australia, vol 15Google Scholar
  66. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xie R, Fang J, Liu C (2017) The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Appl Energy 196:199–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu S-C, He Z-X, Long R-Y, Shen W-X, Ji S-B, Chen Q-B (2016) Impacts of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions: regional differences in China based on panel estimation. Reg Environ Chang 16:777–787.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0795-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yii K-J, Geetha C (2017) The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from Granger causality test. Energy Procedia 105:3118–3124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zafeiriou E, Azam M (2017) CO2 emissions and economic performance in EU agriculture: some evidence from Mediterranean countries. Ecol Indic 81:104–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zahringer K, Kolympiris C, Kalaitzandonakes N (2018) Time to patent at the USPTO: the case of emerging entrepreneurial firms. J Technol Transf 43:923–952.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9524-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang Y-J, Peng Y-L, Maa C-Q, Shenc B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhou Y, Liu Y (2016) Does population have a larger impact on carbon dioxide emissions than income? Evidence from a cross-regional panel analysis in China. Appl Energy 180:800–809.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou H, Sandner PG, Martinelli SL, Block JH (2016) Patents, trademarks, and their complementarity in venture capital funding. Technovation 47:14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Data Link InstituteTemaGhana

Personalised recommendations